| Arguedate: | April 16 |
| Argueyear: | 2013 |
| Decidedate: | June 13 |
| Decideyear: | 2013 |
| Fullname: | American Trucking Associations Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, California |
| Usvol: | 569 |
| Uspage: | 641 |
| Parallelcitations: | 133 S. Ct. 2096; 186 L. Ed. 2d 177; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4539 |
| Docket: | 11-798 |
| Oralargument: | https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_11_798/argument |
| Prior: | 660 F.3d 384 (9th Cir. 2011) |
| Majority: | Kagan |
| Joinmajority: | unanimous |
| Concurrence: | Thomas |
American Trucking Ass'ns, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 569 U.S. 641 (2013), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that certain regulations imposed by City of Los Angeles on trucking companies were preempted by federal law.[1] In 2006 the Board of Harbor Commissioners for Los Angeles, California adopted an environmental protection plan that included an effort called Clean Truck Program (CTP).[2] The stated goal of the program is to "reduce negative impacts that port [trucking] inflicts on the local community."[3] The implementation of this program began in 2007 and required trucking companies to comply with various requirements relating to maintenance of trucks, employment of drivers, and trucking operations.[4] The American Trucking Associations believed some of the regulations were in violation of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) and filed suit.[5] Litigation eventually made its way up to the Supreme Court of the United States,[6] where the Court held that two of the requirements of the CTP were in violation of the FAAAA.[7]