| Election Name: | 2024 Saxony state election |
| Country: | Saxony |
| Type: | parliamentary |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 2019 Saxony state election |
| Previous Year: | 2019 |
| Next Election: | 2029 Saxony state election |
| Next Year: | 2029 |
| Seats For Election: | All 120 seats in the Landtag of Saxony |
| Majority Seats: | 61 |
| Election Date: | 1 September 2024 |
| Turnout: | 2,367,607 (74.4%) 8.2 pp |
| Leader1: | Michael Kretschmer |
| Party1: | Christian Democratic Union of Germany |
| Last Election1: | 45 seats, 32.1% |
| Seats1: | 41 |
| Seat Change1: | 4 |
| Popular Vote1: | 749,114 |
| Percentage1: | 31.9% |
| Swing1: | 0.2 pp |
| Leader2: | Jörg Urban |
| Party2: | Alternative for Germany |
| Last Election2: | 38 seats, 27.5% |
| Seats2: | 40 |
| Seat Change2: | 2 |
| Popular Vote2: | 719,279 |
| Percentage2: | 30.6% |
| Swing2: | 3.1 pp |
| Leader3: | Sabine Zimmermann |
| Party3: | Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht |
| Last Election3: | Did not exist |
| Seats3: | 15 |
| Seat Change3: | 15 |
| Popular Vote3: | 277,568 |
| Percentage3: | 11.8% |
| Swing3: | New party |
| Leader4: | Petra Köpping |
| Party4: | Social Democratic Party of Germany |
| Last Election4: | 10 seats, 7.7% |
| Seats4: | 10 |
| Seat Change4: | 0 |
| Popular Vote4: | 172,021 |
| Percentage4: | 7.3% |
| Swing4: | 0.4 pp |
| Leader5: | Wolfram Günther &<br>Katja Meier |
| Party5: | Alliance 90/The Greens |
| Last Election5: | 12 seats, 8.6% |
| Seats5: | 7 |
| Seat Change5: | 5 |
| Popular Vote5: | 119,980 |
| Percentage5: | 5.1% |
| Swing5: | 3.5 pp |
| Leader6: | Susanne Schaper |
| Party6: | The Left (Germany) |
| Last Election6: | 14 seats, 10.4% |
| Seats6: | 6 |
| Seat Change6: | 8 |
| Popular Vote6: | 104,891 |
| Percentage6: | 4.5% |
| Swing6: | 5.9 pp |
| Image7: | FW |
| Leader7: | Matthias Berger |
| Party7: | Free Voters |
| Last Election7: | 0 seats, 3.4% |
| Seats7: | 1 |
| Seat Change7: | 1 |
| Popular Vote7: | 53,027 |
| Percentage7: | 2.3% |
| Swing7: | 1.1 pp |
| Map Size: | 425px |
| Government | |
| Before Election: | Kretschmer II |
| Before Party: | CDU–Greens–SPD |
| Posttitle: | Government after election |
The 2024 Saxony state election was held on 1 September 2024 to elect members to the 8th Landtag of Saxony. It was held on the same day as the 2024 Thuringian state election.[1] Going into the election, the state government was led by Michael Kretschmer of the CDU as Minister-President, in a coalition with the Greens and the SPD.
The CDU remained the largest party with slight losses, followed closely by the Alternative for Germany (AfD) which obtained its best ever result. The SPD remained steady while the Greens fell to just over 5% of the vote; the incumbent coalition lost its majority.[2] [3] [4] The Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance ran for the first time and won 12% and fifteen seats. The Left fell below the 5% electoral threshold but retained its representation in the Landtag after winning two direct constituencies. The Free Voters of Saxony (FW) elected a single member after lead candidate Matthias Berger won the constituency of Leipzig-Land III.[5] [6]
The 2019 election was marked by high gains for the Alternative for Germany (AfD), which gained almost 28 percent of the vote and became the second strongest force. After losses, the CDU ended up with almost 32 percent as the strongest party ahead of the AfD. The Left and the SPD received 10.4 and 7.7 percent of the vote, respectively. The Greens increased and achieved their best result in a state election in Saxony with 8.6 percent, the Free Democratic Party (FDP) again missed entering parliament with 4.5 percent.
