1920 United States presidential election in Maryland explained

See main article: 1920 United States presidential election.

Election Name:1920 United States presidential election in Maryland
Country:Maryland
Election Date:November 2, 1920
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1916 United States presidential election in Maryland
Previous Year:1916
Next Election:1924 United States presidential election in Maryland
Next Year:1924
Image1:Warren G Harding-Harris & Ewing crop.jpg
Nominee1:Warren G. Harding
Party1:Republican Party (United States)
Home State1:Ohio
Running Mate1:Calvin Coolidge
Electoral Vote1:8
Popular Vote1:236,117
Percentage1:55.11%
Nominee2:James M. Cox
Party2:Democratic Party (United States)
Home State2:Ohio
Running Mate2:Franklin D. Roosevelt
Electoral Vote2:0
Popular Vote2:180,626
Percentage2:42.16%
Map Size:390px
President
Before Election:Woodrow Wilson
Before Party:Democratic Party (United States)
After Election:Warren G. Harding
After Party:Republican Party (United States)

The 1920 United States presidential election in Maryland took place on November 2, 1920, as part of the 1920 United States presidential election which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose eight representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

With its history as a slave state and substantial historic secessionist support, Maryland had been strongly Democratic during the Third Party System despite having Federalist and Whig tendencies under previous systems.[1] However, hostility towards William Jennings Bryan’s free silver and Populist tendencies in the cities meant that the state shifted Republican in 1896[2] and became very close in subsequent elections during the “System of 1896”. Unlike former Confederate states and Oklahoma, Maryland did not succeed in disenfranchising its large black population despite several attempts,[3] which helped the Republicans remain highly competitive in early twentieth-century state elections.

Woodrow Wilson had carried Maryland by 4.84 percentage points more than his national margin in 1916, which made it his best state outside the former Confederacy or West. Democratic nominee and former Ohio Governor James M. Cox did not campaign in the state, but Republican nominee and Ohio Senator Warren G. Harding, fearing that Cox might add the machine-controlled states of the Northeast to his “Solid South”, did campaign in Maryland during September.[4] The first straw vote in mid-October showed Harding leading by around 300 votes out of 4,300,[5] although that had reversed in a poll a week later,[6] and at the end of October polls were divided with one giving the state to Cox[7] but another saying that it would be safe for Harding if black women could be mustered to vote.[8]

As it turned out, Harding carried the state comfortably: his margin was comparable to the other border states except Kentucky (where Cox was helped by Fayette County political boss Billy Kair[9]) but Maryland was still 13.22 points more Democratic than the nation at-large or an 8 percent bigger differential than in 1916.

Results

Presidential CandidateRunning MatePartyElectoral Vote (EV)Popular Vote (PV)
Warren G. Harding of OhioCalvin CoolidgeRepublican8[10] 236,11755.11%
James M. CoxFranklin D. RooseveltDemocratic0180,62642.16%
Eugene V. DebsSeymour StedmanSocialist08,8762.07%
Parley P. ChristensenMax S. HayesThird Party01,6450.38%
William Wesley CoxAugust GillhausLabor01,1780.27%
Write-ins010.00%

