Binary mass function explained

In astronomy, the binary mass function or simply mass function is a function that constrains the mass of the unseen component (typically a star or exoplanet) in a single-lined spectroscopic binary star or in a planetary system. It can be calculated from observable quantities only, namely the orbital period of the binary system, and the peak radial velocity of the observed star. The velocity of one binary component and the orbital period provide information on the separation and gravitational force between the two components, and hence on the masses of the components.

Introduction

The binary mass function follows from Kepler's third law when the radial velocity of one binary component is known.^[1] Kepler's third law describes the motion of two bodies orbiting a common center of mass. It relates the orbital period with the orbital separation between the two bodies, and the sum of their masses. For a given orbital separation, a higher total system mass implies higher orbital velocities. On the other hand, for a given system mass, a longer orbital period implies a larger separation and lower orbital velocities.

Because the orbital period and orbital velocities in the binary system are related to the masses of the binary components, measuring these parameters provides some information about the masses of one or both components.^[2] However, the true orbital velocity is often unknown, because velocities in the plane of the sky are much more difficult to determine than velocities along the line of sight.

Radial velocity is the velocity component of orbital velocity in the line of sight of the observer. Unlike true orbital velocity, radial velocity can be determined from Doppler spectroscopy of spectral lines in the light of a star,^[3] or from variations in the arrival times of pulses from a radio pulsar.^[4] A binary system is called a single-lined spectroscopic binary if the radial motion of only one of the two binary components can be measured. In this case, a lower limit on the mass of the other, unseen component can be determined.

The true mass and true orbital velocity cannot be determined from the radial velocity because the orbital inclination is generally unknown. (The inclination is the orientation of the orbit from the point of view of the observer, and relates true and radial velocity.) This causes a degeneracy between mass and inclination.^{[5] [6]} For example, if the measured radial velocity is low, this can mean that the true orbital velocity is low (implying low mass objects) and the inclination high (the orbit is seen edge-on), or that the true velocity is high (implying high mass objects) but the inclination low (the orbit is seen face-on).

Derivation for a circular orbit

The peak radial velocity

K is the semi-amplitude of the radial velocity curve, as shown in the figure. The orbital period P _{orb} is found from the periodicity in the radial velocity curve. These are the two observable quantities needed to calculate the binary mass function.

The observed object of which the radial velocity can be measured is taken to be object 1 in this article, its unseen companion is object 2.

Let

M _{1} and M _{2} be the stellar masses, with M _{1} + M _{2} = M _{tot} the total mass of the binary system, v _{1} and v _{2} the orbital velocities, and a _{1} and a _{2} the distances of the objects to the center of mass. a _{1} + a _{2} = a is the semi-major axis (orbital separation) of the binary system.

We start out with Kepler's third law, with

\omega _{orb} = 2 \pi/P _{orb} the orbital frequency and G the gravitational constant,$$GM\_\backslash text\; =\; \backslash omega\_\backslash text^2\; a^3.$$

Using the definition of the center of mass location,

M _{1} a _{1} = M _{2} a _{2} , we can write$$a\; =\; a\_1\; +\; a\_2\; =\; a\_1\; \backslash left(1\; +\; \backslash frac\backslash right)\; =\; a\_1\; \backslash left(1\; +\; \backslash frac\backslash right)\; =\; \backslash frac\; (M\_1\; +\; M\_2)\; =\; \backslash frac.$$

Inserting this expression for

a into Kepler's third law, we find$$GM\_\backslash mathrm\; =\; \backslash omega\_\backslash mathrm^2\; \backslash frac.$$

which can be rewritten to$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac.$$

The peak radial velocity of object 1,

K , depends on the orbital inclination i (an inclination of 0° corresponds to an orbit seen face-on, an inclination of 90° corresponds to an orbit seen edge-on). For a circular orbit (orbital eccentricity = 0) it is given by^[7] $$K\; =\; v\_1\; \backslash sin\; i\; =\; \backslash omega\_\backslash text\; a\_1\; \backslash sin\; i.$$

After substituting

a _{1} we obtain$$\backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac.$$

The binary mass function

f (with unit of mass) is^{[8] [9] [10]} $$f\; =\; \backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac.$$

