Atheist's wager explained
The Atheist's wager, coined by the philosopher Michael Martin and published in his 1990 book Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, is an atheistic response to Pascal's wager regarding the existence of God.[1]
One version of the Atheist's wager suggests that since a kind and loving god would reward good deeds – and that if no gods exist, good deeds would still leave a positive legacy – one should live a good life without religion.[2] [3] Another formulation suggests that a god may reward honest disbelief and punish a dishonest belief in the divine.[4]
Explanation
Martin's wager states that if one were to analyze their options in regard to how to live their life, they would arrive at the following possibilities:[5]
- You may live a good life and believe in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
- You may live a good life without believing in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to heaven: your gain is infinite.
- You may live a good life and believe in a god, but no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a positive legacy to the world; your gain is finite.
- You may live a good life without believing in a god, and no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a positive legacy to the world; your gain is finite.
- You may live an evil life and believe in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to hell: your loss is infinite.
- You may live an evil life without believing in a god, and a benevolent god exists, in which case you go to hell: your loss is infinite.
- You may live an evil life and believe in a god, but no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a negative legacy to the world; your loss is finite.
- You may live an evil life without believing in a god, and no benevolent god exists, in which case you leave a negative legacy to the world; your loss is finite.
The following table shows the values assigned to each possible outcome:
| A benevolent god exists | No benevolent god exists |
|---|
| Belief in god (B) | No belief in god (¬B) | Belief in god (B) | No belief in god (¬B) |
|---|
| Good life (L) | +∞ (heaven) | +∞ (heaven) | +X (positive legacy) | +X (positive legacy) |
|---|
| Evil life (¬L) | −∞ (hell) | −∞ (hell) | −X (negative legacy) | −X (negative legacy) | |
|---|
Given these values, Martin argues that the option to live a good life clearly dominates the option of living an evil life, regardless of belief in a god. Whether one believes in god has no effect on the outcome.
Notes and References
- Book: Oppy, Graham . . 2019 . 978-1-119-11918-0 . First . 221.
- Book: Martin, Michael . Atheism: A Philosophical Justification . . 1990 . 978-0-8772-2642-0 . 232–238 . registration.
- Book: Berry . So What If...the God of the Bible Exists...Does It Really Matter at the End ... . Dog Ear Publishing . 2011 . 978-1-457-50020-6 . 10.
- Book: Stahl . Atheism: A Beginner's Handbook: All You Wanted to Know About Atheism and Why . 2007 . 978-0-5954-2737-6 . 39–42 . iUniverse . registration.
- Martin . Michael . 1983 . Pascal's Wager as an Argument for Not Believing in God . Religious Studies . 19 . 57–64 . 10.1017/S0034412500014700 . 170450896.
