1932 United States presidential election in Texas explained

See main article: 1932 United States presidential election.

Election Name:	1932 United States presidential election in Texas
Country:	Texas
Flag Year:	1923
Type:	presidential
Ongoing:	no
Previous Election:	1928 United States presidential election in Texas
Previous Year:	1928
Next Election:	1936 United States presidential election in Texas
Next Year:	1936
Election Date:	November 8, 1932
Image1:	FDR in 1933 (3x4).jpg
Nominee1:	Franklin D. Roosevelt
Party1:	Democratic Party (United States)
Home State1:	New York
Running Mate1:	John Nance Garner
Electoral Vote1:	23
Popular Vote1:	760,348
Percentage1:	88.06%
Nominee2:	Herbert Hoover
Party2:	Republican Party (United States)
Home State2:	California
Running Mate2:	Charles Curtis
Electoral Vote2:	0
Popular Vote2:	97,959
Percentage2:	11.35%
Map Size:	350px
President
Before Election:	Herbert Hoover
Before Party:	Republican Party (United States)
After Election:	Franklin D. Roosevelt
After Party:	Democratic Party (United States)

The 1932 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 8, 1932, as part of the 1932 United States presidential election, which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose 23 representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Texas voted for the Democratic nominee, Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt of New York, over the Republican nominee, incumbent President Herbert Hoover of California. Roosevelt ran with Speaker of the House John Nance Garner, a Texas native while Hoover ran with incumbent Vice President Charles Curtis of Kansas.

Roosevelt defeated Hoover in Texas by a landslide margin of 76.71%. In this era, Texas was a one-party Solid South state dominated by the Democratic Party, but Roosevelt's performance was overwhelming even relative to the many prior Democratic landslides, and remains the largest blowout victory by any presidential nominee in the state. Furthermore, Roosevelt carried every single county with more than 65% of the vote, This Election and 1852 are the only time in history that a presidential candidate has swept every county in the state of Texas.

With 88.06%, Texas would prove to be Roosevelt's fifth strongest state in popular vote percentage after South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia.^[1], this is the last election in which Kendall County voted for a Democratic presidential candidate; in fact, despite Roosevelt carrying the county with over 73% of the vote, no Democrat has since reached even 45%.^[2]

Results

1932 United States presidential election in Texas^[3]
Party		Candidate	Votes	Percentage	Electoral votes
	Democratic	Franklin D. Roosevelt	760,348	88.06%	23
	Republican	Herbert Hoover (incumbent)	97,959	11.35%	0
	Socialist	Norman Thomas	4,450	0.52%	0
	Liberty	William Hope Harvey	324	0.04%	0
	Communist	William Z. Foster	207	0.02%	0
	Jacksonian Democrat	No candidate	104	0.01%	0
	Write-ins	Write-ins	34	0.00%	0
Totals			863,426	100.00%	23

Results by county

1932 United States presidential election in Texas by county^{[4] [5]}

County	Franklin D. Roosevelt Democratic		Herbert Hoover Republican		Norman Thomas Socialist		William Hope Harvey Liberty		William Z. Foster Communist		Margin		Total votes cast
		%		%		%		%		%		%
	Anderson		4,354		94.10%		259		5.60%		14		0.30%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,095		88.50%		4,627
	Andrews		186		96.37%		6		3.11%		0		0.00%		1		0.52%		0		0.00%		180		93.26%		193
	Angelina		4,962		94.46%		287		5.46%		4		0.08%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,675		89.00%		5,253
	Aransas		268		87.01%		39		12.66%		1		0.32%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		229		74.35%		308
