Battle of Kleidion explained

Conflict:Battle of Kleidion
Partof:the Byzantine-Bulgarian Wars
Date:July 29, 1014
Place:Belasitsa Mountains, close to the village of Klyuch, modern Blagoevgrad Province, Bulgaria
Map Type:Bulgaria#Greece#North Macedonia
Map Relief:1
Coordinates:41.3625°N 23.0175°W
Result:Byzantine victory
Combatant1:Byzantine Empire
Combatant2:Bulgarian Empire
Commander1:Basil II
Nikephoros Xiphias
Constantine Diogenes
Theophylaktos Botaneiates
Commander2:Samuel of Bulgaria
Gabriel Radomir
Strength1:Unknown
Strength2:Unknown
Casualties1:Unknown
Casualties2:Devastating almost entire forces, allegedly 15,000 captured

The Battle of Kleidion (Greek, Ancient (to 1453);: Κλειδίον; or Clidium, after the medieval name of the village of Klyuch, ; also known as the Battle of Belasitsa) took place on July 29, 1014, between the Byzantine Empire and the Bulgarian Empire. It was the culmination of the nearly half-century struggle between the Byzantine Emperor Basil II and the Bulgarian emperor Samuel in the late 10th and early 11th centuries. The result was a decisive Byzantine victory.

The battle took place in the valley between the mountains of Belasitsa and Ograzhden, near the modern Bulgarian village of Klyuch. The decisive encounter occurred on July 29 with an attack in the rear by a force under the Byzantine general Nikephoros Xiphias, who had infiltrated the Bulgarian positions. The ensuing battle was a major defeat for the Bulgarians. Thousands of Bulgarian soldiers were captured and blinded by order of Basil II, who would subsequently be known as the "Bulgar-Slayer". Samuel survived the battle, but died two months later from a heart attack, reportedly brought on by the sight of his blind soldiers.

Although the engagement did not end the First Bulgarian Empire, the Battle of Kleidion reduced its ability to resist Byzantine advances, and it has been considered the pivotal encounter of the war with Byzantium.

Background

The origins of the conflict date back to the 7th century, when the Bulgars under Khan Asparukh established a state along the Danube in one of the provinces of the Eastern Roman Empire. As a result, the Bulgarian state fought a series of wars with Byzantium in order to secure its continued existence.[1]

In 968, Bulgaria was invaded from the north by the Kievan prince Sviatoslav.[2] By that time, the Bulgarian Empire, which had once threatened the existence of Byzantium under the reign of Simeon, had lost much of its power.[3] During the conflict, the Kievan raids were repeatedly defeated by the Byzantines, who were also at war with the Bulgarians, a continuous conflict since the fall of the Bulgarian capital Preslav in 971. This war had resulted in the Bulgarian emperor Boris II being forced to renounce his imperial title in Constantinople, and eastern Bulgaria came under Byzantine rule.[4] The Byzantines assumed that this act would signify the end of independent Bulgaria, but the western Bulgarian lands remained autonomous and under the Comitopuli brothers David, Moses, Aaron and Samuel, resistance against the Byzantines emerged.[5] [6]

When the Byzantine emperor Basil II ascended the throne in 976, he made the destruction of independent Bulgaria his first ambition. Opposing him were the western Bulgarians, now led by Samuel of Bulgaria. Basil II's first campaign was disastrous, the Emperor barely escaping with his life when the Bulgarians annihilated the Byzantine army in the Gates of Trajan Pass in 986.[7] Over the next fifteen years, while Basil was preoccupied with revolts against his rule and the Fatimid threat in the east, Samuel retook most of the previously conquered Bulgarian lands and carried the war into enemy territory in a series of campaigns. However, his invasion of southern Greece, that reached as far as Corinth, resulted in a major defeat in the Battle of Spercheios in 996. The next phase of the war began in 1000, when Basil, having secured his own position, launched a series of offensives against Bulgaria. He secured Moesia, and in 1003, his forces took Vidin. The next year, Basil inflicted a heavy defeat on Samuel in the Battle of Skopie. By 1005, Basil had regained control of Thessaly and parts of southern Macedonia. Over these and the next few years, a regular pattern emerged: the Byzantines would campaign in Bulgaria, laying siege to forts and pillaging the countryside, while the numerically inferior Bulgarians, unable to offer direct opposition, launched diversionary raids in Macedonia and Greece. Despite some successes, these did not achieve any permanent results, nor did they force Basil to abandon his campaigns in Bulgaria. A counter-attack in 1009 failed at the Battle of Kreta,[8] [9] and although the Byzantines themselves did not achieve any decisive success, their methodical war of attrition deprived the Bulgarians of their strongholds and gradually weakened their forces.[10] In the words of Byzantine historian John Skylitzes: "The Emperor Basil II continued to invade Bulgaria each year and destroy and devastate everything on his way. Samuel could not stop him in the open field or engage the Emperor in a decisive battle, and suffered many defeats and began to lose his strength."[11] The culmination of the war came in 1014, when Samuel, at the head of his army, resolved to stop the Byzantine army before it could enter the Bulgarian heartland.

