Billings ovulation method explained

Billings ovulation method
Bc Type:Behavioral
Date First Use:developed in 1950s
Rate Type:Failure
Perfect Failure%:0.5–3
Typical Failure%:1–22
Reversibility:immediate
User Reminders:Accurate teaching and daily charting are essential.
Clinic Interval:None
Std Protection Yesno:No
Periods Advantage:Prediction
Benefits:Low cost, no prerequisites for use, no side effects, can aid pregnancy achievement
Weight Gain Yesno:No
Risks:Nil

The Billings ovulation method is a method in which women use their vaginal mucus to determine their fertility.[1] It does not rely on the presence of ovulation, rather it identifies patterns of potential fertility and obvious infertility within the cycle, whatever its length. Effectiveness, however, is not very clear.[1]

Evidence

Evidence of effectiveness is not very clear.[1] Typical use of this method is associated with a pregnancy rate of 1 to 22%. A World Health Organization study found that 15% is caused by a conscious departure from method rules. The percentage of people who stop using the method after a year is 1–24%. Perfect use has been estimated to result in pregnancy in 0.5–3%.[2] [3] Some studies of perfect use excluded those who could not detect secretions that represented fertility.[2]

Fertility

Function

In the days leading up to ovulation the cervix responds to oestrogen by producing mucus capable of sustaining sperm survival. This mucus leaves the vagina as the woman is in an upright position. The mucus is observed through the sensation at the vulva and by looking at any cervical secretions. Daily charting of these observations will reveal either an unchanging pattern indicating infertility or a changing pattern of sensation and discharge indicating fertility. Both of these patterns follow the hormonal patterns which control sperm survival and conception.[6]

History

The first recorded observations of the relationship between cervical mucus and survival of spermatozoa come from the mid-19th century. The topic was not systematically studied, however, for almost another century. In 1948, Erik Odeblad was studying mycoplasms in the female genital tract. During the course of his studies, he noticed that cervical mucus changed in a predictable pattern through the course of a woman's cycle. He continued his study of the cervix.[7]

John Billings (1918 - 2007) was involved with the development of the Billings ovulation method.[8]

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Poston. Dudley L. Jr.. Bouvier. Leon F.. Population and Society: An Introduction to Demography. 2010. Cambridge University Press. 9781139489386. 91. en.
  2. Pallone. SR. Bergus. GR. Fertility awareness-based methods: another option for family planning.. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2009. 22. 2. 147–57. 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080038. 19264938. free.
  3. Book: Hatcher. Robert Anthony. M.D. Anita L. Nelson. Contraceptive Technology. 2007. Ardent Media. 9781597080019. 345. en.
  4. Book: Kippley, John . Sheila Kippley . 1996 . The Art of Natural Family Planning . 4th . The Couple to Couple League . Cincinnati, OH . 978-0-926412-13-2 . 88 .
  5. http://www.woomb.org/bom/trials/chinaLaunching.html China Successfully Launching Billings Method
  6. Teaching the Billings Ovulation Method, Dr E. L. Billings AM, MB BS, DCH (London), 2001.
  7. Odeblad . Erik . 1994 . The Discovery of Different Types of Cervical Mucus . Bulletin of the Ovulation Method Research and Reference Centre of Australia . 21 . 3 . 3–35 . 2006-10-19 . https://web.archive.org/web/20051220081928/http://www.woomb.org/omrrca/bulletin/vol21/no3/discovery.shtml#Index . 2005-12-20 . dead .
  8. Billings . J . 2002 . THE QUEST - leading to the discovery of the Billings Ovulation Method . Bulletin of Ovulation Method Research and Reference Centre of Australia . 29 . 1 . 18–28 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20070219081722/http://www.woomb.org/omrrca/bulletin/vol29/no1/thequest.shtml . 2007-02-19 .