Beirut 75 Explained

Beirut 75
Author:Ghada Al-Samman
Country:Lebanon
Language:Arabic
Genre:Novel
Publisher:Ghada Al-Samman Publications
Pub Date:1975
Pages:112

Beirut 75 (1975) is the first full-length novel written by Syrian author, Ghada Al-Samman. It is about what is theorised to be the social and political causes of the Lebanese Civil War in 1975.[1]

Characters

Source:[2]

All characters were victims of existential nightmares leading to "fatalness and insanity".

Main Idea & Plot

Source:[2]

The novel begins with five people heading to Beirut riding the same vehicle. Everyone was silent, having internal conversations among themselves. From depression, suffocation, and fear, each of them was eager to solving their own concerns, while observing the rest in curiosity. They all had different goals; fame, wealth, freedom, security, dignity, and recognition, hoping they’d achieve it in Beirut.

It was their dream to go there. Farah wanted fame and wealth; Yasmina wanted love, freedom, and a lively life, also wealth. Abu Mustafa wanted to continue his career and for his son, Mustafa, to join him. However, the city turns out to be a "prison"; exposing some of its "darkest sides, from Israeli air raids triggering memories, to encountering wounded people, racism, and sexual exploitation". Cultural, societal, and political aspects are "exposed" putting each character in a position of "self-reflection and protesting".

Cultural and Political Aspects

Yasmina desiring freedom in her love life, realises that the liveliness she desires within the oceans, skies, and trees, fades away when her boyfriend, Nemer, is used by his father as a partisan for the right-wing militia, the moment his father set a marriage for convenience with a daughter of a wealthy ally, changing Yasmina's views as a "free woman" from the "perspective of Beirut’s society".

Mustafa, on one hand, hated the career of fishing; he did not want to become like his father because he considered that "killing fish is similar to killing humanity", and because he loves reading and writing poetry. While Abu Mustafa tended to be upset, he did not scold Mustafa much about this, despite thinking that it did make him crazy. Because it "hit Abu Mustafa that this craziness is inherited from a man who owns a secret genie lamp", speaking of himself, as he has "always wanted to meet with the genie before he dies".

The Aspects of Racism and Exploitation

The Damascene, Farah, was a depraved victim to the Western-style idolatry of Beirut's "elite", Neshan; constantly pushing him to be on the spotlight under the conditions of "becoming rich and famous". At the beginning, Farah would remember how his father would always scold him, feeling "disgusted towards the piles of books Farah owned, and thinking of him as a rebel", as he wanted him to be like Neshan, their relative.

The Aspect of Israeli Air-Raids and the Connection with Socio-political Aspects

While Yasmina and Farah were discovering Beirut, Israeli air raids were observed across the sky. Yasmina was in a yacht with her boyfriend, Nemer, causing her to panic; yet Nemer, didn't seem to care. Farah was in the middle of the streets paranoid from the same air raids, which tended to trigger his memories back in Damascus. But same condition; everyone tended to move on with their life. The author's aim here was to depict how the region "did not tend to do much about Israeli air raids overwhelming people" hence criticising them about it.[3]

The Aspects of Injustice and Poverty

The three other passengers, Abu Mustafa, Abu Al Mulla, and Ta’an were pictured as the ones who were not able to "escape poverty" due to their perceived victimisation of a feudal tribal society that "condemns for no reason". "Surrendering to existential nightmare conditions", it led Ta’an to the insanity of accidentally killing a tourist, while Abu Al Mulla and Abu Mustafa went fatal.

Existential Nightmare Conditions In-Depth

Abu Al Mulla wanted to steal a statue to give to someone who was going to pay him 10,000 lira; the decision that was made after he thought of ways to get his daughters back from a palace they worked as maids in. Stealing was overwhelming for him because it was the "first time to commit such an act while he is extremely religious", and he was "betraying his friend", speaking of the statue, whom he developed a relationship with and even tended to speak to most of the time, making people think of him as crazy.

Later on, when he was on bed with the statue next to him waiting for the man to come, Abu Al Mulla was scared from the statue's looks, sensing anger and fiery light. This was due to his existential nightmares, making him think that the statue was really his friend who felt betrayed.

Then suddenly, he saw the statue's fingers crawling around his neck, chocking him to death. His family came in later, and saw Abu Al Mulla dead with what the children considered as "a small puppet made out of rocks", and Al Mulla said that his "father died from clot", which meant that the statue wasn't really of something big after all; it was due to these nightmares.

Ending

Honour crimes providing fatal for Yasmina, and insanity overwhelming Farah, Beirut was to undergo a name change in the last section of the novel named "Nightmare" that featured Farah. He stole the asylum’s banner, running away from there after being "kept in for a while" (nightmares), and he went to Beirut's entrance, threw away its banner, and replaced it with "Lunatic Asylum" laughing out loud at what the place "really is after all" due to all these cultural, political, psychological, and societal "shocking" aspects that caused suffering because what they wanted was to "be recognised and feel free".

Quotes

Source:[3]

Reviews

Subject-wise, Kim Jensen said that the aspects discussed by Al-Samman are marked by their dramatic passion and their ability to create a net of recurrent symbols which are cast and re-cast to show the inter-relatedness of the five characters.[4]

And while the novel theorises the possible social and political causes of the Lebanese Civil War in 1975, George Nicolas Hage argues that the representation of Beirut as a whole through the symbolisation of characters tends to be lacking because the city is stripped out of all its positive qualities, such as being the cultural capital of the Middle East and its intellectual literacy center, in addition to the fact that characters speaking in French are ridiculed, while it's the first language that the author learned.[4]

See also

Ghada al-Samman

Beirut Nightmares

External links

«بيروت 75» لغادة السمان

Notes and References

  1. Book: Samm/an, Gh/adah . Beirut '75 . 1995-07-01 . University of Arkansas Press . 978-1-55728-382-5 . en.
  2. Book: Al Samman, Ghada . Beirut 75 . Ghada Al Samman Publications . 1975 . Beirut . ar.
  3. Web site: Beirut '75 by Ghada al-Samman: An Autobiographical Interpretation . 2022-07-26 . GeorgeNicolasEl-Hage.com . en.
  4. Web site: Ghada Samman's 'Beirut '75' Unmasks Gender and Class in Post-Colonial Society Al Jadid . 2022-07-26 . www.aljadid.com.