| Election Name: | 2008 Azorean regional election |
| Country: | Azores |
| Type: | parliamentary |
| Previous Election: | 2004 Azorean regional election |
| Previous Year: | 2004 |
| Election Date: | 19 October 2008 |
| Next Election: | 2012 Azorean regional election |
| Next Year: | 2012 |
| Seats For Election: | 57 seats to the Legislative Assembly of Azores |
| Majority Seats: | 29 |
| Turnout: | 46.7% 8.6 pp |
| Leader1: | Carlos César |
| Party1: | Socialist Party (Portugal) |
| Leaders Seat1: | São Miguel |
| Last Election1: | 31 seats, 57.0% |
| Seats1: | 30 |
| Seat Change1: | 1 |
| Popular Vote1: | 44,940[1] |
| Percentage1: | 49.9% |
| Swing1: | 7.1 pp |
| Leader2: | Carlos Costa Neves |
| Party2: | Social Democratic Party (Portugal) |
| Leaders Seat2: | São Miguel |
| Last Election2: | 19 seats (CA) |
| Seats2: | 18 |
| Seat Change2: | 1 |
| Popular Vote2: | 27,254 |
| Percentage2: | 30.3% |
| Swing2: | N/A |
| Map Size: | 250px |
| President | |
| Before Election: | Carlos Cesar |
| Before Party: | Socialist Party (Portugal) |
| After Election: | Vasco Cordeiro |
| After Party: | Socialist Party (Portugal) --> |
| Image3: | CDS |
| Leader3: | Artur Lima |
| Party3: | CDS – People's Party |
| Leader Since3: | 2008 |
| Leaders Seat3: | Terceira |
| Last Election3: | 2 seats (CA) |
| Seats3: | 5 |
| Seat Change3: | 3 |
| Popular Vote3: | 7,857 |
| Percentage3: | 8.7% |
| Swing3: | N/A |
| Image4: | BE |
| Leader4: | Zuraida Soares |
| Party4: | Left Bloc (Portugal) |
| Leader Since4: | 2008 |
| Leaders Seat4: | São Miguel |
| Last Election4: | 0 seats, 1.0% |
| Seats4: | 2 |
| Seat Change4: | 2 |
| Popular Vote4: | 2,972 |
| Percentage4: | 3.3% |
| Swing4: | 2.3 pp |
| Image5: | CDU |
| Leader5: | Aníbal Pires |
| Party5: | Democratic Unity Coalition |
| Leader Since5: | 2005 |
| Leaders Seat5: | São Miguel |
| Last Election5: | 0 seats, 2.8% |
| Seats5: | 1 |
| Seat Change5: | 1 |
| Popular Vote5: | 2,829 |
| Percentage5: | 3.1% |
| Swing5: | 0.3 pp |
| Image6: | PPM |
| Leader6: | Paulo Estêvão |
| Party6: | PPM |
| Leader Since6: | 2008 |
| Leaders Seat6: | Corvo |
| Last Election6: | 0 seats, 0.3% |
| Seats6: | 1 |
| Seat Change6: | 1 |
| Popular Vote6: | 423 |
| Percentage6: | 0.5% |
| Swing6: | 0.2 pp |
| Map Size: | 400px |
| President | |
| Before Election: | Carlos Cesar |
| Before Party: | Socialist Party (Portugal) |
| After Election: | Carlos Cesar |
| After Party: | Socialist Party (Portugal) |
The 2008 Azorean regional election (Portuguese: Eleições Regionais dos Açores de 2008) was an election held on 19 October 2008 for the legislative assembly and government of the Portuguese autonomous region of the Azores.[2] in which the Socialist Party, under the leadership of Carlos César won a third mandate with 46.7 percent of the turnout, while their rivals, under the Social Democratic Party leader Carlos Costa Neves, received 30.27 percent of the vote: this result would lead to Neves' resignation in the following days.
