Ada (programming language) explained

Ada
Logo Alt:Green logo on horizon with Ada letters and slogan
Paradigm:Multi-paradigm

structured, imperative, object-oriented, aspect-oriented,[1] concurrent, array, distributed, generic, procedural, meta

Family:Pascal
Designers:
  • MIL-STD-1815, Ada 83: Jean Ichbiah
  • Ada 95: Tucker Taft
  • Ada 2005: Tucker Taft
  • Ada 2012: Tucker Taft
Typing:static, strong, safe, nominal
Implementations:AdaCore GNAT,[2]
Green Hills Software Optimising Ada 95 compiler,
PTC ApexAda and ObjectAda,[3]
MapuSoft Ada-C/C++ changer,[4] formerly known as "AdaMagic with C Intermediate",[5]
DDC-I Score
Dialects:SPARK, Ravenscar profile
Influenced:C++, Chapel,[6] Drago,[7] D, Eiffel, Griffin,[8] Java, Nim, ParaSail, PL/SQL, PL/pgSQL, Python, Ruby, Seed7, SPARforte,[9] Sparkel, SQL/PSM, VHDL
Latest Release Version:Ada 2022
Latest Release Date:May 2023
Influenced By:ALGOL 68, Pascal, Simula 67,[10] C++ (Ada 95), Smalltalk (Ada 95), Modula-2 (Ada 95) Java (Ada 2005), Eiffel (Ada 2012)
Operating System:Multi- or cross-platform
File Ext:.adb, .ads
Wikibooks:Ada Programming

Ada is a structured, statically typed, imperative, and object-oriented high-level programming language, inspired by Pascal and other languages. It has built-in language support for design by contract (DbC), extremely strong typing, explicit concurrency, tasks, synchronous message passing, protected objects, and non-determinism. Ada improves code safety and maintainability by using the compiler to find errors in favor of runtime errors. Ada is an international technical standard, jointly defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)., the standard, called Ada 2022 informally, is ISO/IEC 8652:2023.[11]

Ada was originally designed by a team led by French computer scientist Jean Ichbiah of Honeywell under contract to the United States Department of Defense (DoD) from 1977 to 1983 to supersede over 450 programming languages used by the DoD at that time.[12] Ada was named after Ada Lovelace (1815–1852), who has been credited as the first computer programmer.[13]

Features

Ada was originally designed for embedded and real-time systems. The Ada 95 revision, designed by S. Tucker Taft of Intermetrics between 1992 and 1995, improved support for systems, numerical, financial, and object-oriented programming (OOP).

Features of Ada include: strong typing, modular programming mechanisms (packages), run-time checking, parallel processing (tasks, synchronous message passing, protected objects, and nondeterministic select statements), exception handling, and generics. Ada 95 added support for object-oriented programming, including dynamic dispatch.

The syntax of Ada minimizes choices of ways to perform basic operations, and prefers English keywords (such as "or else" and "and then") to symbols (such as "||" and "&&"). Ada uses the basic arithmetical operators "+", "-", "*", and "/", but avoids using other symbols. Code blocks are delimited by words such as "declare", "begin", and "end", where the "end" (in most cases) is followed by the identifier of the block it closes (e.g., if ... end if, loop ... end loop). In the case of conditional blocks this avoids a dangling else that could pair with the wrong nested if-expression in other languages like C or Java.

Ada is designed for developing very large software systems. Ada packages can be compiled separately. Ada package specifications (the package interface) can also be compiled separately without the implementation to check for consistency. This makes it possible to detect problems early during the design phase, before implementation starts.

A large number of compile-time checks are supported to help avoid bugs that would not be detectable until run-time in some other languages or would require explicit checks to be added to the source code. For example, the syntax requires explicitly named closing of blocks to prevent errors due to mismatched end tokens. The adherence to strong typing allows detecting many common software errors (wrong parameters, range violations, invalid references, mismatched types, etc.) either during compile-time, or otherwise during run-time. As concurrency is part of the language specification, the compiler can in some cases detect potential deadlocks.[14] Compilers also commonly check for misspelled identifiers, visibility of packages, redundant declarations, etc. and can provide warnings and useful suggestions on how to fix the error.

