| Bersih 3.0 rally | |
| Partof: | Bersih movement |
| Date: | 28 April 2012 |
| Place: | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
| Status: | Concluded |
| Goals: | To call for free and fair elections in Malaysia |
| Side1: | Bersih Pakatan Rakyat Himpunan Hijau |
| Side2: | Election Commission Government of Malaysia Royal Malaysia Police RELA Corps |
| Leadfigures1: | Anwar Ibrahim Ambiga Sreenevasan A. Samad Said Wong Tack |
| Leadfigures2: | Najib Razak Hishammuddin Hussein Ismail Omar |
| Howmany1: | Official estimation: 22,000[1] Independent estimation: 80,000 – 100,000[2] Bersih estimation: 250,000 – 300,000 worldwide[3] |
| Casualties1: | 60 local demonstrators injured, 512 arrested |
| Casualties2: | 20 policemen injured[4] |
The Bersih 3.0 rally (also called Sit In rally or Duduk Bantah in Malay) was the largest democratic protest in Malaysia.[5] This rally was organised as a follow-up to the 2011 Bersih rally and the 2007 Bersih rally. The rally, organised by the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih), was supported by Pakatan Rakyat, the coalition of the three largest opposition parties in Malaysia along with other small political parties like Parti Sosialis Malaysia and social organisations such as Malaysian Trades Union Congress, Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) and Malaysian Bar. In addition, Bersih 3.0 was endorsed by 84 NGOs. In particular, it was joined by Himpunan Hijau (Green Assembly), a civil movement protesting the Lynas rare earth project in Malaysia. In addition to the main rally at Kuala Lumpur, smaller rallies were held in 10 other cities in Malaysia, as well as in 34 other countries. Following the last rally in 2011, the government of Malaysia organised a Public Select Committee (PSC) to look into electoral reforms in Malaysia, which released their proposals in April 2012. Seven of the eight demands by the Bersih have been included in the 22 recommendations submitted by the PSC. PSC Committee member P. Kamalanathan said only one demand by Bersih, on a minimum 21 days campaign period, was not included because it was not suitable to be implemented in Sabah and Sarawak. However, the matter was still being considered, where the current campaign period of seven days had been extended to 10 days.[6] Bersih claimed that PSC proposals were half-hearted and accused the Election Commission of Malaysia (EC) of being insincere in introducing electoral reforms. Bersih has stated that they would call off the rally if the Malaysian government gave a guarantee that electoral reforms take place before the next Malaysian general elections.
Bersih, short for the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Malay: Gabungan Pilihanraya '''Bersih''' dan Adil), is a coalition of 62 non-governmental organisations founded in November 2006.[7] [8] Since its founding, Bersih has been supported by the three main opposition parties, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR), PAS, and DAP.[8] Bersih is the Malay word for "clean."[9]
Bersih, is chaired by former Bar Council president Ambiga Sreenevasan. Ambiga served as president of the Bar from 2007 to 2009 and is a recipient of the US State Department's International Women of Courage Awards.[10] [11]
The first Bersih rally on 10 November 2007 was estimated to have drawn between 30,000 and 50,000 people.[12] It was broken up by police using tear gas and chemical-laced water cannons.[12] [13] The rally was said to play a major role in helping the opposition parties make big gains in the 2008 general election.[14] The second rally on 9 July 2011 was met with similar force by the police after they tried to make their way to the Merdeka Stadium.[15]
The Bersih's immediate demands were:[16]
The Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) on Electoral Reforms was formed in the aftermath of the 2011 Bersih rally. The committee, consisting of five Barisan Nasional MPs, three Pakatan Rakyat MPs and one Independent MP, came up with 22 recommendations for reforming the electoral system in Malaysia.[17] However an opposition minority report was rejected by the parliament speaker without further debate.[18] [19]
Early in April 2012, the Public Select Committee released a report of their findings on electoral reform. The speaker in the Dewan Rakyat, or House of Representatives, passed the report with no debate between the opposition and ruling parties. An opposition minority report was not included in the final report.[20] So far none of Bersih's demands have been met, and with indications that the Malaysian Government would be calling a general election without any electoral reforms, Bersih announced a third rally for clean and fair elections for 28 April 2012.[21]
