1936 United States presidential election in Texas explained

See main article: 1936 United States presidential election.

Election Name:	1936 United States presidential election in Texas
Country:	Texas
Type:	presidential
Ongoing:	no
Previous Election:	1932 United States presidential election in Texas
Previous Year:	1932
Next Election:	1940 United States presidential election in Texas
Next Year:	1940
Votes For Election:	All 23 Texas votes to the Electoral College
Election Date:	November 3, 1936^[1]
Image1:	FDR in 1933 (cropped).jpg
Nominee1:	Franklin D. Roosevelt
Party1:	Democratic Party (United States)
Home State1:	New York
Running Mate1:	John Nance Garner
Electoral Vote1:	23
Popular Vote1:	739,952
Percentage1:	87.08%
Nominee2:	Alf Landon
Party2:	Republican Party (United States)
Home State2:	Kansas
Running Mate2:	Frank Knox
Electoral Vote2:	0
Popular Vote2:	104,661
Percentage2:	12.32%
Map Size:	350px
President
Before Election:	Franklin D. Roosevelt
Before Party:	Democratic Party (United States)
After Election:	Franklin D. Roosevelt
After Party:	Democratic Party (United States)

The 1936 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 3, 1936, as part of the 1936 United States presidential election. Texas voters chose 23^[2] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Texas was won by incumbent President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D–New York), with 87.08% of the popular vote, over Governor Alf Landon (R–Kansas), with 12.32% of the popular vote, a landslide victory margin of 74.76%.^{[3] [4]} Despite the overwhelming Democratic victory here, however, Landon performed better than fellow Republican Herbert Hoover had in 1932, with the state swinging approximately two points towards the GOP, and he managed to flip both Gillespie County and Kendall County back into the Republican column, the latter remaining with the party ever since.

By percentage of the popular vote won, Texas was Roosevelt's fifth-best state, behind South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Georgia.

Results

Results by county

1936 United States presidential election in Texas by county^[5]

County	Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic		Alf Landon Republican		William Lemke^[6] Union		Various candidates Other parties		Margin		Total votes cast
		%		%		%		%		%
	Anderson		3,749		92.80%		289		7.15%		0		0.00%		2		0.05%		3,460		85.64%		4,040
	Andrews		287		93.79%		18		5.88%		0		0.00%		1		0.33%		269		87.91%		306
	Angelina		3,943		91.91%		342		7.97%		1		0.02%		4		0.09%		3,601		83.94%		4,290
	Aransas		206		74.37%		60		21.66%		8		2.89%		3		1.08%		146		52.71%		277
	Archer		1,672		91.77%		146		8.01%		4		0.22%		0		0.00%		1,526		83.75%		1,822
	Armstrong		897		96.14%		33		3.54%		3		0.32%		0		0.00%		864		92.60%		933
	Atascosa		2,041		86.85%		285		12.13%		17		0.72%		7		0.30%		1,756		74.72%		2,350
	Austin		1,635		84.76%		290		15.03%		2		0.10%		2		0.10%		1,345		69.73%		1,929
