Rationality: | Irrational |
Symbol: | ζ(3) |
In mathematics, Apéry's constant is the sum of the reciprocals of the positive cubes. That is, it is defined as the number
\begin{align} \zeta(3)&=
infty | |
\sum | |
n=1 |
1 | |
n3 |
\\ &=\limn\left(
1 | |
13 |
+
1 | |
23 |
+ … +
1 | |
n3 |
\right), \end{align}
where is the Riemann zeta function. It has an approximate value of
.
It is named after Roger Apéry, who proved that it is an irrational number.
Apéry's constant arises naturally in a number of physical problems, including in the second- and third-order terms of the electron's gyromagnetic ratio using quantum electrodynamics. It also arises in the analysis of random minimum spanning trees and in conjunction with the gamma function when solving certain integrals involving exponential functions in a quotient, which appear occasionally in physics, for instance, when evaluating the two-dimensional case of the Debye model and the Stefan–Boltzmann law.
See main article: Apéry's theorem. was named Apéry's constant after the French mathematician Roger Apéry, who proved in 1978 that it is an irrational number. This result is known as Apéry's theorem. The original proof is complex and hard to grasp, and simpler proofs were found later.[1]
Beukers's simplified irrationality proof involves approximating the integrand of the known triple integral for,
\zeta(3)=
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
1 | |
1-xyz |
dxdydz,
I3:=-
1 | |
2 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
Pn(x)Pn(y)log(xy) | |
1-xy |
dxdy=bn\zeta(3)-an,
where
|I|\leq\zeta(3)(1-\sqrt{2})4n
Pn(z)
bn,2\operatorname{lcm}(1,2,\ldots,n) ⋅ an\inZ
It is still not known whether Apéry's constant is transcendental.
In addition to the fundamental series:
\zeta(3)=
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
1 | |
k3 |
,
\zeta(3)=
\pi2 | |
7 |
\left(1-
infty | |
4\sum | |
k=1 |
\zeta(2k) | |
22k(2k+1)(2k+2) |
\right)
Since the 19th century, a number of mathematicians have found convergence acceleration series for calculating decimal places of . Since the 1990s, this search has focused on computationally efficient series with fast convergence rates (see section "Known digits").
The following series representation was found by A. A. Markov in 1890, rediscovered by Hjortnaes in 1953, and rediscovered once more and widely advertised by Apéry in 1979:
\zeta(3)=
5 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
(-1)k-1
k!2 | |
(2k)!k3 |
.
The following series representation gives (asymptotically) 1.43 new correct decimal places per term:
\zeta(3)=
1 | |
4 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
(-1)k-1
(k-1)!3(56k2-32k+5) | |
(2k-1)2(3k)! |
.
The following series representation gives (asymptotically) 3.01 new correct decimal places per term:
\zeta(3)=
1 | |
64 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=0 |
(-1)k
k!10(205k2+250k+77) | |
(2k+1)!5 |
.
The following series representation gives (asymptotically) 5.04 new correct decimal places per term:[2]
\zeta(3)=
1 | |
24 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=0 |
(-1)k
(2k+1)!3(2k)!3k!3(126392k5+412708k4+531578k3+336367k2+104000k+12463) | |
(3k+2)!(4k+3)!3 |
.
The following series representation gives (asymptotically) 3.92 new correct decimal places per term:
\zeta(3)=
1 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=0 |
(-1)k(2k)!3(k+1)!6(40885k5+124346k4+150160k3+89888k2+26629k+3116) | |
(k+1)2(3k+3)!4 |
.
In 1998, Broadhurst gave a series representation that allows arbitrary binary digits to be computed, and thus, for the constant to be obtained in nearly linear time and logarithmic space.
The following representation was found by Tóth in 2022:
\begin{align} \sumn\geq1
9tn-1+7tn | |
n3 |
&=8\zeta(3),\end{align}
(tn)n\geq0
n\rm
s
1
(2s+1)\sumn\geq1
tn-1 | |
ns |
+(2s-1)\sumn\geq1
tn | |
ns |
=2s\zeta(s).