| Party | 2019 result | candidates | List candidates | Lead candidate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bgcolor= | Christian Democratic Union (CDU) | 32.1% | 60 | 78 | Michael Kretschmer | ||
| bgcolor= | Alternative for Germany (AfD) | 27.5% | 60 | 75 | Jörg Urban | ||
| bgcolor= | The Left (LINKE) | 10.4% | 60 | 47 | Susanne Schaper | ||
| bgcolor= | Alliance 90/The Greens (GRÜNE) | 8.6% | 60 | 30 | Katja Meier | ||
| bgcolor= | Social Democratic Party (SPD) | 7.7% | 60 | 54 | Petra Köpping | ||
| bgcolor= | Free Democratic Party (FDP) | 4.5% | 60 | 48 | Robert Malorny | ||
| bgcolor= | Free Voters of Saxony (FW) | 3.4% | 59 | 33 | Matthias Berger | ||
| bgcolor= | Die PARTEI | 1.6% | 3 | 9 | Sabine Kuechler | ||
| bgcolor= | Pirate Party Germany (PIRATEN) | 0.3% | – | 9 | Stephanie Henkel | ||
| bgcolor= | Ecological Democratic Party (ÖDP) | 0.3% | 2 | 11 | Jonas Bialon | ||
| bgcolor= | Civil Rights Movement Solidarity (BüSo) | 0.1% | 4 | 12 | Michael Gründler | ||
| bgcolor= | Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) | – | 39 | 30 | Sabine Zimmermann | ||
| Free Saxons (FS) | – | 35 | 30 | Martin Kohlmann | |||
| bgcolor= | Values Union (WU) | – | 5 | 7 | Heiko Petzold | ||
| bgcolor= | Alliance Germany (BD) | – | 3 | 16 | Steffen Grosse | ||
| bgcolor= | Grassroots Democratic Party (dieBasis) | – | 3 | 11 | David Murcek | ||
| bgcolor= | Alliance C – Christians for Germany (Bündnis C) | – | – | 7 | Thomas Lamowski | ||
| bgcolor= | V-Partei³ | – | – | 4 | Simone Schwarzbach | ||
| bgcolor= | Action Party for Animal Welfare (Tierschutz hier | ) | – | – | 3 | Uwe Werner | |
| Other | – | 13 | – | ||||
| Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size | CDU | AfD | Linke | Grüne | SPD | FDP | FW | BSW | Others | Lead | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 state election | – | 31.9 | 30.6 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 7.3 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 11.8 | 5.6 | 1.3 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,000 | 33 | 31 | 3 | 5.5 | 6 | – | – | 13.5 | 8 | 2 | ||||
| Forsa | 1,012 | 33 | 31 | 3 | 6 | 7 | – | – | 12 | 8 | 2 | ||||
| Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 1,973 | 33 | 30 | 4 | 6 | 6 | – | – | 12 | 9 | 3 | ||||
| INSA | 1,000 | 30 | 32 | 4 | 5 | 6 | – | 3 | 15 | 5 | 2 | ||||
| Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 1,028 | 33 | 30 | 4 | 6 | 7 | – | – | 11 | 9 | 3 | ||||
| Infratest dimap | 1,566 | 31 | 30 | 4 | 6 | 7 | – | – | 14 | 8 | 1 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,000 | 34.5 | 30 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5 | 1 | – | 14 | 6.5 | 4.5 | ||||
| Forsa | 1,041 | 33 | 30 | 3 | 6 | 6 | – | – | 13 | 9 | 3 | ||||
| INSA | 1,500 | 29 | 32 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 1,003 | 34 | 30 | 4 | 6 | 6 | – | – | 11 | 9 | 4 | ||||
| Infratest dimap | 1,157 | 29 | 30 | 3 | 7 | 7 | – | – | 15 | 9 | 1 | ||||
| INSA | 1,500 | 30 | 32 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | – | 15 | 7 | 2 | ||||
| 2024 EP election | data-sort-value="2024-06-09" | 9 Jun 2024 | – | 21.8 | 31.8 | 4.9 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 12.6 | 11.3 | 10 | ||
| Civey | 3,002 | 31 | 30 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | – | 10 | 9 | 1 | ||||
| INSA | 1,000 | 30 | 34 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,200 | 31.5 | 31 | 3 | 6.5 | 6 | 1.5 | – | 13.5 | 7 | 0.5 | ||||
| Infratest dimap | 1,177 | 30 | 35 | 4 | 7 | 7 | – | – | 8 | 9 | 5 | ||||
| Forsa | 1,507 | 30 | 34 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 4 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 970 | 33.5 | 32 | 8.5 | 7 | 6 | 2.5 | – | – | 10 | 1.5 | ||||
| 30.5 | 28.5 | 6 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 2 | – | 15.5 | 6.5 | 2 | ||||||
| Civey | 3,004 | 33 | 37 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 1 | – | – | 11 | 4 | ||||
| Civey | 3,002 | 33 | 33 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | – | 8 | data-sort-value="0" | Tie | |||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,173 | 28.5 | 32.5 | 7.5 | 5.5 | 8.5 | 4 | – | – | 13.5 | 4 | ||||
| 27.5 | 31 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 6 | – | – | 14.5 | 11 | 3.5 | ||||||