	Bailey		788		79.36%		191		19.23%		10		1.01%		4		0.40%		597		60.12%		993
	Bandera		720		61.49%		431		36.81%		18		1.54%		2		0.17%		289		24.68%		1,171
	Bastrop		2,395		92.04%		198		7.61%		7		0.27%		2		0.08%		2,197		84.44%		2,602
	Baylor		1,541		93.85%		100		6.09%		0		0.00%		1		0.06%		1,441		87.76%		1,642
	Bee		1,462		70.22%		603		28.96%		11		0.53%		6		0.29%		859		41.26%		2,082
	Bell		6,119		92.42%		475		7.17%		21		0.32%		6		0.09%		5,644		85.24%		6,621
	Bexar		35,781		72.74%		12,951		26.33%		205		0.42%		250		0.51%		22,830		46.41%		49,187
	Blanco		1,056		76.97%		313		22.81%		0		0.00%		3		0.22%		743		54.15%		1,372
	Borden		220		88.71%		26		10.48%		1		0.40%		1		0.40%		194		78.23%		248
	Bosque		2,283		86.54%		350		13.27%		2		0.08%		3		0.11%		1,933		73.28%		2,638
	Bowie		5,030		91.11%		472		8.55%		12		0.22%		7		0.13%		4,558		82.56%		5,521
	Brazoria		2,284		82.01%		462		16.59%		29		1.04%		10		0.36%		1,822		65.42%		2,785
	Brazos		2,610		98.16%		45		1.69%		0		0.00%		4		0.15%		2,565		96.46%		2,659
	Brewster		828		84.40%		151		15.39%		2		0.20%		0		0.00%		677		69.01%		981
	Briscoe		849		92.99%		64		7.01%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		785		85.98%		913
	Brooks		365		75.57%		117		24.22%		0		0.00%		1		0.21%		248		51.35%		483
	Brown		3,971		89.08%		448		10.05%		34		0.76%		5		0.11%		3,523		79.03%		4,458
	Burleson		1,466		91.57%		135		8.43%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,331		83.14%		1,601
	Burnet		1,581		93.33%		111		6.55%		1		0.06%		1		0.06%		1,470		86.78%		1,694
	Caldwell		3,019		91.76%		247		7.51%		24		0.73%		0		0.00%		2,772		84.26%		3,290
	Calhoun		685		87.71%		92		11.78%		1		0.13%		3		0.38%		593		75.93%		781
	Callahan		1,739		87.34%		245		12.31%		2		0.10%		5		0.25%		1,494		75.04%		1,991
	Cameron		5,887		71.74%		2,160		26.32%		150		1.83%		9		0.11%		3,727		45.42%		8,206
	Camp		939		92.33%		78		7.67%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		861		84.66%		1,017
	Carson		1,568		90.74%		147		8.51%		13		0.75%		0		0.00%		1,421		82.23%		1,728
	Cass		2,461		93.57%		169		6.43%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,292		87.15%		2,630
	Castro		950		92.68%		65		6.34%		10		0.98%		0		0.00%		885		86.34%		1,025
	Chambers		984		87.78%		134		11.95%		2		0.18%		1		0.09%		850		75.83%		1,121
	Cherokee		3,908		92.65%		302		7.16%		3		0.07%		5		0.12%		3,606		85.49%		4,218
	Childress		2,076		89.99%		209		9.06%		13		0.56%		9		0.39%		1,867		80.93%		2,307
	Clay		2,168		91.09%		196		8.24%		11		0.46%		5		0.21%		1,972		82.86%		2,380
	Cochran		683		91.19%		58		7.74%		1		0.13%		7		0.93%		625		83.44%		749
	Coke		888		91.93%		68		7.04%		3		0.31%		7		0.72%		820		84.89%		966
	Coleman		2,900		91.28%		269		8.47%		4		0.13%		4		0.13%		2,631		82.81%		3,177
	Collin		5,669		91.29%		531		8.55%		2		0.03%		8		0.13%		5,138		82.74%		6,210
	Collingsworth		2,012		92.63%		158		7.27%		0		0.00%		2		0.09%		1,854		85.36%		2,172
	Colorado		1,435		79.06%		372		20.50%		3		0.17%		5		0.28%		1,063		58.57%		1,815