The following series representation was found by Ramanujan:[4]
\zeta(3)=
7 | |
180 |
\pi3-2
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
1 | |
k3(e2\pi-1) |
.
The following series representation was found by Simon Plouffe in 1998:
\zeta(3)=14
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
1 | |
k3\sinh(\pik) |
-
11 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
1 | |
k3(e2\pi-1) |
-
7 | |
2 |
infty | |
\sum | |
k=1 |
1 | |
k3(e2\pi+1) |
.
collected many series that converge to Apéry's constant.
There are numerous integral representations for Apéry's constant. Some of them are simple, others are more complicated.
The following formula follows directly from the integral definition of the zeta function:
\zeta(3)=
1{2}\int | |
0 |
infty
x2 | |
ex-1 |
dx
Other formulas include
\zeta(3)=\pi
infty | |
\int | |
0 |
\cos(2\arctanx) | |||||||||
|
dx
\zeta(3)=-
1 | |
2 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
log(xy) | |
1-xy |
dxdy=
1 | |
-\int | |
0 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
log(1-xy) | |
xy |
dxdy.
Also,
\begin{align} \zeta(3)&=
8\pi2 | |
7 |
1 | |
\int | |
0 |
| ||||||||||
(1+x2)4 |
dx\\ &=
8\pi2 | |
7 |
infty | |
\int | |
1 |
x(x4-4x2+1)loglog{x | |
A connection to the derivatives of the gamma function
\zeta(3)=-\tfrac{1}{2}(\Gamma'''(1)+\gamma3+\tfrac{1}{2}\pi2\gamma)=-\tfrac{1}{2}\psi(2)(1)
The number of known digits of Apéry's constant has increased dramatically during the last decades, and now stands at more than . This is due both to the increasing performance of computers and to algorithmic improvements.
Decimal digits | Computation performed by | ||
1735 | 16 | Leonhard Euler | |
Unknown | 16 | Adrien-Marie Legendre | |
1887 | 32 | Thomas Joannes Stieltjes | |
1996 | Greg J. Fee & Simon Plouffe | ||
1997 | Bruno Haible & Thomas Papanikolaou | ||
May 1997 | Patrick Demichel | ||
February 1998 | Sebastian Wedeniwski | ||
March 1998 | Sebastian Wedeniwski | ||
July 1998 | Sebastian Wedeniwski | ||
December 1998 | Sebastian Wedeniwski | ||
September 2001 | Shigeru Kondo & Xavier Gourdon | ||
February 2002 | Shigeru Kondo & Xavier Gourdon | ||
February 2003 | Patrick Demichel & Xavier Gourdon | ||
April 2006 | Shigeru Kondo & Steve Pagliarulo | ||
January 21, 2009 | Alexander J. Yee & Raymond Chan | ||
February 15, 2009 | Alexander J. Yee & Raymond Chan | ||
September 17, 2010 | Alexander J. Yee | ||
September 23, 2013 | Robert J. Setti | ||
August 7, 2015 | Ron Watkins | ||
December 21, 2015 | Dipanjan Nag | ||
August 13, 2017 | Ron Watkins | ||
May 26, 2019 | Ian Cutress[5] | ||
July 26, 2020 | Seungmin Kim[6] | ||
December 22, 2023 | Andrew Sun |
The reciprocal of (0.8319073725807...) is the probability that any three positive integers, chosen at random, will be relatively prime, in the sense that as approaches infinity, the probability that three positive integers less than chosen uniformly at random will not share a common prime factor approaches this value. (The probability for n positive integers is .) In the same sense, it is the probability that a positive integer chosen at random will not be evenly divisible by the cube of an integer greater than one. (The probability for not having divisibility by an n-th power is .)
See main article: Particular values of the Riemann zeta function. Many people have tried to extend Apéry's proof that is irrational to other values of the zeta function with odd arguments. Infinitely many of the numbers must be irrational, and at least one of the numbers,,, and must be irrational.