Election Name: | 1956 Quebec general election |
Country: | Quebec |
Type: | parliamentary |
Ongoing: | no |
Party Colour: | no |
Party Name: | no |
Previous Election: | 1952 Quebec general election |
Previous Year: | 1952 |
Previous Mps: | 24th Quebec Legislature |
Next Election: | 1960 Quebec general election |
Next Year: | 1960 |
Elected Members: | 25th Quebec Legislature |
Seats For Election: | 93 seats in the 24th Legislative Assembly of Quebec 47 seats were needed for a majority |
Election Date: | June 20, 1956 |
Image1: | Maurice Duplessis.jpg |
Image1 Size: | 180x180px |
Leader1: | Maurice Duplessis |
Leader Since1: | June 20, 1936 |
Leaders Seat1: | Trois-Rivières |
Last Election1: | 68 seats, 50.5% |
Seats1: | 72 |
Seat Change1: | 4 |
Percentage1: | 51.8% |
Swing1: | 1.3pp |
Image2 Size: | 180x180px |
Leader2: | Georges-Émile Lapalme |
Leader Since2: | May 20, 1950 |
Leaders Seat2: | Montréal-Outremont |
Last Election2: | 23 seats, 45.77% |
Seats2: | 20 |
Seat Change2: | 3 |
Percentage2: | 44.87% |
Swing2: | 0.9pp |
Premier | |
Before Election: | Maurice Duplessis |
After Election: | Maurice Duplessis |
Posttitle: | Premier after election |
The 1956 Quebec general election was held on June 20, 1956, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Union Nationale, led by Maurice Duplessis, won re-election, defeating the Quebec Liberal Party, led by Georges-Émile Lapalme.[1]
This was the fifth and final time (and the fourth in a row) that Duplessis led his party to a general election victory. No party has since been able to win more than three elections in a row. Duplessis died in office in 1959.
It was Lapalme's second (and final) loss in a row as Liberal leader. The Liberals did not manage to improve on their performance in the previous 1952 election.
An Act passed in 1954 provided for the creation of the new electoral district of Jonquière-Kénogami for the next election, which was carved out from Chicoutimi and Lac-Saint-Jean.[2] In 1955, a bill was passed designated members of the assembly as Members of Provincial Parliament or MPPs.[3]
The Liberals and the Union des électeurs pooled their resources to conduct a joint campaign against the UN in at least 50 ridings.[4] They collaborated to such a degree that in February 1956 the Liberal MPP René Hamel had proposed a motion espousing social credit theory in the Assembly, and a joint rally was held in May 1956 in Shawinigan to mark that event. While the strategy was viewed within the parties as a means to maximize their strength in opposing the UN, the electorate tended to view it as being confusing, while the Montreal Gazette called it "an irresponsible alliance".[5] There were also Liberals in the old guard that wanted the UN to win.
The Liberals supported four UdE and two Nationalist candidates,[6] respectively running as Liberals and Independents, of which none won:[7]
One observer noted, "The Union Nationale’s strongly entrenched position could not be seriously challenged unless a united front was formed of all opposing groups." The UN chose to campaign on Quebec's right to fiscal autonomy, the party's accomplishments and the future of Ungava, while the Liberals' chances were restrained by their alliance with the UdE (while shutting out the Parti social démocratique), the choice of Chaloult and Laporte not to identify themselves as Liberal candidates, and the party's tendency to side with Ottawa's centralizing policies. The UN correctly assumed that Quebec voters, when given a choice, would prefer a nationalist policy over a social one.