Prelude

See also: Medieval Bulgarian Army and Byzantine Army. Samuel knew that the Byzantine army would have to invade the country through a series of mountain passes, and so took precautions to bar them. The Bulgarians built ditches along the frontier and fortified many of the valleys and passes with walls and towers, especially the pass of Kleidion on the Struma River which Basil would need to pass through to reach the heart of Bulgaria. Samuel heavily fortified the northern slopes of the Belasitsa mountain to the south and east of Strumitsa Castle.[12] The wide valley of the Strumitsa River was a convenient place for attack and it had been used by Byzantine forces for this purpose in previous years. The Bulgarians disposed a strong guard to keep the pass safe. In addition, the Bulgarian ruler chose Strumitsa for his defensive base — it was located on the road from Thessaloniki leading to Thrace to the east and Ohrid to the west.[13] The rugged terrain to the south was dotted with earthworks and walls guarded by strong Bulgarian units.[14] [15]

Samuel's decision to face Basil II and the bulk of his army at Kleidion was not only prompted by the constant defeats and invasions which had devastated the country, but also by concerns over his authority among the nobility, which had been fatally weakened by Basil's campaigns. In 1005 for example, the governor of the important Adriatic port of Dyrrhachium had surrendered the town to Basil II.[16] To face this threat, Samuel gathered a large army to face the Byzantines, some claiming it numbered as many as 45,000 soldiers.[17] Basil II also prepared carefully, assembling a large army of his own and taking his most experienced commanders, including the governor of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv), Nicephorus Xiphias, who had conquered the old Bulgarian capitals Pliska and Preslav from Samuel in 1001.

Battle

The Byzantine army marched from Constantinople through Komotini, Drama and Serres and reached the Rupel pass on the Struma river. From there the army entered the Strumitsa valley and reached the vicinity of the village of Klyuch, where the river bent and approached Belasitsa and Ozgrazhden. There the army was stopped by a thick wooden wall, defended by Bulgarian soldiers.[18] [19] The Byzantines attacked the palisade immediately, but were repulsed with heavy casualties.[20] [21]

In response, Samuel sent a large army under one of the most able Bulgarian nobles, Nestoritsa, to strike southwards and draw the attention of Basil away from the siege at Klyuch.[22] Nestoritsa's Bulgarians reached Thessalonika, but Byzantine troops under Theophylact Botaneiates, the strategos (governor-general) of the city and his son Mihail managed to defeat them outside the city walls in a bloody battle. Theophylactus captured many soldiers and a large quantity of military equipment and marched north to join Basil at Klyuch.[23] [24]

Basil's first attempt to overwhelm the defenders of the pass was unsuccessful and his army was unable to pass through the valley, which was defended by 15,000–20,000 Bulgarians.[25] Despite the difficulties the Byzantine Emperor did not abandon the attack. He ordered his general Nicephorus Xiphias to manoeuvre his troops around the high Belasitsa mountain and threaten the Bulgarians from behind, while he continued the assaults on the wall.[26] [27] Xiphias led his troops along a steep path that led him into the Bulgarians' rear. On July 29, Xiphias attacked the Bulgarian defenders, trapping them in the valley. The Bulgarians abandoned their towers to face this new threat and Basil was able to break through the front line and destroy the wall.[28] [29]

In the confusion of the rout, thousands of Bulgarian troops were killed and the remainder desperately attempted to flee westwards. Samuel and his son Gabriel Radomir immediately headed to the east from their headquarters in the Strumitsa fortress to aid their army, but in desperate fighting near the village of Mokrievo (present-day North Macedonia) they were overwhelmed by the quickly advancing enemy.[30] Many Bulgarian soldiers were killed at Mokrievo and many more were captured.[31] Emperor Samuel himself barely escaped, only breaking free through the bravery of his son, who mounted his father on his own horse and took him to safety in Prilep.[32] From Prilep, Samuel returned to Prespa while Gabriel Radomir headed towards Strumitsa to continue the struggle.[33]

Further developments

See also: Battle of Strumitsa. After his victory, Basil II advanced towards Strumitsa, which was key to holding the whole Vardar valley. On their way to the city, the Byzantines seized the Matsukion fortress to the east of their advance.[34] The Byzantine Emperor also sent an army under Botaneiates to surround Strumitsa and destroy all ramparts to the south and clear the passage to Thessalonica. With the remainder of his troops, Basil laid siege to the city itself. The Bulgarians allowed Botaneiates to destroy the fortifications, but he and his army were ambushed by Bulgarian raiders in a narrow valley, soon after their task was complete. In the ensuing battle Botaneiates was completely defeated and the Bulgarian commander Gabriel Radomir personally stabbed Botaneiates with his spear.[35] [36] As a result, Basil II was forced to abandon the siege of Strumitsa and retreat. On the return, the eloquence of the cubicularius Sergius convinced the defenders of Melnik to surrender,[37] another heavy blow for the Bulgarians as the town guarded the main road to Sofia from the south.

