Competition: | World League |
Continent: | World |
Year: | 2016 |
Size: | 250 px |
City: | Kraków (Group 1 Final) |
Dates: | 16 June – 17 July |
Teams: | 36 |
Confederations: | 5 |
Venues: | 27 |
Cities: | 27 |
Champions: | SRB |
Title Number: | 1 |
Second: | BRA |
Third: | FRA |
Fourth: | ITA |
Mvp: | ![]() |
Outside Spikers: | ![]() ![]() |
Opposite Spiker: | ![]() |
Middle Blockers: | ![]() ![]() |
Setter: | ![]() |
Libero: | ![]() |
Matches: | 162 |
Best Scorer: | Sokolov (155 points) |
Best Spiker: | ![]() |
Best Blocker: | ![]() |
Best Server: | ![]() |
Best Setter: | ![]() |
Best Digger: | ![]() |
Best Receiver: | ![]() |
Website: | FIVB World League |
Last: | 2015 FIVB Volleyball World League |
Next: | 2017 FIVB Volleyball World League |
The 2016 FIVB Volleyball World League was the 27th edition of the annual men's international volleyball tournament which was played by a record of 36 teams from 16 June to 17 July 2016. The Group 1 final round was held in Kraków, Poland.[1] After being runners-up on five occasions, Serbia finally claimed their first World League after prevailing over Brazil in straight sets.[2] [3] The defending champions France claimed their first ever bronze medal at the World League after a fast victory in straight sets against Italy.[4] Marko Ivović was elected the most valuable player.[5]
Canada secured their promotion into the 2017 World League Group 1 by sweeping hosts Portugal in straight sets in the Group 2 final four held in Matosinhos.[6] [7]
In the Group 3 final four, held in Frankfurt, Germany, Slovenia defeated the home team in four sets to crown their first ever World League appearance. Additionally, the team coached by former World League champion and MVP Andrea Giani earned a spot for the Intercontinental Group 2 in the next year.[8] [9]
width=16% | Africa | width=16% | Asia and Oceania | width=36% | Europe | width=16% | North America | width=16% | South America |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 1 | 1 |
1 Teams making their debuts.
The pools of Group 1 and Group 2 were announced on 18 August 2015. The pools of Group 3 were announced on 29 October 2015.[12]
Week 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=33% | Pool A1 Australia | width=33% | Pool B1 Brazil | width=33% | Pool C1 Russia |
Week 2 | |||||
Pool D1 Poland | Pool E1 Italy | Pool F1 Serbia | |||
Week 3 | |||||
Pool G1 France | Pool H1 United States | Pool I1 Iran | |||
Week 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=33% | Pool A2 Turkey | width=33% | Pool B2 Japan | width=33% | Pool C2 Czech Republic |
Week 2 | |||||
Pool D2 Slovakia | Pool E2 Egypt | Pool F2 Canada | |||
Week 3 | |||||
Pool G2 South Korea | Pool H2 China | Pool I2 Finland | |||
Week 1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=17% | Pool A3 Slovenia | width=17% | Pool B3 Mexico | width=17% | Pool C3 Greece |
Week 2 | |||||
width=17% | Pool D3 Greece | width=17% | Pool E3 Tunisia | width=17% | Pool F3 Kazakhstan |
Week 5 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Group 1 Poland | |||
Pool J1 Pool K1 | |||
Week 4 | Week 3 | ||
width=50% | Group 2 Portugal | width=50% | Group 3 Germany |
● | Intercontinental round | ● | Final round |
Week 1 16–19 Jun | Week 2 23–26 Jun | Week 3 1–3 Jul | Week 4 9–10 Jul | Week 5 13–17 Jul | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group 1 | 18 matches | 18 matches | 18 matches | 10 matches | ||
Group 2 | 18 matches | 18 matches | 18 matches | 4 matches | ||
Group 3 | 18 matches | 18 matches | 4 matches |
There are 21 players in team rosters. Maximum of 12 regular players and maximum of 2 liberos can be selected to play in each week. The full rosters of 21 players of each team can be seen in the article below.
See main article: 2016 FIVB Volleyball World League squads.