Candidates | align="center" | UN | align="center" | Lib | align="center" | PSD | align="center" | Lab-Pr | align="center" | Ind | align="center" | I-Lib | align="center" | I-UN | align="center" | Lab | align="center" | UN-Lab | align="center" | CF | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2 | 50 | 49 | 1 | 100 | |||||||||||||||||
3 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 60 | |||||||||||||
4 | 13 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 52 | ||||||||||||
5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 25 | ||||||||||||
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||||||
7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |||||||||||||||
8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Total | 93 | 91 | 26 | 32 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 272 |
[11] |-! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party! rowspan=2 | Party leader! colspan=4 | MPPs! colspan=4 | Votes|-! Candidates!1952!1956!±!#! ±!%! ± (pp)|style="text-align:left;"|Maurice Duplessis|93||68||72||4||956,082||108,099||51.80%||1.30|style="text-align:left;"|Georges-Émile Lapalme|92||23||20||3||828,264||59,725||44.87%||0.90|style="text-align:left;"|Thérèse Casgrain|26|| - || - || - ||11,232||4,807||0.61%||0.35|style="text-align:left;"|Gui Caron|32|| - || - || - ||6,517||2,585||0.35%||0.12|-|rowspan="7" | |style="text-align:left;" colspan="10"|Other candidates|-|style="text-align:left;" ||style="text-align:left;"| |7||1||1||||33,205||19,359||1.80%||0.98|-|style="text-align:left;" ||style="text-align:left;"||7|| - || - || - ||4,438||528||0.24%||0.06|-|style="text-align:left;" ||style="text-align:left;"||10|| - || - || - ||4,108||9,089||0.22%||0.57|-|style="text-align:left;" ||style="text-align:left;"||3|| - || - || - ||1,274||247||0.07%||0.01|-|style="text-align:left;" ||style="text-align:left;"||1|| - || - || - ||516||New||0.03%||New|-|style="text-align:left;" ||style="text-align:left;"||1|| - || - || - ||93||New||0.01%||New|-! colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" | Total|272||92! " colspan="2"|93! " colspan="2"|1,845,729! " colspan="2"| 100%|-| colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Rejected ballots| 28,781| 3,133| colspan="2"||-| colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Voter turnout| 1,874,510| 169,599| 78.32| 2.44|-| colspan="7" style="text-align:left;" | Registered electors| 2,393,360| 146,362| colspan="2"||}
Riding | Winning party | Turnout [13] | Votes | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | 1952 | Party | Votes | Share | Margin # | Margin % | UN | Lib | Total | |||||||||||
Abitibi-Est | UN | UN | 13,967 | 53.94% | 2,200 | 8.50% | 81.31% | 13,967 | 11,767 | – | – | – | – | – | 160 | – | 25,894 | |||
Abitibi-Ouest | UN | Lib | 6,207 | 50.66% | 161 | 1.31% | 89.27% | 6,046 | 6,207 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,253 | |||
Argenteuil | UN | UN | 7,153 | 55.54% | 1,427 | 11.08% | 86.07% | 7,153 | 5,726 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,879 | |||
UN | UN | 10,189 | 54.74% | 1,765 | 9.48% | 92.72% | 10,189 | 8,424 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,613 | ||||
Bagot | UN | UN | 5,696 | 61.46% | 2,124 | 22.92% | 90.76% | 5,696 | 3,572 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,268 | |||
