| Election Name: | 2004 Hong Kong legislative election |
| Country: | Hong Kong |
| Type: | parliamentary |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Mps: | List of LegCo members elected in Hong Kong legislative election, 2000 |
| Previous Election: | 2000 Hong Kong legislative election |
| Previous Year: | 2000 |
| Next Election: | 2008 Hong Kong legislative election |
| Next Year: | 2008 |
| Elected Mps: | members elected |
| Seats For Election: | All 60 seats to the Legislative Council |
| Majority Seats: | 31 |
| Election Date: | 12 September 2004 |
| Opinion Polls: | Opinion polling for the Hong Kong legislative election, 2004 |
| Registered: | 3,207,227 4.97% |
| Turnout: | 1,784,406 (55.64%) 12.07pp |
| Leader1: | Ma Lik |
| Alliance1: | Pro-Beijing camp |
| Party1: | Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong |
| Leaders Seat1: | Hong Kong Island |
| Last Election1: | 11 seats, 28.40% |
| Seats1: | 12 |
| Seat Change1: | 2 |
| Popular Vote1: | 454,827 |
| Percentage1: | 25.49% |
| Swing1: | 2.91pp |
| Leader2: | James Tien |
| Alliance2: | Pro-Beijing camp |
| Party2: | Liberal Party (Hong Kong) |
| Leaders Seat2: | New Territories East |
| Last Election2: | 7 seats, 1.88% |
| Seats2: | 10 |
| Seat Change2: | 2 |
| Popular Vote2: | 118,997 |
| Percentage2: | 6.72% |
| Swing2: | 4.84pp |
| Leader3: | Yeung Sum |
| Alliance3: | Pro-democracy camp |
| Party3: | Democratic Party (Hong Kong) |
| Leaders Seat3: | Hong Kong Island |
| Last Election3: | 13 seats, 31.74% |
| Seats3: | 9 |
| Seat Change3: | 2 |
| Popular Vote3: | 445,988 |
| Percentage3: | 25.19% |
| Swing3: | 6.47pp |
| Leader4: | Emily Lau |
| Alliance4: | Pro-democracy camp |
| Party4: | The Frontier (Hong Kong) |
| Leaders Seat4: | New Territories East |
| Last Election4: | 2 seats, 6.78% |
| Seats4: | 1 |
| Seat Change4: | 1 |
| Popular Vote4: | 121,900 |
| Percentage4: | 6.89% |
| Swing4: | 0.11pp |
| Leader5: | Frederick Fung |
| Party5: | Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood |
| Alliance5: | Pro-democracy camp |
| Leaders Seat5: | Kowloon West |
| Last Election5: | 1 seat, 4.75% |
| Seats5: | 1 |
| Popular Vote5: | 74,671 |
| Percentage5: | 4.22% |
| Swing5: | 0.53pp |
| Leader6: | Lau Chin-shek |
| Party6: | Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions |
| Alliance6: | Pro-democracy camp |
| Leaders Seat6: | Kowloon West |
| Last Election6: | 2 seats, 7.33% |
| Seats6: | 1 |
| Popular Vote6: | 69,844 |
| Percentage6: | 3.95% |
| Swing6: | 3.38pp |
| Leader7: | Leung Kwok-hung |
| Party7: | April Fifth Action |
| Alliance7: | Pro-democracy camp |
| Leaders Seat7: | New Territories East |
| Last Election7: | 0 seat, 1.38% |
| Seats7: | 1 |
| Seat Change7: | 1 |
| Popular Vote7: | 60,925 |
| Percentage7: | 3.44% |
| Swing7: | 2.06pp |
| Leader8: | Leung Yiu-chung |
| Party8: | Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre |
| Alliance8: | Pro-democracy camp |
| Leaders Seat8: | New Territories West |
| Last Election8: | 1 seat, 4.50% |
| Seats8: | 1 |
| Popular Vote8: | 59,033 |
| Percentage8: | 3.33% |
| Swing8: | 1.17pp |
| Leader9: | Ambrose Lau |
| Alliance9: | Pro-Beijing camp |
| Party9: | Hong Kong Progressive Alliance |
| Leaders Seat9: | Retired from Election Committee |
| Last Election9: | 4 seats, 1.95% |
| Seats9: | 0 |
| Seat Change9: | 4 |
| Popular Vote9: | 14,174 |
| Percentage9: | 0.80% |
| Swing9: | 1.15pp |
| Party control | |
| Before Election: | Pro-Beijing camp |
| Posttitle: | Party control after election |
| After Election: | Pro-Beijing camp |
The 2004 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was held on 12 September 2004 for members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo). The election returned 30 members from directly elected geographical constituencies and 30 members from functional constituencies, of which 11 were unopposed.