Match won 3–0 or 3–1: 3 match points for the winner, 0 match points for the loser
Match won 3–2: 2 match points for the winner, 1 match point for the loser
width=40 | Rank | Team |
---|---|---|
4 | ||
5 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
9 | ||
10 | ||
11 | ||
12 | ||
13 | ||
14 | ||
15 | ||
16 | ||
17 | ||
18 | ||
19 | ||
20 | ||
21 | ||
22 | ||
23 | ||
24 | ||
25 | ||
26 | ||
27 | ||
28 | ||
29 | ||
30 | ||
31 | ||
32 | ||
33 | ||
34 | ||
35 | ||
36 |
14-man Roster for Group 1 Final Round | |
Aleksandar Okolić, Uroš Kovačević, Milan Katić, Aleksa Brđović, Dragan Stanković (c), Marko Ivović, Nikola Jovović, Miloš Nikić, Tomislav Dokić, Dražen Luburić, Neven Majstorović, Marko Podraščanin, Nikola Rosić, Srećko Lisinac | |
Head coach | |
Nikola Grbić |
The statistics of each group follows the vis reports P2 and P3. The statistics include 6 volleyball skills; serve, reception, set, spike, block, and dig. The table below shows the top 5 ranked players in each skill by group plus top scorers as of 10 July 2016.[13] [14] [15]
Best scorers determined by scored points from spike, block and serve.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | Points | width=250 | Name | width=50 | Points | width=250 | Name | width=50 | Points |
align=center | 1 | align=center | 155 | align=center | 188 | align=center | 125 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 153 | Wouter Ter Maat | align=center | 178 | align=center | 116 | |||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 130 | align=center | 171 | align=center | 113 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 124 | align=center | 164 | Chen Chien-chen | align=center | 100 | |||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 123 | align=center | 158 | align=center | 99 |
Best spikers determined by successful spikes in percentage.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 55.90 | align=center | 56.95 | align=center | 55.70 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 55.56 | align=center | 53.95 | align=center | 55.06 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 54.59 | align=center | 52.97 | align=center | 54.97 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 53.15 | align=center | 52.50 | Wang Ming-chun | align=center | 54.48 | |||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 52.63 | align=center | 51.59 | align=center | 53.01 |
Best blockers determined by the average of stuff blocks per set.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 0.74 | align=center | 0.82 | align=center | 1.07 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 0.69 | align=center | 0.76 | align=center | 1.00 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 0.69 | align=center | 0.60 | ![]() | align=center | 0.86 | |||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 0.68 | align=center | 0.54 | align=center | 0.77 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 0.59 | align=center | 0.53 | align=center | 0.72 |
Best servers determined by the average of aces per set.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 0.52 | align=center | 0.55 | align=center | 0.71 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 0.47 | align=center | 0.51 | align=center | 0.46 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 0.43 | align=center | 0.47 | align=center | 0.40 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 0.40 | align=center | 0.36 | align=center | 0.39 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 0.39 | align=center | 0.34 | align=center | 0.27 |
Best setters determined by the average of running sets per set.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 9.06 | align=center | 11.97 | align=center | 9.08 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 8.82 | align=center | 11.53 | align=center | 8.84 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 6.90 | align=center | 9.44 | align=center | 7.17 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 5.93 | align=center | 8.71 | Huang Pei-hung | align=center | 6.59 | |||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 5.83 | align=center | 6.06 | align=center | 6.39 |
Best diggers determined by the average of successful digs per set.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 3.03 | align=center | 2.50 | align=center | 2.31 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 2.25 | align=center | 1.66 | align=center | 2.09 | ||||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 2.23 | align=center | 1.56 | align=center | 1.78 | ||||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 2.18 | align=center | 1.54 | align=center | 1.65 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 2.12 | align=center | 1.37 | align=center | 1.52 |
Best receivers determined by efficient receptions in percentage.
Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
width=30 | Rank | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | width=250 | Name | width=50 | |||
align=center | 1 | align=center | 59.47 | align=center | 66.44 | align=center | 61.03 | ||||||
align=center | 2 | align=center | 57.96 | ![]() | align=center | 65.12 | align=center | 59.35 | |||||
align=center | 3 | align=center | 56.29 | align=center | 64.18 | Lin Yung-shun | align=center | 59.28 | |||||
align=center | 4 | align=center | 56.25 | align=center | 60.81 | align=center | 58.91 | ||||||
align=center | 5 | align=center | 56.10 | align=center | 60.67 | align=center | 58.33 |