| Election Name: | 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election |
| Country: | Louisiana |
| Type: | presidential |
| Ongoing: | no |
| Previous Election: | 1987 Louisiana gubernatorial election |
| Previous Year: | 1987 |
| Election Date: | October 19, 1991 (first round) November 16, 1991 (runoff) |
| Next Election: | 1995 Louisiana gubernatorial election |
| Next Year: | 1995 |
| Flag Year: | 1912 |
| 1Blank: | First round |
| 2Blank: | Runoff |
| Image1: | File:Edwin Edwards (1986) (cropped).png |
| Candidate1: | Edwin Edwards |
| Party1: | Democratic Party (United States) |
| 1Data1: | 523,096 33.76% |
| 2Data1: | 1,057,031 61.17% |
| Candidate2: | David Duke |
| Party2: | Republican Party (United States) |
| 1Data2: | 491,342 31.71% |
| 2Data2: | 671,009 38.83% |
| Image4: | File:Buddy Roemer Congress.jpg |
| Candidate4: | Buddy Roemer |
| Party4: | Republican Party (United States) |
| 1Data4: | 410,690 26.51% |
| 2Data4: | Eliminated |
| Image5: | File:Clyde C. Holloway.jpg |
| Candidate5: | Clyde C. Holloway |
| Party5: | Republican Party (United States) |
| 1Data5: | 82,683 5.34% |
| 2Data5: | Eliminated |
| Governor | |
| Before Election: | Buddy Roemer |
| Before Party: | Republican Party (United States) |
| After Election: | Edwin Edwards |
| After Party: | Democratic Party (United States) |
The 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election resulted in the election of Democrat Edwin Edwards to his fourth non-consecutive term as governor of Louisiana. The election received national and international attention due to the unexpectedly strong showing of David Duke, a former Grand Wizard of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, who had ties to other white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups. Incumbent Republican Governor Buddy Roemer, who had switched from the Democratic to Republican Party during his term, ran for re-election to a second term but was eliminated in the first round of voting.
In 1991, all elections in Louisiana except U.S. presidential elections followed a variation of the open primary system called the jungle primary. Candidates of all parties are listed on one ballot; voters need not limit themselves to the candidates of one party. Unless one candidate takes 50% or more of the vote in the first round, a run-off election is then held between the top two candidates, who may be members of the same party. In this election, the first round of voting was held on October 19, 1991, and the runoff was held on November 16. In 1990, Duke mounted a campaign for the U.S. Senate, losing to incumbent Democrat J. Bennett Johnston. Leading Republicans repudiated Duke's candidacy, citing his history as a white supremacist.
Public Service Commissioner Kathleen Blanco, a Democrat, announced her candidacy in May 1991. Edwards was not impressed by her entry. It was the first time in 40 years a woman had seriously run for Governor but Edwards surmised she would not get out of single digits. Blanco, who came from Acadiana, could have complicated Edwards' bid for a fourth term but after 100 days she suddenly withdrew and ran for Public Service Commissioner again.[1] Blanco would later be elected governor in her own right in 2003.
Meanwhile, Governor Roemer was facing a potential opponent for the Republican support who could have denied him major party support he needed to stave off Holloway and Duke. Another prominent party-switcher, Secretary of State Fox McKeithen, who withdrew from a 1990 U.S. Senate bid, actively explored a gubernatorial bid. His father, former Governor John McKeithen, would prove to be a strong asset had he run, but in the end, McKeithen figured that his time had come and gone and ran for reelection as Secretary of State.[2]
After the withdrawal of Blanco and McKeithen, the field of candidates began to solidify. Then late in March, incumbent Governor Buddy Roemer changed his party affiliation from Democrat to Republican, dismaying many members of both parties. One irate Republican was the state party chairman, Billy Nungesser of New Orleans. After failing to get the Louisiana Republicans' endorsement convention canceled, Roemer announced he would skip the event. The convention, as expected, endorsed U.S. Representative Clyde C. Holloway, the favored candidate of the anti-abortion forces in the state, with whom Roemer was at odds at the time.[3]
The first round primary gubernatorial contest included Roemer, Edwin Edwards, David Duke, and Eighth District Congressman Holloway who all ran in Louisiana's open primary. Roemer was wounded by his mistakes as governor, while Edwards and Duke each had a passionate core group of supporters. Roemer placed third in the primary. One of the contributing factors to his defeat was a last-minute advertising barrage by Marine Shale owner Jack Kent; Marine Shale had been targeted by the Roemer administration as a polluter, and Kent spent $500,000 of his own money in the closing days of the campaign to purchase anti-Roemer commercials.
