| Antonino Ferro | |
| Birth Date: | 2 March 1947 |
| Birth Place: | Italy |
| Nationality: | Italian |
| Fields: | Psychoanalysis |
| Workplaces: | Pavia |
| Known For: | Post-Bionian Field Theory |
Antonino Ferro (Italian: [antoˈniːno ˈfɛrro]; born 2 March 1947) is an Italian psychoanalyst, who specializes in the work with children. He is strongly influenced by the British psychoanalyst W.R. Bion, and together with Giuseppe Civitarese (also a frequent collaborator) has been instrumental in the development of post-Bionian Field Theory (BFT).
Antonino Ferro works from Pavia near Milan, and is a member of the Italian Psychoanalytic Society, of which he was the president from 2013 to 2017; he is also a member of the International Psychoanalytic Association.
Ferro, alongside Giuseppe Civitarese, is primarily known for his development of the concept of the analytic field, for which he borrowed from the work of W.R. Bion and the Barangers. The analytic field is a response to the notion of the analytic dyad. Ferro further develops this concept by arguing that there aren't merely two persons involved in analysis. Rather, they are part of a larger, co-constructed field. He writes:
[...] field theory has a strong technical specificity of its own, in that it breaks for the first time with the idea of making the here and-now explicit in the session and of consequent transference interpretation. As a result, the relational aspect in effect becomes a stream flowing through the field; this river then widens out into a vast lake in which there is time for characters to emerge, to sink into the depths, to return to the background or to take the stage again.[1]Ferro, trained as a Kleinian, would eventually move away from its focus on the penetrating analysis of phantasy-life, since he felt it would create a persecutory environment for the analysand. Building on Bion's concept of reverie, he emphasized the analyst mind's receptivity for dreams.[2] Ferro thus establishes an intersubjective positioning of the analyst and the analysand who together explore the various dreams that permeate the consulting room.
The field is a concept taken from the work of the Barangers, two Argentinian psychoanalysts of French descent. The Barangers argued that the field "is a dynamic bi-personal configuration, including spatial, temporal and functional elements, resulting in an unconscious ‘bi-personal phantasy’."[3]
Ferro conceives of the clinical encounter as a space for exploring narratives, dreams, and stories. As part of this explorative process he proposes something he refers to as affective hologram. In each story of the analysand there's various characters that appears as such a hologram, that is to say, an emotional constellation. Levine suggests that the Field is thus home to "giant weather map, with each statement implying the possible beginning formation of a new weather disturbance."[4]
Ferro draws a distinction between two types of interpretation: saturated and unsaturated ones, with each of them impacting the transference differently. If an interpretation is to saturated, then it establishes to definite a hold on the transference and narrows down the potential meanings.[5]
Ferro has been hailed by Howard Levine as one of Bion's "most fertile, productive and creative" descendants, "the embodiment of Bion's concept [of an analyst]". Levine goes on to praise Ferro's unique contributions to contemporary psychoanalysis, a vision Levine describes as "catalytic, transformational".[6] The jury of the Sigourney Award referred to him further as "a psychoanalytic leader, making major contributions to literature, lecturing, and teaching throughout the world and building bridges between psychoanalysis and the scientific and university communities."[7]