| Litigants: | Amadeo v. Zant |
| Decidedate: | May 31 |
| Decideyear: | 1988 |
| Fullname: | Amadeo v. Zant |
| Usvol: | 486 |
| Uspage: | 214 |
| Holding: | A convicted person may use habeas corpus to challenge their conviction if they later learn that the prosecution racially discriminated in jury selection. |
| Majority: | Marshall |
| Joinmajority: | unanimous |
Amadeo v. Zant, 486 U.S. 214 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a convicted person may use habeas corpus to challenge their conviction if they later learn that the prosecution racially discriminated in jury selection.[1]