	Archer		1,555		94.01%		97		5.86%		2		0.12%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,458		88.15%		1,654
	Armstrong		813		92.70%		63		7.18%		1		0.11%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		750		85.52%		877
	Atascosa		2,101		91.07%		192		8.32%		14		0.61%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,909		82.75%		2,307
	Austin		2,806		94.96%		142		4.81%		7		0.24%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,664		90.15%		2,955
	Bailey		851		88.83%		104		10.86%		3		0.31%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		747		77.97%		958
	Bandera		883		70.70%		359		28.74%		6		0.48%		1		0.08%		0		0.00%		524		41.95%		1,249
	Bastrop		3,077		94.42%		180		5.52%		1		0.03%		0		0.00%		1		0.03%		2,897		88.89%		3,259
	Baylor		1,437		96.25%		55		3.68%		1		0.07%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,382		92.57%		1,493
	Bee		2,180		80.03%		534		19.60%		8		0.29%		0		0.00%		2		0.07%		1,646		60.43%		2,724
	Bell		7,607		91.06%		724		8.67%		23		0.28%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		6,883		82.39%		8,354
	Bexar		37,765		82.83%		7,466		16.37%		332		0.73%		18		0.04%		13		0.03%		30,299		66.45%		45,594
	Blanco		1,233		90.20%		127		9.29%		7		0.51%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,106		80.91%		1,367
	Borden		242		97.19%		7		2.81%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		235		94.38%		249
	Bosque		3,214		92.12%		272		7.80%		3		0.09%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,942		84.32%		3,489
	Bowie		5,269		90.39%		541		9.28%		19		0.33%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,728		81.11%		5,829
	Brazoria		2,948		82.44%		617		17.25%		11		0.31%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,331		65.18%		3,576
	Brazos		2,588		92.40%		195		6.96%		18		0.64%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,393		85.43%		2,801
	Brewster		875		86.63%		130		12.87%		3		0.30%		2		0.20%		0		0.00%		745		73.76%		1,010
	Briscoe		977		95.50%		42		4.11%		2		0.20%		2		0.20%		0		0.00%		935		91.40%		1,023
	Brooks		608		87.23%		86		12.34%		3		0.43%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		522		74.89%		697
	Brown		4,024		91.98%		330		7.54%		19		0.43%		1		0.02%		1		0.02%		3,694		84.43%		4,375
	Burleson		2,423		95.21%		119		4.68%		2		0.08%		0		0.00%		1		0.04%		2,304		90.53%		2,545
	Burnet		1,904		92.88%		144		7.02%		0		0.00%		1		0.05%		1		0.05%		1,760		85.85%		2,050
	Caldwell		3,317		91.88%		291		8.06%		2		0.06%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,026		83.82%		3,610
	Calhoun		834		88.35%		100		10.59%		10		1.06%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		734		77.75%		944
	Callahan		2,133		93.23%		152		6.64%		3		0.13%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,981		86.58%		2,288
	Cameron		7,146		79.53%		1,785		19.87%		51		0.57%		2		0.02%		1		0.01%		5,361		59.67%		8,985
	Camp		1,416		94.97%		73		4.90%		2		0.13%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,343		90.07%		1,491
	Carson		1,391		86.67%		212		13.21%		2		0.12%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,179		73.46%		1,605
	Cass		3,135		93.33%		224		6.67%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,911		86.66%		3,359
	Castro		949		92.77%		66		6.45%		8		0.78%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		883		86.31%		1,023
	Chambers		843		89.78%		91		9.69%		5		0.53%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		752		80.09%		939
	Cherokee		4,125		94.44%		233		5.33%		9		0.21%		1		0.02%		0		0.00%		3,892		89.10%		4,368
	Childress		2,072		92.58%		153		6.84%		13		0.58%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,919		85.75%		2,238
	Clay		2,365		93.74%		151		5.98%		7		0.28%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,214		87.75%		2,523
	Cochran		345		88.92%		31		7.99%		12		3.09%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		314		80.93%		388
