8.8 cm Pak 43 | |
Origin: | Germany |
Type: | Anti-tank gun |
Is Artillery: | yes |
Service: | 1943–1945 |
Used By: | Nazi Germany |
Wars: | World War II |
Designer: | Krupp |
Manufacturer: | Krupp Rheinmetall-Borsig Henschel & Son |
Production Date: | 1943–1945 |
Number: | ~2,100 |
Unit Cost: | 26,000 RM |
Variants: | Pak 43 Pak 43/41 KwK 43 |
Weight: | Pak 43 |
Part Length: | bore (71 calibres) Pak 43 |
Crew: | 6+ |
Cartridge: | 88 × 822mm R[1] |
Cartridge Weight: | Armor-piercing composite rigid (APCR) Pzgr 40/43 |
Rate: | 6–10 rounds per minute |
Velocity: | Pzgr 40/43 |
Max Range: | Pak 43 |
Breech: | Semi-automatic vertical sliding-block |
Recoil: | Hydro-pneumatic |
Carriage: | Cruciform mount Pak 43 Split trail Pak 43/41 |
Elevation: | -8° to +40° Pak 43 -5° to +38° Pak 43/41 |
Traverse: | 360° Pak 43 56° Pak 43/41 |
The Pak 43 (Panzerabwehrkanone 43 and Panzerjägerkanone 43[2] [3] [4]) was a German 8.8 cm anti-tank gun developed by Krupp in competition with the Rheinmetall 8.8 cm Flak 41 anti-aircraft gun and used during World War II. The Pak 43 was the most powerful anti-tank gun of the Wehrmacht to see service in significant numbers, also serving in modified form as the 8.8 cm KwK 43 main gun on the Tiger II tank, the open-top Nashorn and fully enclosed, casemate-hulled Elefant and Jagdpanther tank destroyers.
The improved 8.8 cm gun was fitted with a semi-automatic vertical breech mechanism that greatly reduced recoil. It could also be fired electrically while on its wheels. It had a very flat trajectory out to 1000yd, making it easier for the gunner to hit targets at longer ranges as fewer corrections in elevation were needed. The gun had exceptional penetration and could defeat the frontal armour of any Allied tank to see service during the war at long range, even the Soviet IS-2 tanks and IS chassis-based tank destroyers. The gun's maximum firing range exceeded 15km (09miles).
KwK 43 and Pak 43s were initially manufactured with monobloc barrels but the extremely high muzzle velocity and operating pressures caused rapid barrel wear, resulting in a change to a two-piece barrel. This did not affect performance but made replacing a worn out barrel much faster and easier than before. A new PzGr.39/43 APCBC-HE projectile was designed, which, apart from the addition of much wider driving bands, was identical to the older 10.2kg (22.5lb) PzGr.39-1 APCBC-HE projectile used by the 8.8 cm KwK 36 and Pak 43 guns. The wider driving bands resulted in an increased weight to 10.4kg (22.9lb) for the PzGr.39/43.[5] The older PzGr.39-1 was used for the KwK & Pak 43 before new PzGr.39/43 rounds came into use but only if the gun had fired no more than 500 rounds. Over this, the expected barrel wear combined with the narrow driving bands could lead to a loss of pressure. The new PzGr.39/43 could be fired without loss of pressure until the barrel was worn out, thus requiring no restriction.
PzGr.39-1 FES & Al all up weight: 10.2 kg (9.87 kg without fuse & bursting charge)
PzGr.39/43 FES & Al all up weight: 10.4 kg (10.06 kg without fuse & bursting charge)
The same 278-gram BdZ 5127 fuse and 59-gram Amatol bursting charge was used for PzGr.39-1 and PzGr.39/43 rounds, requiring armoured targets of 30 mm or thicker to ignite after penetration for maximum effect.