Prisoners

Skylitzes records that Basil completely routed the Bulgarian army and took 15,000 prisoners (14,000 according to Kekaumenos). Modern historians, however, such as Vasil Zlatarski, claim that these numbers are exaggerated. The 14th century Bulgarian translation of the Manasses Chronicle numbers the prisoners at 8,000. Basil divided the prisoners into groups of 100 men, blinded 99 men in each group and left one man in each with one eye so that he could lead the others home;[38] this was done in retaliation for the death of Botaneiates, who was Basil's favourite general and advisor, and also to crush the Bulgarian morale.[39] Another possible reason was that, in Byzantine eyes, the Bulgarians were rebels against their authority, and blinding was the usual punishment meted out to rebels.[40] For this action, Basil gained the nickname Boulgaroktonos (Greek, Modern (1453-);: Βουλγαροκτόνος, Bulgarian: Българоубиец), "the Bulgar-slayer". Samuel died of a heart attack on October 6, 1014, reportedly due to seeing his soldiers blinded.[41] [42]

Aftermath

The death of Botaneiates and the four more years of war that followed indicate that the Byzantine success was not complete.[43] Some modern historians doubt that the Bulgarian defeat was as complete as described by Skylitzes and Kekaumenos.[44] Other historians emphasize that the death of Emperor Samuel two months later was much more fateful for Bulgaria.[45] His heirs Gabriel Radomir and Ivan Vladislav were unable to effectively resist the attacks of Basil II, and Bulgaria was completely defeated in 1018.[46] In that year Emperor Ivan Vladislav was killed in a battle at Dyrrhachium,[47] and Bulgaria became a province of the Byzantine Empire until the successful uprising led by the Asen brothers in 1185.

Other theses in the historiography stress the significance of the battle. As a result of the battle of Belasitsa, the Bulgarian army suffered heavy casualties that could not be restored. The ability of the central government to control the peripheral and interior provinces of the Empire was reduced and the actions of the local and provincial governors became more decisive for the outcome of the war with Byzantium. Many of them voluntarily surrendered to Basil II.[48]

The battle also affected the Serbs and the Croats, who were forced to acknowledge the supremacy of the Byzantine Emperor after 1018.[49] [50] The borders of the Byzantine Empire were restored to the Danube for the first time since the 7th century, allowing Byzantium to control the entire Balkan peninsula from the Danube to the Peloponnese and from the Adriatic Sea to the Black Sea.[51]

