| BL 14-inch Mark VII | |
| Origin: | UK |
| Type: | Naval gun |
| Is Ranged: | YES |
| Is Artillery: | YES |
| Is Uk: | YES |
| Service: | 1940-1951 |
| Used By: | UK |
| Design Date: | 1937 |
| Number: | 78 |
| Weight: | 80.26MT |
| Length: | 54feet |
| Part Length: | 52feet bore (45 calibres) |
| Cartridge: | 1590lb |
| Caliber: | 14inches |
| Rate: | 2 rounds per minute |
| Velocity: | Standard Charge: 2483ft/s (new gun), 2400ft/s (25% wear)[1] |
| Max Range: | 38600yd at 40° with new linings, or 36500yd at 40.7° (25% wear) |
| Elevation: | Naval: 41° Coastal: 45° |
The BL 14-inch Mk VII naval gun[2] was a breech loading (BL) gun designed for the battleships of the Royal Navy in the late 1930s. This gun armed the battleships during the Second World War.
The choice of calibre was limited by the Second London Naval Treaty, an extension of the Washington Naval Treaty which set limits on the size, armament, and number of battleships constructed by the major powers. After disappointing experiences with the combination of high velocity but relatively light shell in the BL 16 inch /45 naval gun of the s, the British reverted to the combination of lower velocities and (relatively) heavier shells in this weapon.[3]
The built-up gun was of an all-steel construction, using a radial expansion design; this was an advance on earlier British heavy guns, which employed a wire-wound technology. The resulting gun was lighter, less prone to droop, more accurate and had a significantly longer barrel life. The estimated barrel life was 340 effective full charges. Length of bore: 630 inches (45 calibres long). Weight of gun (without breech or counterbalance: 77 tons 14 cwt 84 lbs. Weight of gun with counterbalance: 89 tons 2 cwt 84 lbs. Weight of breech mechanism: 1 ton 17 cwt. Rifling: polygroove, 72 grooves plain section, uniform right-hand twist of 1 turn in 30 calibres. The standard propellant charge: 338lb of cordite.[4] [5]
The new 14-inch Armour Piercing (AP) 1,590-pound/ 721 kg shell had, relative to its size, superior ballistic performance and armour-penetration compared to previous British shells, due to improvements in design and material which had taken place since World War I.[6] The shell also carried a proportionally large bursting charge of 39.8lb.[7] [8]
The choice of mounting was a mechanically complex quadruple turret (each battleship had two quadruple turrets (Mark III) and one twin turret (Mark II)). Although the class of battleships was initially designed with three quadruple turrets, it proved impossible to include this amount of firepower and the desired level of protection without exceeding the 35,000 ton displacement treaty limit, furthermore the weight of the superimposed quadruple "B" turret brought the stability of the vessel into question, hence the "B" turret was changed to a smaller twin mount so the weight savings could be freed up for increased armour protection. The turret and ammunition-handling facilities incorporated many anti-flash measures and interlocks, improving safety but adding to complexity.[9] Revolving weight of mountings: quadruple Mk III 1,582 tons, twin Mk II 915 tons.[10]
In service, the quad turrets proved to be less reliable than was hoped for. Wartime haste in building, insufficient clearance between the rotating and fixed structure of the turret, insufficient full calibre firing exercises and extensive arrangements to prevent flash from reaching the magazines[11] led to problems during prolonged actions. In order to bring ammunition into the turret at any degree of train, the design included a transfer ring between the magazine and turret; this did not have sufficient clearance to allow for the ship bending and flexing.[12] These defects were addressed, and improved clearances, improved mechanical linkages, and better training led to greater reliability in the quadruple turrets but they remained controversial.[11]
On entering operational service the turrets gained an initial reputation for unreliability, with individual guns and entire turrets jamming in action. However, it has been argued that these jams were typically caused by errors in drill, either due to lack of gun crew training, as was the case when the newly commissioned engaged the in the Battle of the Denmark Strait (1941), or due to crew fatigue resulting from the prolonged nature of the engagement, as was the case when engaged Bismarck in 1941 and engaged in the Battle of North Cape (1943).[13] During the battle against Bismarck, a close-range hit from a 14-inch shell fired by King George V or a 16-inch shell fired by Rodney penetrated the 340mm-thick armour of the barbette of Bismarck's 'B' turret, causing an internal explosion which blew the rear face of the turret away. Underwater survey also shows that the 350mm vertical armour of Bismarcks conning tower was penetrated by 14-inch shells.[14] In the Battle of North Cape, Duke of York fired 52 broadsides; of these 31 straddled the Scharnhorst, a fast and actively manoeuvring target, and a further 16 fell within 200 yards – an excellent performance, even when radar-control is taken into account.[15] The effects of the 14-inch shellfire on Scharnhorst quickly degraded her fighting abilities: Duke of Yorks first salvo put 'A' turret out of action; 'B' turret soon followed; a subsequent hit penetrated the German ship's armour, detonating in one of the boiler rooms and reducing the vessel's speed. This reduction in speed meant that the Scharnhorst could not escape pursuit, and was responsible for her eventual destruction.[16]
By being instrumental in the destruction of two modern enemy battleships, the 14-inch Mark VII gun was, arguably, one of the most successful battleship main armaments of World War II.[17]
See main article: article and Cross-Channel guns in the Second World War. In World War II two guns, nicknamed Winnie and Pooh, were mounted as coastal artillery near Dover to engage German batteries across the Channel in occupied France.
Reproduced from Nav weapons.com