Barton decarboxylation explained

The Barton decarboxylation is a radical reaction in which a carboxylic acid is converted to a thiohydroxamate ester (commonly referred to as a Barton ester). The product is then heated in the presence of a radical initiator and a suitable hydrogen donor to afford the decarboxylated product.[1] [2] This is an example of a reductive decarboxylation. Using this reaction it is possible to remove carboxylic acid moieties from alkyl groups and replace them with other functional groups.[3] [4] (See Scheme 1) This reaction is named after its developer, the British chemist and Nobel laureate Sir Derek Barton (1918–1998).

Mechanism

The reaction is initiated by homolytic cleavage of a radical initiator, in this case 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN), upon heating. A hydrogen is then abstracted from the hydrogen source (tributylstannane in this case) to leave a tributylstannyl radical that attacks the sulfur atom of the thiohydroxamate ester. The N-O bond of the thiohydroxamate ester undergoes homolysis to form a carboxyl radical which then undergoes decarboxylation and carbon dioxide (CO2) is lost. The remaining alkyl radical (R·) then abstracts a hydrogen atom from remaining tributylstannane to form the reduced alkane (RH). (See Scheme 2) The tributyltin radical enters into another cycle of the reaction until all thiohydroxamate ester is consumed.

N-O bond cleavage of the Barton ester can also occur spontaneously upon heating or by irradiation with light to initiate the reaction. In this case a radical initiator is not required but a hydrogen-atom (H-atom) donor is still necessary to form the reduced alkane (RH). Alternative H-atom donors to tributylstannane include tertiary thiols and organosilanes.[5] The relative expense, smell, and toxicity associated with tin, thiol or silane reagents can be avoided by carrying the reaction out using chloroform as both solvent and H-atom donor.[6]

It is also possible to functionalize the alkyl radical by use of other radical trapping species (X-Y + R· -> R-X + Y·).[7] The reaction proceeds due to the formation of the stable S-Sn bond and increasing aromaticity of the thiohydroxamate ester. There is also an overall increase in entropy due to the formation of gas which drives the reaction forward.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Barton, D. H. R.. Derek Harold Richard Barton. Crich, D.. Motherwell, W. B.. New and improved methods for the radical decarboxylation of acids. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.. 1983. 939. 10.1039/C39830000939. 17.
  2. 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)99826-0. Barton, D. H. R.. Derek Harold Richard Barton. Crich, D.. Motherwell, W. B.. A practical alternative to the hunsdiecker reaction. Tetrahedron Letters. 1983. 24. 4979. 45.
  3. Barton, D. H. R.. Derek Harold Richard Barton. Crich, D.. Motherwell, W. B.. The invention of new radical chain reactions. Part VIII. Radical chemistry of thiohydroxamic esters; A new method for the generation of carbon radicals from carboxylic acids. Tetrahedron Letters. 1985. 41. 3901. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)97173-X. 19.
  4. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)86878-2. Barton, D. H. R.. Derek Harold Richard Barton. Bridon, D.. Zard, S. Z.. Fernandaz-Picot, I.. The invention of radical reactions Part XV.1 Some mechanistic aspects of the decarboxylative rearrangement of thiohydroxamic esters. Tetrahedron. 1987 . 43. 2733. 12.
  5. Baguley. P. A.. Walton, J. C.. Flight from the Tyranny of Tin: The Quest for Practical Radical Sources Free from Metal Encumbrances. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 4 December 1998. 37. 22. 3072–3082. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981204)37:22<3072::AID-ANIE3072>3.0.CO;2-9. 29711327.
  6. Ko, E. J.. Savage, G. P.. Williams, C. M.. Tsanaktsidis, J.. Reducing the Cost, Smell, and Toxicity of the Barton Reductive Decarboxylation: Chloroform as the Hydrogen Atom Source. Organic Letters. 15 April 2011. 13. 8. 1944–1947. 10.1021/ol200290m. 21438514.
  7. 10.1016/j.tet.2009.01.103 . Saraiva, M. F. . Couri, M.R.C. . Hyaric, M.L. . The Barton ester free-radical reaction: a brief review of applications . . 2009 . 65 . 3563 . 18.