Ada also supports run-time checks to protect against access to unallocated memory, buffer overflow errors, range violations, off-by-one errors, array access errors, and other detectable bugs. These checks can be disabled in the interest of runtime efficiency, but can often be compiled efficiently. It also includes facilities to help program verification. For these reasons, Ada is sometimes used in critical systems, where any anomaly might lead to very serious consequences, e.g., accidental death, injury or severe financial loss. Examples of systems where Ada is used include avionics, air traffic control, railways, banking, military and space technology.[15] [16]

Ada's dynamic memory management is high-level and type-safe. Ada has no generic or untyped pointers; nor does it implicitly declare any pointer type. Instead, all dynamic memory allocation and deallocation must occur via explicitly declared access types. Each access type has an associated storage pool that handles the low-level details of memory management; the programmer can either use the default storage pool or define new ones (this is particularly relevant for Non-Uniform Memory Access). It is even possible to declare several different access types that all designate the same type but use different storage pools. Also, the language provides for accessibility checks, both at compile time and at run time, that ensures that an access value cannot outlive the type of the object it points to.[17]

Though the semantics of the language allow automatic garbage collection of inaccessible objects, most implementations do not support it by default, as it would cause unpredictable behaviour in real-time systems. Ada does support a limited form of region-based memory management; also, creative use of storage pools can provide for a limited form of automatic garbage collection, since destroying a storage pool also destroys all the objects in the pool.

A double-dash ("--"), resembling an em dash, denotes comment text. Comments stop at end of line; there is intentionally no way to make a comment span multiple lines, to prevent unclosed comments from accidentally voiding whole sections of source code. Disabling a whole block of code therefore requires the prefixing of each line (or column) individually with "--". While this clearly denotes disabled code by creating a column of repeated "--" down the page, it also renders the experimental dis/re-enablement of large blocks a more drawn-out process in editors without block commenting support.

The semicolon (";") is a statement terminator, and the null or no-operation statement is null;. A single ; without a statement to terminate is not allowed.

Unlike most ISO standards, the Ada language definition (known as the Ada Reference Manual or ARM, or sometimes the Language Reference Manual or LRM) is free content. Thus, it is a common reference for Ada programmers, not only programmers implementing Ada compilers. Apart from the reference manual, there is also an extensive rationale document which explains the language design and the use of various language constructs. This document is also widely used by programmers. When the language was revised, a new rationale document was written.

One notable free software tool that is used by many Ada programmers to aid them in writing Ada source code is the GNAT Programming Studio, and GNAT which is part of the GNU Compiler Collection.

History

In the 1970s the US Department of Defense (DoD) became concerned by the number of different programming languages being used for its embedded computer system projects, many of which were obsolete or hardware-dependent, and none of which supported safe modular programming. In 1975, a working group, the High Order Language Working Group (HOLWG), was formed with the intent to reduce this number by finding or creating a programming language generally suitable for the department's and the UK Ministry of Defence's requirements. After many iterations beginning with an original straw-man proposal[18] the eventual programming language was named Ada. The total number of high-level programming languages in use for such projects fell from over 450 in 1983 to 37 by 1996.