The official electoral race occurred from 5 October to 17 October 2008, marked by a 53.34 percent abstention rate of the 192,943 registered voters (102,735 did not cast a vote); only 90,030 people voted in this election.[3]
The Azores regional parliament elects 57 members through a proportional system in which the 9 islands elect a number of MPs proportional to the number of registered voters. MPs are allocated by using the d'Hondt method. For the first time, 5 members were also elected from a Compensation constituency.
| Constituency | Total MPs | Registered voters | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corvo | 2 | 342 | |
| Faial | 4 | 11,535 | |
| Flores | 3 | 3,219 | |
| Graciosa | 3 | 3,781 | |
| Pico | 4 | 11,611 | |
| Santa Maria | 3 | 4,536 | |
| São Jorge | 4 | 8,102 | |
| São Miguel | 19 | 102,503 | |
| Terceira | 10 | 45,324 | |
| Compensation | 5 | ||
| Total | 57 | 225,211 |
Following their absence from the regional assembly between 2004 and 2008, the Communist Party (PCP), under their leader Aníbal C. Pires returned to campaign in a new coalition, with the Ecologist Party "The Greens".[4] Emboldened by minor successes in the Autonomous Region of Madeira during the 2007 election, the coalition was seen as new way of reviving the party.[4] In his speech to the national PCP assembly in 2007 he pushed for an intense campaign to support maritime natural resources exploitation and workers' rights, especially in the "disequal social and economic" centre of São Miguel.[4] [5]
After the defeat of the PSD/CDS–PP coalition in the 2004 regional election, then party leader Victor do Couto Cruz held on to the post for around a year until resigning and calling a leadership ballot for 18 December 2005. Two candidates were on the ballot: Carlos Costa Neves, former party leader between 1997 and 1999 and Américo Natalino Viveiros. Costa Neves was easily elected leader:[6]
|- style="background-color:#E9E9E9"! align="center" colspan=2 style="width: 60px"|Candidate! align="center" style="width: 50px"|Votes! align="center" style="width: 50px"|%|-|bgcolor=orange|| align=left | Carlos Costa Neves| align=right | 154| align=right | 54.8|-|bgcolor=orange|| align=left | Américo Natalino Viveiros| align=right | 99| align=right | 35.2|-| colspan=2 align=left | Blank/Invalid ballots| align=right | 28| align=right | 10.0|-|- style="background-color:#E9E9E9"| colspan=2 style="text-align:left;" | Turnout| align=right | 281| align=right | –|-| colspan="4" align=left|Source: [6] |}
The leader of the PSD, Carlos Costa Neves, promised to "move the attitude" in the party, with the objective of recuperating Azorean confidence in the party, after their defeat in the 2000 elections.[7] Following his election to the party, Neves had defended a reorganization of the party, the mobilization and dialogue with militants, in addition to the development of innovative proposals, and noted his direct election as an affirmation of the new party politics.[7] He warned that politics was in danger of permanent stagnation, where the discourse "in the Azores was created within the pink walls of the Palace of Santana", that the PSD was needed "a combative opposition and alternative politics".[7]
During the campaign Aníbal Pires continued to drive a rift between national politics and the Azorean electorate, noting the divergent policies and rhetoric of Prime Minister Jóse Socrates as it dealt with the Azores: "The PS has two discourses: one on the continent and another in the Azores".[8] The communist candidate recorded that the Prime Minister, during his election support of PS leader Carlos César, especially on milk quotes and expansion of the Azorean portion EEZ was mute.[8] Meanwhile, the CDS, with their new slogan "Sempre ao favor dos Açorianos" (Always at the favour of Azoreans) tried to promote a more issues-oriented campaign that presented their initiatives and successes in the lead-up to the election; these included a comparative listing of the initiatives in committee, bills presented for review/debate, inter-parliamentary interventions in the assembly, projects brought to resolution through their influence and political statements.[9]
On 21 March 2008, the CDU candidate defended a new plan to subsidize the football teams of the region, after a visit to Terceira and Graciosa, suggesting that many of the supports reach the teams late, requiring them to request loans to support inter-island travel.[10] At the same time, Pires questioned the financing of the new hospital in Angra do Heroísmo, which he considered "obscure and unnecessary because the public sector is losing money to the private sector".[10] He indicated that European Union financing could pay 85% of the cost, and that present accounts had enough funds to support its construction, citing the 30 year concession of lands, installations and maintenance responsibilities to the construction firm.[10]
Aníbal Pires attacked Carlos César's "silence" on the Labour Accord for Portuguese civilians working at the Lajes Base, using it as a justification for sending CDU candidates to Horta: he alleged that the Communists were a "different voice", that placed issues of regional cohesion and worker's rights in the forefront.[11] Cesar shrugged off the commentary, noting his defense that the new African Command (AFRICOM) should remain at Lakes, and requesting a quick response from the national government supporting the suggestion.[11]
The political parties presented candidates lists for the campaign, where 225,211 electors could elect 57 deputies to the Legislative Assembly.Os partidos e coligações que concorreram às eleições para a Assembleia legislativa da Região Autónoma dos Açores em 2008 foram os seguintes, listados por ordem alfabética:
| Date | Polling Firm/Source | Others | Lead | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2008 | 2008 regional election | 49.9 | 30.3 | 8.7 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 19.6 | |
| 19 Oct (19:00) | Exit Poll - RTP Universidade Católica | 51–57 | 27–31 | 7–9 | 2–4 | 2–4 | - | 25 | |
| 17 Oct 2004 | 2004 regional election | 57.0 | 36.8 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 20.2 | ||
The Regional Assembly fractured during this election, with a multi-political representation replacing the three traditional parties in parliament: the traditional parties (PS, PSD and CDS-PP) were replaced by six parties (PS, PSD, CDS-PP, BE, CDU and PPM) in the regional assembly. Part of these changes were due to the constituency compensation (Portuguese: círculo eleitoral de compensação) where several of the smallest parties were able to obtain representation: the BE elected two parliamentarians through this method, while each of the remaining parties obtained one (the exception being the PPM, which was seen as a reactionary vote for the politics that isolated the small island).