For an estimated or assumed mass

M _{1} of the observed object 1, a minimum mass M _{2,min} can be determined for the unseen object 2 by assuming i = 90 ^{\circ} . The true mass M _{2} depends on the orbital inclination. The inclination is typically not known, but to some extent it can be determined from observed eclipses, be constrained from the non-observation of eclipses, or be modelled using ellipsoidal variations (the non-spherical shape of a star in binary system leads to variations in brightness over the course of an orbit that depend on the system's inclination).^[11]

Limits

In the case of

M _{1} \gg M _{2} (for example, when the unseen object is an exoplanet), the mass function simplifies to$$f\; \backslash approx\; \backslash frac.$$

In the other extreme, when

M _{1} \ll M _{2} (for example, when the unseen object is a high-mass black hole), the mass function becomes$$f\; \backslash approx\; M\_2\; \backslash sin^3\; i,$$and since 0 \leq \sin(i) \leq 1 for 0 ^{\circ} \leq i \leq 90 ^{\circ} , the mass function gives a lower limit on the mass of the unseen object 2.

In general, for any

i or M _{1} ,$$M\_2\; >\; \backslash max\backslash left(f,\; f^\; M\_1^\backslash right).$$

Eccentric orbit

In an orbit with eccentricity

e , the mass function is given by^[12] $$f\; =\; \backslash frac\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash left(1\; -\; e^2\backslash right)^.$$

Applications

X-ray binaries

If the accretor in an X-ray binary has a minimum mass that significantly exceeds the Tolman–Oppenheimer–Volkoff limit (the maximum possible mass for a neutron star), it is expected to be a black hole. This is the case in Cygnus X-1, for example, where the radial velocity of the companion star has been measured.^[13]

Exoplanets

An exoplanet causes its host star to move in a small orbit around the center of mass of the star-planet system. This 'wobble' can be observed if the radial velocity of the star is sufficiently high. This is the radial velocity method of detecting exoplanets. Using the mass function and the radial velocity of the host star, the minimum mass of an exoplanet can be determined.^{[14] [15] [16]} Applying this method on Proxima Centauri, the closest star to the solar system, led to the discovery of Proxima Centauri b, a terrestrial planet with a minimum mass of .^[17]

Pulsar planets

Pulsar planets are planets orbiting pulsars, and several have been discovered using pulsar timing. The radial velocity variations of the pulsar follow from the varying intervals between the arrival times of the pulses. The first exoplanets were discovered this way in 1992 around the millisecond pulsar PSR 1257+12.^[18] Another example is PSR J1719-1438, a millisecond pulsar whose companion, PSR J1719-1438 b, has a minimum mass approximate equal to the mass of Jupiter, according to the mass function.