Results by county

CountyWarren Gamaliel Harding
Republican
James Middleton Cox
Democratic
Eugene Victor Debs
Socialist
Parley Parker Christensen
Third Party
William Wesley Cox
Labor
MarginTotal votes cast[11]
data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %
Allegany9,59557.37%5,64333.74%1,2917.72%960.57%1000.60%3,95223.63%16,725
Anne Arundel6,19954.52%5,05344.44%700.62%150.13%330.29%1,14610.08%11,370
Baltimore12,43256.04%9,36542.22%2331.05%1130.51%400.18%3,06713.83%22,183
Baltimore City125,52657.02%86,74839.40%6,2722.85%1,0910.50%5090.23%38,77817.61%220,146
Calvert1,74158.01%1,23040.99%80.27%120.40%100.33%51117.03%3,001
Caroline2,92948.90%3,01250.28%290.48%170.28%30.05%-83-1.39%5,990
Carroll5,78457.13%4,27342.20%180.18%250.25%250.25%1,51114.92%10,125
Cecil3,43549.37%3,46849.85%70.10%260.37%210.30%-33-0.47%6,957
Charles2,58560.54%1,64238.45%120.28%20.05%290.68%94322.08%4,270
Dorchester4,21851.38%3,95048.11%150.18%60.07%210.26%2683.26%8,210
Frederick9,55954.57%7,74744.22%980.56%440.25%700.40%1,81210.34%17,518
Garrett2,80570.25%1,07026.80%912.28%60.15%210.53%1,73543.45%3,993
Harford4,17549.86%4,13449.37%360.43%130.16%160.19%410.49%8,374
Howard2,60851.46%2,39747.30%230.45%130.26%270.53%2114.16%5,068
Kent2,83848.22%3,03451.55%20.03%40.07%80.14%-196-3.33%5,886
Montgomery5,94847.96%6,27750.61%760.61%500.40%510.41%-329-2.65%12,402
Prince George's6,62856.83%4,85741.64%1100.94%450.39%230.20%1,77115.18%11,663
Queen Anne's2,15737.43%3,51961.07%380.66%290.50%190.33%-1,362-23.64%5,762
St. Mary's2,17553.13%1,86145.46%270.66%70.17%240.59%3147.67%4,094
Somerset3,65857.57%2,63441.45%160.25%30.05%430.68%1,02416.12%6,354
Talbot3,05049.19%3,13050.48%110.18%20.03%70.11%-80-1.29%6,200
Washington8,75754.75%6,85242.84%3532.21%80.05%250.16%1,90511.91%15,995
Wicomico4,22545.39%5,05454.29%120.13%60.06%120.13%-829-8.91%9,309
Worcester3,09045.13%3,67653.69%280.41%120.18%410.60%-586-8.56%6,847
Totals236,11755.11%180,62642.16%8,8762.07%1,6450.38%1,1780.27%55,49112.95%428,442

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

See also

Notes and References

  1. Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 30, 130
  2. Diamond, William; ‘Urban and Rural Voting in 1896’; The American Historical Review, vol. 46, no. 2 (January 1941), pp. 281-305
  3. Shufelt, Gordeon H.; 'Jim Crow among strangers: The growth of Baltimore's Little Italy and Maryland's disfranchisement campaigns'; Journal of American Ethnic History; vol. 19, issue 4 (Summer 2000), pp. 49-78
  4. Price, Harry N.; ‘Alter Harding Tour: Managers Abridge Western Trip; Arrange Tryout in East. Now Aim to Win Maryland’; The Washington Post, September 17, 1920, p. 1
  5. ‘Shows Harding Leading: Nation-Wide Straw Vote Gives Him 371,461, Against 242,432 for Cox’; New York Times, October 10, 1920, p. 6
  6. ‘Cox Gains Slightly in Big Straw Vote: But Harding Leads on Ballot with 495,961 Against 325,004 for Governor’; New York Times, October 17, 1920, p. 5
  7. ‘Harding 363 Votes, Cox 168, Is Result Obtained From Estimates by 47 Editors: Maryland, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Montana, Utah and Arizona, With Solid South, Are Only States Conceded to Democratic Candidate in Nation-Wide Canvass’; Special to the Washington Post, October 31, 1920, p. 1
  8. ‘Maryland Appears Safely Republican: Harding May Get Record Vote if Colored Women Can Master Ballot’; The Washington Post, October 31, 1920, p. 4
  9. Bolin, Janes Duane; Bossism and Reform in a Southern City: Lexington, Kentucky, 1880-1940, pp. 82-83
  10. Web site: 1920 Presidential General Election Results – Maryland. Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas.
  11. Maryland State Board of Elections; ‘Maryland Election Returns, 1920’; Maryland Manual (1921) pp. 133-137