2016 Washington Initiative 732 Explained

Washington Initiative 732 (2016)
Country:Washington
Washington Carbon Emission Tax and Sales Tax Reduction
Yes:1265123
No:1839414
Mapcaption:Yes NoOther

Washington Initiative 732 (I-732) was a ballot initiative in 2016 to levy a carbon tax in the State of Washington, and simultaneously reduce the state sales tax. It was rejected 59.3% to 40.7%.[1] The measure appeared on the November 2016 ballot.[2] The backers of I-732 submitted roughly 350,000 signatures in December 2015 to certify the initiative.[3]

The initiative was spearheaded by environmental economist Yoram Bauman, a strong advocate of carbon pricing. It was modeled after the British Columbia carbon tax, which was considered "popular across the political spectrum".[4] The carbon tax in British Columbia caused the province's fuel consumption to decrease by 16% and its greenhouse gas emissions to decrease 3.5 times faster than the emissions of Canada as a whole, while maintaining steady economic growth.[5]

Ballot measure summary

The ballot measure summary as written by the Secretary of State of Washington:

"This measure would impose a carbon emission tax on the sale or use of certain fossil fuels and fossil-fuel-generated electricity, at $15 per metric ton of carbon dioxide in 2017, and increasing gradually to $100 per metric ton (2016 dollars adjusted for inflation), with more gradual phase-in for some users. It would reduce the sales tax rate by one percentage point over two years, increase a low-income sales tax exemption, and reduce certain manufacturing taxes.[6] "

Provisions

Initiative 732 contained four provisions:[7]

Supporting organizations

The primary sponsor of Initiative 732 was CarbonWA, a group founded by environmental economist Yoram Bauman to promote carbon pricing. The Audubon Society was also a major proponent of Initiative 732, "Audubon Washington believes Initiative 732 provides swift and effective action to reduce carbon pollution".[8] Other organizations that supported Initiative 732 included the Sightline Institute,[9] and the Citizens' Climate Lobby. Other supporters include Washington State legislator Joe Fitzgibbon (D), Washington State Senator Steve Litzow (R), Washington State Senator Joe Fain (R), Washington State Senator Cyrus Habib (D),[10] and the editorial board of The Olympian.[11] Climate scientist James Hansen, who has been involved with the Citizens' Climate Lobby for many years, strongly supported the proposal.[12]

The backers of initiative 732 claimed that I-732 "taxes carbon to fight climate change, boost clean energy, & save the environment for future generations".[13]

Non-supporting organizations

Several environmental organizations chose to make a recommendation to "not support" the measure, as opposed to "support" or "oppose", including the Sierra Club,[14] 350.org Seattle (who originally supported the measure, and later rescinded their support),[15] and Climate Solutions.[16]

Common points made in their statements included concerns that the initiative would result in a budget shortfall, and concerns over how the initiative would spend carbon fee receipts, e.g., Climate Solutions stated:[17]

Opposing organizations

Opponents to Initiative 732 included the Washington State Labor Council, stating: "I-732 would send Washington in the wrong direction and create more damaging austerity choices",[18] the Association of Washington Businesses,[19] and Longview Daily News.[20]

Several organizations opposed the measure from an "environmental justice" perspective, or with a reference to the necessary breadth of the supporting coalition, including Front and Centered (formerly: Communities of Color for Climate Justice),[21] and the Washington Environmental Council, stating:[22]

Aftermath

Although I-732 failed to pass, Carbon Washington continued to work to put a price on carbon emissions in the State of Washington. They worked with others to support Washington Initiative 1631, a carbon tax measure that appeared on the ballots in 2018[23] [24] but was also rejected.

See also

Notes and References

  1. News: Washington Initiative 732 — Create Carbon Emission Tax — Results: Rejected. The New York Times. August 2017.
  2. News: Washington Carbon Emission Tax and Sales Tax Reduction, Initiative 732 (2016) . 30 July 2018 . Ballotpedia . Lucy Burns Institute.
  3. Web site: I-732, I-735 sponsors turn in signatures. blogs.sos.wa.gov. 2016-08-07.
  4. News: Roberts. David. The left vs. a carbon tax. 25 October 2016. Vox.com. Vox. 18 October 2016.
  5. News: Fragroso. Alejandro Davila. British Columbia's Carbon Tax Has Been So Successful That Businesses Want To Increase It. 25 October 2016. ThinkProgress. Center for American Progress. 31 March 2016.
  6. Web site: Initiatives & Referendums - Elections & Voting - WA Secretary of State. www.sos.wa.gov. 2016-08-07.
  7. Web site: Carbon Washington Our Policy. en-US. 2016-08-07.
  8. Web site: Why We Support I-732. 2016-06-29. 2016-08-07.
  9. Web site: Weighing CarbonWA's Tax Swap Ballot Initiative. Sightline Institute. August 2016. 2016-08-07.
  10. Web site: Carbon Washington Endorsements. en-US. 2016-08-07.
  11. Web site: Carbon tax proposal can move climate needle. 2016-08-07.
  12. News: Hansen. James. Washington can lead on climate change by passing I-732. 25 October 2016. Seattle Times.
  13. Web site: Yes On Initiative 732. Carbon Washington. en-US. 2016-08-07.
  14. Web site: Sierra Club Position on Carbon Washington Ballot Initiative 732. 26 April 2016. 2018-11-02.
  15. Web site: Rescinding our endorsement of I-732. 2018-11-02. 2018-11-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20181111044004/http://350seattle.org/2016/07/09/rescinding-our-endorsement-of-i-732/. dead.
  16. Web site: Why we cannot support Initiative 732, but will not actively oppose it. 2018-11-02.
  17. Web site: Why we cannot support Initiative 732, but will not actively oppose it. 2018-11-02.
  18. Web site: WSLC opposes Initiative 732 carbon tax The Stand. www.thestand.org. 2016-08-07.
  19. Web site: Employers can't afford to sit out election. 2016-08-07.
  20. Web site: No on Initiative 732. 2016-08-07.
  21. Web site: I-732 Blocks Progress on Climate Justice. 30 December 2015. 2018-11-02.
  22. Web site: WEC Statement on I-732. 2018-11-02. 2017-03-06. https://web.archive.org/web/20170306210456/https://wecprotects.org/wec-position-732/. dead.
  23. Web site: We support the carbon fee initiative I-1631 + news . Carbon Washington . 30 July 2018 . 21 April 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180421215535/http://carbonwa.org/support-carbon-fee-initiative-1631-news/ . dead .
  24. Web site: Washington Carbon Emissions Fee and Revenue Allocation Initiative (2018) . Ballotpedia . 30 July 2018.