Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada have the option of releasing reasons for a unanimous decision anonymously by simply attributing the judgment to "The Court". The practice began around 1979 by Chief Justice Bora Laskin, borrowing from the US Supreme Court practice of anonymizing certain unanimous decisions.[1] Unlike in the US, which uses it primarily for uncontroversial cases, in Canada, it is used almost always for important and controversial cases.[2]
It has been suggested that the practice has been used to give greater authority to the decision by having the entire court speak as a single voice.[3]
Peter McCormick, a professor of political science at the University of Lethbridge who studies Canada's appellate courts, calls these "Latin: per coram decisions", but his terminology is not in general use. McCormick states that there were 9 reported Latin: per coram decisions prior to Laskin's term as Chief Justice of Canada, 15 reported Latin: per coram decisions under Laskin's chief justiceship, and 51 reported Latin: per coram decisions under Brian Dickson's chief justiceship.[4]
The following is a list of anonymous decisions that are attributed to "The Court":
| width=36% | Case name ! | width=28% | Citation ! | Subject |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quebec (AG) v Blaikie (No 1) | [1979] 2 SCR 1016 | Minority language rights | ||
| Quebec (AG) v Blaikie (No 2) | [1981] 1 SCR 312 | Language of delegated legislation | ||
| Quebec (AG) v Quebec Assn of Protestant School Boards | [1984] 2 SCR 66 | Minority language education rights | ||
| Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights | [1985] 1 SCR 721 | Language rights | ||
| R v Baig | [1987] 2 SCR 537 | Right to counsel | ||
| Ford v Quebec (AG) | [1988] 2 SCR 712 | Commercial freedom of expression | ||
| Devine v Quebec (AG) | [1988] 2 SCR 790 | Freedom of expression, French language legislation | ||
| Tremblay v Daigle | [1989] 2 SCR 530 | Abortion | ||
| Reference Re Milgaard | [1992] 1 SCR 866 | Wrongful conviction - murder | ||
| Reference Re Secession of Quebec | [1998] 2 SCR 217 | Secession | ||
| Del Zotto v Canada | [1999] 1 SCR 3 | |||
| Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue) v Nolisair International Inc (Trustee of); Sécurité Saglac (1992) Inc (Trustee of) v Quebec (Deputy Minister of Revenue) | [1999] 1 SCR 759 | |||
| R v Marshall | [1999] 3 SCR 533 | Aboriginal fishing rights | ||
| Reference Re Firearms Act | [2000] 1 SCR 783 | Gun control | ||
| R v Latimer | [2001] 1 SCR 3 | Cruel and unusual punishment, mercy killings | ||
| Smith v Canada (AG) | 2001 SCC 88 | |||
| Privacy Act (Can) (Re) | 2001 SCC 89 | |||
| R v Larivière | 2001 SCC 93 | |||
| United States v Burns | 2001 SCC 7 | Extradition and execution | ||
| Suresh v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) | 2002 SCC 1 | Torture | ||
| Ahani v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) | 2002 SCC 2 | Torture | ||
| R v Powley | 2003 SCC 43 | Métis hunting rights | ||
| R v Blais | 2003 SCC 44 | Métis hunting rights | ||
| Reference Re Same-Sex Marriage | 2004 SCC 79 | Same-sex marriage | ||
| R v RGL | 2005 SCC 18 | |||
| Solski (Tutor of) v Quebec (AG) | 2005 SCC 14 | |||
| Gosselin (Tutor of) v Quebec (AG) | 2005 SCC 15 | |||
| Okwuobi v Lester B Pearson School Board | 2005 SCC 16 | |||
| Provincial Court Judges' Assn of New Brunswick v New Brunswick (Minister of Justice) | 2005 SCC 44 | Judicial independence | ||
| R v Rodrigue | 2005 SCC 67 | |||
| Forum des maires de la Péninsule acadienne v Canada (Food Inspection Agency) | 2005 SCC 85 | |||
| R v Hazout | 2006 SCC 42 | |||
| BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders | 2008 SCC 69 | Nature of the duties of corporate directors in Canadian law. | ||
| R v Ahmad | 2011 SCC 6 | Whether Parliament's decision to limit superior courts from determining questions of disclosure of information pertaining to international relations, national defence or national security invades the core jurisdiction of superior courts | ||
| Reference Re Securities Act | 2011 SCC 66 | Constitutionality of a proposed federal securities regulator. | ||
| Reference Re Broadcasting Act | 2012 SCC 4 | Whether Internet service providers are "broadcasters" when providing access to broadcasting through Internet | ||
| Momentous.ca Corp v Canadian American Association of Professional Baseball Ltd | 2012 SCC 9 | Conflict of laws | ||
| Fundy Settlement v Canada | 2012 SCC 14 | Taxation and trusts | ||
| Canada (AG) v Kane | 2012 SCC 64 | Standard of review of Public Service Staffing Tribunal decision | ||
| Construction Labour Relations v Driver Iron Inc | 2012 SCC 65 | Judicial review of Alberta Labour Relations Board decision | ||
| R v Mailhot | 2013 SCC 17 | Fairness of charge to jury. | ||
| R v Ibanescu | 2013 SCC 31 | Admissibility of straddle evidence | ||
| Reference re Senate Reform | 2014 SCC 32 | Whether Parliament can unilaterally set fixed terms for Senators — Whether Parliament can unilaterally implement framework for consultative elections for appointments to Senate — Whether Parliament can unilaterally repeal ss. 23(3) and 23(4) of Constitution Act, 1867 requiring that Senators must own land worth $4,000 in province for which they are appointed and have net worth of at least $4,000 — Whether constitutional amendment abolishing Senate may be accomplished by general amending procedure or whether unanimous consent procedure applies | ||
| Carter v Canada (AG) | 2015 SCC 5 | Physician-assisted suicide. | ||
| R v Goleski | 2015 SCC 6 | Burden of proof of proving an "excuse" under s. 794(2) of the Criminal Code | ||
| Zurich Insurance Co v Chubb Insurance Co of Canada | 2015 SCC 19 | Whether specific insurance company is an "insurer" for the purposes of Ontario statutory accident benefits scheme | ||
| Caplin v Canada (Justice) | 2015 SCC 32 | Whether Minister of Justice's surrender via extradition of an accused charged with murder was reasonable | ||
| Canada (AG) v Barnaby | 2015 SCC 31 | Whether Minister of Justice's surrender via extradition of an accused charged with murder was reasonable; Whether extraditing the accused to possibly be subjected to a fourth trial would be contrary to the principles of fundamental justice under s. 7 of the Charter | ||
| R v Smith | 2015 SCC 34 | Whether regulations limiting the lawful possession of medical marijuana to dried forms infringe the right to life, liberty and security of the prison under s. 7 of the Charter; Whether accused has standing to challenge the constitutional validity of provisions under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act | ||
| R v Cody | 2017 SCC 31 | Unreasonable delay. | ||
| R v Comeau | 2018 SCC 15 | Interprovincial Trade. | ||
| Reference re An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families | 2024 SCC 5 | Whether Parliament enacting a statute establishing national standards to protect Indigenous children and affirming Indigenous peoples’ inherent right of self‑government in relation to child and family services is ultra vires. |