HOLWG crafted the Steelman language requirements, a series of documents stating the requirements they felt a programming language should satisfy. Many existing languages were formally reviewed, but the team concluded in 1977 that no existing language met the specifications.Requests for proposals for a new programming language were issued and four contractors were hired to develop their proposals under the names of Red (Intermetrics led by Benjamin Brosgol), Green (Honeywell, led by Jean Ichbiah), Blue (SofTech, led by John Goodenough)[19] and Yellow (SRI International, led by Jay Spitzen). In April 1978, after public scrutiny, the Red and Green proposals passed to the next phase. In May 1979, the Green proposal, designed by Jean Ichbiah at Honeywell, was chosen and given the name Ada—after Augusta Ada King, Countess of Lovelace, usually known as Ada Lovelace. This proposal was influenced by the language LIS that Ichbiah and his group had developed in the 1970s. The preliminary Ada reference manual was published in ACM SIGPLAN Notices in June 1979. The Military Standard reference manual was approved on December 10, 1980 (Ada Lovelace's birthday), and given the number MIL-STD-1815 in honor of Ada Lovelace's birth year. In 1981, Tony Hoare took advantage of his Turing Award speech to criticize Ada for being overly complex and hence unreliable,[20] but subsequently seemed to recant in the foreword he wrote for an Ada textbook.[21]

Ada attracted much attention from the programming community as a whole during its early days. Its backers and others predicted that it might become a dominant language for general purpose programming and not only defense-related work. Ichbiah publicly stated that within ten years, only two programming languages would remain: Ada and Lisp.[22] Early Ada compilers struggled to implement the large, complex language, and both compile-time and run-time performance tended to be slow and tools primitive. Compiler vendors expended most of their efforts in passing the massive, language-conformance-testing, government-required Ada Compiler Validation Capability (ACVC) validation suite that was required in another novel feature of the Ada language effort. The Jargon File, a dictionary of computer hacker slang originating in 1975–1983, notes in an entry on Ada that "it is precisely what one might expect given that kind of endorsement by fiat; designed by committee...difficult to use, and overall a disastrous, multi-billion-dollar boondoggle...Ada Lovelace...would almost certainly blanch at the use her name has been latterly put to; the kindest thing that has been said about it is that there is probably a good small language screaming to get out from inside its vast, elephantine bulk."[23]

The first validated Ada implementation was the NYU Ada/Ed translator,[24] certified on April 11, 1983. NYU Ada/Ed is implemented in the high-level set language SETL.[25] Several commercial companies began offering Ada compilers and associated development tools, including Alsys, TeleSoft, DDC-I, Advanced Computer Techniques, Tartan Laboratories, Irvine Compiler, TLD Systems, and Verdix.[26] Computer manufacturers who had a significant business in the defense, aerospace, or related industries, also offered Ada compilers and tools on their platforms; these included Concurrent Computer Corporation, Cray Research, Inc., Digital Equipment Corporation, Harris Computer Systems, and Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG.[26]

In 1991, the US Department of Defense began to require the use of Ada (the Ada mandate) for all software,[27] though exceptions to this rule were often granted. The Department of Defense Ada mandate was effectively removed in 1997, as the DoD began to embrace commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) technology.[28] Similar requirements existed in other NATO countries: Ada was required for NATO systems involving command and control and other functions, and Ada was the mandated or preferred language for defense-related applications in countries such as Sweden, Germany, and Canada.[29]

By the late 1980s and early 1990s, Ada compilers had improved in performance, but there were still barriers to fully exploiting Ada's abilities, including a tasking model that was different from what most real-time programmers were used to.

Because of Ada's safety-critical support features, it is now used not only for military applications, but also in commercial projects where a software bug can have severe consequences, e.g., avionics and air traffic control, commercial rockets such as the Ariane 4 and 5, satellites and other space systems, railway transport and banking.For example, the Primary Flight Control System, the fly-by-wire system software in the Boeing 777, was written in Ada, as were the fly-by-wire systems for the aerodynamically unstable Eurofighter Typhoon,[30] Saab Gripen,[31] Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor and the DFCS replacement flight control system for the Grumman F-14 Tomcat. The Canadian Automated Air Traffic System was written in 1 million lines of Ada (SLOC count). It featured advanced distributed processing, a distributed Ada database, and object-oriented design. Ada is also used in other air traffic systems, e.g., the UK's next-generation Interim Future Area Control Tools Support air traffic control system is designed and implemented using SPARK Ada.[32] It is also used in the French TVM in-cab signalling system on the TGV high-speed rail system, and the metro suburban trains in Paris, London, Hong Kong and New York City.[33]

