Back action (quantum) explained

Introduction (error in measurement)

Back Action in quantum mechanics is the phenomenon in which the act of measuring a property of a particle directly influences the state of the particle. In all scientific measurement, there exists a degree of error due to a variety of factors. This could include unaccounted-for variables, imperfect procedure execution, or imperfect measurement devices. In classical mechanics, it is assumed that the error of any experiment could theoretically be zero if all relevant aspects of the configuration are known and the measurement devices are perfect. However, quantum mechanical theory supports that the act of measuring a quantity, regardless of the degree of precision, carries inherent uncertainty as the measurement influences the quantity itself.[1] [2] This behavior is known as back action. This is due to the fact that quantum uncertainty carries minimum fluctuations as a probability. For example, even objects at absolute zero still carry ‘motion’ due to such fluctuations.[3]

Simultaneous measurement & uncertainty

Simultaneous measurement is not possible in quantum mechanics for observables that do not commute (the commutator of the observables is not equal to zero). Since observable quantities are treated as operators, their values do not necessarily follow classical algebraic properties. For this reason, there always remains a minimum uncertainty in regard to the uncertainty principle. This relationship sets a minimum uncertainty when measuring position and momentum. However, it can be extended to any incompatible observables.[4]

\sigmax\sigmap\geq\hbar/2

2\geq
\sigma
B

|\left(

1
2i

\right)\langle[\hat{A},\hat{B}]\rangle|2

Effect of measurement on system

Each observable operator has a set of eigenstates, each with an eigenvalue. The full initial state of a system is a linear combination of the full set of its eigenstates. Upon measurement, the state then collapses to an eigenstate with a given probability and will proceed to evolve over time after measurement. Thus, measuring a system affects its future behavior and will thus affect further measurements of non-commuting observables.

Using bra-ket notation, consider a given system that begins in a state

|\psi\rangle

, and an observable operator

\hatO

with the set of eigenstates

\{|\omegai\rangle\}

each with a corresponding eigenvalue

λi

. A measurement of

\hatO

is made, and the probability of getting

λi

is as follows:

P(λi)=|\langle\omega

2
i|\psi\rangle|

The particle's state has now collapsed to the state

|\omegai\rangle

. Now, consider another observable

\hatB

with the set of eigenstates

\{|\varphii\rangle\}

each with a corresponding eigenvalue

bi

. If a subsequent measurement of

\hatB

on the system is made, the possible outcomes are now

\{bi\}

, each with the following probability:

P(bi)=|\langle\varphii|\omega

2
i\rangle|

Had

\hatO

not been measured first, the probability of each outcome would have remained as:

P(bi)=|\langle\varphi

2
i|\psi\rangle|

Thus, unless

\hatB

and

\hatO

share and identical set of eigenstates (that is to say,

\{|\varphii\rangle\}=\{|\omegai\rangle\}

), the initial measurement fundamentally influences the system to affect future measurements. This statement is identical to stating that if the commutator of the two observables is non-zero, repeated observations of the observables will present altered results. Observables will share the set of eigenstates if

[\hatO,\hatB]=0

Back action is an area of active research. Recent experiments with nanomechanical systems have attempted to evade back action while making measurements.[5] [6]

Notes and References

  1. Book: Braginskij, Vladimir B. . Quantum measurement . Khalili . Farid Y. . 2010 . Cambridge Univ. Pr . 978-0-521-48413-8 . Thorne . Kip S. . Transferred to digit. print., [Nachdr.] . Cambridge.
  2. Hatridge . M. . Shankar . S. . Mirrahimi . M. . Schackert . F. . Geerlings . K. . Brecht . T. . Sliwa . K. M. . Abdo . B. . Frunzio . L. . Girvin . S. M. . Schoelkopf . R. J. . Devoret . M. H. . 2013-01-11 . Quantum Back-Action of an Individual Variable-Strength Measurement . Science . en . 339 . 6116 . 178–181 . 10.1126/science.1226897 . 0036-8075. 1903.11732 .
  3. Web site: Quantum Backaction - Open Quantum Sensing and Measurement Notes . 2023-11-01 . qsm.quantumtinkerer.tudelft.nl.
  4. Book: Griffiths, David . Introduction to Quantum Mechanics . Pearson Education Inc. . 2005 . 0131911759 . 2nd . United States of America.
  5. Hertzberg . J. B. . Rocheleau . T. . Ndukum . T. . Savva . M. . Clerk . A. A. . Schwab . K. C. . March 2010 . Back-action-evading measurements of nanomechanical motion . Nature Physics . en . 6 . 3 . 213–217 . 10.1038/nphys1479 . 1745-2473. 0906.0967 .
  6. Møller . Christoffer B. . Thomas . Rodrigo A. . Vasilakis . Georgios . Zeuthen . Emil . Tsaturyan . Yeghishe . Balabas . Mikhail . Jensen . Kasper . Schliesser . Albert . Hammerer . Klemens . Polzik . Eugene S. . July 2017 . Quantum back-action-evading measurement of motion in a negative mass reference frame . Nature . en . 547 . 7662 . 191–195 . 10.1038/nature22980 . 0028-0836. 1608.03613 .