Official Name: | Barlow, Oregon |
Settlement Type: | City |
Mapsize: | 250px |
Subdivision Type: | Country |
Subdivision Name: | United States |
Subdivision Type1: | State |
Subdivision Name1: | Oregon |
Subdivision Type2: | County |
Subdivision Name2: | Clackamas |
Leader Title: | Mayor |
Leader Name: | Michael Lundsten[1] |
Established Title: | Incorporated |
Established Date: | 1903 |
Area Total Sq Mi: | 0.05 |
Area Footnotes: | [2] |
Area Total Km2: | 0.14 |
Area Land Sq Mi: | 0.05 |
Area Land Km2: | 0.14 |
Area Water Sq Mi: | 0.00 |
Area Water Km2: | 0.00 |
Population As Of: | 2020 |
Population Total: | 133 |
Population Density Km2: | 985.18 |
Population Density Sq Mi: | 2557.69 |
Timezone: | Pacific |
Utc Offset: | -8 |
Timezone Dst: | Pacific |
Utc Offset Dst: | -7 |
Coordinates: | 45.2522°N -122.7225°W |
Elevation Ft: | 102 |
Postal Code Type: | ZIP code |
Postal Code: | 97013 |
Area Code: | 503 |
Blank Name: | FIPS code |
Blank Info: | 41-04000 |
Blank1 Name: | GNIS feature ID |
Blank1 Info: | 2409787 |
Unit Pref: | Imperial |
Barlow is a city in Clackamas County, Oregon, United States. The population was 133 at the 2020 census. The mayor of Barlow is Michael Lundsten, as of the most recent election in 2018.
Barlow is named for William Barlow, the son of Samuel K. Barlow (developer of the Barlow Road). Samuel bought the donation land claim in which Barlow is located from Thomas McKay on September 17, 1850. He later sold the land to William.[3]
In 1870, the railroad was built through Barlow. The station was originally named Barlows (for William, not Samuel). As of 2003, the main line of the Union Pacific Railroad still ran through Barlow.[3]
The post office at Barlow was opened on February 7, 1871. It closed on January 3, 1975.[3]
According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 0.05sqmi, all of it land.[4]
As of the census of 2010, there were 135 people, 44 households, and 35 families living in the city. The population density was 2700PD/sqmi. There were 45 housing units at an average density of 900/sqmi. The racial makeup of the city was 80.7% White, 0.7% African American, 0.7% Native American, 14.1% from other races, and 3.7% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 14.8% of the population.[5]
There were 44 households, of which 36.4% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 61.4% were married couples living together, 11.4% had a female householder with no husband present, 6.8% had a male householder with no wife present, and 20.5% were non-families. 20.5% of all households were made up of individuals, and 11.4% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 3.07 and the average family size was 3.43.[5]
The median age in the city was 38.4 years. 29.6% of residents were under the age of 18; 8.1% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 23% were from 25 to 44; 26.7% were from 45 to 64; and 12.6% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 48.9% male and 51.1% female.[5]
As of the census of 2000, there were 140 people, 40 households, and 33 families living in the city. The population density was 2275.8sp=usNaNsp=us. There were 41 housing units at an average density of 666.5sp=usNaNsp=us. The racial makeup of the city was 90.71% White, 0.71% Asian, 3.57% from other races, and 5.00% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 9.29% of the population.[5]
There were 40 households, out of which 47.5% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 77.5% were married couples living together, 5.0% had a female householder with no husband present, and 17.5% were non-families. 12.5% of all households were made up of individuals, and 7.5% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 3.50 and the average family size was 3.79.[5]
In the city, the population was spread out, with 32.9% under the age of 18, 8.6% from 18 to 24, 28.6% from 25 to 44, 19.3% from 45 to 64, and 10.7% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females, there were 97.2 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 104.3 males.[5]
The median income for a household in the city was $41,250, and the median income for a family was $46,250. Males had a median income of $35,156 versus $37,917 for females. The per capita income for the city was $14,431. There were 5.4% of families and 3.5% of the population living below the poverty line, including 7.9% of under eighteens and none of those over 64.[5]