Standardization

Timeline of Ada language
YearInformal nameANSI Standard ISO/IEC Standard
1980AdaMIL-STD 1815
1983Ada 83/87MIL-STD 1815A8652:1987
1995Ada 958652:1995
2007Ada 20058652:1995/Amd 1:2007
2012Ada 20128652:2012
2023Ada 20228652:2023

Preliminary Ada can be found in ACM Sigplan Notices Vol 14, No 6, June 1979[34]

Ada was first published in 1980 as an ANSI standard ANSI/MIL-STD 1815. As this very first version held many errors and inconsistencies, the revised edition was published in 1983 as ANSI/MIL-STD 1815A. Without any further changes, it became an ISO standard in 1987.[35] This version of the language is commonly known as Ada 83, from the date of its adoption by ANSI, but is sometimes referred to also as Ada 87, from the date of its adoption by ISO.[36] There is also a French translation; DIN translated it into German as DIN 66268 in 1988.

Ada 95, the joint ISO/IEC/ANSI standard ISO/IEC 8652:1995[37] [38] was published in February 1995, making it the first ISO standard object-oriented programming language. To help with the standard revision and future acceptance, the US Air Force funded the development of the GNAT Compiler. Presently, the GNAT Compiler is part of the GNU Compiler Collection.

Work has continued on improving and updating the technical content of the Ada language. A Technical Corrigendum to Ada 95 was published in October 2001,[39] [40] and a major Amendment, ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Amd 1:2007 [41] [42] was published on March 9, 2007, commonly known as Ada 2005 because work on the new standard was finished that year.

At the Ada-Europe 2012 conference in Stockholm, the Ada Resource Association (ARA) and Ada-Europe announced the completion of the design of the latest version of the Ada language and the submission of the reference manual to the ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22/WG 9 of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) for approval. ISO/IEC 8652:2012[43] (see Ada 2012 RM) was published in December 2012, known as Ada 2012. A technical corrigendum, ISO/IEC 8652:2012/COR 1:2016, was published [44] (see RM 2012 with TC 1).

On May 2, 2023, the Ada community saw the formal approval of publication of the Ada 2022 edition of the programming language standard.[11]

Despite the names Ada 83, 95 etc., legally there is only one Ada standard, the one of the last ISO/IEC standard: with the acceptance of a new standard version, the previous one becomes withdrawn. The other names are just informal ones referencing a certain edition.

Other related standards include ISO/IEC 8651-3:1988 Information processing systems—Computer graphics—Graphical Kernel System (GKS) language bindings—Part 3: Ada.

Language constructs

Ada is an ALGOL-like programming language featuring control structures with reserved words such as if, then, else, while, for, and so on. However, Ada also has many data structuring facilities and other abstractions which were not included in the original ALGOL 60, such as type definitions, records, pointers, enumerations. Such constructs were in part inherited from or inspired by Pascal.

"Hello, world!" in Ada

A common example of a language's syntax is the Hello world program:(hello.adb)with Ada.Text_IO;procedure Hello isbegin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Hello, world!");end Hello;This program can be compiled by using the freely available open source compiler GNAT, by executinggnatmake hello.adb

Data types

Ada's type system is not based on a set of predefined primitive types but allows users to declare their own types. This declaration in turn is not based on the internal representation of the type but on describing the goal which should be achieved. This allows the compiler to determine a suitable memory size for the type, and to check for violations of the type definition at compile time and run time (i.e., range violations, buffer overruns, type consistency, etc.). Ada supports numerical types defined by a range, modulo types, aggregate types (records and arrays), and enumeration types. Access types define a reference to an instance of a specified type; untyped pointers are not permitted.Special types provided by the language are task types and protected types.

For example, a date might be represented as:

type Day_type is range 1 .. 31;type Month_type is range 1 .. 12;type Year_type is range 1800 .. 2100;type Hours is mod 24;type Weekday is (Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday);

type Date is record Day : Day_type; Month : Month_type; Year : Year_type; end record;

Important to note: Day_type, Month_type, Year_type, Hours are incompatible types, meaning that for instance the following expression is illegal:

Today: Day_type := 4;Current_Month: Month_type := 10;... Today + Current_Month ... -- illegal

The predefined plus-operator can only add values of the same type, so the expression is illegal.