Beauce | UN | UN | 13,432 | 56.66% | 3,158 | 13.32% | 88.52% | 13,432 | 10,274 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 23,706 | |||
Beauharnois | UN | UN | 11,928 | 58.31% | 3,450 | 16.87% | 87.96% | 11,928 | 8,478 | – | 50 | – | – | – | – | – | 20,456 | |||
Bellechasse | UN | UN | 6,243 | 57.89% | 1,702 | 15.78% | 82.86% | 6,243 | 4,541 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,784 | |||
Berthier | UN | UN | 7,123 | 56.17% | 1,565 | 12.34% | 90.30% | 7,123 | 5,558 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,681 | |||
Bonaventure | UN | Lib | 8,551 | 52.68% | 869 | 5.35% | 84.06% | 7,682 | 8,551 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 16,233 | |||
Brome | UN | Lib | 3,274 | 51.66% | 245 | 3.87% | 83.36% | 3,029 | 3,274 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,338 | |||
Chambly | UN | Lib | 20,031 | 49.43% | 767 | 1.89% | 76.45% | 19,264 | 20,031 | 877 | 150 | – | 205 | – | – | – | 40,527 | |||
Champlain | UN | UN | 12,579 | 58.93% | 3,814 | 17.87% | 90.32% | 12,579 | 8,765 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21,344 | |||
Charlevoix | UN | UN | 7,729 | 60.37% | 2,655 | 20.74% | 87.17% | 7,729 | 5,074 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,803 | |||
Châteauguay | UN | UN | 5,936 | 57.10% | 1,477 | 14.21% | 85.59% | 5,936 | 4,459 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,395 | |||
Chicoutimi | UN | UN | 19,103 | 67.22% | 9,788 | 34.44% | 87.25% | 19,103 | 9,315 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 28,418 | |||
Compton | UN | Lib | 5,542 | 51.41% | 401 | 3.72% | 85.72% | 5,141 | 5,542 | 98 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,781 | |||
Deux-Montagnes | UN | UN | 8,133 | 72.31% | 5,162 | 45.90% | 83.43% | 8,133 | 2,971 | 143 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11,247 | |||
Dorchester | UN | UN | 9,569 | 60.74% | 3,385 | 21.49% | 85.40% | 9,569 | 6,184 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,753 | |||
Drummond | Lib | UN | 13,211 | 53.83% | 1,928 | 7.86% | 91.52% | 13,211 | 11,283 | – | 47 | – | – | – | – | – | 24,541 | |||
Frontenac | Lib | UN | 6,451 | 52.12% | 524 | 4.23% | 89.65% | 6,451 | 5,927 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,378 | |||
Gaspé-Nord | UN | UN | 4,574 | 50.40% | 135 | 1.49% | 84.26% | 4,574 | 4,439 | – | – | 62 | – | – | – | – | 9,075 | |||
Gaspé-Sud | UN | UN | 8,016 | 56.03% | 1,726 | 12.06% | 85.67% | 8,016 | 6,290 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,306 | |||
Gatineau | UN | UN | 8,206 | 55.96% | 1,748 | 11.92% | 76.32% | 8,206 | 6,458 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,664 | |||
Hull | UN | Lib | 10,564 | 45.70% | 143 | 0.62% | 83.05% | 10,421 | 10,564 | 157 | 79 | – | – | 1,895 | – | – | 23,116 | |||
Huntingdon | UN | UN | 3,273 | 52.33% | 291 | 4.65% | 84.69% | 3,273 | 2,982 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,255 | |||
Iberville | UN | UN | 3,903 | 57.22% | 985 | 14.44% | 88.13% | 3,903 | 2,918 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6,821 | |||
Îles-de-la-Madeleine | UN | UN | 2,591 | 56.72% | 614 | 13.44% | 89.09% | 2,591 | 1,977 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4,568 | |||
Jacques-Cartier | Lib | Lib | 31,385 | 55.39% | 9,094 | 16.05% | 70.68% | 22,291 | 31,385 | 2,322 | 668 | – | – | – | – | – | 56,666 | |||