| INSA | 1,500 | 29 | 35 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | – | – | 9 | 6 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,558 | 30 | 32.5 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 5 | – | – | 6.5 | 2.5 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 987 | 31 | 32 | 9.5 | 7 | 9.5 | 4 | – | – | 7 | 1 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,020 | 29.5 | 31 | 8 | 9.5 | 10.5 | 3.5 | – | – | 8 | 1.5 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,000 | 34 | 30 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 3 | – | – | 9 | 4 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,204 | 35 | 28 | 7.5 | 9.5 | 9 | 3 | – | – | 8 | 7 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,023 | 33 | 27 | 5.5 | 9.5 | 12 | 4 | – | – | 9 | 6 | ||||
| INSA | 1,000 | 25 | 28 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 3 | – | 7 | 3 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,100 | 29 | 26.5 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 5 | – | – | 9.5 | 2.5 | ||||
| Infratest dimap | 1,178 | 27 | 24 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 7 | 3 | – | 8 | 3 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,002 | 22 | 25.5 | 7 | 9 | 19 | 10 | – | – | 7.5 | 3.5 | ||||
| 2021 federal election | – | 17.2 | 24.6 | 9.3 | 8.6 | 19.3 | 11.0 | 2.3 | – | 7.7 | 5.3 | ||||
| INSA | 1,000 | 31 | 26 | 11 | 7 | 11 | 8 | – | – | 6 | 5 | ||||
| Infratest dimap | 1,179 | 35 | 21 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 4 | – | 6 | 14 | ||||
| INSA | 1,001 | 34 | 25 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 8 | – | – | 5 | 9 | ||||
| INSA | 1,000 | 24 | 26 | 11 | 13 | 6 | 12 | – | – | 8 | 2 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | – | 40 | 30 | 9.5 | 8 | 7 | 1.5 | – | – | 4 | 10 | ||||
| INSA | 1,008 | 34 | 26 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 5 | – | – | 7 | 8 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | – | 38 | 27.5 | 10 | 10.5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | – | 4 | 10.5 | ||||
| INSA | 1,020 | 36 | 26 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 4 | – | – | 6 | 10 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | – | 40 | 26 | 8.5 | 9.5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | – | 6 | 14 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | – | 36.5 | 29 | 9 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 4 | 1.5 | – | 5 | 7.5 | ||||
| 2019 state election | – | 32.1 | 27.5 | 10.4 | 8.6 | 7.7 | 4.5 | 3.4 | – | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size | None/ Unsure | Lead | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDU | AfD | AfD | Linke | Grüne | SPD | BSW | ||||||
| Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 1,973 | 70 | 15 | – | – | – | – | – | 15 | 55 | ||
| INSA | 1,000 | 45 | 18 | – | – | – | – | – | 37 | 27 | ||
| Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 1,028 | 68 | 13 | – | – | – | – | – | 19 | 55 | ||
| Infratest dimap | 1,566 | 58 | 20 | – | – | – | – | – | 22 | 38 | ||
| Forsa | 1,041 | 50 | 14 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 34 | 36 | ||
| Forschungsgruppe Wahlen | 1,003 | 64 | 14 | – | – | – | – | – | 22 | 50 | ||
| Infratest dimap | 1,157 | 58 | 17 | – | – | – | – | – | 25 | 41 | ||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 970 | 56 | 23 | – | – | – | – | – | 21 | 33 | ||
| 56 | – | 29 | – | – | – | – | 15 | 27 | ||||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,173 | 57 | 26 | – | – | – | – | – | 17 | 31 | ||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,558 | 45 | 21 | – | – | – | – | – | 34 | 24 | ||
| Wahlkreisprognose | 1,020 | 39 | 24 | – | 4 | 3 | 9 | – | 21 | 15 | ||
The first announcement of the seat distribution, which was early in the morning of 2 September, showed 42 seats for CDU, 41 for AfD, 9 for SPD, and 6 for the Greens. Later in the morning, the state electoral committee announced there had been an error in calculating the seat distribution: one seat was deducted from CDU's and AfD's blocs, and one seat was added to SPD's and Greens' blocs.[7] The committee blamed a software bug that resulted in the 117th through 120th seats being allocated incorrectly. External observers initially speculated that the seat distribution was mistakenly calculated with the D'Hondt method, even though the Sainte-Laguë method was to replace it beginning with this election; administrators denied this and stated it was a coincidence that the incorrect seat distribution matched the D'Hondt method's result.[8] [9] Notably, the loss of this one seat denied AfD a Sperrminorität ("blocking minority") that would have given it veto power over certain parliamentary actions requiring a two-thirds majority, such as judicial appointments and constitutional amendments, even if it is not in government.