Types can be refined by declaring subtypes:

subtype Working_Hours is Hours range 0 .. 12; -- at most 12 Hours to work a daysubtype Working_Day is Weekday range Monday .. Friday; -- Days to work

Work_Load: constant array(Working_Day) of Working_Hours -- implicit type declaration := (Friday => 6, Monday => 4, others => 10); -- lookup table for working hours with initialization

Types can have modifiers such as limited, abstract, private etc. Private types do not show their inner structure; objects of limited types cannot be copied.[45] Ada 95 adds further features for object-oriented extension of types.

Control structures

Ada is a structured programming language, meaning that the flow of control is structured into standard statements. All standard constructs and deep-level early exit are supported, so the use of the also supported "go to" commands is seldom needed.

-- while a is not equal to b, loop.while a /= b loop Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Waiting");end loop;

if a > b then Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Condition met");else Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("Condition not met");end if;

for i in 1 .. 10 loop Ada.Text_IO.Put ("Iteration: "); Ada.Text_IO.Put (i); Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line;end loop;

loop a := a + 1; exit when a = 10;end loop;

case i is when 0 => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("zero"); when 1 => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("one"); when 2 => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("two"); -- case statements have to cover all possible cases: when others => Ada.Text_IO.Put ("none of the above");end case;

for aWeekday in Weekday'Range loop -- loop over an enumeration Put_Line (Weekday'Image(aWeekday)); -- output string representation of an enumeration if aWeekday in Working_Day then -- check of a subtype of an enumeration Put_Line (" to work for " & Working_Hours'Image (Work_Load(aWeekday))); -- access into a lookup table end if;end loop;

Packages, procedures and functions

Among the parts of an Ada program are packages, procedures and functions.

Functions differ from procedures in that they must return a value. Function calls cannot be used "as a statement", and their result must be assigned to a variable. However, since Ada 2012, functions are not required to be pure and may mutate their suitably declared parameters or the global state.[46]

Example:Package specification (example.ads)package Example is type Number is range 1 .. 11; procedure Print_and_Increment (j: in out Number);end Example;Package body (example.adb)with Ada.Text_IO;package body Example is

i : Number := Number'First;

procedure Print_and_Increment (j: in out Number) is

function Next (k: in Number) return Number is begin return k + 1; end Next;

begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line ("The total is: " & Number'Image(j)); j := Next (j); end Print_and_Increment;

-- package initialization executed when the package is elaboratedbegin while i < Number'Last loop Print_and_Increment (i); end loop;end Example;This program can be compiled, e.g., by using the freely available open-source compiler GNAT, by executinggnatmake -z example.adb

Packages, procedures and functions can nest to any depth, and each can also be the logical outermost block.

Each package, procedure or function can have its own declarations of constants, types, variables, and other procedures, functions and packages, which can be declared in any order.

Pragmas

A pragma is a compiler directive that conveys information to the compiler to allow specific manipulating of compiled output.[47] Certain pragmas are built into the language,[48] while others are implementation-specific.

Examples of common usage of compiler pragmas would be to disable certain features, such as run-time type checking or array subscript boundary checking, or to instruct the compiler to insert object code instead of a function call (as C/C++ does with inline functions).

Generics

See also

References

International standards

Rationale

These documents have been published in various forms, including print.