Joliette | UN | UN | 11,500 | 64.88% | 5,275 | 29.76% | 86.06% | 11,500 | 6,225 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 17,725 | |||
Jonquière-Kénogami | New | UN | 11,946 | 50.68% | 320 | 1.36% | 88.00% | 11,946 | – | – | – | 11,626 | – | – | – | – | 23,572 | |||
Kamouraska | UN | UN | 6,489 | 58.30% | 1,847 | 16.59% | 81.48% | 6,489 | 4,642 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11,131 | |||
UN | UN | 7,260 | 55.53% | 1,445 | 11.05% | 87.97% | 7,260 | 5,815 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13,075 | ||||
L'Islet | UN | UN | 5,322 | 53.25% | 649 | 6.49% | 86.54% | 5,322 | 4,673 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,995 | |||
Labelle | UN | UN | 6,717 | 62.07% | 2,658 | 24.56% | 87.41% | 6,717 | 4,059 | – | 46 | – | – | – | – | – | 10,822 | |||
Lac-Saint-Jean | UN | UN | 8,544 | 54.49% | 1,408 | 8.98% | 92.66% | 8,544 | 7,136 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,680 | |||
Laval | UN | UN | 50,417 | 53.91% | 9,203 | 9.84% | 70.51% | 50,417 | 41,214 | 1,129 | 763 | – | – | – | – | – | 93,523 | |||
Laviolette | UN | UN | 11,848 | 59.46% | 3,769 | 18.91% | 82.94% | 11,848 | 8,079 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,927 | |||
Lévis | Lib | UN | 12,220 | 54.30% | 2,114 | 9.39% | 90.04% | 12,220 | 10,106 | – | 18 | – | – | 161 | – | – | 22,505 | |||
Lotbinière | UN | UN | 7,052 | 57.23% | 1,781 | 14.45% | 89.41% | 7,052 | 5,271 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,323 | |||
Maisonneuve | Lib | UN | 20,668 | 50.93% | 2,469 | 6.08% | 68.96% | 20,668 | 18,199 | 227 | 176 | 249 | 119 | 941 | – | – | 40,579 | |||
Maskinongé | UN | UN | 5,588 | 57.26% | 1,417 | 14.52% | 93.04% | 5,588 | 4,171 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,759 | |||
Matane | UN | UN | 10,109 | 57.93% | 2,769 | 15.87% | 84.28% | 10,109 | 7,340 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 17,449 | |||
Matapédia | UN | UN | 7,205 | 54.66% | 1,229 | 9.32% | 86.00% | 7,205 | 5,976 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13,181 | |||
Mégantic | UN | UN | 12,123 | 52.50% | 1,155 | 5.00% | 92.22% | 12,123 | 10,968 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 23,091 | |||
Missisquoi | UN | UN | 7,001 | 56.72% | 1,658 | 13.43% | 86.03% | 7,001 | 5,343 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12,344 | |||
Montcalm | UN | UN | 4,585 | 56.67% | 1,079 | 13.34% | 89.26% | 4,585 | 3,506 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,091 | |||
Montmagny | UN | UN | 6,403 | 55.92% | 1,355 | 11.83% | 87.37% | 6,403 | 5,048 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 11,451 | |||
Montmorency | UN | UN | 6,628 | 59.53% | 2,165 | 19.44% | 90.72% | 6,628 | 4,463 | – | 43 | – | – | – | – | – | 11,134 | |||
Lib | UN | 29,076 | 49.76% | 3,439 | 5.88% | 66.38% | 29,076 | 25,637 | 334 | 239 | 238 | 1,798 | 91 | 1,025 | – | 58,438 | ||||
UN | UN | 17,154 | 60.26% | 7,491 | 26.31% | 70.86% | 17,154 | – | – | – | 9,663 | 1,652 | – | – | – | 28,469 | ||||
UN | UN | 18,165 | 60.03% | 6,705 | 22.16% | 65.79% | 18,165 | 11,460 | 162 | 383 | – | – | – | 89 | – | 30,259 | ||||
Lib | Lib | 28,175 | 77.44% | 21,106 | 58.01% | 55.29% | 7,069 | 28,175 | 629 | 510 | – | – | – | – | – | 36,383 | ||||