Bersih has been backed by the Bar Council of Malaysia and Suhakam[22] The Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) supports the Bersih's right for a peaceful assembly.[23] Bersih 3.0 was also backed by Pertubuhan IKRAM Malaysia (IKRAM), an Islamic missionary NGO.[24]
Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein stated that the government over-reacted in its response to the Bersih rally in 2011.[25] Hishammuddin has said that the government does not view the Bersih 3.0 rally as a security threat.[26] He offered two alternative venues to that of Dataran Merdeka, Bukit Jalil National Stadium and Stadium Merdeka, but these were rejected by Bersih.[27]
Information, Communications and Culture Minister Rais Yatim has described the Bersih ("clean") rally as "dirty", saying they do not respect the laws of the country.[28]
After several meetings between Bersih and DBKL, no compromise was made regarding the choice of venue for the rally.[29] DBKL erected barricades to prevent the sit-in rally by Bersih.[30]
The Malaysian High Court instructed the Hishammuddin to clarify whether Bersih is a banned organisation, especially since his recent statements were inconsistent regarding the organisation.[31] [32]
The Malaysian police received an order from Kuala Lumpur Magistrate Court barring any entry by Bersih into Dataran Merdeka and any rally gathering there would be considered illegal.[33] [34]
During the lead up to the rally, it was revealed by PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution Ismail in a Malay daily, that the Election Commission (EC) chairman and deputy chairman were UMNO members, leading to claims of conflict of interest. The United Malays National Organisation (abbreviated as UMNO), is Malaysia's largest political party. Bersih stated they would give the two men the benefit of the doubt until more information surfaced.[35] [36]
Saifuddin alleged that EC chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof is a member of Bunga Daisy UMNO branch under the Putrajaya division and his deputy, Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar is a member of Kubang Bunggor UMNO branch under the Pasir Mas Kelantan Division. Wan Ahmad denied the allegations and in slamming the PKR secretary-general for the "big lie", he wanted the former to apologise for slandering him. In response to the demand to step down by the opposition, EC chairman said under the Constitution, the chairman and the deputy were appointed by the King, in line with advice from the Malay rulers. The EC Chairman stated that this was a sign of disrespect by the opposition of the royal institution.[37]
It turned out later that the Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof with the details as alleged by Saifuddin is a driver at the Prime Minister's Office whose name similar to the EC chairman.[38] Then, a pensioner who runs a food stall in Kelantan, Wan Ahmad Wan Omar came forward denying the allegation and said Saifuddin had mistaken him for the EC deputy chairman. Both NRIC and Umno membership number as revealed by Saifuddin are actually belong to him.[39] UMNO Head Office also confirmed that both Tan Sri Abd Aziz and Datuk Wan Ahmad are not UMNO members.[40]
Despite the police roadblocks, the organiser claimed up to 300,000[3] people turned up for the Bersih rally in and around Kuala Lumpur city centre. Close to 58 roads leading into the city were blocked by the police.[41] Protestors gathered at several points in the city such as Masjid Negara, Masjid India, Pasar Seni, Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre (KLCC), Brickfields and Jalan Sultan before proceeding to Dataran Merdeka.[42]
Police began using tear gas and water cannons to disperse the protestors therefore they began breaching the barricades.[43] [44] A police car was overturned to rescue someone trapped under the car after it ran into the crowd, injuring two protesters. The policeman who was driving crashed the car purposely because he was trying to arrest protesters. Other protesters later protected the police officer from retaliation.[45] Some protesters are beaten by over a dozen police which kicked and punched or surrounded the latter. There are protesters which are beaten by sticks and even beaten even though they are being carried to the detention center without retaliation. When near the press, the police stopped all their harassments.
