Competition: | World Grand Prix |
Continent: | World |
Gender: | women |
Year: | 2017 |
City: | Nanjing (Group 1 Final) |
Dates: | 7 July – 6 August |
Teams: | 32 |
Confederations: | 5 |
Venues: | 25 |
Cities: | 25 |
Champions: | BRA |
Title Number: | 12 |
Second: | ITA |
Third: | SRB |
Fourth: | CHN |
Mvp: | Natália Pereira |
Outside Spikers: | Zhu Ting Natália Pereira |
Opposite Spiker: | Tijana Bošković |
Middle Blockers: | Ana Beatriz Corrêa Milena Rašić |
Setter: | Ding Xia |
Libero: | Monica De Gennaro |
Matches: | 148 |
Website: | FIVB World Grand Prix |
Last: | 2016 FIVB Volleyball World Grand Prix |
Next: | 2018 FIVB Volleyball Women's Nations League |
The 2017 FIVB Volleyball World Grand Prix was the 25th edition of the annual women's international volleyball tournament played by 32 teams between 7 July and 6 August.[1] [2] The Group 1 Final Round was held in Nanjing, China.[3]
Defending champions Brazil won their record twelfth title in the tournament after a 3–2 win over Italy.[4] [5] Serbia captured their third bronze medal in the competition by defeating China in a rematch of the previous year's Olympic final.[6] Natália Pereira from Brazil was elected the MVP for the second straight year.
In the Group 2 finals held in Ostrava, Czech Republic, Poland defeated South Korea in straight sets.[7]
Moreover, Hungary finished atop of Group 3 at their first-ever World Grand Prix participation after a 3–0 win over the home team in the final match in Canberra, Australia.[8]
width=16% | Africa | width=16% | Asia and Oceania | width=36% | Europe | width=16% | North America | width=16% | South America |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 1 | 1 | 1 |
1 Teams making their debuts.
The pools were announced on 14 September 2016.
Week 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=33% | Pool A1 Turkey | width=33% | Pool B1 China | width=33% | Pool C1 Netherlands |
Week 2 | |||||
Pool D1 Japan | Pool E1 Macau | Pool F1 Russia | |||
Week 3 | |||||
Pool G1 Hong Kong | Pool H1 Thailand | Pool I1 Brazil | |||
Week 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=33% | Pool A2 Bulgaria | width=33% | Pool B2 Argentina | width=33% | Pool C2 Peru |
Week 2 | |||||
Pool D2 Kazakhstan | Pool E2 Poland | Pool F2 Puerto Rico | |||
Week 3 | |||||
Pool G2 Canada | Pool H2 South Korea | Pool I2 Croatia | |||
Week 1 | |||
---|---|---|---|
width=50% | Pool A3 Mexico | width=50% | Pool B3 Cameroon |
Week 2 | |||
width=17% | Pool C3 Venezuela | width=17% | Pool D3 Trinidad and Tobago |
Week 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Group 1 China | |||
Pool J1 Pool K1 | |||
Week 4 | Week 3 | ||
width=50% | Group 2 Czech Republic | width=50% | Group 3 Australia |
● | Intercontinental round | ● | Final round |
Week 1 7–9 Jul | Week 2 14–16 Jul | Week 3 21–23 Jul | Week 4 28–30 Jul | Week 5 2–6 Aug | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 18 matches | 18 matches | 18 matches | 10 matches | ||
Group 2 | 18 matches | 18 matches | 18 matches | 4 matches | ||
Group 3 | 12 matches | 12 matches | 4 matches |
See main article: 2017 FIVB Volleyball World Grand Prix squads.
Match won 3–0 or 3–1: 3 match points for the winner, 0 match points for the loser
Match won 3–2: 2 match points for the winner, 1 match point for the loser
width=40 | Rank | Team |
---|---|---|
4 | ||
5 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
9 | ||
10 | ||
11 | ||
12 | ||
13 | ||
14 | ||
15 | ||
16 | ||
17 | ||
18 | ||
19 | ||
20 | ||
21 | ||
22 | ||
23 | ||
24 | ||
25 | ||
26 | ||
27 | ||
28 | ||
29 | ||
30 | ||
31 | ||
32 |
14-woman Roster for Group 1 Final Round | |
Mara Leão, Macris Carneiro, Ana Carolina da Silva, Adenízia da Silva, Rosamaria Montibeller, Roberta Ratzke, Tandara Caixeta, Natália Pereira (c), Amanda Francisco, Gabriella Souza, Drussyla Costa, Suelen Pinto, Ana Beatriz Corrêa, Monique Pavão | |
Head coach | |
José Roberto Guimarães |
The statistics of each group follow the vis reports P2 and P3. The statistics include 6 volleyball skills: serve, reception, set, spike, block, and dig. The table below shows the top 5 ranked players in each skill by group plus top scorers as of 24 July 2017.[23] [24] [25]
Best scorers determined by scored points from spike, block, and serve.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | Points | width=250 | Name | width=50 | Points | width=250 | Name | width=50 | Points |
align=center | 1 | align=center | 153 | align=center | 147 | align=center | 135 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 149 | align=center | 145 | align=center | 129 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 142 | align=center | 144 | align=center | 114 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 138 | align=center | 143 | align=center | 101 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 135 | align=center | 134 | align=center | 100 |
Best spikers determined by successful spikes in percentage.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 49.80 | align=center | 48.29 | align=center | 43.02 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 47.40 | align=center | 44.56 | align=center | 40.60 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 45.54 | align=center | 41.91 | align=center | 38.97 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 44.75 | align=center | 41.63 | align=center | 37.37 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 44.31 | align=center | 41.04 | align=center | 37.17 |
Best blockers determined by the average of stuff blocks per set.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 1.09 | align=center | 0.90 | align=center | 1.04 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 1.03 | align=center | 0.80 | align=center | 0.95 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 0.73 | align=center | 0.73 | align=center | 0.86 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 0.70 | align=center | 0.71 | align=center | 0.70 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 0.69 | align=center | 0.62 | align=center | 0.61 |
Best servers determined by the average of aces per set.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 0.48 | align=center | 0.55 | align=center | 0.70 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 0.46 | align=center | 0.47 | align=center | 0.55 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 0.35 | align=center | 0.40 | align=center | 0.50 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 0.34 | align=center | 0.39 | align=center | 0.39 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 0.32 | align=center | 0.38 | align=center | 0.32 |
Best setters determined by the average of running sets per set.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 10.62 | align=center | 9.69 | align=center | 4.75 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 7.06 | align=center | 7.83 | align=center | 4.19 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 6.23 | align=center | 6.53 | align=center | 3.63 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 5.82 | align=center | 6.34 | align=center | 2.32 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 5.81 | align=center | 6.16 | align=center | 2.09 |
Best diggers determined by the average of successful digs per set.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 3.17 | align=center | 4.90 | align=center | 2.50 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 2.97 | align=center | 4.18 | align=center | 2.36 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 2.69 | align=center | 3.97 | align=center | 2.33 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 2.57 | align=center | 3.35 | align=center | 1.87 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 2.36 | align=center | 3.12 | align=center | 1.45 |
Best receivers determined by efficient receptions in percentage.
GROUP 1 | GROUP 2 | GROUP 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 77.50 | align=center | 60.00 | align=center | 55.80 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 64.07 | Mirian Patiño | align=center | 59.88 | align=center | 39.88 | |||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 59.55 | Martyna Grajber | align=center | 54.75 | align=center | 36.22 | |||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 56.00 | align=center | 54.35 | align=center | 34.93 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 53.43 | align=center | 54.17 | align=center | 34.27 |