Bates v. City of Little Rock explained

Litigants:Bates v. City of Little Rock
Arguedate:November 18
Argueyear:1959
Decidedate:February 23
Decideyear:1960
Fullname:Bates et al. v. City of Little Rock et al.
Usvol:361
Uspage:516
Parallelcitations:80 S. Ct. 412; 4 L. Ed. 2d 480; 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1601
Prior:Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas
Subsequent:229 Ark. 819, 319 S. W. 2d 37, reversed.
Holding:State governments cannot compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists when it inhibits freedom of association.
Majority:Stewart
Joinmajority: unanimous
Concurrence:Black & Douglas
Lawsapplied:U.S. Const. amend. I and XIV

Bates v. City of Little Rock, 361 U.S. 516 (1960), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government to compel the disclosure of an organization's membership lists via a tax-exemption regulatory scheme.

This was a companion case to NAACP v. Alabama (1958), which also held that NAACP membership records are protected by First Amendment freedom of association, and Talley v. California (1960), which held that Talley, a civil rights activist, could not be fined for an anonymous flyer. These cases help establish the right to privacy under the First Amendment, expanded on in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee (1982).

See also