An unprecedented number of 3.2 million people registered to vote in the election. The turnout rate was an unprecedented 55.6% with 1,784,406 voters casting ballots, beating the previous record set in 1998 by 200,000 votes. While pro-democratic opposition candidates gained new seats in the legislature, their gains fell short of their expectations.
In the geographical constituencies, candidates from the pro-democratic camp secured 60 percent of the seats in the geographical sectors of the election, taking 18 seats (up from 17) in this category, and 62 percent of the popular vote. On the other hand, the pro-Beijing and pro-business candidates made greater gains, winning 12 directly elected seats (up from 7). In the functional constituencies which the pro-democratic camp sought to abolish, the camp made more gains (from 5 to 7 seats).
Overall, the democrats took 25 seats and the pro-government camp 35 seats. Bills initiated by the government can still be passed on pro-government support alone, but bills originated by members cannot be passed without democratic support, since these bills require absolute majorities in each sector (geographical and functional) of the legislature.[1] Constitutional amendments require a two-thirds vote and thereby also require support from the democratic camp.
Despite the increase in the number of seats returned by geographical constituencies and the record turnout, the Democratic Party lost the status of being the largest political party in the Legislative Council to the pro-government Democratic Alliance for Betterment of Hong Kong, DAB, who secured 12 seats if including the two members who ran under the banner of the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, and pro-business Liberal Party who secured 10 seats, thereby becoming only the third-largest party. Some attributed the poor performance of the pro-democratic camp to tactical miscalculation in vote allocation. This was not helped by some of the democratic parties' personal scandals.
The pro-Beijing and pro-business parties succeeded in retaining the majority in the legislature. However, pro-democracy candidates have maintained the threshold to block changes, if necessary, to the Basic Law of Hong Kong, since a two-thirds vote is required for amendment. The current Legislative Council also saw the entry of more radical members of the democratic camp.
According to the Annex II of the Basic Law of Hong Kong, the 6-seat Election Committee constituency indirectly elected by the 800-member Election Committee would be abolished, while the directly elected geographical constituency seats would increase from 24 to 30,[2] same number of the indirectly elected functional constituencies. As a result, Hong Kong Island and Kowloon East was added one extra seat each, from five to six and four to five respectively, and the New Territories West and New Territories East was added two extra seats each, from six to eight and five to seven respectively, while the number of seats in Kowloon West remained four.
The election came amidst the deteriorating governance and intense debates over constitutional reforms in Hong Kong. The Tung Chee-hwa administration had been embattling with economic recession brought by the 1997 financial crisis and the more prominent SARS outbreak in 2003. Nevertheless, the Tung administration pushed forward the controversial Hong Kong Basic Law Article 23 legislation which outlawed "treason" and "subversive activities" and raised concerns on its potential threats against Hong Kong people's civil liberties. A group of barristers formed the Basic Law Article 23 Concern Group and rallied against the national security legislation. Over 500,000 people to protested on 1 July 2003, the sixth anniversary of the establishment of the HKSAR, against the legislation, the largest demonstration since the handover.[3] The Article 23 legislation further crippled the Tung administration as the government saw its popularity dropped to a new low. The Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong (DAB), the largest pro-Beijing party saw its largest defeat in the District Council elections in November 2003, which alarmed the Beijing and the Hong Kong government.
The Annex I and Annex II of the Basic Law state that the method for selecting the Chief Executive and for forming the Legislative Council could be amended after 2007. The pro-democracy camp argued that the third term of Chief Executive and fourth term of Legislative Council should be elected on the basis of universal suffrage in 2007 and 2008 as stipulated in the Article 45 and 68 of the Basic Law respectively.[4] In 2004, the Article 23 Concern Group transformed into the Article 45 Concern Group calling for the early implementation of the universal suffrage. Facing the pro-democracy pressure for full democratisation, in April 2004, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) ruled out the 2007/08 universal suffrage.