Books

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Ada2012 Rationale. adacore.com. 5 May 2018. live. https://web.archive.org/web/20160418132340/http://www.adacore.com/uploads/technical-papers/Ada2012_Rational_Introducion.pdf. 18 April 2016.
  2. Web site: Commercial software solutions for Ada, C and C++. AdaCore. Apr 4, 2023.
  3. Web site: PTC ObjectAda . PTC.com . 2014-01-27.
  4. Web site: MapuSoft Ada-C/C++ changer. 16 April 2019.
  5. Web site: Ada 95 Certified Processors List - Details. ada-auth.org. Apr 4, 2023.
  6. Web site: Chapel spec (Acknowledgements). https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://chapel.cray.com/spec/spec-0.98.pdf . 2022-10-09 . live. 2015-10-01. 2016-01-14. Cray Inc.
  7. Web site: Drago. 2018-08-06. 2020-09-14. https://web.archive.org/web/20200914212150/http://www.iuma.ulpgc.es/users/gsd/Drago/. dead.
  8. Web site: The Griffin Project. cs.nyu.edu. Apr 4, 2023.
  9. Web site: SparForte Programming Language. www.sparforte.com. Apr 4, 2023.
  10. Ada Rationale, 1986, pp. 23, 70, 110–114, 137, 165, 236
  11. Luis Miguel . Pinho . From the Editor's Desk . Ada Letters . XLIII . 1 . Association for Computing Machinery . June 2023 . 3 . 10.1145/3631483 . 31 January 2024 .
  12. Web site: The Ada Programming Language. University of Mich. 27 May 2016. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20160522063844/http://groups.engin.umd.umich.edu/CIS/course.des/cis400/ada/ada.html. 2016-05-22.
  13. 10.1109/MAHC.2003.1253887. Lovelace & Babbage and the creation of the 1843 'notes'. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing. 25. 4. 16–26. 2003. Fuegi. J. Francis. J. 40077111.
  14. Web site: Concurrency - Chapter 6 - Ada 95 QUALITY AND STYLE Guide. adaic.org. November 5, 2021.
  15. Web site: Ada helps churn out less-buggy code. Government Computer News. 2010-09-14. Taft. S. Tucker. Olsen. Florence. 2–3. 1999-06-30. 2015-08-31. https://web.archive.org/web/20150831211902/http://gcn.com/Articles/1999/06/30/Ada-helps-churn-out-lessbuggy-code.aspx. dead.
  16. Web site: Feldman . Michael . Who's Using Ada? Real-World Projects Powered by the Ada Programming Language November 2014 . SIGAda Education Working Group.
  17. https://youtube.com/watch?v=RyY01fRyGhM&t=419 no safe dynamic memory management in ADA
  18. Web site: DoD - Strawman Requirements - April 1975. iment.com. Apr 4, 2023.
  19. Web site: John Goodenough | SEI Staff Profile . Sei.cmu.edu . 2014-01-27.
  20. C.A.R. . Hoare . Tony Hoare . 1981 . The Emperor's Old Clothes . live . Communications of the ACM . . 24 . 2 . 75–83 . 10.1145/358549.358561 . 97895 . https://web.archive.org/web/20160304012013/http://zoo.cs.yale.edu/classes/cs422/2011/bib/hoare81emperor.pdf . 2016-03-04 . free.
  21. Book: Watt . D.A. . Wichmann . B.A. . Findlay . W. . Ada: Language and Methodology . Prentice-Hall . 1987.
  22. Rosen . J-P. . The Ada Paradox(es) . Ada Letters . ACM SIGAda . 24 . 2 . August 2009 . 28–35. 10.1145/1620593.1620597 . 608405 .
  23. Web site: THIS IS THE JARGON FILE, VERSION 2.6.2 . TXT . 1991-02-14 . 2023-01-31 .
  24. Web site: Ada Compiler Validation Summary Report: NYU Ada/ED, Version 19.7 V-001 . SofTech Inc. . Waltham, MA . 1983-04-11 . 2010-12-16 . https://web.archive.org/web/20120312080046/http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA136759 . 2012-03-12 . dead.