Further reading

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. Mutafchiev, Book about the Bulgarians, p. 59
  2. Gyuzelev, Short History of Bulgaria, p. 68
  3. Bozhilov, Tsar Simeon the Great, pp. 115–116, 124–126, 137–144
  4. Pirivatrich, The State of Samuel, pp. 58–59
  5. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, in "Selected sources" Vol. II, p. 64
  6. Pirivatrich, The State of Samuel, pp. 94–95
  7. Angelov / Cholpanov, Bulgarian Military History in the Middle Ages (10th–15th centuries), pp. 39–41, 43–44
  8. Gyuzelev, Short History of Bulgaria, p. 71
  9. Nikolov, Centralism and regionalism in early Medieval Bulgaria (end of the 7th – beginning of the 11th centuries) p. 130
  10. Pirivatrich, The State of Samuel, pp. 135–136
  11. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, in "Selected sources" Vol. II, pp. 65–66
  12. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, II, p. 45
  13. Zlatarski, History of Bulgaria in the Middle Ages, Vol. I, Part 2, pp. 731–732, 736
  14. Nikolov, Centralism and Regionalism in Early Medieval Bulgaria, pp. 179–180
  15. A description of the palisade built by Samuel between Belasitsa and Ograzhden (in Bulgarian) – G. Mitrev, The palisade of Samuel and the battle in 1014, pp. 76–79, in: Macedonian Review (journal), in Bulgarian, 1993, issue 2
  16. Ostrogorski, History of Byzantium, pp. 404–405
  17. Nikolov, Centralism and Regionalism in Early Medieval Bulgaria, p. 131. G. Nikolov estimates the total number of the Bulgarian army including the squads of local militia at maximum 45,000. The Byzantine historian Georgius Monachus Continuatus wrote that the Bulgarian army had 360,000 men, a greatly exaggerated number, the actual being 10 times smaller
  18. Zlatarski, History of Bulgaria in the Middle Ages, Vol. I, Part 2, p. 731
  19. Nikolov, Centralism and Regionalism in Early Medieval Bulgaria, p. 180
  20. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, II, p. 457
  21. Zonaras, ibid., IV, p. 121
  22. Nikolov, Centralism and Regionalism in Early Medieval Bulgaria, p. 146
  23. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, "Selected sources", Vol. II, p. 66
  24. Zlatarski, History of Bulgaria in the Middle Ages, Vol. I, Part 2, pp. 732–734
  25. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, p. 457
  26. Cedrin, pp. 457–458. George Kedrenos's Historical Synopsis is a compilation chronicle based on the writings of John Skylitzes, George Syncellus, Theophanes the Confessor and several other historians. It is not clear what edition is referred to here.
  27. Book: Savvidēs, Alexis G. K. . 1994 . Προσωπογραφικό σημείωμα για τον Βυζαντινό στρατηλάτη Νικηφόρο Ξιφία [Profile of Byzantine soldier Nicephoros Xifias] . 25–27 . el:Βυζαντινή προσωπογραφία, τοπική ιστορία και βυζαντινοτουρκικές σχέσεις . Byzantine Prosopography, Topical History and Byzantine-Turkish Relations . Κριτική Ιστορική Βιβλιοθήκη . Athens . 960-218-089-7 . el.
  28. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, "Selected sources", Vol. II, p. 66
  29. Zlatarski, History of Bulgaria in the Middle Ages, Vol. I, Part 2, pp. 734–736
  30. Angelov / Cholpanov, Bulgarian Military History in the Middle Ages (10th–15th centuries), p. 55
  31. http://kroraina.com/NI/izvori/GIBI_VI/GIBI_VI.djvu Greek sources on the History of Bulgaria (in Bulgarian), Vol. VI
  32. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, p. 458
  33. Zonaras, ibid., p. 121
  34. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, p. 459
  35. Zlatarski, History of Bulgaria in the Middle Ages, Vol. I, Part 2, p. 738
  36. Angelov / Cholpanov, Bulgarian Military History in the Middle Ages (10th–15th centuries), pp. 55–56
  37. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, р. 460
  38. Ioannes Scylitzes, Historia, р. 458
  39. Gyuzelev, Short History of Bulgaria, p. 74
  40. Pirivatrich, The State of Samuel, p. 178. СS. Pirivatic indicates that blinding was the traditional punishment in Byzantium for a rebellion against the legitimate ruler.
  41. Book: Runciman, Steven . 1930 . A History of the First Bulgarian Empire . London . G. Bell and Sons . 242 . 458819568 . January 28, 2008 . March 4, 2016 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160304001206/http://www.promacedonia.com/en/sr/sr_3_3.htm . dead . (retrieved on 7 September 2008)
  42. Dobrev . Ivan . 2004 . bg:Новооткритият надпис за цар Самуил и събитията в 1014 г. . The Newly Discovered Inscription of Tsar Samuel and the Events of the Year 1014 . Старобългарис-тика [Palaeobulgarica] . 28 . 3 . 3–24 . bg.
  43. Holmes, Catherine, Basil II (A.D. 976–1025)
  44. Stephenson, P., The Legend of Basil the Bulgar-Slayer, Cambridge University Press, 2003,, p. 4
  45. Zlatarski, History of Bulgaria in the Middle Ages, Vol. I, Part 2, pp. 740–741
  46. Whittow, Making of Orthodox Byzantium, pp. 387–388
  47. Runciman, A History of the First Bulgarian Empire, p. 248 (retrieved on 7.9.2008)
  48. Nikolov, Centralism and Regionalism in Early Medieval Bulgaria, pp. 130–131, 143
  49. Stephenson, P., The Balkan Frontier in the Year 1000, pp. 123–124 (в: Magdalino, P., Byzantium in the Year 1000, Brill 2003,); Ostrogorsky, History of Byzantium, p. 408; Mutafchiev, Lecture notes on Byzantine history, Vol. ІІ, p. 280; Ćirković, Sima, Doseljavanje slovena i dukljanska država
  50. Croatia was not conquered by Byzantium but became its vassal – see Matanov, Hristo, The Medieval Balkans. Historical Essays (Средновековните Балкани. Исторически очерци), in Bulgarian, Paradigma Publishers, Sofia, 2002,, p. 150
  51. Vasiliev, A., History of the Byzantine empire, 6. The Macedonian epoch (867–1081), Relations of the Byzantine Empire with the Bulgarians and Magyars, retrieved on 20 November 2007. (in Russian: Васильев, А. А., "История Византийской империи", том 1, Взаимоотношения Византийской империи с болгарами и мадьярами .)