1983 South African constitutional referendum explained

Country:South Africa
Flag Year:1982
Are you in favour of the implementation of the Constitution Act, 1983, as approved by Parliament?
Yes:1,360,223
No:691,577
Total:2,062,469
Electorate:2,713,000
Map:South Africa 1983 referendum results by region.svg
Mapdivision:region

A referendum on a new constitution was held in South Africa on 2 November 1983 in which the white population was given the opportunity to approve or reject the Constitution of 1983. This constitution introduced the Tricameral Parliament, in which Coloured and Indian South Africans would be represented in separate parliamentary chambers, while black Africans, who were the majority of South Africa's population, would remain unrepresented. The referendum passed with 66.3% of voters voting "Yes"; consequently the new constitution came into force on 3 September 1984.

Background

In 1981 the Senate was abolished and replaced with the President's Council, which was an advisory body consisting of sixty nominated members from the white, coloured, Indian and Chinese population groups. Following a request by Prime Minister P.W. Botha, the President's Council presented a set of proposals in 1982 for constitutional and political reform. This proposal called for the implementation of "power sharing" between the white, coloured and Indian communities.

The right wing of the ruling National Party (NP) rejected this proposal and a group of its MPs, led by Dr. Andries Treurnicht, a cabinet minister and the leader of the NP in the Transvaal province, broke away to form the Conservative Party (CP) in order to fight for a return to apartheid in its original form. However, Botha continued to be in favour of implementing the President's Council proposal and in 1983 the NP government introduced a new constitutional framework. A referendum was called for in order to determine public support for the reforms amongst white voters. The New Republic Party led by Vause Raw supported the new constitution, although it continued to call for black representation in Parliament.

Opposition

Both the Progressive Federal Party (PFP), which objected to the exclusion of blacks, as well as the CP, which objected to the participation of coloureds and Indians, campaigned for a "No" vote. However, many PFP followers and parts of the anti-government English language press supported the new constitution as "a step in the right direction". The conservative opposition to the reforms used banners with the text "Rhodesia voted yes – vote no!" reflecting on the transformation to majority rule in Rhodesia.[1]

The response of Coloured, Indian and black leaders were mixed. The new constitution was rejected by most Bantustan leaders and the Urban Councils Association of South Africa (representing the black township administrations) because it did not provide for black representation. Coloured and Indian parties that intended to participate in the Tricameral Parliament but also insisted on extending representation to the black majority.[2]

The United Democratic Front (UDF) was launched as a non-racial coalition to oppose the referendum and the subsequent elections for the coloured and Indian chambers in parliament.

Results

ChoiceVotes%
Yes1,360,22366.29
No691,57733.71
Invalid/blank votes10,669
Total2,062,469100
Registered voters/turnout2,713,00076.02
align=left colspan=3Source:[3]

By region

For counting purposes the provinces of South Africa were divided into various referendum areas. The following table shows the results in each area.[4]

Area Yes No Valid
votes
Invalid
votes
Total
votes
Votes % Votes %
Cape
22,502 74.42 7,733 25.58 30,235 93 30,328
221,511 75.61 71,456 24.39 292,967 1,229 294,196
53,202 77.91 15,087 22.09 68,289 255 68,544
31,256 73.23 11,426 26.77 42,682 141 42,823
34,815 66.05 17,898 33.95 52,713 110 52,823
60,661 70.08 25,901 29.92 86,562 208 86,770
Total 423,947 73.93 149,501 26.07 573,448 2,036 575,484
Natal
123,783 73.58 44,442 26.42 168,225 750 168,975
50,519 71.58 20,060 28.42 70,579 366 70,945
Total 174,302 72.99 64,502 27.01 238,804 1,116 239,920
Orange Free State
52,019 65.86 26,960 34.14 78,979 331 79,310
55,486 63.19 32,321 36.81 87,807 189 87,996
Total 107,505 64.46 59,281 35.54 166,786 520 167,306
Transvaal
113,600 65.35 60,241 34.65 173,841 900 174,741
194,396 69.44 85,554 30.56 279,950 3,906 283,856
31,403 47.42 34,827 52.58 66,230 247 66,477
209,763 57.13 157,433 42.87 367,196 1,035 368,231
105,307 56.76 80,238 43.24 185,545 909 186,454
Total 654,469 61.01 418,293 38.99 1,072,762 6,997 1,079,759
South Africa
Total 1,360,223 66.29 691,577 33.71 2,051,800 10,669 2,062,469

Notes and References

  1. News: Godwin. Peter. Whose Kith and Kin Now?. https://web.archive.org/web/20040805050335/http://www.maryellenmark.com/text/magazines/london_sunday_times/904G-000-005.html. 5 August 2004. The Sunday Times Magazine. 25 March 1984. 9 August 2013. Those with unbendable prejudices (the most furiously racist of them being post-UDI immigrants) began to leave for South Africa. There they spread horror stories about Zimbabwe and, in the recent South African referendum on giving Coloureds and Indians the vote, flocked to vote for the right-wing parties behind such banners as 'Rhodesia voted yes – vote no!'.
  2. Web site: Survey of race relations in South Africa: 1983 . . 28 November 2018 . 27 November 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20181127110502/http://psimg.jstor.org/fsi/img/pdf/t0/10.5555/al.sff.document.boo19840000.042.000_final.pdf . dead .
  3. Web site: Südafrika, 2. November 1983 : Verfassungsreform . Search Engine for Direct Democracy . 2 November 1983 . de . 31 December 2012.
  4. Notice 874 of 1983: Result of the referendum held on 2 November 1983 . . 219 . 8960 . 11 November 1983 . 27.