First voting round, October 19
| 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
| Democratic | Edwin Edwards | align=center | 523,096 | align=center | 33.76 | |
| Republican | David Duke | align=center | 491,342 | align=center | 31.71 | |
| Republican | Buddy Roemer (incumbent) | align=center | 410,690 | align=center | 26.51 | |
| Republican | Clyde C. Holloway | align=center | 82,683 | align=center | 5.34 | |
| Democratic | Sam S. Jones | align=center | 11,847 | align=center | 0.76 | |
| Other | Ed Karst | align=center | 9,663 | align=center | 0.62 | |
| Democratic | Fred Dent | align=center | 7,385 | align=center | 0.48 | |
| Republican | Anne Thompson | align=center | 4,118 | align=center | 0.27 | |
| Democratic | Jim Crowley | align=center | 4,000 | align=center | 0.26 | |
| Democratic | Albert Powell | align=center | 2,053 | align=center | 0.13 | |
| Other | Ronnie Johnson | align=center | 1,372 | align=center | 0.09 | |
| Democratic | Cousin Ken Lewis | align=center | 1,006 | align=center | 0.06 | |
| Total | align=center | 1,549,255 | align=center | 100 | ||
Faced with the alternative of David Duke, many Louisianans who were otherwise critical of Edwards now looked favorably on him as an alternative. This included Buddy Roemer, who ran on an "Anyone but Edwards" platform during his successful 1987 campaign. He ended up endorsing Edwards rather than Duke, who was the putative Republican candidate.
The resulting runoff campaign was widely seen as one of the dirtiest and most negative campaigns in recent history. Edwards and his supporters seized on Duke's record as a white supremacist; Duke responded by claiming to be a born-again Christian who had renounced racism and anti-Semitism after his conversion.[4]
Nearly the entire Republican leadership rejected Duke's candidacy. In a news conference, President George H. W. Bush condemned Duke as unfit for public office:[4]
When someone has a long record, an ugly record, of racism and bigotry, that record simply cannot be erased by the glib rhetoric of a political campaign. So I believe David Duke is an insincere charlatan. I believe he's attempting to hoodwink the voters of Louisiana. I believe he should be rejected for what he is and what he stands for.
Humorous unofficial bumper stickers were created in support of Edwards over Duke, despite Edwards' negative reputation. One bumper sticker read "Vote for the Lizard, not the Wizard", while another read "Vote For The Crook: It's Important."[5] [6] [7]
The runoff debate, held on November 6, 1991, received significant attention when reporter Norman Robinson questioned Duke. Robinson, who is African-American, told Duke that he was "scared" at the prospect of his winning the election because of his history of "diabolical, evil, vile" racist and anti-Semitic comments, some of which he read to Duke. He then pressed Duke for an apology. When Duke protested that Robinson was not being fair to him, Robinson replied that he did not think Duke was being honest. Jason Berry of the Los Angeles Times called it "startling TV" and the "catalyst" for the "overwhelming" turnout of black voters that helped former Governor Edwin Edwards defeat Duke.[8]
Runoff, November 16
| 1991 Louisiana gubernatorial election runoff | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