Weight | Travel: 4750kg (10,470lb) Combat: 3650kg (8,050lb) | Combat: 4350kg (9,590lb) | |
---|---|---|---|
Length | 9.2m (30.2feet) | 9.144m (30feet) | |
Barrel length | 6.35m (20.83feet) | 6.36m (20.87feet) | |
Width | 2.527m (08.291feet) | ||
Height | 1.7m (05.6feet) | 1.981m (06.499feet) |
The main version of the Pak 43 was based on a highly effective cruciform mount, which offered a full 360 degree traverse and a much lower profile than the ubiquitous anti-aircraft 8.8 cm Flak 37. However the manufacture of this version was initially slow and costly, a situation that was made worse by the destruction of the carriage production line by Allied bombing.
As part of the design effort from Krupp to compete with the Flak 41, a barrel had been produced to prove the ballistics and design. This barrel design was developed, via an intermediate design known as the Gerät 42, to become the barrel used with Pak 43/41 design. When the Pak 43 was delayed, Krupp was asked to produce a weapon using this barrel using as many existing components as possible. This previous barrel design was then designated the Pak 41.[6]
The Pak 41 barrel was fitted with a horizontal sliding-block breech mechanism resembling that of the 7.5 cm Pak 40, and the semi-automatic gear was a simplified version of that used on the Pak 43. The two-wheel split-trail carriage was from the 10.5 cm leFH 18 field howitzer, with the wheels from the 15 cm s FH howitzer. The Pak 41 was ballistically identical to the Pak 43 and fired the same ammunition, hence its performance was identical. Sources are unclear as to whether the Pak 41 and the Pak 43 barrels were identical; either way it is responsible for the Pak 43/41 designation for the whole design.[7] [8] [9] [10]
The 43/41 proved heavy and awkward to handle in the mud and snow of the Eastern Front and gunners referred to 43/41 as the "barn door" (German: Scheunentor),[11] a reference to the size and weight of the gun. Nevertheless, the improvised Pak 43/41 proved an effective substitute for the Pak 43 until sufficient numbers of the more complex cruciform mounts could be manufactured to replace it in service.
The Pak 43 was also mounted in German armored vehicles, and this version was known as the 8.8 cm KwK 43. Versions of this gun were mounted in a number of German armored vehicles under different designations, including the Tiger II heavy tank (KwK 43 L/71) and several tank destroyers: the Hornisse/Nashorn (Pak 43/1), Ferdinand/Elefant (Pak 43/2, early name Stu.K. 43/1), and Jagdpanther (Pak 43/3 and Pak 43/4, early name Stu.K. 43). A few examples of the Tiger II-based Jagdtiger were also completed with the 8.8 cm weapon due to a shortage of the 12.8 cm Pak 44, but these tank destroyers are not believed to have seen operational service.
There were 578 8.8 cm Pak in German army service on 1 October 1944 and 829 on 1 January 1945.
The Pzgr. 39/43 and HE shells were generally available. Pzgr. 40/43 were in severely short supply.
Penetration | Hit probability versus 2.5 m x 2 m target[12] | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Range | RHA plate at 30° from vertical | in training | in combat | |
100 m | 202 mm | 100% | 100% | |
500 m | 185 mm | 100% | 100% | |
1,000 m | 165 mm | 100% | 85% | |
1,500 m | 148 mm | 95% | 61% | |
2,000 m | 132 mm | 85% | 43% | |
2,500 m | n/a | 74% | 30% | |
3,000 m | n/a | 61% | 23% | |
3,500 m | n/a | 51% | 17% | |
4,000 m | n/a | 42% | 13% |
Hit probability versus 2.5 m x 2 m target | ||||
Range | Penetration | in training | in combat | |
---|---|---|---|---|
100 m | 238 mm | 100% | 100% | |
500 m | 217 mm | 100% | 100% | |
1000 m | 193 mm | 100% | 89% | |
1500 m | 171 mm | 97% | 66% | |
2000 m | 153 mm | 89% | 47% | |
2500 m | n/a | 78% | 34% | |
3000 m | n/a | 66% | 25% |