	Comal		1,611		74.21%		554		25.52%		4		0.18%		2		0.09%		1,057		48.69%		2,171
	Comanche		2,587		86.09%		355		11.81%		60		2.00%		3		0.10%		2,232		74.28%		3,005
	Concho		1,089		93.48%		76		6.52%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,013		86.95%		1,165
	Cooke		3,686		83.93%		686		15.62%		12		0.27%		8		0.18%		3,000		68.31%		4,392
	Coryell		2,064		92.85%		150		6.75%		5		0.22%		4		0.18%		1,914		86.10%		2,223
	Cottle		1,265		93.08%		86		6.33%		5		0.37%		3		0.22%		1,179		86.75%		1,359
	Crane		622		96.14%		25		3.86%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		597		92.27%		647
	Crockett		231		75.00%		75		24.35%		2		0.65%		0		0.00%		156		50.65%		308
	Crosby		1,711		91.64%		153		8.19%		3		0.16%		0		0.00%		1,558		83.45%		1,867
	Culberson		239		91.22%		23		8.78%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		216		82.44%		262
	Dallam		1,436		83.15%		220		12.74%		68		3.94%		3		0.17%		1,216		70.41%		1,727
	Dallas		42,153		84.89%		7,204		14.51%		175		0.35%		125		0.25%		34,949		70.38%		49,657
	Dawson		1,829		91.82%		156		7.83%		6		0.30%		1		0.05%		1,673		83.99%		1,992
	Deaf Smith		1,236		89.11%		142		10.24%		9		0.65%		0		0.00%		1,094		78.88%		1,387
	Delta		1,466		94.64%		82		5.29%		1		0.06%		0		0.00%		1,384		89.35%		1,549
	Denton		5,021		90.91%		476		8.62%		15		0.27%		11		0.20%		4,545		82.29%		5,523
	De Witt		1,977		75.98%		616		23.67%		1		0.04%		8		0.31%		1,361		52.31%		2,602
	Dickens		1,445		92.57%		115		7.37%		0		0.00%		1		0.06%		1,330		85.20%		1,561
	Dimmit		704		68.95%		296		28.99%		21		2.06%		0		0.00%		408		39.96%		1,021
	Donley		1,513		90.93%		133		7.99%		17		1.02%		1		0.06%		1,380		82.93%		1,664
	Duval		2,901		94.56%		163		5.31%		4		0.13%		0		0.00%		2,738		89.24%		3,068
	Eastland		4,659		85.99%		724		13.36%		17		0.31%		18		0.33%		3,935		72.63%		5,418
	Ector		816		89.87%		81		8.92%		10		1.10%		1		0.11%		735		80.95%		908
	Edwards		354		68.87%		157		30.54%		3		0.58%		0		0.00%		197		38.33%		514
	Ellis		5,644		94.46%		319		5.34%		4		0.07%		8		0.13%		5,325		89.12%		5,975
	El Paso		11,920		86.32%		1,773		12.84%		96		0.70%		20		0.14%		10,147		73.48%		13,809
	Erath		2,694		89.95%		290		9.68%		4		0.13%		7		0.23%		2,404		80.27%		2,995
	Falls		3,411		95.92%		140		3.94%		0		0.00%		5		0.14%		3,271		91.99%		3,556
	Fannin		5,242		93.32%		368		6.55%		1		0.02%		6		0.11%		4,874		86.77%		5,617
	Fayette		2,820		82.46%		595		17.40%		4		0.12%		1		0.03%		2,225		65.06%		3,420
	Fisher		2,068		92.78%		155		6.95%		2		0.09%		4		0.18%		1,913		85.82%		2,229
	Floyd		1,863		88.93%		217		10.36%		14		0.67%		1		0.05%		1,646		78.57%		2,095
	Foard		928		92.34%		74		7.36%		2		0.20%		1		0.10%		854		84.98%		1,005
	Fort Bend		2,588		93.26%		176		6.34%		9		0.32%		2		0.07%		2,412		86.92%		2,775
	Franklin		925		90.95%		90		8.85%		1		0.10%		1		0.10%		835		82.10%		1,017
	Freestone		1,929		93.23%		134		6.48%		0		0.00%		6		0.29%		1,795		86.76%		2,069
	Frio		1,019		83.59%		193		15.83%		7		0.57%		0		0.00%		826		67.76%		1,219