  25. Book: Dewar . Robert B. K. . Fisher . Gerald A. Jr. . Schonberg . Edmond . Froelich . Robert . Bryant . Stephen . Goss . Clinton F. . Burke . Michael . Proceeding of the ACM-SIGPLAN symposium on Ada programming language - SIGPLAN '80 . The NYU Ada translator and interpreter . 15 . 11 . 194–201 . November 1980 . 0-89791-030-3 . 10.1145/948632.948659. 10586359 .
  26. News: Ada Validated Compilers List . Ada Information Clearinghouse . July 1, 1992 . 1–36.
  27. Web site: The Congressional Ada Mandate . Ada Information Clearinghouse . 1983-04-11 . 2015-06-07 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160304073005/http://archive.adaic.com/pol-hist/policy/mandate.txt . 2016-03-04.
  28. The rise, fall and persistence of Ada . Ricky E. . Sward . November 2010 . SIGAda '10: Proceedings of the ACM SIGAda annual international conference on SIGAda . 71–74 . 10.1145/1879063.1879081. 978-1-4503-0027-8 .
  29. Book: Babiak, Nicholas J. . Ada, the New DoD Weapon System Computer Language – Panacea or Calamity . https://web.archive.org/web/20191215065214/http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a217657.pdf . live . December 15, 2019 . . 1989 . 39–40.
  30. Web site: 16 June 1999 . Agile thinking . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20210415054346/https://www.flightglobal.com/agile-thinking/26933.article . 15 April 2021 . 13 Feb 2024 . FlightGlobal.
  31. Web site: Frisberg . Bo . Usage of Ada in the Gripen Flight Control System . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20240115002036/https://www.sigada.org/conf/sa98/papers/frisberg.pdf . 15 Jan 2024 . 13 Feb 2024 . The Special Interest Group on Ada.
  32. Web site: AdaCore. GNAT Pro Chosen for UK's Next Generation ATC System. 2011-03-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20101224163518/http://www.adacore.com/2007/06/19/adacore-gnat-pro-chosen-for-uk-next-generation/. 2010-12-24. dead.
  33. Web site: AdaCore. Look Who's Using Ada. 2011-03-01. https://web.archive.org/web/20101224102110/http://www.adacore.com/home/ada_answers/lookwho. 2010-12-24. dead.
  34. Web site: ACM Sigplan Notices . 14 . 6 . June 1979. 1–145 . 10.1145/956650.956651 . Ichbiah . J. D. .
  35. Web site: 2013-02-21 . ISO 8652:1987 . 2024-01-19 . ISO . en.
  36. Web site: Ada 83 LRM, Front Page . 2024-01-19 . archive.adaic.com.
  37. Web site: ISO/IEC 8652:1995 . 2024-01-19 . ISO . en.
  38. Web site: Ada 95 Language Reference Manual (original) - Ada Resource Association . 2024-01-19 . www.adaic.org.
  39. https://www.iso.org/standard/35451.html ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Corr 1:2001
  40. http://www.adaic.org/standards/95lrm/html/RM-TTL.html Ada 95 RM with TC 1
  41. Web site: ISO/IEC 8652:1995/Amd 1:2007 . 2024-01-19 . ISO . en.
  42. Web site: Ada Reference Manual, ISO/IEC 8652:2007(E) Ed. 3 . 2024-01-19 . www.adaic.org.
  43. Web site: 2013-03-28 . ISO/IEC 8652:2012 . 2024-01-19 . ISO . en.
  44. Web site: ISO/IEC 8652:2012/Cor 1:2016 . 2024-01-19 . ISO . en.
  45. Web site: Ada Syntax Card . 28 February 2011 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20110706133825/http://www.digilife.be/quickreferences/QRC/Ada%20Syntax%20Card.pdf . 6 July 2011.
  46. Web site: Subprograms . learn.adacore.com . AdaCore . 14 April 2024.
  47. Web site: Ada 83 LRM, Sec 2.8: Pragmas . Archive.adaic.com . 2014-01-27.
  48. Web site: Ada 83 LRM, Appendix/Annex B: Predefined Language Pragmas . Archive.adaic.com . 2014-01-27 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20120206005541/http://archive.adaic.com/standards/83lrm/html/lrm-B.html . 2012-02-06.