	Coke		983		93.89%		57		5.44%		6		0.57%		1		0.10%		0		0.00%		926		88.44%		1,047
	Coleman		2,881		92.10%		235		7.51%		12		0.38%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,646		84.59%		3,128
	Collin		6,059		90.46%		589		8.79%		50		0.75%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		5,470		81.67%		6,698
	Collingsworth		1,753		93.29%		115		6.12%		8		0.43%		2		0.11%		1		0.05%		1,638		87.17%		1,879
	Colorado		2,715		88.47%		331		10.79%		22		0.72%		1		0.03%		0		0.00%		2,384		77.68%		3,069
	Comal		2,211		92.05%		176		7.33%		13		0.54%		1		0.04%		1		0.04%		2,035		84.72%		2,402
	Comanche		3,134		93.86%		192		5.75%		13		0.39%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,942		88.11%		3,339
	Concho		1,126		95.91%		44		3.75%		4		0.34%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,082		92.16%		1,174
	Cooke		3,775		88.51%		470		11.02%		20		0.47%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,305		77.49%		4,265
	Coryell		3,347		94.52%		191		5.39%		3		0.08%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,156		89.13%		3,541
	Cottle		1,196		96.92%		38		3.08%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,158		93.84%		1,234
	Crane		416		91.63%		37		8.15%		1		0.22%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		379		83.48%		454
	Crockett		329		66.20%		168		33.80%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		161		32.39%		497
	Crosby		1,590		93.64%		108		6.36%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,482		87.28%		1,698
	Culberson		285		93.75%		18		5.92%		0		0.00%		1		0.33%		0		0.00%		267		87.83%		304
	Dallam		1,935		84.13%		341		14.83%		21		0.91%		2		0.09%		1		0.04%		1,594		69.30%		2,300
	Dallas		37,363		80.09%		8,919		19.12%		354		0.76%		9		0.02%		8		0.02%		28,444		60.97%		46,653
	Dawson		1,659		91.51%		153		8.44%		1		0.06%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,506		83.07%		1,813
	Deaf Smith		1,307		86.84%		198		13.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,109		73.69%		1,505
	Delta		2,013		95.81%		87		4.14%		1		0.05%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,926		91.67%		2,101
	Denton		5,115		90.10%		520		9.16%		39		0.69%		3		0.05%		0		0.00%		4,595		80.94%		5,677
	De Witt		3,206		91.05%		309		8.78%		4		0.11%		1		0.03%		1		0.03%		2,897		82.28%		3,521
	Dickens		1,491		95.45%		63		4.03%		7		0.45%		1		0.06%		0		0.00%		1,428		91.42%		1,562
	Dimmit		843		77.34%		241		22.11%		5		0.46%		1		0.09%		0		0.00%		602		55.23%		1,090
	Donley		1,626		91.71%		141		7.95%		5		0.28%		0		0.00%		1		0.06%		1,485		83.76%		1,773
	Duval		1,566		98.12%		30		1.88%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,536		96.24%		1,596
	Eastland		4,958		89.24%		598		10.76%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,360		78.47%		5,556
	Ector		530		89.08%		37		6.22%		1		0.17%		19		3.19%		8		1.34%		493		82.86%		595
	Edwards		575		71.52%		224		27.86%		4		0.50%		1		0.12%		0		0.00%		351		43.66%		804
	Ellis		7,033		92.49%		527		6.93%		39		0.51%		0		0.00%		5		0.07%		6,506		85.56%		7,604
	El Paso		11,336		78.77%		2,841		19.74%		214		1.49%		1		0.01%		0		0.00%		8,495		59.03%		14,392
	Erath		3,319		91.46%		284		7.83%		20		0.55%		5		0.14%		1		0.03%		3,035		83.63%		3,629
	Falls		3,896		95.40%		181		4.43%		7		0.17%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,715		90.96%		4,084
	Fannin		5,338		91.80%		460		7.91%		16		0.28%		0		0.00%		1		0.02%		4,878		83.89%		5,815
	Fayette		4,985		95.26%		245		4.68%		3		0.06%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,740		90.58%		5,233
	Fisher		1,395		92.63%		105		6.97%		6		0.40%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,290		85.66%		1,506
	Floyd		1,976		92.94%		145		6.82%		4		0.19%		1		0.05%		0		0.00%		1,831		86.12%		2,126
