Backun v. United States explained

Litigants:Backun v. United States
Courtseal:Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.svg
Decidedate:June 10,
Decideyear:1940
Fullname:Backun v. United States
Citations:112 F.2d 635
Majority:Parker
Joinmajority:Dobie
Concurrence:Soper

Backun v. United States, 112 F.2d 635 (4th Cir. 1940),[1] is a criminal case that held that the mental element for complicity in a crime is that the accessory had knowledge that aiding or abetting would facilitate the criminal act of the principal, and did not require the accomplice have the same purpose as the principal.[2] The case is contrasted with the Second Circuit case of United States v. Peoni, which held the opposite.[2]

Notes and References

  1. Backun v. United States . 112 . F.2d . 635 . . 1940 . https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/112/635/1498899/ . 2018-06-04 .
  2. [John Kaplan (law professor)|John Kaplan]