Lib | Lib | 24,348 | 67.83% | 14,331 | 39.93% | 55.80% | 10,017 | 24,348 | 726 | 802 | – | – | – | – | – | 35,893 | ||||
Lib | Lib | 17,344 | 51.30% | 1,960 | 5.80% | 70.57% | 15,384 | 17,344 | 234 | 156 | – | – | 172 | – | 516 | 33,806 | ||||
UN | UN | 11,206 | 62.36% | 4,922 | 27.39% | 63.90% | 11,206 | 6,284 | 279 | 200 | – | – | – | – | – | 17,969 | ||||
Lib | Lib | 12,276 | 49.47% | 2,461 | 9.92% | 52.88% | 9,815 | 12,276 | 425 | 649 | – | 1,650 | – | – | – | 24,815 | ||||
Ind | Ind | 10,520 | 66.01% | 6,432 | 40.36% | 60.75% | 587 | 4,088 | 145 | 167 | 10,520 | – | 429 | – | – | 15,936 | ||||
Lib | UN | 15,051 | 54.80% | 3,853 | 14.03% | 67.93% | 15,051 | 11,198 | 195 | 172 | 847 | – | – | – | – | 27,463 | ||||
Lib | Lib | 20,175 | 70.12% | 13,361 | 46.43% | 64.50% | 6,814 | 20,175 | 1,785 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 28,774 | ||||
Napierville-Laprairie | UN | UN | 7,861 | 53.81% | 1,166 | 7.98% | 89.28% | 7,861 | 6,695 | – | 52 | – | – | – | – | – | 14,608 | |||
Nicolet | UN | UN | 8,498 | 59.33% | 2,673 | 18.66% | 86.53% | 8,498 | 5,825 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,323 | |||
Papineau | UN | UN | 11,164 | 56.21% | 2,467 | 12.42% | 87.78% | 11,164 | 8,697 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,861 | |||
Pontiac | UN | UN | 6,201 | 71.83% | 3,769 | 43.66% | 79.30% | 6,201 | 2,432 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,633 | |||
Portneuf | UN | UN | 12,810 | 60.72% | 4,523 | 21.44% | 87.52% | 12,810 | 8,287 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21,097 | |||
Québec-Centre | UN | UN | 10,983 | 60.18% | 3,715 | 20.36% | 81.48% | 10,983 | 7,268 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,251 | |||
Québec-Comté | Lib | UN | 21,272 | 56.22% | 5,047 | 13.34% | 85.59% | 21,272 | 16,225 | – | 63 | – | – | 280 | – | – | 37,840 | |||
Québec-Est | Lib | UN | 20,173 | 55.47% | 4,090 | 11.25% | 85.85% | 20,173 | 16,083 | – | 112 | – | – | – | – | – | 36,368 | |||
Lib | Lib | 10,073 | 50.40% | 158 | 0.79% | 82.76% | 9,915 | 10,073 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,988 | ||||
Richelieu | Lib | UN | 9,552 | 54.28% | 1,590 | 9.03% | 89.78% | 9,552 | 7,962 | 66 | 19 | – | – | – | – | – | 17,599 | |||
Richmond | Lib | Lib | 9,470 | 51.49% | 742 | 4.03% | 90.47% | 8,728 | 9,470 | – | 194 | – | – | – | – | – | 18,392 | |||
Rimouski | UN | Lib | 9,911 | 51.05% | 408 | 2.10% | 85.03% | 9,503 | 9,911 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 19,414 | |||
Rivière-du-Loup | UN | Lib | 8,623 | 51.24% | 556 | 3.30% | 87.88% | 8,067 | 8,623 | – | – | – | – | 139 | – | – | 16,829 | |||
Roberval | UN | UN | 10,903 | 52.50% | 1,038 | 5.00% | 88.94% | 10,903 | 9,865 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 20,768 | |||
Rouville | UN | UN | 5,277 | 52.84% | 567 | 5.68% | 87.54% | 5,277 | 4,710 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,987 | |||
Rouyn-Noranda | UN | Lib | 7,561 | 51.16% | 1,007 | 6.81% | 84.35% | 6,554 | 7,561 | 665 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14,780 | |||
Saguenay | UN | UN | 10,899 | 58.60% | 3,198 | 17.19% | 75.91% | 10,899 | 7,701 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 18,600 | |||
Saint-Hyacinthe | UN | Lib | 9,965 | 51.67% | 669 | 3.47% | 83.85% | 9,296 | 9,965 | – | 24 | – | – | – | – | – | 19,285 | |||