	Foard		882		93.04%		53		5.59%		13		1.37%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		829		87.45%		948
	Fort Bend		3,109		95.22%		148		4.53%		8		0.25%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,961		90.69%		3,265
	Franklin		1,305		95.81%		56		4.11%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1		0.07%		1,249		91.70%		1,362
	Freestone		2,481		93.41%		170		6.40%		5		0.19%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,311		87.01%		2,656
	Frio		998		87.54%		142		12.46%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		856		75.09%		1,140
	Gaines		510		90.75%		44		7.83%		8		1.42%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		466		82.92%		562
	Galveston		10,491		83.38%		2,011		15.98%		71		0.56%		4		0.03%		5		0.04%		8,480		67.40%		12,582
	Garza		812		89.82%		87		9.62%		5		0.55%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		725		80.20%		904
	Gillespie		2,642		79.65%		662		19.96%		12		0.36%		1		0.03%		0		0.00%		1,980		59.69%		3,317
	Glasscock		212		83.46%		42		16.54%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		170		66.93%		254
	Goliad		1,542		89.76%		170		9.90%		1		0.06%		4		0.23%		1		0.06%		1,372		79.86%		1,718
	Gonzales		3,384		90.77%		337		9.04%		5		0.13%		1		0.03%		1		0.03%		3,047		81.73%		3,728
	Gray		3,446		86.69%		505		12.70%		22		0.55%		1		0.03%		1		0.03%		2,941		73.99%		3,975
	Grayson		9,631		87.62%		1,317		11.98%		42		0.38%		2		0.02%		0		0.00%		8,314		75.64%		10,992
	Gregg		5,204		93.38%		341		6.12%		20		0.36%		0		0.00%		8		0.14%		4,863		87.26%		5,573
	Grimes		2,065		92.89%		153		6.88%		4		0.18%		1		0.04%		0		0.00%		1,912		86.01%		2,223
	Guadalupe		3,751		84.27%		691		15.52%		9		0.20%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,060		68.75%		4,451
	Hale		3,029		88.13%		369		10.74%		39		1.13%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,660		77.39%		3,437
	Hall		2,114		95.31%		91		4.10%		13		0.59%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,023		91.21%		2,218
	Hamilton		2,474		93.64%		164		6.21%		2		0.08%		1		0.04%		1		0.04%		2,310		87.43%		2,642
	Hansford		803		89.12%		67		7.44%		30		3.33%		1		0.11%		0		0.00%		736		81.69%		901
	Hardeman		1,985		92.97%		145		6.79%		5		0.23%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,840		86.18%		2,135
	Hardin		2,783		94.53%		161		5.47%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,622		89.06%		2,944
	Harris		46,886		83.77%		8,604		15.37%		426		0.76%		9		0.02%		45		0.08%		38,282		68.40%		55,970
	Harrison		4,057		88.12%		528		11.47%		19		0.41%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,529		76.65%		4,604
	Hartley		586		88.79%		74		11.21%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		512		77.58%		660
	Haskell		2,330		93.20%		154		6.16%		16		0.64%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,176		87.04%		2,500
	Hays		1,822		88.88%		220		10.73%		7		0.34%		1		0.05%		0		0.00%		1,602		78.15%		2,050
	Hemphill		918		87.26%		133		12.64%		1		0.10%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		785		74.62%		1,052
	Henderson		3,522		93.67%		219		5.82%		19		0.51%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,303		87.85%		3,760
	Hidalgo		9,695		75.84%		2,969		23.22%		100		0.78%		14		0.11%		6		0.05%		6,726		52.61%		12,784
	Hill		5,297		93.55%		360		6.36%		4		0.07%		1		0.02%		0		0.00%		4,937		87.20%		5,662
	Hockley		1,513		93.22%		76		4.68%		34		2.09%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,437		88.54%		1,623
	Hood		1,119		90.98%		106		8.62%		5		0.41%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,013		82.36%		1,230
	Hopkins		4,891		94.81%		261		5.06%		7		0.14%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,630		89.75%		5,159
	Houston		3,087		94.84%		165		5.07%		3		0.09%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,922		89.77%		3,255
