1932 Florida gubernatorial election explained

Election Name:1932 Florida gubernatorial election
Country:Florida
Flag Year:1900
Type:Presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1928 Florida gubernatorial election
Previous Year:1928
Next Election:1936 Florida gubernatorial election
Next Year:1936
Election Date:November 8, 1932
Image1:David Sholtz.jpg
Nominee1:David Sholtz
Party1:Democratic Party (United States)
Popular Vote1:186,270
Percentage1:66.62%
Nominee2:William J. Howey
Party2:Republican Party (United States)
Popular Vote2:93,323
Percentage2:33.38%
Map Size:301px
Governor
Before Election:Doyle E. Carlton
Before Party:Democratic Party (United States)
After Election:David Sholtz
After Party:Democratic Party (United States)

The 1932 Florida gubernatorial election was held on November 8, 1932. Democratic nominee David Sholtz defeated Republican nominee William J. Howey with 66.62% of the vote.

Primary elections

Primary elections were held on June 7, 1932.[1]

Democratic primary

During the Democratic primary, the campaign platforms for several candidates are known. David Sholtz would run on a campaign involving: increasing government services, giving back pay for teachers, making school terms 9 months log, free textbook for school students, creating a workers' compensation law, increasing bank regulation and providing more funding for public welfare. Carl Maples would pitch himself as being someone who supported a localized self-government.[2] Former governor Cary A. Hardee would emphasize his record when he was governor while running in the primaries. Another former governor, John W. Martin would emphasize that he led to many roads being paved in Florida and would promise that if elected for a second nonconsecutive term as governor he would give: "a dollar in his pocket and a smile on his face."[3]

Many political observers believed that former governors John W. Martin and Cary A. Hardee would face off against each other in a runoff race.

Candidates

Endorsements

Runoff Results by county

General election

William J. Howey ran on a similar campaign platform to 1928. During his 1932 platform he promised to reduce the amount of circuit courts, replace county school boards with appointed superintendents and give parole to prisoners after serving 1/3 of their sentence. He supported refinancing the state's bonds at lower interest rates. As a way to pay off the state's debts, he proposed stopping all road construction and diverting the funds instead to paying off the state's debts. Howey was in favor of giving more legal rights to women and was fond of the benefits of having a two party system in the state. The Republicans favored abolishing the poll tax in the state while the Democrats were against this as they saw this as a major blow to white supremacy in the state.[6]

Candidates

Results

Results by county

County[7] David Sholtz
Democratic
William J. Howey
Republican
Total votes
%%
3,099 67.92%1,464 32.08% 4,563
1,019 75.76% 326 24.24% 1,345
2,493 79.50% 643 20.50% 3,136
1,217 79.65% 311 20.35% 1,528
1,606 54.76% 1,327 45.24% 2,933
3,173 61.34% 2,000 38.66% 5,173
1,049 72.44% 399 27.56% 1,448
835 60.20% 552 39.80% 1,387
1,081 77.60% 312 22.40% 1,393
1,082 58.52% 767 41.48% 1,849
373 80.91% 88 19.09% 461
2,213 82.39% 473 17.61% 2,686
16,530 59.88% 11,077 40.12% 27,607
1,504 67.69% 718 32.31% 2,222
1,002 84.56% 183 15.44% 1,185
15,949 62.77% 9,460 37.23% 25,409
5,441 68.70% 2,479 31.30% 7,920
415 71.43% 166 28.57% 581
893 83.61% 175 16.39% 1,068
1,660 82.71% 347 17.29% 2,007
629 72.80% 235 27.20% 864
448 62.14% 273 37.86% 721
567 83.14% 115 16.86% 682
867 69.36% 383 30.64% 1,250
2,200 69.38% 971 30.62% 3,171
624 72.64% 235 27.36% 859
975 70.14% 415 29.86% 1,390
1,539 66.22% 785 33.78% 2,324
17,962 73.55% 6,460 26.45% 24,422
2,384 75.44% 776 24.56% 3,160
1,033 59.27% 710 40.73% 1,743
4,127 77.30% 1,212 22.70% 5,339
1,287 87.25% 188 12.75% 1,475
826 86.40% 130 13.60% 956
2,601 51.35% 2,464 48.65% 5,065
2,381 66.34% 1,208 33.66% 3,589
2,65681.70% 595 18.30% 3,251
1,418 79.40% 368 20.60% 1,786
584 82.14% 127 17.86% 711
1,484 80.17% 367 19.83% 1,851
2,834 65.25% 1,509 34.75% 4,343
2,385 57.32% 1,776 42.68% 4,161
700 58.53% 496 41.47% 1,196
2,648 87.11% 392 12.89% 3,040
907 59.91% 607 40.09% 1,514
1,841 79.15% 485 20.85% 2,326
717 78.79% 193 21.21% 910
4,859 56.61% 3,725 43.39% 8,584
1,467 55.40% 1,181 44.60% 2,648
7,732 65.04% 4,156 34.96% 11,888
2,217 64.43% 1,224 35.57% 3,441
9,787 57.83% 7,138 42.17% 16,925
8,785 66.66% 4,393 33.34% 13,178
1,894 57.73% 1,387 42.27% 3,281
2,318 73.08% 854 26.92% 3,172
1,839 67.61% 881 32.39% 2,720
2,008 63.10% 1,174 36.90% 3,182
3,043 66.07% 1,563 33.93% 4,606
1,479 73.55% 532 26.45% 2,011
1,523 65.25% 811 34.75% 2,334
1,758 77.31% 516 22.69% 2,274
1,134 73.21% 415 26.79% 1,549
846 83.60% 166 16.40% 1,012
7,197 59.44% 4,910 40.56% 12,107
913 84.85% 163 15.15% 1,076
2,238 80.13% 555 19.87% 2,793
1,975 70.23% 837 29.77% 2,812
Total186,27066.62%93,32333.38%279,593

Notes and References

  1. Book: The Florida Handbook . 1987 . 9780961600006 . 2020-05-19.
  2. Web site: Evans. Jon S.. 2011. Weathering the Storm: Florida Politics during the Administration of Spessard L. Holland in World War II (thesis). live. Florida State University Libraries. https://web.archive.org/web/20210806112534/https://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu:253845/datastream/PDF/view . 2021-08-06 .
  3. Cox, Merlin G. (1964) "David Sholtz: New Deal Governor of Florida," Florida Historical Quarterly: Vol. 43 : No. 2, Article 5.
  4. Web site: Journal of the Senate . Florida Senate . April 4, 1933.
  5. Gray, R. A. (n.d.). (rep.). Tabulation of Official Vote Florida Primary Elections : Democratic and Republican (Vol. 1932, p. 16).
  6. Hughes, Jr.. Melvin. January 1988. WILLIAM J. HOWEY AND HIS FLORIDA DREAMS. The Florida Historical Quarterly. LXVI. 3. University of Central Florida Digital Library.
  7. Gray, R. A. (1932). (rep.). Report of the Secretary of State of the State of Florida (Vol. 1931–1932, p. 309). Tallahassee, FL: Rose Ptg. Co.