A total of 512 people were arrested for various offences in the rally, far less than the 1,667 detained in the Bersih 2.0 rally the previous year.[46]
909 tear gas canisters and 58 tear gas grenades were used by the police against the protesters in the rally.[47]
Social media were used not only to organise the rally, but to spread the mission of Bersih 3.0.
Simultaneous Bersih rallies were held in other cities throughout Malaysia such as Kota Kinabalu, Sabah;[48] Kuching, Sarawak;[49] Kuantan, Penang, Pahang; Ipoh, Perak; Miri, Sarawak;[50] Malacca and Johor Bahru, Johor.[51]
In total there were rallies held in 35 countries and 85 cities around the world.[52]
Large rallies were held in cities in Australia such as Sydney,[53] [54] Melbourne, Canberra, Hobart, Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth.[55] Rallies in Singapore, Thailand and other Asian countries were also large.[56]
Rallies were organised in India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Japan, Jordan, South Korea, China, Taiwan (Taipei and Tainan), United States, Canada, Russia and various countries in Europe, including the United Kingdom; one of the largest of which was held in London, with smaller rallies being organised in Manchester, Nottingham, Newcastle, and Edinburgh.[57]
The Prime Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak, gave remarks in the aftermath of the rally. Najib claimed that Bersih activists merely wanted to paint a negative image of the Government to the world and confront the police so that they could throw allegations of police brutality to the public. Najib also claimed that the organizers are not concerned about fair and clean elections, that the rally was politically motivated, and that it was conducted by supporters of Pakatan Rakyat in an attempt to take over Putrajaya.[58]
International observers have described the Bersih rally as 'peaceful', 'festive' and 'exemplary'.[59]
In the aftermath of the protests, analysts said premier Najib Razak's reform credentials had been dented, forcing him to push back elections.[60]
A few days before the violent demonstration, Kelantan Menteri Besar and PAS spiritual leader, Datuk Seri Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat had reportedly issued a "fatwā" that it is wajib for all Muslims to attend the rally[61] and halal to overthrow a 'sinful' government through street demonstrations.[62]
A young Malaysian director, Benji Lim, alleged that the opposition have hijacked the rally and cause a harness to the protesters. Lim, standing among the reporters during Anwar Ibrahim press conference regarding the rally, said,
Hishamuddin Hussein, said,
A petition website were also made by Bersih supporters, dearambiga.com, which said in its introduction,
Abdul Haleem Abdul Rahiman said that
Dato' S.Ambiga later denied that Bersih 3.0 rally were hijacked."No one can (hijack Bersih) if we remain focused and single-minded about ensuring reforms before the 13th general election".[63] [64]
PKR Youth chief, Shamsul Iskandar Md Akin later denied that the opposition have hijacked the rally and accused UMNO as it were a part of it "propaganda strategy"[65]
The Malaysian Bar, in its interim report on the gathering, said that words like sampah ('garbage') anjing ('dog') and anjing kurap ('mangy dog') were hurled at police and Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) who were on duty.[66]
It said that at around 2:50 pm, near the barricades at Dataran Merdeka, some of its monitors observed rally participants shouting masuk, kita masuk ('enter, let's enter'). The opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim was caught on video near one of the police barricades talking to one of his colleagues in which critics allege that he was inciting supporters to push aside the barriers.[67] The police force then used water cannons as well as fired tear gas towards the participants after repeated warnings to disperse were ignored. The monitors, who were trapped within the crowd of participants, then heard a group of participants yelling undur, undur ('retreat, retreat'). However, some of the participants kept on shouting masuk, masuk ('enter, enter'), and some of the monitors later observed participants taunting policemen and FRU at another location, especially after tear gas and water cannons were used. According to the report, some of the participants also hurled words like anjing, anjing ('dogs, dogs') and anjing kurap ('mangy dog') at police and FRU officers.[68]
The report said that some of the monitors heard rally participants calling police officers sampah ('garbage') as they passed the police line near the roundabout at Jalan Kinabalu, the police officers, however, did not heed what was said by the participants or retaliate. It further said that between 12 pm and 1 pm, participants at the intersection of Jalan Tun Perak, Jalan Tuanku Andul Rahman and Jalan Raja booed and jeered at policemen but there was no retaliation from the police. The report mentioned that rally participants, at times, threw objects like cans, empty plastic bottles and other items at police and City Hall vehicles moving along Jalan Tun Perak between 12 pm and 2 pm.