	Gaines		680		93.66%		42		5.79%		0		0.00%		4		0.55%		638		87.88%		726
	Galveston		9,370		84.37%		1,666		15.00%		44		0.40%		26		0.23%		7,704		69.37%		11,106
	Garza		807		85.67%		132		14.01%		2		0.21%		1		0.11%		675		71.66%		942
	Gillespie		1,016		40.41%		1,421		56.52%		69		2.74%		8		0.32%		-405		-16.11%		2,514
	Glasscock		252		89.05%		29		10.25%		0		0.00%		2		0.71%		223		78.80%		283
	Goliad		1,184		78.36%		323		21.38%		2		0.13%		2		0.13%		861		56.98%		1,511
	Gonzales		2,674		88.16%		352		11.61%		3		0.10%		4		0.13%		2,322		76.56%		3,033
	Gray		4,347		89.83%		464		9.59%		21		0.43%		7		0.14%		3,883		80.24%		4,839
	Grayson		10,627		91.64%		947		8.17%		12		0.10%		11		0.09%		9,680		83.47%		11,597
	Gregg		6,489		91.12%		621		8.72%		6		0.08%		5		0.07%		5,868		82.40%		7,121
	Grimes		1,851		93.06%		136		6.84%		0		0.00%		2		0.10%		1,715		86.22%		1,989
	Guadalupe		2,962		69.91%		1,266		29.88%		3		0.07%		6		0.14%		1,696		40.03%		4,237
	Hale		3,109		86.80%		451		12.59%		12		0.34%		10		0.28%		2,658		74.20%		3,582
	Hall		2,195		93.56%		126		5.37%		20		0.85%		5		0.21%		2,069		88.19%		2,346
	Hamilton		1,929		90.48%		202		9.47%		0		0.00%		1		0.05%		1,727		81.00%		2,132
	Hansford		826		89.69%		74		8.03%		16		1.74%		5		0.54%		752		81.65%		921
	Hardeman		1,991		90.17%		207		9.38%		7		0.32%		3		0.14%		1,784		80.80%		2,208
	Hardin		2,351		95.18%		119		4.82%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,232		90.36%		2,470
	Harris		59,205		87.67%		8,083		11.97%		109		0.16%		136		0.20%		51,122		75.70%		67,533
	Harrison		3,400		91.69%		302		8.14%		0		0.00%		6		0.16%		3,098		83.55%		3,708
	Hartley		560		93.33%		40		6.67%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		520		86.67%		600
	Haskell		2,713		94.46%		156		5.43%		2		0.07%		1		0.03%		2,557		89.03%		2,872
	Hays		1,964		86.94%		286		12.66%		9		0.40%		0		0.00%		1,678		74.28%		2,259
	Hemphill		1,008		88.89%		121		10.67%		5		0.44%		0		0.00%		887		78.22%		1,134
	Henderson		3,259		92.45%		260		7.38%		0		0.00%		6		0.17%		2,999		85.08%		3,525
	Hidalgo		6,782		67.46%		2,962		29.46%		285		2.83%		24		0.24%		3,820		38.00%		10,053
	Hill		4,710		94.58%		265		5.32%		4		0.08%		1		0.02%		4,445		89.26%		4,980
	Hockley		1,731		94.44%		90		4.91%		2		0.11%		10		0.55%		1,641		89.53%		1,833
	Hood		988		90.31%		102		9.32%		3		0.27%		1		0.09%		886		80.99%		1,094
	Hopkins		2,753		91.22%		261		8.65%		0		0.00%		4		0.13%		2,492		82.57%		3,018
	Houston		2,458		96.05%		99		3.87%		1		0.04%		1		0.04%		2,359		92.18%		2,559
	Howard		3,094		92.75%		230		6.89%		4		0.12%		8		0.24%		2,864		85.85%		3,336
	Hudspeth		363		93.56%		24		6.19%		0		0.00%		1		0.26%		339		87.37%		388
	Hunt		5,801		94.37%		335		5.45%		7		0.11%		4		0.07%		5,466		88.92%		6,147
	Hutchinson		2,478		86.25%		390		13.57%		1		0.03%		4		0.14%		2,088		72.68%		2,873
	Irion		476		89.81%		49		9.25%		0		0.00%		5		0.94%		427		80.57%		530
	Jack		1,113		85.22%		183		14.01%		7		0.54%		3		0.23%		930		71.21%		1,306
	Jackson		952		84.40%		171		15.16%		4		0.35%		1		0.09%		781		69.24%		1,128