Saint-Jean | UN | UN | 8,279 | 56.17% | 1,901 | 12.90% | 85.62% | 8,279 | 6,378 | 55 | 27 | – | – | – | – | – | 14,739 | |||
Saint-Maurice | Lib | Lib | 13,851 | 51.37% | 741 | 2.75% | 90.44% | 13,110 | 13,851 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 26,961 | |||
Saint-Sauveur | UN | UN | 16,117 | 68.77% | 8,862 | 37.81% | 87.43% | 16,117 | 7,255 | – | 64 | – | – | – | – | – | 23,436 | |||
Shefford | Lib | UN | 11,534 | 53.59% | 1,627 | 7.56% | 85.31% | 11,534 | 9,907 | – | 82 | – | – | – | – | – | 21,523 | |||
UN | UN | 16,588 | 55.30% | 3,438 | 11.46% | 78.62% | 16,588 | 13,150 | 73 | 185 | – | – | – | – | – | 29,996 | ||||
UN | UN | 7,815 | 50.26% | 81 | 0.52% | 82.63% | 7,815 | 7,734 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,549 | ||||
Lib | UN | 4,078 | 50.83% | 133 | 1.66% | 86.26% | 4,078 | 3,945 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,023 | ||||
UN | UN | 6,299 | 59.35% | 1,985 | 18.70% | 85.36% | 6,299 | 4,314 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10,613 | ||||
Terrebonne | UN | UN | 20,984 | 57.57% | 5,704 | 15.65% | 85.34% | 20,984 | 15,280 | 107 | 77 | – | – | – | – | – | 36,448 | |||
Trois-Rivières | UN | UN | 16,263 | 61.73% | 6,327 | 24.02% | 88.23% | 16,263 | 9,936 | – | 52 | – | – | – | – | 93 | 26,344 | |||
Vaudreuil-Soulanges | UN | UN | 7,681 | 51.00% | 370 | 2.46% | 85.94% | 7,681 | 7,311 | 70 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15,062 | |||
Verchères | Lib | UN | 5,104 | 53.06% | 627 | 6.52% | 89.67% | 5,104 | 4,477 | 39 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,620 | |||
Lib | Lib | 13,808 | 80.05% | 10,870 | 63.02% | 51.26% | 2,938 | 13,808 | 255 | 248 | – | – | – | – | – | 17,249 | ||||
Wolfe | Lib | UN | 4,058 | 50.31% | 50 | 0.62% | 93.33% | 4,058 | 4,008 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8,066 | |||
Yamaska | UN | UN | 4,736 | 66.22% | 2,320 | 32.44% | 85.90% | 4,736 | 2,416 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 7,152 |
= open seat
= turnout is above provincial average
= winning candidate was in previous Legislature
= incumbent had switched allegiance
= not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature
= incumbency arose from byelection gain
= previously incumbent in another riding
= other incumbents renominated
= UdE candidates under the Liberal banner
= Nationalist candidates supported by the Liberals
= multiple candidates
Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UN | Lib | Ind | ||||
70 | 2 | 72 | ||||
20 | 20 | |||||
1 | 1 | |||||
Total | 20 | 71 | 2 | 93 |
Parties | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
72 | 20 | 1 | 93 | ||||
20 | 71 | 92 | |||||
1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |||
16 | 6 | 2 | 24 | ||||
13 | 11 | 5 | 29 | ||||
5 | 3 | 1 | 9 | ||||
3 | 2 | 5 | |||||
1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
1 | 1 | ||||||
1 | 1 |
Party | ||||||
align="center" | UN | align="center" | Lib | align="center" | Ind | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 55 | 9 | 1 | 65 | |
Open seats held | 3 | 1 | 4 | |||
Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated | 9 | 6 | 15 | ||
Incumbents defeated - previous incumbents returned | 3 | 3 | ||||
Open seats gained | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
New ridings | New MPP elected | 1 | 1 | |||
Total | 72 | 20 | 1 | 93 |