Ambrosia beetle explained

Ambrosia beetles are beetles of the weevil subfamilies Scolytinae and Platypodinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), which live in nutritional symbiosis with ambrosia fungi. The beetles excavate tunnels in dead or stressed trees into which they introduce fungal gardens, their sole source of nutrition. After landing on a suitable tree, an ambrosia beetle excavates a tunnel in which it releases its fungal symbiont. The fungus penetrates the plant's xylem tissue, extracts nutrients from it, and concentrates the nutrients on and near the surface of the beetle gallery. Ambrosia fungi are typically poor wood degraders, and instead utilize less demanding nutrients.^[1] Symbiotic fungi produce and detoxify ethanol, which is an attractant for ambrosia beetles and likely prevents growth of antagonistic pathogens and selects for other beneficial symbionts.^[2] The majority of ambrosia beetles colonize xylem (sapwood and/or heartwood) of recently dead trees, but some colonize stressed trees that are still alive, and a few species attack healthy trees.^[3] Species differ in their preference for different parts of trees, different stages of deterioration, and in the shape of their tunnels ("galleries"). However, the majority of ambrosia beetles are not specialized to any taxonomic group of hosts, unlike most phytophagous organisms including the closely related bark beetles.One species of ambrosia beetle, Austroplatypus incompertus exhibits eusociality, one of the few organisms outside of Hymenoptera and Isoptera to do so.

Classification and diversity

Until recently ambrosia beetles have been placed in independent families Scolytidae and Platypodidae, however, they are in fact some of the most highly derived weevils, and are now placed in the subfamilies Scolytinae and Platypodinae of Family Curculionidae^{[4] [5] [6]} There are about 3,000 known beetle species employing the ambrosia strategy.^[7]

Ambrosia beetles are an ecological guild, but not a phylogenetic clade. The ambrosia habit is an example of convergent evolution, as several groups evolved the same symbiotic relationship independently.^[8] The highest diversity of ambrosia beetles is in the tropics. In the Paleotropical region, hundreds of species of Xyleborini and Platypodinae are the main agent initiating dead wood decomposition. In the Neotropics, Platypodinae and Xyleborini are joined by the scolytine tribe Cortylini. Compared to the diversity in the tropics, ambrosia beetle fauna in the temperate zone is rather limited. In the Nearctic region it is dominated by a few species from Cortylini, Xyleborini and Xyloterini. In the Palearctic realm, significant groups are Xyloterini and Xyleborini, joined by Scolytoplatypodini in the Far East.

The symbiotic relationship

Beetles and their larvae graze on mycelium exposed on the gallery walls and on bodies called sporodochia, clusters of the fungus' spores. Most ambrosia beetle species don't ingest the wood tissue; instead, the sawdust resulting from the excavation is pushed out of the gallery. Following the larval and pupal stage, adult ambrosia beetles collect masses of fungal spores into their mycangia and leave the gallery to find their own tree.

A few dozen species of ambrosia fungi have been described, currently in the genera Ambrosiella, Meredithiella, and Phialophoropsis (from Microascales), Afroraffaelea and Raffaelea (from Ophiostomatales), Ambrosiozyma (Saccharomycetales), Fusarium and Geosmithia (from Hypocreales), and Flavodon (from Basidiomycota). Many more species remain to be discovered. Little is known about the bionomy or specificity of ambrosia fungi. Ambrosia fungi are thought to be dependent on transport and inoculation provided by their beetle symbionts, as they have not been found in any other habitat. All ambrosia fungi are probably asexual and clonal.^[9] Some beetles are known to acquire ("steal") fungal inoculum from fungal gardens of other ambrosia beetle species.^[10]

Evolutionary origin

During their evolution, most scolytid and platypodid weevils became progressively more or less dependent on fungi regularly co-habiting dead trees. This evolution had various outcomes in different groups:

• Some phloem-eating bark beetles (phloeophages) are vectors of phytopathogenic fungi, which in some cases contribute to tree death.^[11] The extent to which fungal pathogenicity benefits the beetles themselves is not at all trivial and remains disputed.^[12]
• Many of phloem-feeding bark beetles use phloem-infesting fungi as an addition to their diet. Some phloeophages became dependent on such a mixed diet and evolved mycangia to transport their symbionts from maternal trees to newly infested trees.^[13] These beetles are called mycophloeophages.
• Ambrosia beetles and ambrosia fungi are thus only one end of the spectrum of the weevil-fungus association, where both the beetle and the fungus became completely dependent on each other.^[14]

Impact on forests

The vast majority of ambrosia beetles colonize dead trees, and have minor or no economic effect. A few species are able to colonize living stressed trees (Xylosandrus).^[15] A few species are able to attack live and healthy trees, and those can reach epidemic proportions in non-native, invaded regions (Xyleborus glabratus, Euwallacea fornicatus^[16]).

Beetle species that readily colonize lumber, such as sawlogs, green lumber, and stave-bolts, often cause region-specific economic loss from the pinhole and stained-wood defects caused by their brood galleries. In Northern USA and Canada, conifer logs are attractive to Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) during the spring swarming flight (Dyer 1967).^[17] Previous studies showed that short log sections become attractive more rapidly than corresponding long logs.

See also

• Laurel wilt disease
• Forest pathology
• Euwallacea fornicatus
• Xyleborus glabratus

External links

• Images and information on the Ambrosia Symbiosis at the University of Florida.
• The MSU HISL database contains a worldwide species list of Xyleborini, a major group of ambrosia beetles, from the Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae of S.L. Wood and D.E. Bright (1992)
• A USDA-sponsored information resource and key to the world genera of Xyleborini
• American Bark and Ambrosia Beetles
• More information on ambrosia beetle social behaviour and fungiculture on http://behav.zoology.unibe.ch/index.php?pp=55&p=46
• Farewell to taco topping? The effects of the Redbay ambrosia beetle and laurel wilt disease
• Ambrosia beetles on the UF / IFAS Featured Creatures Web site
  • Platypus spp., ambrosia beetles
  • Xylosandrus crassiusculus, Asian (or granulate) ambrosia beetle
  • Xylosandrus compactus, black twig borer

Bibliography

• van de Peppel . L. J. J. . Aanen . D. K. . Biedermann . P. H. W. . Low intraspecific genetic diversity indicates asexuality and vertical transmission in the fungal cultivars of ambrosia beetles . Fungal Ecology . April 2018 . 32 . 57–64 . 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.11.010 . 21.11116/0000-0003-BB62-C . free .