| Democratic | Edwin Edwards | align=center | 1,057,031 | align=center | 61.17 | |
| Republican | David Duke | align=center | 671,009 | align=center | 38.83 | |
| Majority | align=center | 386,022 | align=center | 22.34 | ||
| Total | align=center | 1,728,040 | align=center | 100 | ||
| Democratic gain from Republican | ||||||
| Runoff results by parish[9] | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parish | Edwin Washington Edwards Democratic | David Ernest Duke Republican | Margin | Total votes cast | |||||||||||
| % | % | % | |||||||||||||
| Acadia | 14,928 | 60.44% | 9,772 | 39.56% | 5,156 | 20.88% | 24,700 | ||||||||
| Allen | 6,171 | 60.46% | 4,036 | 39.54% | 2,135 | 20.92% | 10,207 | ||||||||
| Ascension | 14,792 | 53.48% | 12,867 | 46.52% | 1,925 | 6.96% | 27,659 | ||||||||
| Assumption | 6,488 | 59.67% | 4,385 | 40.33% | 2,103 | 19.34% | 10,873 | ||||||||
| Avoyelles | 9,044 | 53.72% | 7,792 | 46.28% | 1,252 | 7.44% | 16,836 | ||||||||
| Beauregard | 5,565 | 46.70% | 6,351 | 53.30% | 786 | 6.60% | 11,916 | ||||||||
| Bienville | 4,685 | 59.30% | 3,216 | 40.70% | 1,469 | 18.60% | 7,901 | ||||||||
| Bossier | 14,536 | 50.14% | 14,457 | 49.86% | 79 | 0.28% | 28,993 | ||||||||
| Caddo | 59,933 | 64.08% | 33,591 | 35.92% | 26,342 | 28.16% | 93,524 | ||||||||
| Calcasieu | 40,617 | 65.71% | 21,193 | 34.29% | 19,424 | 31.42% | 61,810 | ||||||||
| Caldwell | 2,112 | 37.04% | 3,590 | 62.96% | 1,478 | 15.92% | 5,702 | ||||||||
| Cameron | 2,669 | 64.75% | 1,453 | 35.25% | 1,216 | 19.50% | 4,122 | ||||||||
| Catahoula | 2,815 | 44.79% | 3,470 | 55.21% | 655 | 10.42% | 6,285 | ||||||||
| Claiborne | 4,329 | 57.70% | 3,174 | 42.30% | 1,155 | 15.40% | 7,503 | ||||||||
| Concordia | 4,544 | 47.41% | 5,040 | 52.59% | 496 | 5.18% | 9,584 | ||||||||
| De Soto | 6,607 | 59.11% | 4,571 | 40.89% | 2,036 | 18.22% | 11,178 | ||||||||
| East Baton Rouge | 100,138 | 66.41% | 50,656 | 33.59% | 49,482 | 32.82% | 150,794 | ||||||||
| East Carroll | 3,017 | 68.98% | 1,357 | 31.02% | 1,660 | 37.96% | 4,374 | ||||||||
| East Feliciana | 4,949 | 59.55% | 3,362 | 40.45% | 1,587 | 19.10% | 8,311 | ||||||||
| Evangeline | 8,947 | 54.50% | 7,470 | 45.50% | 1,477 | 9.00% | 16,417 | ||||||||
| Franklin | 4,410 | 41.65% | 6,179 | 58.35% | 1,769 | 16.70% | 10,589 | ||||||||
| Grant | 3,516 | 43.86% | 4,500 | 56.14% | 984 | 12.28% | 8,016 | ||||||||
| Iberia | 16,594 | 56.43% | 12,814 | 43.57% | 3,780 | 12.86% | 29,408 | ||||||||
| Iberville | 10,693 | 64.56% | 5,870 | 35.44% | 4,823 | 29.12% | 16,563 | ||||||||
| Jackson | 3,345 | 44.49% | 4,173 | 55.51% | 828 | 11.02% | 7,518 | ||||||||
| Jefferson | 102,261 | 59.30% | 70,183 | 40.70% | 32,078 | 18.60% | 172,444 | ||||||||
| Jefferson Davis | 8,581 | 63.79% | 4,870 | 36.21% | 3,711 | 27.58% | 13,451 | ||||||||
| Lafayette | 40,816 | 64.63% | 22,336 | 35.37% | 18,480 | 29.26% | 63,152 | ||||||||
| Lafourche | 21,346 | 59.29% | 14,655 | 40.71% | 6,691 | 18.58% | 36,001 | ||||||||
| LaSalle | 2,432 | 33.12% | 4,910 | 66.88% | 2,478 | 33.76% | 7,342 | ||||||||
| Lincoln | 9,382 | 61.22% | 5,943 | 38.78% | 3,439 | 22.44% | 15,325 | ||||||||
| Livingston | 12,152 | 39.58% | 18,554 | 60.42% | 6,402 | 20.84% | 30,706 | ||||||||
