Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board explained

Litigants:Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board
Arguedate:October 18
Argueyear:1965
Decidedate:November 15
Decideyear:1965
Fullname:Albertson, et al. v. Subversive Activities Control Board
Usvol:382
Uspage:70
Parallelcitations:86 S. Ct. 194; 15 L. Ed. 2d 165; 1965 U.S. LEXIS 263
Holding:Persons believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the SACB because that would violate their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment.
Majority:Brennan
Joinmajority:Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Stewart, Fortas
Concurrence:Black
Concurrence2:Clark
Notparticipating:White
Lawsapplied:U.S. Const. amend. V

Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 382 U.S. 70 (1965), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on November 15, 1965, that persons (in this case, William Albertson) believed to be members of the Communist Party of the United States of America could not be required to register as party members with the Subversive Activities Control Board because the information which party members were required to submit could form the basis of their prosecution for being party members, which is a crime, and therefore deprived them of their self-incrimination rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

See also