2006 South Dakota Amendment C Explained

Amendment C
Yes:172,305
No:160,152
Total:341105
Electorate:507,132
Turnoutpct:65.56
Mapcaption:Yes No
Notes:[1] [2] [3]
South Dakota Marriage Definition Amendment
Country:South Dakota
Date:November 7, 2006

South Dakota Amendment C of 2006 is an amendment to the South Dakota Constitution to make it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages, or to recognize civil unions, domestic partnerships, or other quasi-marital relationships regardless of gender. The referendum was approved on 7 November 2006 by 52% of the state's voters.[4]

The text of the adopted amendment states:

Only marriage between a man and a woman shall be valid or recognized in South Dakota. The uniting of two or more persons in a civil union, domestic partnership, or other quasi-marital relationship shall not be valid or recognized in South Dakota.[5]

The amendment was rendered void by Obergefell v. Hodges, a US Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

Pre-decision opinion polls

Date of opinion pollConducted bySample sizeIn favorAgainstUndecidedMarginMargin of ErrorSource
2006 ? 46% ? 1% con ? [6]
? ? 41% ? 8% con ? [7]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. https://sdsos.gov/elections-voting/election-resources/election-history/2006/2006_general_election_official_returns_ballot_questions.aspx 2006 South Dakota General Election Data - Official Returns for Ballot Questions
  2. https://sdsos.gov/elections-voting/upcoming-elections/voter-registration-totals/voter-registration-comparison-table.aspx Voter Registration Tracking
  3. https://sdsos.gov/elections-voting/election-resources/election-history/registration_turnout.aspx Voter Registration/Turnout Statistics 1988-2010
  4. http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/ballot.measures/ CNN.com Election 2006 - Ballot Measures
  5. http://legis.state.sd.us/sessions/2005/bills/HJR1001p.pdf House Joint Resolution 1001
  6. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-nov-04-na-gaymarry4-story.html S. Dakota not so sure about gay-marriage ban
  7. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/nov/1/20061101-110134-3459r/ Marriage limits set to face stiff fight in 3 states