	Jasper		1,500		93.05%		109		6.76%		3		0.19%		0		0.00%		1,391		86.29%		1,612
	Jeff Davis		291		89.54%		33		10.15%		1		0.31%		0		0.00%		258		79.38%		325
	Jefferson		18,187		87.40%		2,544		12.23%		32		0.15%		45		0.22%		15,643		75.18%		20,808
	Jim Hogg		712		93.68%		48		6.32%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		664		87.37%		760
	Jim Wells		1,691		82.97%		338		16.58%		7		0.34%		2		0.10%		1,353		66.39%		2,038
	Johnson		4,281		92.12%		337		7.25%		24		0.52%		5		0.11%		3,944		84.87%		4,647
	Jones		3,396		91.71%		305		8.24%		0		0.00%		2		0.05%		3,091		83.47%		3,703
	Karnes		2,067		84.47%		371		15.16%		8		0.33%		1		0.04%		1,696		69.31%		2,447
	Kaufman		3,943		94.44%		229		5.49%		1		0.02%		2		0.05%		3,714		88.96%		4,175
	Kendall		405		36.68%		693		62.77%		4		0.36%		2		0.18%		-288		-26.09%		1,104
	Kenedy		96		76.19%		30		23.81%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		66		52.38%		126
	Kent		533		94.50%		31		5.50%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		502		89.01%		564
	Kerr		1,586		61.26%		994		38.39%		8		0.31%		1		0.04%		592		22.87%		2,589
	Kimble		681		81.75%		151		18.13%		0		0.00%		1		0.12%		530		63.63%		833
	King		211		94.20%		13		5.80%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		198		88.39%		224
	Kinney		357		67.11%		175		32.89%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		182		34.21%		532
	Kleberg		1,488		87.12%		156		9.13%		61		3.57%		3		0.18%		1,332		77.99%		1,708
	Knox		1,823		91.15%		171		8.55%		1		0.05%		5		0.25%		1,652		82.60%		2,000
	Lamar		5,621		94.65%		308		5.19%		10		0.17%		0		0.00%		5,313		89.46%		5,939
	Lamb		2,320		88.21%		300		11.41%		4		0.15%		6		0.23%		2,020		76.81%		2,630
	Lampasas		1,462		91.43%		134		8.38%		3		0.19%		0		0.00%		1,328		83.05%		1,599
	La Salle		704		90.49%		74		9.51%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		630		80.98%		778
	Lavaca		2,204		84.12%		403		15.38%		10		0.38%		3		0.11%		1,801		68.74%		2,620
	Lee		1,155		80.94%		271		18.99%		0		0.00%		1		0.07%		884		61.95%		1,427
	Leon		1,748		94.69%		97		5.25%		0		0.00%		1		0.05%		1,651		89.44%		1,846
	Liberty		2,813		91.69%		244		7.95%		6		0.20%		5		0.16%		2,569		83.74%		3,068
	Limestone		3,857		95.05%		196		4.83%		4		0.10%		1		0.02%		3,661		90.22%		4,058
	Lipscomb		973		77.65%		273		21.79%		4		0.32%		3		0.24%		700		55.87%		1,253
	Live Oak		874		76.33%		231		20.17%		32		2.79%		8		0.70%		643		56.16%		1,145
	Llano		1,302		92.41%		107		7.59%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,195		84.81%		1,409
	Loving		118		72.39%		21		12.88%		19		11.66%		5		3.07%		97		59.51%		163
	Lubbock		6,425		90.97%		622		8.81%		11		0.16%		5		0.07%		5,803		82.16%		7,063
	Lynn		1,983		91.89%		169		7.83%		0		0.00%		6		0.28%		1,814		84.06%		2,158
	McCulloch		1,722		83.55%		323		15.67%		7		0.34%		9		0.44%		1,399		67.88%		2,061
	McLennan		12,489		90.77%		1,116		8.11%		115		0.84%		39		0.28%		11,373		82.66%		13,759