Other noted incidents are:
According to an interim report by the Malaysian Bar Council, police brutality was widespread, with instances of savage beatings of civilians as well as arbitrary use of tear gas and water cannons.[77] However, the same report admits that demonstrators had consistently provoked the police. The council noted that the demonstrators had booed, jeered and insulted with derogatory words but no retaliation from the policemen. Home Minister, Hishammudin Hussein defend the police as "professional in controlling NGO rally,supported by opposition which turn as a chaos"[78]
Between 9.30 am and 2.30 pm, majority of Bar Council monitors observed the police force (including FRU team) appeared unperturbed by the participants, and some were courteous towards the participants. Around 12.00 pm, near the KLCC – between Jalan P Ramlee and Jalan Raja Chulan, crowds marched towards the direction of Jalan Tun Perak. Along the way, traffic police gave full co-operation and managed the traffic for the crowd to march. Monitors observed there was no disturbance at all. And for hours the police stood aside, looking relaxed and doing nothing.[79] The peaceful rally later descended into chaos when police officers retaliated after the demonstrators removed the barbed wire and barriers at Dataran Merdeka and storm into the square, access to which was barred by a magistrate's court restraining order. Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar in a statement after the riots had pointed that the water cannon and tear gas was only fired to disperse rioters so that they will break through police barricades, an action which will make them breach the law, violate a court order and ignore the spirit of Peaceful Assembly Act 2012.[80]
The Bar Council's report also noted that:
The Bar Council further stated that the authorities had disregarded provisions within the United Nations Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials (UNBPUFF), the United Nations Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials (UNCC), and Amnesty International guidelines.[81]
Several journalists were attacked by police officers, where some photographers had their cameras and memory cards destroyed after taking photos of alleged police brutality. Malaysiakini photographer Koh Jun Lin was arrested and his camera equipment confiscated. Malay Mail confirmed that its photographer Arif Kartono was punched by police and his camera destroyed. Al-Jazeera's crew was roughed about and their camera damaged after they tried to film an officer beating up a protester.[82] The Inspector-General of Police, Ismail Omar promised that there will be investigations and refuted an earlier statement made by the Home Minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, who claimed that the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) of the police allows them to seize media equipment including cameras or memory cards.[83]
There are widespread media blackout, biased reporting and censorship by the Malaysian mass media on the Bersih 3.0 event.
An international observer, Senator Nick Xenophon, of the Australian Senate, was accused[84] [85] [86] [87] of being anti-Islamic and pro-gay & lesbian in the New Straits Times, Utusan Malaysia and Berita Harian.[88] The New Straits Times subsequently published a retraction and apology.[89] [90]
The Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) stated that there was significantly less print media coverage on Bersih 3.0, in comparison to Bersih 2.0 in 2011. CIJ began monitoring articles on Bersih 3.0 on 14 April 2012, two weeks before the scheduled 28 April rally, matching an identical study conducted which began two weeks before 9 July 2011 rally. CIJ monitored articles in four newspapers – Utusan Malaysia, New Straits Times, The Star and theSun – and showed between 90% and 60% drop in the volume of news coverage. Neutrality of the articles were also disputed, with two major newspapers providing largely negative view of the event. Overall, given the significance of Bersih 3.0, it was assumed that the major newspapers were deliberately toning down their Bersih coverage – either of their own accord, or due to interference from the government or the political parties which own them.[91]
The BBC issued a statement seeking explanation over the apparent doctoring of one of its news reports by the Malaysian satellite broadcaster Astro.[92] Two interviews with demonstrators were cut, as well as a partial deletion of the narration of the correspondence on how the violence was triggered after the event was concluded. Astro admitted to censoring BBC's coverage but expressed disappointment with the global news channel for failing to understand that they did so to comply with local guidelines.[93]