Ankenbrandt v. Richards explained

Litigants:Ankenbrandt v. Richards
Decidedate:June 15
Decideyear:1992
Usvol:504
Uspage:689
Holding:Notwithstanding the traditional exception to diversity jurisdiction excluding cases between married spouses, federal courts are not required to abstain from hearing money damages suits between those spouses.
Majority:White
Joinmajority:unanimous

Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, notwithstanding the traditional exception to diversity jurisdiction excluding cases between married spouses, federal courts are not required to abstain from hearing money damages suits between those spouses.[1] [2]

Notes and References

  1. .
  2. Book: Lieberman, Jethro K. . A Practical Companion to the Constitution . 1999 . 23. Abstention Doctrine.