1928 United States presidential election in Oregon explained

See main article: 1928 United States presidential election.

Election Name:1928 United States presidential election in Oregon
Country:Oregon
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1924 United States presidential election in Oregon
Previous Year:1924
Next Election:1932 United States presidential election in Oregon
Next Year:1932
Election Date:November 6, 1928
Image1:Herbert Hoover - NARA - 532049.jpg
Nominee1:Herbert Hoover
Party1:Republican Party (United States)
Home State1:California
Running Mate1:Charles Curtis
Electoral Vote1:5
Popular Vote1:205,341
Percentage1:64.18%
Nominee2:Al Smith
Party2:Democratic Party (United States)
Home State2:New York
Running Mate2:Joseph T. Robinson
Electoral Vote2:0
Popular Vote2:109,223
Percentage2:34.14%
Map Size:375px
President
Before Election:Calvin Coolidge
Before Party:Republican Party (United States)
After Election:Herbert Hoover
After Party:Republican Party (United States)

The 1928 United States presidential election in Oregon took place on November 6, 1928, as part of the 1928 United States presidential election. Voters chose five representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Outside a few presidential and gubernatorial elections like that of 1922 influenced by the Ku Klux Klan, Oregon was a virtually one-party Republican state during the “System of 1896”,[1] where the only competition was via Republican primaries.[2] Apart from Woodrow Wilson’s two elections, during the first of which the GOP was severely divided, no Democrat since William Jennings Bryan in 1900 had carried a single county in the state.

In 1924 Oregon had nonetheless been the fifth-strongest of the fifteen Western and Plains States for Democrat John W. Davis behind Ozark mountaineer-dominated Nebraska, Mormon Utah and southern-leaning New Mexico and Arizona. Moreover, although maverick Wisconsin Senator Robert M. La Follette Sr. fared less well than in the other Pacific States, he still gained nearly one in four of Oregon's ballots as an independent. However, when La Follette died in 1925 his family endorsed New York City Catholic Democrat Al Smith,[3] towards whose faith Oregon's largely Puritan (in the northwest) or Ozark Methodist (in the south and east), Anglo-Saxon[4] and fiercely anti-Catholic populace was strongly hostile.[5] This had been seen in a notorious law outlawing private religious schools under Klan-supported Governor Walter M. Pierce, whose decision was viewed unconstitutional by both the Oregon Supreme Court in 1924 and federally in Pierce v. Society of Sisters a year later.[6]

Despite this severe wariness,[7] Smith did manage to win the state's Democratic presidential primary against token opposition from Missouri Senator James Reed[8] and Montana Senator Thomas Walsh, whilst former Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover won the state's Republican primary unopposed with over six times as many voters.[9] From the beginning polls showed opposition to Smith's Catholicism and anti-Prohibition views as very strong in Oregon,[10] and neither major party would campaign in the state during the fall. October polls showed Hoover winning the state by a two-to-one margin and Smith gaining no more than a quarter of the La Follette vote. As of 2020, this is the final presidential election in Oregon in which a Republican carried all of the state's counties.[11]

Whereas in more Catholic states of the northern “Frost Belt” like Wisconsin, North Dakota and Minnesota Smith was able to revive a moribund Democratic Party at a presidential level,[12] Oregon's smaller but still significant La Follette electorate concentrated in the lower Willamette Valley and arch-isolationist Southern Oregon balked at voting for a Catholic.[13] Consequently, Republican nominee Hoover was able to gain 13.17 percent upon Calvin Coolidge’s 1924 performance in Oregon and become the fifth Republican in seven presidential elections to sweep all Oregon’s counties.

This would be the last occasion until Donald Trump in 2016 that Columbia County voted for a Republican presidential candidate.[14] [15]

Results

Presidential CandidateRunning MatePartyElectoral Vote (EV)Popular Vote (PV)
Herbert Hoover of CaliforniaCharles CurtisRepublican5[16] 205,34164.18%
Al SmithJoseph T. RobinsonDemocratic0109,22334.14%
Norman ThomasJames MaurerSocialist Principles Independent02,7200.85%
Verne L. ReynoldsJeremiah CrowleySocialist Labor01,5640.49%
William Z. FosterBenjamin GitlowIndependent01,0940.34%