Notes and References

1. Book: Karttunen . Hannu . Kröger . Pekka . Oja . Heikki . Poutanen . Markku . Donner . Karl J. . Fundamental Astronomy . . 2007 . 1st pub. 1987 . 221–227 . Chapter 9: Binary Stars and Stellar Masses . https://books.google.com/books?id=DjeVdb0sLEAC&pg=PA221 . 978-3-540-34143-7 . amp.
2. Web site: The Evolution of Binary Systems, in Accretion Processes in Astrophysics . Philipp . Podsiadlowski . . April 20, 2016 .
3. Web site: Radial Velocity – The First Method that Worked . . April 20, 2016 .
4. Web site: The Binary Pulsar PSR 1913+16 . . April 26, 2016 .
5. 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/188. True Masses of Radial-Velocity Exoplanets. 2015. Brown. Robert A.. The Astrophysical Journal. 2015ApJ...805..188B. 805. 2. 188. 1501.02673. 119294767.
6. Web site: Binary Stars . Shane . Larson . . April 26, 2016 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20150412200552/http://www.physics.usu.edu/shane/classes/astrophysics/lectures/lec08_binaries.pdf . April 12, 2015 .
7. Book: Tauris . T.M. . van den Heuvel . E.P.J. . Ed van den Heuvel . Lewin . Walter . Walter Lewin . van der Klis . Michiel . Michiel van der Klis . Compact stellar X-ray sources . limited . . 2006 . 623–665 . Chapter 16: Formation and evolution of compact stellar X-ray sources . astro-ph/0303456 . 978-0-521-82659-4 . amp.
8. 10.1126/science.1208890. Transformation of a Star into a Planet in a Millisecond Pulsar Binary. 2011. Bailes. M.. Matthew Bailes. Bates. S. D.. Bhalerao. V.. Bhat. N. D. R.. Burgay. M.. Burke-Spolaor. S.. d'Amico. N.. Johnston. S.. Keith. M. J.. Kramer. M.. Kulkarni. S. R.. Levin. L.. Lyne. A. G.. Milia. S.. Possenti. A.. Spitler. L.. Stappers. B.. Van Straten. W.. Science. 2011Sci...333.1717B . 21868629 . 333 . 6050 . 1717–1720 . 1108.5201 . 206535504 . 8.
9. 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/95. Evidence for a Massive Neutron Star from a Radial-velocity Study of the Companion to the Black-widow Pulsar PSR B1957+20. 2011. van Kerkwijk. M. H.. Breton. R. P.. Kulkarni. S. R.. Shrinivas Kulkarni. The Astrophysical Journal. 2011ApJ...728...95V . 728. 2. 95. 1009.5427. 37759376.
10. Web site: Binary Mass Function . . April 20, 2016 .
11. Web site: The Orbital Inclination . . February 17, 2017 . May 14, 2020 . https://web.archive.org/web/20200514093553/http://cmi2.yale.edu/bh/week4/pages/page5.html . dead .
12. Book: Boffin . H. M. J. . Arenou . F. . Hestroffer . D. . Proceedings of the workshop "Orbital Couples: Pas de Deux in the Solar System and the Milky Way" . 2012 . 41–44 . The mass-ratio distribution of spectroscopic binaries . Observatoire de Paris . 978-2-910015-64-0 . amp. 2012ocpd.conf...41B .
13. Web site: Observational Evidence for Black Holes . . November 3, 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171010230722/http://eagle.phys.utk.edu/guidry/astro421/lectures/lecture490_ch15.pdf . October 10, 2017 . dead .
14. Web site: Documentation and Methodology . . April 25, 2016 .
15. 10.1086/504701. Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets . 2006 . Butler. R.P.. R. Paul Butler. Wright. J. T.. Marcy. G. W.. Geoffrey Marcy. Fischer. D. A.. Debra Fischer. Vogt. S. S.. Steven S. Vogt. Tinney. C. G.. Jones. H. R. A.. Carter. B. D.. Johnson. J. A.. McCarthy. C.. Penny. A. J.. The Astrophysical Journal. 2006ApJ...646..505B . 646. 1. 505–522. astro-ph/0607493 . 119067572. 8.
16. Web site: Detecting Invisible Objects: a guide to the discovery of Extrasolar Planets and Black Holes . John . Kolena . . April 25, 2016 .
17. 2016Natur.536..437A. A terrestrial planet candidate in a temperate orbit around Proxima Centauri. Nature. 536. 7617. 437–440. Anglada-Escudé. Guillem. Amado. Pedro J.. Barnes. John. Berdiñas. Zaira M.. Butler. R. Paul. Coleman. Gavin A. L.. de la Cueva. Ignacio. Dreizler. Stefan. Endl. Michael. Giesers. Benjamin. Jeffers. Sandra V.. Jenkins. James S.. Jones. Hugh R. A.. Kiraga. Marcin. Kürster. Martin. López-González. María J.. Marvin. Christopher J.. Morales. Nicolás. Morin. Julien. Nelson. Richard P.. Ortiz. José L.. Ofir. Aviv. Paardekooper. Sijme-Jan. Reiners. Ansgar. Rodríguez. Eloy. Rodríguez-López. Cristina. Sarmiento. Luis F.. Strachan. John P.. Tsapras. Yiannis. Tuomi. Mikko. Mathias . Zechmeister. 3. 2016. 1609.03449. 10.1038/nature19106. 27558064. 4451513.
18. Wolszczan. D. A.. Aleksander Wolszczan. Frail. D.. Dale Frail. A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257+12 . Nature. 355 . 6356 . 145–147 . 9 January 1992 . 1992Natur.355..145W . 10.1038/355145a0 . 4260368.