| Official Name: | Baidar ech Chamout |
| Other Name: | Baïdar ech Chamoût |
| Settlement Type: | Village |
| Subdivision Type: | Country |
| Subdivision Type1: | Governorate |
| Subdivision Name1: | Beqaa Governorate |
| Subdivision Type2: | District |
| Subdivision Name2: | Western Beqaa District |
| Unit Pref: | Imperial |
| Population Blank1 Title: | Ethnicities |
| Population Blank2 Title: | Religions |
| Baidar ech Chamout | |
| Alternate Name: | Beidar Chamout |
| Map Type: | Lebanon |
| Map Size: | 200 |
| Location: | 3km (02miles) northeast of Machgara, Lebanon |
| Region: | Beqaa Governorate |
| Coordinates: | 33.5308°N 35.6694°W |
| Epochs: | Heavy Neolithic, Neolithic, Paleolithic |
| Cultures: | Qaraoun culture |
| Excavations: | 1952 |
| Archaeologists: | Henri Fleisch, Jacques Cauvin |
| Condition: | Ruins |
| Public Access: | Yes |
Baidar ech Chamout, Baïdar ech Chamoût or Beidar Chamout is a small village located 3km (02miles) northeast of Machgara in the Western Beqaa District of Beqaa Governorate in Lebanon.[1]
A Heavy Neolithic archaeological site of the Qaraoun culture is located in the area on the right bank of the Litani river, where the North Cheeta exits from a ravine opposite the Dahr er Rimoul foothills. It was found by Henri Fleisch in 1952 in an area of approximately 100m (300feet) by 600m (2,000feet) in the fields around a fountain of the Machgara spring on a track approximately 500m (1,600feet) southwest of cote 853. It was described in detail in Fleisch's report of 1954 and again in 1960. Jacques Cauvin also examined and published details of the materials found, then stored with the Saint Joseph University (now the Museum of Lebanese Prehistory). The Heavy Neolithic pieces were considered identical to those found at Qaraoun II.[2]
A later Neolithic assemblage was found thought to be similar to the Neolithic récent of Byblos consisting of adzes, rabots, chisels and cores. Another assemblage without any triangular points was tentatively suggested to date to the middle Paleolithic, although may actually be Neolithic. The area was under cultivation in 1966.[1]