The Socialist Party under the direction of Carlos César obtained a plurality of the votes (49.96%), a reduced mandate since the 2004 elections, when his team won 57% of the total.[1] Although the Socialists won seats in all the islands of the archipelago, they declined in the number of votes and mandates elected to the Regional Legislative Assembly: in 2004, the Socialists had 60140 votes and 31 mandates (of 52 possible) while in the most recent run they obtained 45,070 votes and 30 of 75 seats.[1] The abstention rate continued to rise in the last elections, reaching 53.24% during these elections. Of the over 193000 registered voters, less than 90000 exercised their electoral right.[1]
The Social Democratic Party obtained the second largest support during the elections, but obtained 20% less than the Socialists during the election (30.27% of the popular vote and electing 18 deputies).[1] This poor result resulted in the election of 18 deputies, even when in the last round of elections, the party along with the coalition partner (the Democratic Social Centre) elected 21 parliamentarians. This result forced the PSD leader, Carlos Costa Neves, to resign his leadership of the party.[1]
The remaining parties each obtained just over 10% of the popular vote. Constituent compensation was introduced in the new electoral law in 2006, in order to improve the proportionality of the electoral system, allowing representation for those votes cast that did not elect any deputy in the assembly.
The Democratic Social Centre (CDS-PP) under Artur Lima elected five representatives to the regional Parliament, with 8.7% of the total votes, an increase in relation to the 2004 election (when they elected two deputies, one of which later almost ran as an independent in the middle of his mandate).[1] [12] Speaking on election night the centrist leader, exhorted his members: "We are a Party renovated; a new CDS with representation in all the groups of islands and making one unique promise: much work as has happened until now."[12] Thanking his candidates and militants in the party he indicated his belief that a "clean campaign and without critics" was promoted by his party, "It was a campaign of ideas, with young people, which indicates a renovation of the Party that was likely to present new ideas and proposals for the positive, that will convince the electorate that the best opposition is us."[12]
The Left Bloc also rose in the elections, becoming the fourth political force in the Azores, with 3.3% of the votes. In comparison to the 2004 elections, when the Bloc obtained only 0.97% the vote, this election was seen as the Bloc's premiere in the Azorean Parliament, with two elected deputies.[1]
The coalition CDU (Communists and "Greens") returned to the assembly with one deputy and 3.14% of the popular vote, an increase in the last four years (2.97%).[1] Following the results, Aníbel Pires congratulated his forces by noting their increase in six electoral circles, and success in returning to Parliament, through the constituency compensation formula. Their results (one seat) were less than their rivals the BE, which he noted was "not relevant at the moment", but that the "voice of the Azorean people, the workers and the questions of cohesion" had returned to Parliament. Reaffirming that the "compromise that [they] made with the Azorean people will finally be completed", he added that the Socialists were unable to obtain an absolute majority, that they should "come off their pedestal and retake the capacity to hear the Azorean people".