Notes and References

1. Kasson . Matthew T. . Wickert . Kristen L. . Stauder . Cameron M. . Macias . Angie M. . Berger . Matthew C. . Simmons . D. Rabern . Short . Dylan P. G. . DeVallance . David B. . Hulcr . Jiri . Mutualism with aggressive wood-degrading Flavodon ambrosius (Polyporales) facilitates niche expansion and communal social structure in Ambrosiophilus ambrosia beetles . Fungal Ecology . October 2016 . 23 . 86–96 . 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.07.002 . free .
2. Ranger . Christopher M. . Biedermann . Peter H. W. . Phuntumart . Vipaporn . Beligala . Gayathri U. . Ghosh . Satyaki . Palmquist . Debra E. . Mueller . Robert . Barnett . Jenny . Schultz . Peter B. . Reding . Michael E. . Benz . J. Philipp . Symbiont selection via alcohol benefits fungus farming by ambrosia beetles . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 24 April 2018 . 115 . 17 . 4447–4452 . 10.1073/pnas.1716852115 . 5924889 . 29632193 . 2018PNAS..115.4447R . free .
3. Hulcr . Jiri . Stelinski . Lukasz L. . The Ambrosia Symbiosis: From Evolutionary Ecology to Practical Management . Annual Review of Entomology . 31 January 2017 . 62 . 285–303 . 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035105 . 27860522 . free .
4. Kuschel . Guillermo . Leschen . Richard A. B. . Zimmerman . Elwood C. . Platypodidae under scrutiny . Invertebrate Systematics . 2000 . 14 . 6 . 771–805 . 10.1071/IT00024 .
5. Marvaldi . Adriana E. . Sequeira . Andrea S. . O'Brien . Charles W. . Farrell . Brian D. . Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetics of Weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea): Do Niche Shifts Accompany Diversification? . Systematic Biology . September 2002 . 51 . 5 . 761–785 . 10.1080/10635150290102465 . 12396590 . free .
6. McKenna . Duane D. . Sequeira . Andrea S. . Marvaldi . Adriana E. . Farrell . Brian D. . Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 28 April 2009 . 106 . 17 . 7083–7088 . 10.1073/pnas.0810618106 . 19365072 . 2678426 . 2009PNAS..106.7083M . free .
7. Book: 10.1016/B978-0-12-417156-5.00002-2 . Morphology, Taxonomy, and Phylogenetics of Bark Beetles . Bark Beetles . 2015 . Hulcr . Jiri . Atkinson . Thomas H. . Cognato . Anthony I. . Jordal . Bjarte H. . McKenna . Duane D. . 41–84 . 978-0-12-417156-5 .
8. Farrell . Brian D. . Sequeira . Andrea S. . O'Meara . Brian C. . Normark . Benjamin B. . Chung . Jeffrey H. . Jordal . Bjarte H. . The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) . Evolution . October 2001 . 55 . 10 . 2011–2027 . 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01318.x . 11761062 . 26352287 .
9. Book: Malloch . D . Blackwell . M . Dispersal biology of ophiostomatoid fungi . 195–206 . Wingfield . Michael J. . Seifert . Keith A. . Webber . Joan F. . Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathogenicity . 1993 . American Phytopathological Society . 978-0-89054-156-2 .
10. Hulcr . Jiri . Cognato . Anthony I. . Repeated evolution of crop theft in fungus‐farming ambrosia beetles . Evolution . November 2010 . 64 . 11 . 3205–3212 . 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01055.x . 20633043 . 11844858 . free .
11. Paine . T. D. . Raffa . K. F. . Harrington . T. C. . Interactions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers . Annual Review of Entomology . January 1997 . 42 . 1 . 179–206 . 10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.179 . 15012312 .
12. Six . Diana L. . Wingfield . Michael J. . The Role of Phytopathogenicity in Bark Beetle–Fungus Symbioses: A Challenge to the Classic Paradigm . Annual Review of Entomology . 7 January 2011 . 56 . 1 . 255–272 . 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144839 . 20822444 . 2263/15796 . free .
13. Klepzig . Kier D. . Six . D. L. . Bark Beetle-Fungal Symbiosis: Context Dependency in Complex Associations . Symbiosis . 2004 . 37 . 189–2005 .
14. Book: Beaver . R. A. . Insect-Fungus Relationship in the Bark and Ambrosia Beetles . 121–143 . https://books.google.com/books?id=DwO5_3N7sSAC&pg=PA121 . Meurant . Gerard . Insect-Fungus Interactions . 2012 . Academic Press . 978-0-08-098453-7 .
15. Ranger . Christopher M. . Reding . Michael E. . Persad . Anand B. . Herms . Daniel A. . Ability of stress-related volatiles to attract and induce attacks by Xylosandrus germanus and other ambrosia beetles . Agricultural and Forest Entomology . May 2010 . 12 . 2 . 177–185 . 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2009.00469.x . 54556122 . free .
16. Hulcr . Jiri . Black . Adam . Prior . Kirsten . Chen . Chi-Yu . Li . Hou-Feng . Studies of Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Their Native Ranges Help Predict Invasion Impact . Florida Entomologist . June 2017 . 100 . 2 . 257–261 . 10.1653/024.100.0219 . 67808629 . free .
17. Dyer . E. D. A. . Relation of attack by ambrosia beetle (Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.)) to felling date of spruce in central British Columbia . Bi-monthly Research Notes . 1967 . 23 . 2 . 11 .