With the cancellation of the Election Committee constituency, there were total of twelve incumbents chose not to run for re-election. Ip Kwok-him lost his seat in the Central and Western District Council therefore was not qualified for running in the District Council functional constituency.
See main article: Opinion polling for the Hong Kong legislative election, 2004.
Before election:
| 22 | 38 | |
| Pro-democracy | Pro-Beijing |
| 25 | 35 | |
| Pro-democracy | Pro-Beijing |
|-! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:center;" rowspan=2 colspan=3|Parties and allegiances! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" colspan=4 |Geographical constituencies! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" colspan=4 |Functional constituencies! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" rowspan=2 |Total
seats! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" rowspan=2 |±|-! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |Votes! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |%! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |±pp! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |Seats! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |Votes! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |%! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |±pp! style="background-color:#E9E9E9;text-align:right;" |Seats|-|rowspan=6 style="text-align:left;background-color:Pink;border-bottom-style:hidden;"||style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Democratic Alliance for the Betterment of Hong Kong |402,420|22.73|5.67|8| –| –| –|2|10||-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Liberal Party |118,997|6.72|4.84|2|6,126|4.71|0.25|8|10|2|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions |52,564|2.97|N/A|1|566|0.44|N/A|2|3|2|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Hong Kong Progressive Alliance |14,174|0.80|1.15|0|17|0.01|0.14|0|0|4|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |New Century Forum |4,511|0.25|1.35|0| –| –| –| –|0|1|-| style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Pro-government individuals and others|69,306|3.92| –|1|36,313|27.91|–|11|12|−|-style="background-color:Pink"| style="text-align:left;" colspan=3 |Total for pro-Beijing camp|661,972|37.40|2.46|12|43,022|33.07|6.78|23|35| 4|-|rowspan=9 style="text-align:left;background-color:LightGreen;width:1px;border-bottom-style:hidden;"||style="background-color:;width:1px"|| style="text-align:left;" |Democratic Party |445,988|25.19|6.47|7|48,323|37.15|8.48|2|9|2|-| style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Article 45 Concern Group |117,216|6.62|N/A|3|2,597|2.00|N/A|1|4|2|-| style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |The Frontier |121,900|6.89|0.11|1|–|–|–|–|1|1|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Hong Kong Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood |74,671|4.22|0.53|1|–|–|–|–|1|0|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions |69,844|3.95|3.38|1|–|–|–|–|1|0|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |April Fifth Action |60,925|3.44|2.06|1|–|–|–|–|1|1|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Neighbourhood and Worker's Service Centre |59,033|3.33|1.17|1|–|–|–|–|1|0|-|style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Hong Kong Social Workers' General Union |–|–|–|–|3,199|2.46|N/A|0|0|0|-| style="background-color:"|| style="text-align:left;" |Pro democracy individuals and others|155,812|8.80| –|3|27,594|21.21|–|4|7|−|-style="background-color:LightGreen"| style="text-align:left;" colspan=3 |Total for pro-democracy camp|1,105,388|62.44|1.88|18|81,713|62.81|7.00|7|25| 4|-| style="background-color:" || style="text-align:left;" colspan=2 |Non-partisan individuals and others | 2,830| 0.16| –| 0| 5,351| 4.11| –| 0| 0|−|-|style="text-align:left;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan="3"|Total|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|1,770,190|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|100.00|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"||style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|30|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|130,086|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|100.00|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"||style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|30|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|60|style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|0|-|style="text-align:left;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan=13| |-|style="text-align:left;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan="3"| Valid votes|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 1,770,190|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 99.22|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 0.08|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9" rowspan="4" | |width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 130,086|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 96.41|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 0.25|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan="3" rowspan="4" | |-|style="text-align:left;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan="3"| Invalid votes|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 13,941|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 0.78|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 0.08|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 4,849|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 3.59|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"| 0.25|-|style="text-align:left;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan="3"|Votes cast / turnout|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|1,784,131|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|55.63|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"||width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|134,935|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|70.14|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|13.64|-|style="text-align:left;background-color:#E9E9E9" colspan="3"|Registered voters|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|3,207,227|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|100.00|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|4.97|width="75" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|192,374|width="40" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"|100.00|width="30" style="text-align:right;background-color:#E9E9E9"||-| style="text-align:left;" colspan=13 |Source turnout: Electoral Affairs Commission. 11 candidates in 11 functional constituencies were elected unopposed to the Legislative Council.|} Note: For the joint list of pro-democrats in Hong Kong Island, Kowloon East and New Territories East, the votes are divided equally to each candidate.
