In the mathematical theory of conformal mappings, the area theoremgives an inequality satisfied bythe power series coefficients of certain conformal mappings.The theorem is called by that name, not because of its implications, but rather because the proof usesthe notion of area.
Suppose that
f
D\setminus\{0\}
f(z)=
1z | |
+ |
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
anzn, z\inD\setminus\{0\},
an
infty | |
\sum | |
n=0 |
2\le | |
n|a | |
n| |
1.
The idea of the proof is to look at the area uncovered by the image of
f
r\in(0,1)
-i\theta | |
\gamma | |
r(\theta):=f(re |
), \theta\in[0,2\pi].
\gammar
Dr
C\setminus\gammar([0,2\pi])
Dr
If
D
\gamma
area(D)=\int\gammaxdy=-\int\gammaydx,
\gamma
D
\gammar
Dr
\gammar
\gammar
area(Dr)=
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
\Rel(f(re-i\theta)r)\Iml(-ire-i\thetaf'(re-i\theta)r)d\theta=
2\pi | |
-\int | |
0 |
\Iml(f(re-i\theta)r)\Rel(-ire-i\thetaf'(re-i\theta)r)d\theta.
Dr
area(Dr)=-
12 | |
\Re\int |
2\pi | |
0 |
f(re-i\theta)\overline{re-i\thetaf'(re-i\theta)}d\theta,
\overlinez
a-1=1
f
area(Dr)=-
12 | |
\Re\int |
2\pi | |
0 |
infty mr | |
\sum | |
m=-1 |
n+man\overline{a
i(m-n)\theta | |
m}e |
d\theta.
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
infty | |
\sum | |
m=-1 |
mrn+m|an||am|d\theta<infty,
2\pi | |
\int | |
0 |
ei(m-n)\thetad\theta
2\pi
n=m
area(Dr)=
infty | |
-\pi\sum | |
n=-1 |
nr2n
2. | |
|a | |
n| |
Dr
a-1=1
r\to1
It only remains to justify the claim that
\gammar
Dr
r'
r<r'<1
z0=f(r')
s>0
\gammas
z0
1
\gammat
z0
t\ner'
f
z0
\gammar
z0
1
z0\inDr
\gammar
Dr
The inequalities satisfied by power series coefficients of conformalmappings were of considerable interest to mathematicians prior tothe solution of the Bieberbach conjecture. The area theoremis a central tool in this context. Moreover, the area theorem is oftenused in order to prove the Koebe 1/4 theorem, which is veryuseful in the study of the geometry of conformal mappings.