2015 Kyrgyz parliamentary election explained

Country:Kyrgyzstan
Flag Year:1992
Previous Election:2010
Next Election:2020
Seats For Election:All 120 seats in the Supreme Council
Majority Seats:61
Turnout:58.89% (2.11pp)
Party1:Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan
Last Election1:26
Seats1:38
Percentage1:27.40
Leader2:Ömürbek Babanov
Last Election2:51
Seats2:28
Percentage2:20.08
Leader3:Kanatbek Isaev
Party3:Kyrgyzstan Party
Last Election3:new
Seats3:18
Percentage3:12.91
Leader4:Bakyt Torobayev
Party4:Onuguu–Progress
Last Election4:new
Seats4:13
Percentage4:9.30
Party5:Bir Bol
Last Election5:new
Seats5:12
Percentage5:8.49
Leader6:Omurbek Tekebayev
Party6:Ata Meken Socialist Party
Last Election6:18
Seats6:11
Percentage6:7.75
Prime Minister
Before Election:Temir Sariyev
Before Party:Akshumkar
After Election:Sooronbay Jeenbekov
After Party:Social Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan
Map:2015 Kyrgyzstani legislative election map.svg

Parliamentary elections were held in Kyrgyzstan on 4 October 2015.

Electoral system

The 120 seats in the Supreme Council were elected by proportional representation in a single nationwide constituency, with an electoral threshold of 7% on the national level, as well as 0.7% on each of the nine provinces. No party is allowed to hold more than 65 seats.[1] Party lists were required to have at least 30% of the candidates from each gender, and every fourth candidate had to be of a different gender. Each list was also required to have at least 15% of the candidates being from ethnic minorities.[1]

Biometric voter registration was introduced following claims of vote rigging in previous elections.

Campaign

Several political parties were formed in the run-up to the elections, often as an attempt by wealthy Kyrgyz to further their own interests.[2] Incumbent Prime Minister Temir Sariyev claimed that places on party lists were sold to bidders, with rumours circulating that a high place on a party's list cost between $500,000 and £1,000,000.[2]

Over 10% of prospective candidates were prevented from running due to criminal convictions, whilst one party's leader, a former boxer, was banned after it was claimed they beat up a rival candidate.[2]

Conduct

Although there were some reports of voter fraud,[3] the OSCE mission stated that the elections had been "lively and competitive" and "unique in this region", whilst the PACE mission stated that voters had "made their choice freely among a large number of contestants."

However, the OSCE noted problems with the biometric voter registration, with many people not having registered in time to receive their ID cards.[4] The Council of Europe raised concerns regarding transparency of campaigns and party financing, stating that it should be improved.[4]

Results

Notes and References

  1. http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2174_B.htm Electoral system
  2. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7b833598-6a82-11e5-aca9-d87542bf8673.html#axzz3nd8SxANj Voters celebrate Kyrgyzstan’s democratic experiment
  3. http://www.rferl.mobi/a/kyrgyzstan-elections-unpredictable-democracy/27285940.html Social Democrats Leading In Closely Watched Kyrgyz Vote
  4. http://www.rferl.org/content/social-democrats-win-kyrgyzstans-parliamentary-elections/27288300.html Monitors Praise Kyrgyz Elections Won By Social Democrats