	McMullen		265		87.75%		37		12.25%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		228		75.50%		302
	Madison		1,127		96.16%		45		3.84%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,082		92.32%		1,172
	Marion		919		87.69%		129		12.31%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		790		75.38%		1,048
	Martin		775		90.75%		70		8.20%		8		0.94%		1		0.12%		705		82.55%		854
	Mason		787		68.61%		359		31.30%		1		0.09%		0		0.00%		428		37.31%		1,147
	Matagorda		1,700		78.56%		459		21.21%		3		0.14%		2		0.09%		1,241		57.35%		2,164
	Maverick		890		81.20%		166		15.15%		37		3.38%		3		0.27%		724		66.06%		1,096
	Medina		2,050		67.63%		969		31.97%		10		0.33%		2		0.07%		1,081		35.66%		3,031
	Menard		734		86.05%		115		13.48%		1		0.12%		3		0.35%		619		72.57%		853
	Midland		1,229		86.06%		190		13.31%		8		0.56%		1		0.07%		1,039		72.76%		1,428
	Milam		4,077		93.02%		288		6.57%		0		0.00%		18		0.41%		3,789		86.45%		4,383
	Mills		1,005		85.90%		165		14.10%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		840		71.79%		1,170
	Mitchell		2,035		91.21%		192		8.61%		1		0.04%		3		0.13%		1,843		82.61%		2,231
	Montague		2,789		89.16%		324		10.36%		0		0.00%		15		0.48%		2,465		78.80%		3,128
	Montgomery		2,443		92.61%		186		7.05%		2		0.08%		7		0.27%		2,257		85.56%		2,638
	Moore		583		92.39%		47		7.45%		0		0.00%		1		0.16%		536		84.94%		631
	Morris		1,220		95.91%		52		4.09%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,168		91.82%		1,272
	Motley		867		92.93%		64		6.86%		1		0.11%		1		0.11%		803		86.07%		933
	Nacogdoches		4,075		95.01%		209		4.87%		2		0.05%		3		0.07%		3,866		90.14%		4,289
	Navarro		5,815		95.02%		293		4.79%		9		0.15%		3		0.05%		5,522		90.23%		6,120
	Newton		1,111		92.12%		93		7.71%		1		0.08%		1		0.08%		1,018		84.41%		1,206
	Nolan		2,913		91.15%		268		8.39%		11		0.34%		4		0.13%		2,645		82.76%		3,196
	Nueces		6,597		83.09%		1,234		15.54%		104		1.31%		5		0.06%		5,363		67.54%		7,940
	Ochiltree		1,111		88.03%		109		8.64%		41		3.25%		1		0.08%		1,002		79.40%		1,262
	Oldham		437		94.59%		20		4.33%		5		1.08%		0		0.00%		417		90.26%		462
	Orange		2,281		92.01%		190		7.66%		3		0.12%		5		0.20%		2,091		84.35%		2,479
	Palo Pinto		2,738		87.67%		371		11.88%		9		0.29%		5		0.16%		2,367		75.79%		3,123
	Panola		2,425		95.36%		95		3.74%		1		0.04%		22		0.87%		2,330		91.62%		2,543
	Parker		2,493		86.08%		375		12.95%		13		0.45%		15		0.52%		2,118		73.14%		2,896
	Parmer		936		86.83%		135		12.52%		4		0.37%		3		0.28%		801		74.30%		1,078
	Pecos		1,330		88.79%		167		11.15%		0		0.00%		1		0.07%		1,163		77.64%		1,498
	Polk		1,618		91.93%		141		8.01%		0		0.00%		1		0.06%		1,477		83.92%		1,760
	Potter		6,496		84.99%		1,018		13.32%		117		1.53%		12		0.16%		5,478		71.67%		7,643
	Presidio		938		89.42%		106		10.10%		2		0.19%		3		0.29%		832		79.31%		1,049
	Rains		676		91.23%		63		8.50%		1		0.13%		1		0.13%		613		82.73%		741
	Randall		1,656		91.80%		142		7.87%		3		0.17%		3		0.17%		1,514		83.92%		1,804
	Reagan		477		87.85%		66		12.15%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		411		75.69%		543
