Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012 Explained

Short Title:Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012
Type:Act
Parliament:Scottish Parliament
Long Title:An Act of the Scottish Parliament to make provision about the price at which alcohol may be sold from licensed premises; and for connected purposes.
Year:2012
Introduced By:Nicola Sturgeon MSP
Territorial Extent:Scotland
Royal Assent:29 June 2012
Commencement:1 May 2018
Status:Current
Original Text:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2012/4/enacted
Revised Text:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2012/4

The Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012 is an Act of the Scottish Parliament, which introduces a statutory minimum price for alcohol, initially 50p per unit, as an element in the programme to counter alcohol problems.

The Act was passed with the support of the Scottish National Party, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens. The opposition, Scottish Labour, refused to support the legislation because the Act failed to claw back an estimated £125m windfall profit from alcohol retailers.[1] The Labour MSP Malcolm Chisholm, the former Minister for Health and Community Care, disobeyed his party's whip and supported the government.

Legal challenge

A legal challenge to the minimum pricing legislation failed at the Court of Session. The Scotch Whisky Association, the Confédération Européenne des Producteurs de Spiritueux and the Comité Européen des Entreprises Vins appealed the judgement. The act was delayed, with a legal challenge by the Scotch Whisky Association being referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union by the Court of Session.[2]

The decision of the court, delivered in December 2015, was that such legislation would only be lawful if alternative policies such as higher taxes would not be effective in protecting public health. Scottish judges would be required to consider evidence on this point.[3] [4]

On 15 November 2017, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom unanimously rejected the Scotch Whisky Association's case, ending the legal battle, arguing that minimum pricing was a "proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim".[5]

The act came into effect on 1 May 2018.[6]

Effects

Research by Newcastle University published in May 2021 found that alcohol sales dropped by 7.7% in Scotland following the introduction of a minimum price, when compared to north-east England.[7]

A study published in 2021 found reductions in overall purchases of alcohol, largely restricted to households that bought the most alcohol, which continued into 2020.[8] A study carried out by Public Health Scotland, and the University of Glasgow, found that the implementation of alcohol minimum unit pricing in Scotland led to a 13.4% reduction in deaths from alcohol-specific causes.[9]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Scottish minimum alcohol pricing passed by parliament. BBC Scotland. 16 May 2013. Glasgow. 24 May 2012.
  2. Web site: 30 April 2014. 30 April 2014. BBC News Online. Minimum alcohol policy referred to European court.
  3. News: Court sets conditions on Scotland's minimum alcohol price. 23 December 2015. Financial Times. 23 December 2015.
  4. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=173249&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=621855. Scotch Whisky Association and Others v The Lord Advocate and The Advocate General for Scotland. ECLI:EU:C:2015:845. 23 December 2015. 2016-07-27. ECJ.
  5. Web site: Supreme Court backs Scottish minimum alcohol pricing. BBC News Online. 2017-11-15. 2017-11-15.
  6. News: Scotland calls time on cheap booze. 2018-05-01. BBC News. 2020-04-05. en-GB.
  7. Web site: Minimum unit alcohol price has 'lasting impact' . BBC News . 6 June 2021 . 2021-05-29.
  8. Impact of minimum unit pricing on alcohol purchases in Scotland and Wales: controlled interrupted time series analyses . Lancet Public Health . 1 August 2021 . 6 September 2021.
  9. Evaluating the impact of alcohol minimum unit pricing on deaths and hospitalisations in Scotland: a controlled interrupted time series study . Lancet . 20 March 2023 . 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00497-X . 21 March 2023 . Wyper . Grant M A. . MacKay . Daniel F. . Fraser . Catriona . Lewsey . Jim . Robinson . Mark . Beeston . Clare . Giles . Lucie . 401 . 10385 . 1361–1370 . 36963415 . 10154457 .