Results by county

CountyHerbert Clark Hoover
Republican
Alfred Emmanuel Smith
Democratic
Norman Mattoon Thomas
Socialist Principles Independent
Verne L. Reynolds
Socialist Labor
William Z. Foster
Independent
MarginTotal votes cast[17]
%%%%%%
Baker3,72165.52%1,86132.77%641.13%220.39%110.19%1,86032.75%5,679
Benton4,60575.55%1,41223.17%370.61%170.28%240.39%3,19352.39%6,095
Clackamas9,21659.51%5,91838.22%1571.01%1300.84%650.42%3,29821.30%15,486
Clatsop4,08763.33%2,20834.21%310.48%370.57%911.41%1,87929.11%6,454
Columbia3,51965.21%1,77532.89%340.63%440.82%240.44%1,74432.32%5,396
Coos4,92960.66%3,04037.41%620.76%670.82%280.34%1,88923.25%8,126
Crook87763.46%48735.24%100.72%40.29%40.29%39028.22%1,382
Curry69459.16%45338.62%141.19%40.34%80.68%24120.55%1,173
Deschutes2,81560.83%1,70236.78%290.63%771.66%50.11%1,11324.05%4,628
Douglas5,60970.52%2,19127.55%510.64%550.69%480.60%3,41842.97%7,954
Gilliam88062.50%51536.58%60.43%20.14%50.36%36525.92%1,408
Grant1,41174.03%46924.61%130.68%100.52%30.16%94249.42%1,906
Harney95260.60%60038.19%80.51%60.38%50.32%35222.41%1,571
Hood River1,80665.22%90532.68%180.65%150.54%250.90%90132.54%2,769
Jackson8,05375.43%2,46323.07%880.82%410.38%310.29%5,59052.36%10,676
Jefferson48159.31%30837.98%60.74%80.99%80.99%17321.33%811
Josephine2,62571.31%95926.05%441.20%360.98%170.46%1,66645.26%3,681
Klamath4,45361.28%2,72137.44%320.44%310.43%300.41%1,73223.83%7,267
Lake1,01463.61%54934.44%100.63%90.56%120.75%46529.17%1,594
Lane13,64774.96%4,21323.14%1790.98%930.51%730.40%9,43451.82%18,205
Lincoln2,10057.33%1,46439.97%461.26%320.87%210.57%63617.36%3,663
Linn5,87767.62%2,64530.43%720.83%450.52%520.60%3,23237.19%8,691
Malheur2,16467.35%1,01631.62%180.56%110.34%40.12%1,14835.73%3,213
Marion11,75461.96%6,99836.89%1020.54%690.36%480.25%4,75625.07%18,971
Morrow1,09364.87%54332.23%231.36%140.83%120.71%55032.64%1,685
Multnomah75,73161.64%45,17736.77%1,2190.99%4470.36%2850.23%30,55424.87%122,859
Polk3,24464.44%1,72434.25%300.60%200.40%160.32%1,52030.19%5,034
Sherman75966.35%37532.78%20.17%50.44%30.26%38433.57%1,144
Tillamook2,57066.75%1,20431.27%320.83%280.73%160.42%1,36635.48%3,850
Umatilla5,27767.83%2,39030.72%590.76%340.44%200.26%2,88737.11%7,780
Union3,21959.13%2,15439.57%260.48%300.55%150.28%1,06519.56%5,444
Wallowa1,32656.86%93540.09%391.67%190.81%130.56%39116.77%2,332
Wasco2,74660.85%1,69937.65%300.66%210.47%170.38%1,04723.20%4,513
Washington6,16262.37%3,54435.87%910.92%550.56%270.27%2,61826.50%9,879
Wheeler67775.06%22424.83%10.11%00.00%00.00%45350.22%902
Yamhill5,24867.97%2,38230.85%380.49%250.32%280.36%2,86637.12%7,721
Totals205,34164.18%109,22334.14%2,7200.85%1,5640.49%1,0940.34%96,11830.04%319,942

See also

Notes and References

  1. Burnham, Walter Dean; ‘The System of 1896’, in Kleppner, Paul (editor), The Evolution of American Electoral Systems, pp. 176-179
  2. Murray, Keith; ‘Issues and Personalities of Pacific Northwest Politics, 1889-1950’, The Pacific Northwest Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 3 (July 1950), pp. 213-233
  3. Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, p. 59
  4. [Kevin Phillips (political commentator)|Phillips, Kevin P.]
  5. Book: Allerfeldt, Kristofer . Kristofer Allerfeldt . Race, Radicalism, Religion, and Restriction: Immigration in the Pacific Northwest, 1890-1924 . 2003 . Praeger . 59–62 . 978-0-275-97854-9.
  6. Fox, Robert A. and Buchanan, Nina K. (editors); The Wiley Handbook of School Choice
  7. Lyon, william C.; ‘Smith Is Favoured in the Northwest’;
  8. ‘Smith Retains Lead Over Walsh in Oregon’; New York Times, 19 May 1928, p. 3
  9. Wood, T.R. ‘Explaining the Smith Vote: Republican Swing to Governor May Not Outnumber Hoover Democrats’, Letter to The New York Times, May 23, 1928
  10. ‘Found Hoover Strong: Brooklyn Republican Reports Opposition to Smith in West’; New York Times, July 27, 1928, p. 2
  11. ‘Digest Poll Gives Hoover 44 States’; New York Times, October 19, 1928, p. 4
  12. Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 426
  13. Phillips; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 486
  14. Web site: Wheel. Robert. The 2016 Streak Breakers. Center for Politics. Larry J. Sabato’s Crystal Ball. 13 November 2016.
  15. Sullivan, Robert David; ‘How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century’; America Magazine in The National Catholic Review; June 29, 2016
  16. Web site: 1928 Presidential General Election Results – Oregon. Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas. 23 December 2013.
  17. Our Campaigns; OR US Presidential Election Race, November 06, 1928