	Real		210		79.25%		55		20.75%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		155		58.49%		265
	Red River		2,685		93.00%		199		6.89%		0		0.00%		3		0.10%		2,486		86.11%		2,887
	Reeves		1,127		91.70%		100		8.14%		1		0.08%		1		0.08%		1,027		83.56%		1,229
	Refugio		1,058		81.07%		242		18.54%		5		0.38%		0		0.00%		816		62.53%		1,305
	Roberts		426		94.04%		27		5.96%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		399		88.08%		453
	Robertson		2,633		96.77%		86		3.16%		2		0.07%		0		0.00%		2,547		93.61%		2,721
	Rockwall		1,168		97.74%		26		2.18%		1		0.08%		0		0.00%		1,142		95.56%		1,195
	Runnels		2,985		89.99%		313		9.44%		10		0.30%		9		0.27%		2,672		80.55%		3,317
	Rusk		6,107		93.27%		433		6.61%		4		0.06%		4		0.06%		5,674		86.65%		6,548
	Sabine		1,216		91.70%		108		8.14%		0		0.00%		2		0.15%		1,108		83.56%		1,326
	San Augustine		1,054		94.28%		64		5.72%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		990		88.55%		1,118
	San Jacinto		564		89.38%		67		10.62%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		497		78.76%		631
	San Patricio		2,213		81.21%		482		17.69%		24		0.88%		6		0.22%		1,731		63.52%		2,725
	San Saba		1,505		90.99%		147		8.89%		1		0.06%		1		0.06%		1,358		82.10%		1,654
	Schleicher		469		85.58%		78		14.23%		0		0.00%		1		0.18%		391		71.35%		548
	Scurry		1,746		91.32%		162		8.47%		3		0.16%		1		0.05%		1,584		82.85%		1,912
	Shackelford		1,153		88.35%		152		11.65%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,001		76.70%		1,305
	Shelby		3,167		95.62%		136		4.11%		0		0.00%		9		0.27%		3,031		91.52%		3,312
	Sherman		568		94.35%		34		5.65%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		534		88.70%		602
	Smith		7,116		91.37%		660		8.47%		6		0.08%		6		0.08%		6,456		82.90%		7,788
	Somervell		317		83.86%		57		15.08%		3		0.79%		1		0.26%		260		68.78%		378
	Starr		2,289		87.43%		320		12.22%		3		0.11%		6		0.23%		1,969		75.21%		2,618
	Stephens		2,380		77.27%		681		22.11%		13		0.42%		6		0.19%		1,699		55.16%		3,080
	Sterling		384		96.48%		14		3.52%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		370		92.96%		398
	Stonewall		1,001		94.34%		59		5.56%		0		0.00%		1		0.09%		942		88.78%		1,061
	Sutton		398		86.15%		64		13.85%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		334		72.29%		462
	Swisher		1,453		90.98%		140		8.77%		3		0.19%		1		0.06%		1,313		82.22%		1,597
	Tarrant		29,791		88.24%		3,781		11.20%		139		0.41%		51		0.15%		26,010		77.04%		33,762
	Taylor		6,169		89.43%		678		9.83%		6		0.09%		45		0.65%		5,491		79.60%		6,898
	Terrell		324		79.41%		84		20.59%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		240		58.82%		408
	Terry		1,619		94.18%		87		5.06%		11		0.64%		2		0.12%		1,532		89.12%		1,719
	Throckmorton		949		87.63%		132		12.19%		1		0.09%		1		0.09%		817		75.44%		1,083
	Titus		1,872		95.90%		77		3.94%		0		0.00%		3		0.15%		1,795		91.96%		1,952
	Tom Green		4,803		87.34%		627		11.40%		50		0.91%		19		0.35%		4,176		75.94%		5,499
