List of judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom delivered in 2009 explained

This is a complete list of the judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom between the court's opening on 1 October 2009 and the end of that year. Most of the cases were heard in the House of Lords before judgments were given in the new Supreme Court. The court heard 17 cases during this time; they are listed in order of each case's Neutral citation number.[1]

The table lists judgments made by the court and the opinions of the judges in each case. Judges are treated as having concurred in another's judgment when they either formally attach themselves to the judgment of another or speak only to acknowledge their concurrence with one or more judges. Any judgment which reaches a conclusion which differs from the majority on one or more major points of the appeal has been treated as dissent.

Because every judge in the court is entitled to hand down a judgment, it is not uncommon for groups of judges to reach the same conclusion (i.e. whether to allow or dismiss the appeal) in materially different ways, for example if a panel of 9 judges heard a case with 4 judges dismissing the appeal, 3 finding for the appellant on one point and 2 on another - the table should show 5 judges as the majority and the 4 judges who actually held the more mainstream view as dissenting. The table also does not reflect how significantly judges differed, or how much of a contribution a particular judge made to the overall judgment.

2009 case summaries

Unless otherwise noted, cases were heard by a panel of 5 judges.

Cases involving Scots law are highlighted in orange. Cases involving Northern Irish law are highlighted in green.

width=1200pxCase namewidth=420pxCitationwidth=200pxDecidedwidth=250pxLegal subjectwidth=1200pxSummary of decision
R (E) v JFS[2] [3] [2009] UKSC 114 OctoberCostshttp://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2009/1.pdf
Re Sigma Finance[2009] UKSC 229 OctoberInsolvencyhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0143_Judgment.pdf
R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis[2009] UKSC 329 OctoberPolice law, Article 8 ECHRhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0104_Judgment.pdf
Louca v Germany[2009] UKSC 419 NovemberEuropean Arrest Warrantshttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0047_Judgment.pdf
In re B (A Child) (2009 ruling)[2009] UKSC 519 NovemberFamily lawhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0019_Judgment.pdf
OFT v Abbey National[2009] UKSC 625 NovemberConsumer rightshttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0070_Judgment.pdf
PE (Cameroon) v Home Secretary[2009] UKSC 726 NovemberImmigrationhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0098_Judgment.pdf
R (A) v Croydon[2009] UKSC 826 NovemberFamily law, Article 6 ECHRhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0106_Judgment.pdf
R (Barclay) v Justice Secretary[2009] UKSC 91 DecemberGovernment of Sark, Protocol 1, Article 3 ECHRhttps://web.archive.org/web/20140408224928/http://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0119_Judgment.pdf
I (A Child)[2009] UKSC 101 DecemberJurisdictionhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0075_Judgment.pdf
Environment Secretary v Meier & Ors[2009] UKSC 111 DecemberLand lawhttps://web.archive.org/web/20140408214749/http://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0087_Judgment.pdf
R(A) v B[2009] UKSC 121 DecemberState secrets, Article 10 ECHRhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0020_Judgment.pdf
Barratt Homes Ltd v Welsh Water[2009] UKSC 139 DecemberWater Industry Act 1991http://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0038_Judgment.pdf
R v Horncastle[4] [2009] UKSC 149 DecemberEvidence, Article 6 ECHRhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0073_Judgment.pdf
R (E) v JFS[5] [2009] UKSC 1516 DecemberDiscriminationhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0136_Judgment.pdf
Mahad (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer[2009] UKSC 1616 DecemberImmigrationhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0095_Judgment.pdf
Re S-B (Children)[2009] UKSC 1714 DecemberFamily lawhttp://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2009_0184_Judgment.pdf

2009 Opinions

width=1200pxCase namewidth=1000pxCitationwidth=700pxArguedwidth=700pxDecidedwidth=50pxPhillipswidth=50pxHopewidth=50pxSavillewidth=50pxRodgerwidth=50pxWalkerwidth=50pxHalewidth=50pxBrownwidth=50pxMancewidth=50pxCollinswidth=50pxKerrwidth=50pxClarkewidth=50pxJudgewidth=50pxNeubergerwidth=50pxScott
R (E) v JFS[2009] UKSC 11 October 14 October bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
Re Sigma Finance[2009] UKSC 21–2 July29 October bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=red bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70
R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis[2009] UKSC 313–14 July 29 October bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=00CD00
Louca v Germany[2009] UKSC 429 July19 November bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
Re B (a child)[2009] UKSC 514 October 19 November bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
OFT v Abbey National[2009] UKSC 623–25 June 25 November bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=
PE (Cameroon) v Home Secretary[2009] UKSC 730 July 26 November bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=red bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70
R (A) v Croydon[2009] UKSC 820–23 July 26 November bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70
R (Barclay) v Justice Secretary[2009] UKSC 915–16 July 1 December bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70
I (A Child)[2009] UKSC 1010–11 June1 December bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
Environment Secretary v Meier & Ors[2009] UKSC 1110–11 June 1 December bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=
R(A) v B[2009] UKSC 1210–11 June 1 December bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
Barratt Homes Ltd v Welsh Water[2009] UKSC 1327–28 July 9 December bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=red bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
R v Horncastle[2009] UKSC 147–9 July 9 Decemberbgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=
R (E) v JFS[2009] UKSC 1527–29 October 16 December bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=red bgcolor= bgcolor=red bgcolor=red bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=red bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
Mahad (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer [2009] UKSC 169–11 November 16 December bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=
Re S-B (Children)[2009] UKSC 1725–26 November 14 December bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=00CD00 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor=93DB70 bgcolor= bgcolor= bgcolor=

Judges

External links

Notes and References

  1. O'Keefe . R. . 2010-01-01 . Decisions of British Courts During 2009 Involving Questions of Public or Private International LawA. Public International Law . British Yearbook of International Law . en . 80 . 1 . 451–574 . 10.1093/bybil/80.1.451 . 0068-2691.
  2. Procedural issue before the main appeal reported at UKSC 15
  3. This issue was heard by a diminished panel of 3 judges
  4. An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case
  5. An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case