For the first time, the PPM Partido Popular Monárquico (Popular Monarchist Party) was able to obtain representation in parliament, with its lone seat for Corvo.[1]
Meanwhile, the PDA, the only locally based and autonomy-oriented party, fell below its expectations with only 619 votes (roughly equivalent to 0.69%) of the popular vote. These results would fracture the party leadership.[1]
Ultimately, as Eduardo Correia indicated, the true victor in the Azores elections was the growth in the abstention rate, which achieved its highest level in the 2008 elections since the Carnation Revolution instituted free democratic elections.[3] With 53.24% abstaining, little more than 90000 resident exercised their democratic rights, of the 193.000 registered voters.[3]
|-| colspan="11"||-! rowspan="2" colspan=2 style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=left|Parties! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|Votes! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|%! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|±pp swing! colspan="5" style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align="center"|MPs! rowspan="2" style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |MPs %/
votes %|- style="background-color:#E9E9E9"! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:center;"|2004! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:center;"|2008! style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|±! style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|%! style="background-color:#E9E9E9" align=right|±|-| |44,940||49.92||7.1||31||30||1||52.63||7.0||1.05|-| |27,254||30.27||||19||18||1||31.58||4.9||1.04|-| |7,857||8.73||||2||5||3||8.77||4.9||1.00|-| |2,972||3.30||2.3||0||2||2||3.51||3.5||1.06|-| |2,829||3.14||0.4||0||1||1||1.75||1.7|||0.56|-| |674||0.75||0.4||0||0||0||0.00||0.0||0.0|-|style="width: 10px" bgcolor=blue align="center" | |align=left|Democratic Party of the Atlantic|627||0.70||0.5||0||0||0||0.00||0.0||0.0|-| |423||0.47||0.2||0||1||1||1.75||1.7||3.72|-|colspan=2 align=left style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|Total valid|width="50" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|87,575|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|97.27|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|1.2|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|52|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|57|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|5|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|100.00|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|0.0|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|—|-|colspan=2|Blank ballots|1,685||1.87||1.0||colspan=6 rowspan=4||-|colspan=2|Invalid ballots|770||0.86||0.1|-|colspan=2 align=left style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|Total|width="50" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|90 030|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"|100.00|width="40" align="right" style="background-color:#E9E9E9"||-|colspan=2|Registered voters/turnout||192,943||46.66||8.6|-| colspan=11 align=left | Source: Comissão Nacional de Eleições|}
|- class="unsortable"!rowspan=2|Constituency!!%!!S!!%!!S!!%!!S!!%!!S!!%!!S!!%!!S!rowspan=2|Total
S|- class="unsortable" style="text-align:center;"!colspan=2 | PS!colspan=2 | PSD!colspan=2 | CDS-PP!colspan=2 | BE!colspan=2 | CDU!colspan=2 | PPM|-| style="text-align:left;" | Corvo| style="background:; color:white;"|31.6| 1| 13.0| -| 24.6| -| 0.4| -| 1.1| -| 26.3| 1| 2|-| style="text-align:left;" | Faial| style="background:; color:white;"|41.4| 2| 35.8| 2| 4.6| -| 2.8| -| 10.4| -| 0.4| -| 4|-| style="text-align:left;" | Flores| style="background:; color:white;"|31.8| 1| 30.6| 1| 25.8| 1| 0.6| -| 7.5| -| 0.8| -| 3|-| style="text-align:left;" | Graciosa| style="background:; color:white;"|50.4| 2| 39.1| 1| 4.6| -| 1.6| -| 1.2| -| 0.3| -| 3|-| style="text-align:left;" | Pico| style="background:; color:white;"|47.2| 2| 37.9| 2| 7.6| -| 1.4| -| 2.0| -| 0.4| -| 4|-| style="text-align:left;" | Santa Maria| style="background:; color:white;"|51.6| 2| 30.5| 1| 5.3| -| 2.7| -| 4.0| -| 0.4| -| 3|-| style="text-align:left;" | São Jorge| style="background:; color:white;"|43.2| 2| 32.0| 1| 20.6| 1| 0.9| -| 1.3| -| 0.2| -| 4|-| style="text-align:left;" | São Miguel| style="background:; color:white;"|54.5| 12| 27.9| 6| 5.0| 1| 4.3| -| 3.0| -| 0.4| -| 19|-| style="text-align:left;" | Terceira| style="background:; color:white;"|46.9| 6| 30.3| 3| 13.9| 1| 3.1| -| 2.0| -| 0.3| -| 10|-| style="text-align:left;" | Compensation| style="color:inherit;background:#AAAAAA"|| -| style="color:inherit;background:#AAAAAA"|| 1| style="color:inherit;background:#AAAAAA"|| 1| style="color:inherit;background:#AAAAAA"|| 2| style="color:inherit;background:#AAAAAA"|| 1| style="color:inherit;background:#AAAAAA"|| -| 5|- class="unsortable" style="background:#E9E9E9"| style="text-align:left;" | Total| style="background:; color:white;"|49.9| 30| 30.3| 18| 8.7| 5| 3.3| 2| 3.1| 1| 0.5| 1| 57|-| colspan=14 style="text-align:left;" | Source: Comissão Nacional de Eleições|}