	Travis		12,092		90.07%		1,154		8.60%		141		1.05%		38		0.28%		10,938		81.47%		13,425
	Trinity		1,196		88.72%		151		11.20%		1		0.07%		0		0.00%		1,045		77.52%		1,348
	Tyler		1,076		90.27%		116		9.73%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		960		80.54%		1,192
	Upshur		2,243		87.38%		321		12.50%		0		0.00%		3		0.12%		1,922		74.87%		2,567
	Upton		728		89.54%		81		9.96%		2		0.25%		2		0.25%		647		79.58%		813
	Uvalde		1,743		83.08%		354		16.87%		1		0.05%		0		0.00%		1,389		66.21%		2,098
	Val Verde		1,262		71.26%		504		28.46%		3		0.17%		2		0.11%		758		42.80%		1,771
	Van Zandt		3,257		92.24%		245		6.94%		11		0.31%		18		0.51%		3,012		85.30%		3,531
	Victoria		2,081		85.46%		352		14.46%		2		0.08%		0		0.00%		1,729		71.01%		2,435
	Walker		1,715		96.02%		69		3.86%		0		0.00%		2		0.11%		1,646		92.16%		1,786
	Waller		889		88.72%		111		11.08%		0		0.00%		2		0.20%		778		77.64%		1,002
	Ward		1,113		91.76%		98		8.08%		2		0.16%		0		0.00%		1,015		83.68%		1,213
	Washington		1,993		91.72%		176		8.10%		1		0.05%		3		0.14%		1,817		83.62%		2,173
	Webb		3,594		83.78%		696		16.22%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,898		67.55%		4,290
	Wharton		3,034		90.43%		307		9.15%		7		0.21%		7		0.21%		2,727		81.28%		3,355
	Wheeler		2,415		89.38%		277		10.25%		8		0.30%		2		0.07%		2,138		79.13%		2,702
	Wichita		9,428		87.39%		1,327		12.30%		20		0.19%		13		0.12%		8,101		75.09%		10,788
	Wilbarger		3,279		90.76%		316		8.75%		15		0.42%		3		0.08%		2,963		82.01%		3,613
	Willacy		1,002		71.62%		376		26.88%		19		1.36%		2		0.14%		626		44.75%		1,399
	Williamson		4,995		92.79%		375		6.97%		3		0.06%		10		0.19%		4,620		85.83%		5,383
	Wilson		2,573		89.84%		286		9.99%		1		0.03%		4		0.14%		2,287		79.85%		2,864
	Winkler		903		92.62%		63		6.46%		4		0.41%		5		0.51%		840		86.15%		975
	Wise		2,737		88.58%		348		11.26%		2		0.06%		3		0.10%		2,389		77.31%		3,090
	Wood		2,751		93.25%		192		6.51%		1		0.03%		6		0.20%		2,559		86.75%		2,950
	Yoakum		227		92.65%		13		5.31%		3		1.22%		2		0.82%		214		87.35%		245
	Young		3,065		90.65%		304		8.99%		7		0.21%		5		0.15%		2,761		81.66%		3,381
	Zapata		282		89.24%		34		10.76%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		248		78.48%		316
	Zavala		788		78.64%		209		20.86%		3		0.30%		2		0.20%		579		57.78%		1,002
Totals	739,900	87.06%	104,661	12.32%	3,187	0.38%	1,583	0.19%	635,239	74.79%	849,845

See also

• United States presidential elections in Texas

Notes and References

1. Web site: United States Presidential election of 1936 — Encyclopædia Britannica. December 23, 2018.
2. Web site: 1936 Election for the Thirty-eighth Term (1937-41). December 23, 2018.
3. Web site: 1936 Presidential General Election Results – Texas. December 23, 2018.
4. Web site: The American Presidency Project — Election of 1936. December 23, 2018.
5. Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls; pp. 436–440
6. Web site: Géoelections. 1936 Presidential Election Popular Vote. (.xlsx file for €15 on request)