	Howard		2,733		94.40%		149		5.15%		13		0.45%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,584		89.26%		2,895
	Hudspeth		341		91.42%		31		8.31%		0		0.00%		1		0.27%		0		0.00%		310		83.11%		373
	Hunt		6,856		93.41%		465		6.34%		13		0.18%		0		0.00%		6		0.08%		6,391		87.07%		7,340
	Hutchinson		1,976		78.79%		505		20.14%		26		1.04%		0		0.00%		1		0.04%		1,471		58.65%		2,508
	Irion		398		87.28%		47		10.31%		11		2.41%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		351		76.97%		456
	Jack		1,429		87.45%		189		11.57%		14		0.86%		0		0.00%		2		0.12%		1,240		75.89%		1,634
	Jackson		1,030		84.84%		182		14.99%		2		0.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		848		69.85%		1,214
	Jasper		1,990		95.49%		93		4.46%		1		0.05%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,897		91.03%		2,084
	Jeff Davis		252		83.44%		46		15.23%		4		1.32%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		206		68.21%		302
	Jefferson		17,129		82.09%		3,584		17.18%		145		0.69%		1		0.00%		6		0.03%		13,545		64.92%		20,865
	Jim Hogg		428		89.35%		51		10.65%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		377		78.71%		479
	Jim Wells		1,449		89.39%		162		9.99%		8		0.49%		0		0.00%		2		0.12%		1,287		79.40%		1,621
	Johnson		4,858		89.88%		530		9.81%		17		0.31%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,328		80.07%		5,405
	Jones		2,934		92.03%		224		7.03%		14		0.44%		12		0.38%		4		0.13%		2,710		85.01%		3,188
	Karnes		2,458		92.75%		186		7.02%		4		0.15%		2		0.08%		0		0.00%		2,272		85.74%		2,650
	Kaufman		4,116		93.78%		268		6.11%		5		0.11%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,848		87.67%		4,389
	Kendall		1,185		73.65%		416		25.85%		5		0.31%		2		0.12%		1		0.06%		769		47.79%		1,609
	Kenedy		123		95.35%		5		3.88%		0		0.00%		1		0.78%		0		0.00%		118		91.47%		129
	Kent		561		95.57%		23		3.92%		3		0.51%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		538		91.65%		587
	Kerr		2,165		77.21%		623		22.22%		15		0.53%		1		0.04%		0		0.00%		1,542		54.99%		2,804
	Kimble		890		87.77%		121		11.93%		3		0.30%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		769		75.84%		1,014
	King		224		98.25%		4		1.75%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		220		96.49%		228
	Kinney		678		88.28%		89		11.59%		0		0.00%		1		0.13%		0		0.00%		589		76.69%		768
	Kleberg		1,727		88.56%		198		10.15%		23		1.18%		2		0.10%		0		0.00%		1,529		78.41%		1,950
	Knox		1,600		93.79%		102		5.98%		4		0.23%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,498		87.81%		1,706
	Lamar		5,911		93.72%		375		5.95%		16		0.25%		5		0.08%		0		0.00%		5,536		87.78%		6,307
	Lamb		2,978		90.57%		271		8.24%		39		1.19%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,707		82.33%		3,288
	Lampasas		1,824		93.83%		120		6.17%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,704		87.65%		1,944
	La Salle		810		89.50%		92		10.17%		3		0.33%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		718		79.34%		905
	Lavaca		4,378		94.91%		224		4.86%		9		0.20%		2		0.04%		0		0.00%		4,154		90.05%		4,613
	Lee		1,831		94.33%		110		5.67%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,721		88.67%		1,941
	Leon		1,958		94.32%		108		5.20%		9		0.43%		0		0.00%		1		0.05%		1,850		89.11%		2,076
	Liberty		2,527		90.38%		247		8.83%		18		0.64%		0		0.00%		4		0.14%		2,280		81.55%		2,796
	Limestone		4,416		95.28%		215		4.64%		3		0.06%		1		0.02%		0		0.00%		4,201		90.64%		4,635
	Lipscomb		865		68.06%		349		27.46%		19		1.49%		0		0.00%		38		2.99%		516		40.60%		1,271
	Live Oak		1,070		89.77%		114		9.56%		7		0.59%		0		0.00%		1		0.08%		956		80.20%		1,192
	Llano		1,229		91.92%		108		8.08%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,121		83.84%		1,337
	Loving		187		86.98%		27		12.56%		1		0.47%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		160		74.42%		215