The election was largely seen as a contest between the pro-democracy coalition and the pro-business and pro-Beijing coalitions. There were 162 candidates for 60 seats in the LegCo. Before the election, the pro-democratic camp was widely expected to gain the most votes and increase its representation from 22 seats in the LegCo. Some members of the pro-democratic camp aimed at securing an absolute majority of the seats in the legislature so that they would have the power to veto all government proposals.
The democratic camp called for direct elections for the Chief Executive of Hong Kong in 2007 and for LegCo in 2008, as well as rapid political reform. In contrast, the pro-Beijing and pro-business candidates placed more emphasis on economic growth and social stability. Most of the political parties are now setting 2012 as the ideal time for electoral reform.
While the democratic camp hoped to play up the issue of universal suffrage as a prominent issue in the election, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress ruled out universal suffrage for the Chief Executive election in 2007 and for LegCo elections in 2008 in April 2004 before the election. Despite this, the pro-democratic camp insisted on promoting their agenda, which seemed to backfire when the campaign lost its original momentum. This was not helped by various sex and financial scandals of a few pro-democracy candidates. There were some allegations by the pro-democracy camp of Mainland Chinese influence behind this.
Some of the developments include:
There were a few reports of irregularities. Some polling stations ran out of ballot boxes, causing long delays in voting. To fit more ballots into the ballot boxes, some election workers forcefully stuffed ballots into the box using objects such as barbecue forks and metal rulers. Some stations also used random cardboard boxes without official seals. Some ballot boxes were opened before the close of polling.
The polling station operating manual had mistakes in it, so some candidate representatives were kicked out after the closing of the poll and were prevented from witnessing the counting, as required by law.
Some candidates have tried to challenge the election results, but have remained unsuccessful thus far.
A report on the election process was published shortly after the election.[5] Another report was commissioned by the government to suggest future improvements.[6]
Eight incumbents lost re-election
| Party | Name | Constituency | Remarks | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| placed fourth on the list | |||||
| bgcolor= | placed second on the list; running for New Territories East constituency in the last election | ||||
Voting system: Party-list proportional representation with largest remainder method and Hare quota.
| Results of the Geographical Constituencies | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Island (香港島) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kowloon West (九龍西) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kowloon East (九龍東) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Territories West (新界西) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Territories East (新界東) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Voting systems: Different voting systems apply to different functional constituencies, namely for the Heung Yee Kuk, Agriculture and Fisheries, Insurance and Transport, the preferential elimination system of voting; and for the remaining 24 FCs used the first-past-the-post voting system.[7]
| Results of the Functional Constituencies | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| width=180px | Constituency | Incumbent | Result | Candidate(s) | |||
| Heung Yee Kuk | width=5px style="background-color: " | Wong-fat (Liberal) | Incumbent ran for DC FC Nonpartisan gain | width=5px style="background-color: " | Wai-keung uncontested | ||
| Agriculture and Fisheries | Yung-kan (DAB) | Incumbent hold | Yung-kan (DAB) uncontested | ||||