| Madison | 3,582 | 61.04% | 2,286 | 38.96% | 1,296 | 22.08% | 5,868 | ||||||||
| Morehouse | 6,517 | 47.30% | 7,261 | 52.70% | 744 | 5.60% | 13,778 | ||||||||
| Natchitoches | 8,870 | 58.24% | 6,360 | 41.76% | 2,510 | 16.48% | 15,230 | ||||||||
| Orleans | 173,744 | 87.02% | 25,921 | 12.98% | 147,823 | 74.04% | 199,665 | ||||||||
| Ouachita | 26,137 | 49.45% | 26,722 | 50.55% | 585 | 1.10% | 52,859 | ||||||||
| Plaquemines | 6,689 | 55.79% | 5,301 | 44.21% | 1,388 | 11.58% | 11,990 | ||||||||
| Pointe Coupee | 7,430 | 61.32% | 4,687 | 38.68% | 2,743 | 22.64% | 12,117 | ||||||||
| Rapides | 27,638 | 55.95% | 21,762 | 44.05% | 5,876 | 11.90% | 49,400 | ||||||||
| Red River | 2,674 | 53.34% | 2,339 | 46.66% | 335 | 6.68% | 5,013 | ||||||||
| Richland | 3,970 | 43.39% | 5,179 | 56.61% | 1,209 | 13.22% | 9,149 | ||||||||
| Sabine | 4,635 | 46.88% | 5,251 | 53.12% | 616 | 6.24% | 9,886 | ||||||||
| St. Bernard | 14,394 | 44.23% | 18,153 | 55.77% | 3,759 | 11.54% | 32,547 | ||||||||
| St. Charles | 12,680 | 61.66% | 7,885 | 38.34% | 4,795 | 23.32% | 20,565 | ||||||||
| St. Helena | 3,700 | 60.18% | 2,448 | 39.82% | 1,252 | 20.36% | 6,148 | ||||||||
| St. James | 8,028 | 66.34% | 4,074 | 33.66% | 3,954 | 32.68% | 12,102 | ||||||||
| St. John the Baptist | 11,993 | 64.21% | 6,685 | 35.79% | 5,308 | 28.42% | 18,678 | ||||||||
| St. Landry | 23,362 | 61.34% | 14,725 | 38.66% | 8,637 | 22.68% | 38,087 | ||||||||
| St. Martin | 12,726 | 64.20% | 7,095 | 35.80% | 5,631 | 28.40% | 19,821 | ||||||||
| St. Mary | 15,039 | 61.42% | 9,447 | 38.58% | 5,592 | 22.84% | 24,486 | ||||||||
| St. Tammany | 32,678 | 55.88% | 25,800 | 44.12% | 6,878 | 11.76% | 58,478 | ||||||||
| Tangipahoa | 18,779 | 53.28% | 16,469 | 46.72% | 2,310 | 6.56% | 35,248 | ||||||||
| Tensas | 1,993 | 58.84% | 1,394 | 41.16% | 599 | 17.68% | 3,387 | ||||||||
| Terrebonne | 19,799 | 59.17% | 13,662 | 40.83% | 6,137 | 18.34% | 33,461 | ||||||||
| Union | 4,029 | 40.09% | 6,020 | 59.91% | 1,991 | 19.82% | 10,049 | ||||||||
| Vermillion | 14,477 | 64.75% | 7,882 | 35.25% | 6,595 | 29.50% | 22,359 | ||||||||
| Vernon | 6,676 | 49.33% | 6,856 | 50.67% | 180 | 1.31% | 13,532 | ||||||||
| Washington | 9,157 | 46.40% | 10,577 | 53.60% | 1,420 | 7.20% | 19,734 | ||||||||
| Webster | 9,024 | 51.77% | 8,406 | 48.23% | 618 | 3.54% | 17,430 | ||||||||
| West Baton Rouge | 6,016 | 59.52% | 4,092 | 40.48% | 1,024 | 19.04% | 10,108 | ||||||||
| West Carroll | 1,625 | 31.12% | 3,596 | 68.88% | 1,971 | 37.76% | 5,221 | ||||||||
| West Feliciana | 2,896 | 64.47% | 1,596 | 35.53% | 1,300 | 28.94% | 4,492 | ||||||||
| Winn | 3,660 | 46.05% | 4,288 | 53.95% | 628 | 7.90% | 7,948 | ||||||||
| Totals | 1,057,031 | 61.17% | 671,009 | 38.83% | 386,022 | 22.34% | 1,728,040 | ||||||||
Edwards' large victory was credited to his almost unanimous support from black voters, who had a turnout of 80%. He also won 75% of voters who supported Roemer. 63% of female voters and 59% of male voters supported Edwards. Duke received 56% of white voters with family incomes under $15,000, 63% of those with incomes between $15,000 and $29,999, and 60% of those with incomes between $30,000 and $49,999. 51% of white voters with family incomes between $50,000 and $74,999 and 66% with incomes above $75,000 supported Edwards.[10]