	Lubbock		5,330		89.53%		590		9.91%		29		0.49%		1		0.02%		3		0.05%		4,740		79.62%		5,953
	Lynn		1,930		94.24%		110		5.37%		8		0.39%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,820		88.87%		2,048
	McCulloch		2,006		88.10%		265		11.64%		6		0.26%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,741		76.46%		2,277
	McLennan		11,972		90.80%		1,108		8.40%		100		0.76%		1		0.01%		4		0.03%		10,864		82.40%		13,185
	McMullen		258		95.56%		12		4.44%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		246		91.11%		270
	Madison		1,344		98.53%		20		1.47%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,324		97.07%		1,364
	Marion		861		90.54%		84		8.83%		6		0.63%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		777		81.70%		951
	Martin		694		93.28%		44		5.91%		2		0.27%		4		0.54%		0		0.00%		650		87.37%		744
	Mason		828		72.57%		309		27.08%		4		0.35%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		519		45.49%		1,141
	Matagorda		2,039		82.85%		408		16.58%		14		0.57%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,631		66.27%		2,461
	Maverick		847		80.21%		199		18.84%		10		0.95%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		648		61.36%		1,056
	Medina		2,516		82.87%		515		16.96%		3		0.10%		2		0.07%		0		0.00%		2,001		65.91%		3,036
	Menard		901		85.57%		150		14.25%		2		0.19%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		751		71.32%		1,053
	Midland		1,245		88.80%		136		9.70%		4		0.29%		15		1.07%		2		0.14%		1,109		79.10%		1,402
	Milam		4,676		94.22%		264		5.32%				0.46%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,412		88.90%		4,963
	Mills		1,434		91.51%		133		8.49%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,301		83.02%		1,567
	Mitchell		1,490		90.85%		148		9.02%		2		0.12%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,342		81.83%		1,640
	Montague		3,090		91.39%		262		7.75%				0.77%		3		0.09%		0		0.00%		2,828		83.64%		3,381
	Montgomery		1,971		93.90%		126		6.00%		2		0.10%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,845		87.90%		2,099
	Moore		549		90.44%		56		9.23%		2		0.33%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		493		81.22%		607
	Morris		1,253		97.06%		38		2.94%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,215		94.11%		1,291
	Motley		900		96.15%		34		3.63%		1		0.11%		1		0.11%		0		0.00%		866		92.52%		936
	Nacogdoches		3,603		96.70%		117		3.14%		6		0.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,486		93.56%		3,726
	Navarro		6,392		92.44%		512		7.40%		11		0.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		5,880		85.03%		6,915
	Newton		1,586		97.00%		46		2.81%		2		0.12%		0		0.00%		1		0.06%		1,540		94.19%		1,635
	Nolan		2,453		91.70%		219		8.19%		2		0.07%		1		0.04%		0		0.00%		2,234		83.51%		2,675
	Nueces		6,659		86.91%		967		12.62%		35		0.46%		1		0.01%		0		0.00%		5,692		74.29%		7,662
	Ochiltree		1,097		84.97%		183		14.18%		11		0.85%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		914		70.80%		1,291
	Oldham		432		87.63%		61		12.37%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		371		75.25%		493
	Orange		2,830		91.94%		244		7.93%		4		0.13%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,586		84.02%		3,078
	Palo Pinto		2,722		87.02%		392		12.53%		14		0.45%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,330		74.49%		3,128
	Panola		2,630		97.08%		50		1.85%		29		1.07%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,580		95.24%		2,709
	Parker		3,074		88.28%		372		10.68%		36		1.03%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,702		77.60%		3,482
	Parmer		1,154		87.49%		148		11.22%		16		1.21%		1		0.08%		0		0.00%		1,006		76.27%		1,319
	Pecos		1,261		87.09%		180		12.43%		7		0.48%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,081		74.65%		1,448