| Insurance | Bernard Charnwut | Incumbent hold | Bernard Charnwut uncontested | ||||
| Transport | Miriam Kin-yee (Liberal) | Incumbent re-elected | Miriam Kin-yee (Liberal) uncontested | ||||
| Education | Man-kwong (PTU/Democratic) | Incumbent re-elected | Man-kwong (PTU/Democratic) 82.94% Kai-chun 17.06% | ||||
| Legal | Margaret Ngoi-yee (Independent) | Incumbent hold | Margaret Ngoi-yee (Independent) 74.73% Ka-yin (Independent) 17.21% Judy Kei-yuk (Independent) 8.06% | ||||
| Accountancy | Eric Li Ka-cheung (Independent) | Incumbent retired Independent gain | Heung-man (Independent) 29.05% Mo-po (Independent) 28.74% Elve Yiu-fai (Independent) 15.54% Edward Kwong-fai 9.13% Louis Wing-on (Independent) 5.17% Peter Po-fun 5.16% Sau-yuk (Independent) 3.80% Wilfred Shek-chun 2.09% Wilfred Wang-tai 1.32% | ||||
| Medical | Wing-lok (Independent) | Incumbent lost re-election Independent gain | Ka-ki (Independent) 50.88% Wing-lok (Independent) 42.45% Johnny Kam-chuen 6.67% | ||||
| Health Services | Michael Kwok-fung (Independent) | Incumbent lost re-election Independent gain | Joseph Kok-long (Independent) 43.01% Michael Kwok-fung (Independent democrat) 30.14% Scarlett Oi-lan 14.27% Kwai-fung (Independent) 12.58% | ||||
| Engineering | Raymond Chung-tai | Incumbent re-elected | Raymond Chung-tai 57.29% Wang-kwong 42.71% | ||||
| Architectural, Surveying and Planning | Incumbent lost re-election Independent gain | Patrick Sau-shing (Independent) 28.36% Kenneth Jor-kin (Independent) 16.29% Kaizer Ping-cheung 15.46% Roger Anthony (Independent) 13.73% Stanley Wing-fai (Democratic) 13.23% Yiu-fai (Independent) 12.93% | |||||
| Labour (3 seats) | Fung-ying (Nonpartisan) | Incumbent re-elected | Fung-ying 32.43% Chi-kin (FTU) 29.00% Kwok-hing (FTU) 28.00% Kwok-keung 10.57% | ||||
| Fu-wah (FTU) | Incumbent retired FTU hold | ||||||
| Kwok-keung (DAB) | Incumbent lost re-election FTU gain | ||||||
| Social Welfare | Chi-kwong (Democratic) | Incumbent retired Nonpartisan gain | Chiu-hung 39.01% Kwok-che (SWGU) 38.24% Christine Meng-sang 22.75% | ||||
| Real Estate and Construction | Abraham Lai-him (Independent) | Incumbent hold | Abraham Lai-him (Independent) uncontested | ||||
| Tourism | Howard (Liberal) | Incumbent re-elected | Howard 48.20% Paul Wai-chun 40.75% Freddy Hing-ning 11.05% | ||||
| Commercial (First) | James Pei-chun (Liberal) | Incumbent ran for NTE GC Liberal hold | Jeffrey Kin-fung (Liberal) uncontested | ||||
| Commercial (Second) | Philip Yu-hong | Incumbent hold | Philip Yu-hong uncontested | ||||
| Industrial (First) | Kenneth Woo-shou (Liberal) | Incumbent ran for NTW GC Liberal hold | Andrew Kwan-yuen (Liberal) uncontested | ||||
| Industrial (Second) | Ming-wah | Incumbent hold | Ming-wah uncontested | ||||
| Finance | David Kwok-po | Incumbent hold | David Kwok-po uncontested | ||||
| Financial Services | Incumbent lost re-election Nonpartisan gain | Pui-chung 51.69% Christopher Wah-fung 17.29% King-cheong 16.35% Ka-pun (Liberal) 11.47% Chi-kin (Progressive Alliance) 3.20% | |||||
| Sports, Performing Arts, Culture and Publication | Timothy Tsun-ting | Incumbent hold | Timothy Tsun-ting 69.08% Hon-kin (Democratic) 30.92% | ||||
| Import and Export | Cheung-ching (Progressive Alliance) | Incumbent retired DAB gain | Ting-kwong (DAB) uncontested | ||||
| Textiles and Garment | Sophie Yau-fun (Liberal) | Incumbent re-elected | Sophie Yau-fun (Liberal) 77.94% Kam-yuen 22.06% | ||||
| Wholesale and Retail | Selina Shuk-yee (Liberal) | Incumbent ran for NTW GC Liberal hold | Vincent Kang (Liberal) 46.85% Leung-lo 36.66% Samuel Tim-shing 16.49% | ||||
| Information Technology | Chung-kai (Democratic) | Incumbent re-elected | Chung-kai (Democratic) 52.59% Wai-ho 42.65% Mun-yee (Independent) 4.76% | ||||
| Catering | Tommy Yu-yan (Liberal) | Incumbent re-elected | Tommy Yu-yan (Liberal) 63.75% Josephine Shu-ying 21.75% Sin-ying 14.50% | ||||
| District Council | Kwok-him (DAB) | Incumbent retired Liberal gain | Wong-fat (Liberal) 61.24% Cosmas Kwok-chuen (Democratic) 28.90% Chi-yuen 9.86% | ||||