Saxony has a version of the Grundmandatsklausel ("basic mandate clause") that is present in federal elections, which grants full proportional seating to parties that win two constituency seats even if they do not reach the electoral threshold of 5% of party-list votes. This enabled Die Linke, which received only 4.5% of party-list votes, to win list seats and receive representation in parliament proportionate to its vote share.[10]
The State Criminal Police Office is prosecuting a case of suspected electoral fraud, in which 111 mail ballots in Dresden, 14 in Radeberg, and one in Dohna had their actual votes pasted over and replaced with votes for the right-wing extremist Free Saxony.[11] [12] Initial suspicions were raised after the postal voting district Langebrück-2/Schönborn in Dresden returned an unusually high result of 10.2% of votes for the party, which polled around 2% or less nearly everywhere else in the state. The Dresden and Bautzen electoral committees invalidated all of the modified ballots in their final canvasses of the results on 5 September.[13] The state electoral committee decided this was sufficient and took no further action in its final canvass on 13 September.[14]
Experts from TU Dresden later noticed the neighboring postal voting district Langebrück-1 had returned a similarly unusual figure of 13.4% in June 2024 local elections. Police confirmed that 154 manipulated postal ballots from that election were discovered. Michael Schleinitz, a 44-year-old Free Saxony member from Langebrück who was elected to its district council because of the modified ballots, was suspected of both cases.[15] [16] Schleinitz was arrested for electoral fraud and unrelated charges of attempted arson on 28 October.[17]
After the elections in both Thuringia and Saxony, Sahra Wagenknecht, leader of the BSW, stated her preferences to go into a coalition with either the CDU and/or the SPD in an interview with ARD.
Though a right-wing CDU-AfD coalition would have a majority, the national CDU has prohibited any state faction from working with that party. Because of this, the only possible majority coalition is between the CDU, BSW and SPD,[18] also known as the “blackberry coalition”.[19] [20] This coalition would involve 66 members of the Landtag.
Kretschmer met with Wagenknecht on 9 September "to explore possibilities for constructive political cooperation", with an eye toward beginning negotiations with BSW on the state level. Federal CDU leader Friedrich Merz appealed to nervous party members to trust Kretschmer and Mario Voigt in their respective negotiations, but reiterated that the party would refuse any cooperation or even discussions with AfD.[21] Kretschmer admitted successful government formation would be a "major challenge" but has repeatedly ruled out a minority government.[22] [23]
In a speech on 20 September, Merz described a potential coalition including BSW in either Saxony or Thuringia as "very, very, very unlikely", though with a stated goal of keeping AfD out of the Minister-President's office, he did not rule out other forms of cooperation with the party.[24] Exploratory talks between CDU, BSW and SPD began on 23 September.[25] [26]
On 17 October, the three parties produced a report on the exploratory talks concluding that "constructive and solution-oriented cooperation for Saxony is possible". The parties' state executive committees will meet to vote on approving further negotiations in the following days.[27] On 25 October, SPD suspended its participation in protest of several BSW MdLs voting with AfD to establish a parliamentary inquiry committee into the state government's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic; they were resumed the following week after discussions among the parties' leadership.[28]
On 5 November, BSW left the talks permanently and declared they had failed, citing that the parties had irreconcilable differences on the topics of state finances, migration and the War in Ukraine. The only possible remaining government was a CDU-led minority government or coalition, though Kretschmer repeatedly ruled it out. If a Minister-President is not elected in four months after the first sitting of the Landtag (a deadline of 1 February 2025), the state constitution requires a dissolution of the Landtag and new elections.[29]
Despite Kretschmer's previous statements, CDU and SPD leaders announced on 15 November they had begun negotiations toward forming a minority coalition, which are expected to finish within a month. Kretschmer stated there would be a "consultation process" with the other parties before any legislation is introduced to ensure it has enough support to pass. BSW placed a commitment to halting cuts in social-welfare spending and a harder policy toward illegal migration as conditions of supporting the government.[30] On 4 December, CDU and SPD announced they had completed a coalition agreement. The path to re-electing Kretschmer as Minister-President is unclear; The Left also spoke out against social-spending cuts, while the Greens ruled it out after he sharply attacked them during the campaign. AfD stated they would only support a minority government if it were CDU alone.[31] The state constitution requires an absolute majority for any Minister-President candidate on the first ballot, after which only more yes than no votes (abstentions therefore effectively counting as "yes" votes) is sufficient.[32]