	Polk		2,117		94.98%		110		4.93%		2		0.09%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,007		90.04%		2,229
	Potter		6,366		83.29%		1,233		16.13%		40		0.52%		3		0.04%		1		0.01%		5,133		67.16%		7,643
	Presidio		863		88.33%		112		11.46%		1		0.10%		1		0.10%		0		0.00%		751		76.87%		977
	Rains		937		95.13%		41		4.16%		7		0.71%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		896		90.96%		985
	Randall		1,394		85.10%		231		14.10%		10		0.61%		2		0.12%		1		0.06%		1,163		71.00%		1,638
	Reagan		681		84.28%		124		15.35%		3		0.37%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		557		68.94%		808
	Real		335		79.01%		89		20.99%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		246		58.02%		424
	Red River		3,181		95.44%		145		4.35%		7		0.21%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,036		91.09%		3,333
	Reeves		1,085		89.60%		122		10.07%		4		0.33%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		963		79.52%		1,211
	Refugio		1,201		86.15%		172		12.34%		3		0.22%		18		1.29%		0		0.00%		1,029		73.82%		1,394
	Roberts		451		91.85%		36		7.33%		3		0.61%		1		0.20%		0		0.00%		415		84.52%		491
	Robertson		2,396		94.18%		148		5.82%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,248		88.36%		2,544
	Rockwall		1,237		95.23%		62		4.77%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,175		90.45%		1,299
	Runnels		2,975		92.39%		235		7.30%		10		0.31%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,740		85.09%		3,220
	Rusk		5,074		91.16%		483		8.68%		9		0.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,591		82.48%		5,566
	Sabine		1,789		96.76%		57		3.08%		3		0.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,732		93.67%		1,849
	San Augustine		1,802		98.96%		19		1.04%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,783		97.91%		1,821
	San Jacinto		828		97.64%		16		1.89%		4		0.47%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		812		95.75%		848
	San Patricio		2,142		83.48%		407		15.86%		13		0.51%		4		0.16%		0		0.00%		1,735		67.61%		2,566
	San Saba		1,904		93.89%		122		6.02%		2		0.10%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,782		87.87%		2,028
	Schleicher		516		87.16%		76		12.84%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		440		74.32%		592
	Scurry		1,604		93.75%		105		6.14%		2		0.12%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,499		87.61%		1,711
	Shackelford		1,316		91.52%		117		8.14%		3		0.21%		1		0.07%		1		0.07%		1,199		83.38%		1,438
	Shelby		3,594		96.25%		120		3.21%		20		0.54%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		3,474		93.04%		3,734
	Sherman		515		84.56%		91		14.94%		3		0.49%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		424		69.62%		609
	Smith		7,424		90.53%		750		9.15%		25		0.30%		0		0.00%		2		0.02%		6,674		81.38%		8,201
	Somervell		561		89.90%		43		6.89%		20		3.21%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		518		83.01%		624
	Starr		754		95.93%		32		4.07%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		722		91.86%		786
	Stephens		2,684		90.40%		256		8.62%		23		0.77%		1		0.03%		5		0.17%		2,428		81.78%		2,969
	Sterling		354		96.46%		13		3.54%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		341		92.92%		367
	Stonewall		976		95.13%		50		4.87%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		926		90.25%		1,026
	Sutton		372		76.70%		113		23.30%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		259		53.40%		485
	Swisher		1,448		88.78%		166		10.18%		16		0.98%		1		0.06%		0		0.00%		1,282		78.60%		1,631
	Tarrant		27,836		83.06%		5,251		15.67%		423		1.26%		0		0.00%		3		0.01%		22,585		67.39%		33,513
	Taylor		5,235		88.95%		639		10.86%		10		0.17%		0		0.00%		1		0.02%		4,596		78.10%		5,885
	Terrell		479		78.14%		133		21.70%		1		0.16%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		346		56.44%		613
	Terry		1,448		93.84%		87		5.64%		7		0.45%		1		0.06%		0		0.00%		1,361		88.20%		1,543
	Throckmorton		932		90.57%		95		9.23%		2		0.19%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		837		81.34%		1,029
	Titus		2,523		96.96%		75		2.88%		3		0.12%		0		0.00%		1		0.04%		2,448		94.08%		2,602
	Tom Green		4,957		86.75%		739		12.93%		16		0.28%		0		0.00%		2		0.04%		4,218		73.82%		5,714
	Travis		11,718		87.60%		1,532		11.45%		123		0.92%		1		0.01%		2		0.01%		10,186		76.15%		13,376
	Trinity		1,514		95.70%		65		4.11%		3		0.19%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,449		91.59%		1,582
	Tyler		1,450		96.99%		44		2.94%		1		0.07%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,406		94.05%		1,495
	Upshur		2,900		95.39%		129		4.24%				0.23%		4		0.13%		0		0.00%		2,771		91.15%		3,040
	Upton		1,012		91.17%		92		8.29%		5		0.45%		1		0.09%		0		0.00%		920		82.88%		1,110
	Uvalde		1,759		80.47%		422		19.30%		4		0.18%		0		0.00%		1		0.05%		1,337		61.16%		2,186
	Val Verde		1,412		76.86%		421		22.92%		2		0.11%		0		0.00%		2		0.11%		991		53.95%		1,837
	Van Zandt		4,203		94.92%		190		4.29%		35		0.79%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		4,013		90.63%		4,428
	Victoria		2,777		93.44%		190		6.39%				0.10%		2		0.07%		0		0.00%		2,587		87.05%		2,972
	Walker		1,811		95.17%		83		4.36%		8		0.42%		1		0.05%		0		0.00%		1,728		90.80%		1,903
	Waller		1,192		92.83%		89		6.93%		3		0.23%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		1,103		85.90%		1,284
	Ward		678		89.80%		70		9.27%		3		0.40%		2		0.26%		2		0.26%		608		80.53%		755
	Washington		3,443		97.12%		99		2.79%		2		0.06%		0		0.00%		1		0.03%		3,344		94.33%		3,545
	Webb		4,299		86.52%		657		13.22%		8		0.16%		5		0.10%		0		0.00%		3,642		73.29%		4,969
	Wharton		3,357		88.53%		405		10.68%		28		0.74%		0		0.00%		2		0.05%		2,952		77.85%		3,792
	Wheeler		2,263		92.56%		165		6.75%		16		0.65%		0		0.00%		1		0.04%		2,098		85.81%		2,445
	Wichita		8,889		85.36%		1,479		14.20%		42		0.40%		1		0.01%		2		0.02%		7,410		71.16%		10,413
	Wilbarger		3,397		94.13%		199		5.51%		12		0.33%		1		0.03%		0		0.00%		3,198		88.61%		3,609
	Willacy		1,042		80.03%		259		19.89%		1		0.08%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		783		60.14%		1,302
	Williamson		6,783		94.03%		418		5.79%		13		0.18%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		6,365		88.23%		7,214
	Wilson		2,435		93.22%		174		6.66%		3		0.11%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,261		86.56%		2,612
	Winkler		642		88.19%		78		10.71%		6		0.82%		2		0.27%		0		0.00%		564		77.47%		728
	Wise		2,681		89.97%		286		9.60%		13		0.44%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		2,395		80.37%		2,980
	Wood		3,308		94.08%		189		5.38%		18		0.51%		0		0.00%		1		0.03%		3,119		88.71%		3,516
	Yoakum		245		95.33%		11		4.28%		1		0.39%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		234		91.05%		257
	Young		3,156		90.64%		320		9.19%		5		0.14%		1		0.03%		0		0.00%		2,836		81.45%		3,482
	Zapata		271		91.86%		24		8.14%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		247		83.73%		295
	Zavala		783		82.16%		166		17.42%		4		0.42%		0		0.00%		0		0.00%		617		64.74%		953
Totals	771,109	88.19%	98,218	11.23%	4,421	0.51%	235	0.03%	224	0.03%	672,891	76.95%	874,398

See also

• United States presidential elections in Texas

Notes and References

1. Web site: 1932 Presidential Election Statistics. Dave Leip’s Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. 2018-03-05.
2. Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
3. Web site: 1932 Presidential General Election Results – Texas. 2013-02-07 . Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections.
4. Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920–1964; pp. 431–435
5. Web site: Géoelections. 1932 Presidential Election Popular Vote. (.xlsx file for €15 on request with full Thomas and Harvey data)