1908 United States presidential election in Utah explained

See main article: 1908 United States presidential election.

Election Name:1908 United States presidential election in Utah
Country:Utah
Flag Year:1903
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1904 United States presidential election in Utah
Previous Year:1904
Next Election:1912 United States presidential election in Utah
Next Year:1912
Election Date:November 3, 1908
Image1:William Howard Taft, Bain bw photo portrait, 1908.jpg
Nominee1:William Howard Taft
Party1:Republican Party (United States)
Home State1:Ohio
Running Mate1:James S. Sherman
Electoral Vote1:3
Popular Vote1:61,165
Percentage1:56.23%
Nominee2:William Jennings Bryan
Party2:Democratic Party (United States)
Home State2:Nebraska
Running Mate2:John W. Kern
Electoral Vote2:0
Popular Vote2:42,637
Percentage2:39.19%
Map Size:250px
President
Before Election:Theodore Roosevelt
Before Party:Republican Party (United States)
After Election:William Howard Taft
After Party:Republican Party (United States)

The 1908 United States presidential election in Utah was held on November 3, 1908, throughout all forty-six contemporary states as part of the 1908 United States presidential election. State voters chose three representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president. This was the last election when Utah had the minimum three electoral votes as it would gain a second congressional district after the 1910 Census.

Although Democrat/Populist Bryan had carried Utah in its debut presidential election by a five-to-one margin, the Republican Party – ditching ancestral hostility to the state's dominant Mormon religion[1] – was soon able to take control of the state, despite a threat from the anti-Mormon "American Party" in urban areas with sizeable non-Mormon ("Gentile") populations.[2] In its third election of 1904, Utah had given a virtual two-to-one majority for Theodore Roosevelt against New York Democrat Alton B. Parker, who carried only Dixie's Washington County.

Believing that the election could only be won in the West and Midwest,[3] Bryan – who had had no trouble winning a third Democratic nomination – chose Indiana's John Worth Kern as his running mate. However, although many in the media supported the election of Bryan and praised his policies, the rapid recovery from the "Panic of 1907" meant that Bryan struggled severely in the Progressive-minded Western States once campaigning began.[4]

The antagonism towards Bryan of business meant that Taft had little trouble repeating Theodore Roosevelt's triumph of 1904, although Bryan was able to cut Alton Parker's losing margin from 29 to 17 percentage points. Taft would win Utah by a margin of 17.04%. A powerful socialist movement in mining districts[5] failed to equal Debs' support from the 1904 election as his policies were not considered feasible or were co-opted by the two major parties.[4] Taft was further helped by the unseating of delegates for Bryan as a result of conflict between pro- and anti-Mormon factions.[6]

Four years later, Utah would become one of the only two states that Taft would carry in his attempt for reelection, the other being Vermont.

Results

Results by county

CountyWilliam Howard Taft
Republican
William Jennings Bryan
Democratic
Eugene Victor Debs[7]
Socialist
Thomas Hisgen
Independence
MarginTotal votes cast
%%%%%
94555.13%74143.23%271.58%10.06%20411.90%1,714
2,40162.20%1,41736.71%401.04%20.05%98425.49%3,860
3,79552.86%3,31746.20%640.89%30.04%4786.66%7,179
1,02759.92%58133.90%1066.18%00.00%44626.02%1,714
1,74055.95%1,33142.80%341.09%50.16%40913.15%3,110
1,09854.76%74937.36%1587.88%00.00%34917.41%2,005
87872.03%29924.53%423.45%00.00%57947.50%1,219
23348.85%21545.07%245.03%51.05%183.77%477
71856.01%48838.07%765.93%00.00%23017.94%1,282
1,61948.46%1,42142.53%3008.98%10.03%1985.93%3,341
41479.77%10219.65%30.58%00.00%31260.12%519
1,00455.56%76542.34%382.10%00.00%23913.23%1,807
49057.99%30636.21%495.80%00.00%18421.78%845
33256.46%15726.70%9816.67%10.17%17529.76%588
42759.55%28539.75%00.00%50.70%14219.80%717
20,75557.96%12,95436.18%2,0595.75%410.11%7,80121.79%35,809
13153.25%10944.31%31.22%31.22%228.94%246
3,33357.77%2,30739.99%1282.22%10.02%1,02617.78%5,769
1,77754.90%1,27239.30%1875.78%10.03%50515.60%3,237
1,61250.84%1,40244.21%1484.67%90.28%2106.62%3,171
1,10656.03%80840.93%592.99%10.05%29815.10%1,974
78248.57%68342.42%1459.01%00.00%996.15%1,610
6,39054.88%4,98442.81%2672.29%20.02%1,40612.08%11,643
1,26553.83%98541.91%984.17%20.09%28011.91%2,350
73847.49%81052.12%50.32%10.06%-72-4.63%1,554
27649.64%18433.09%9617.27%00.00%9216.55%556
5,87956.05%3,96537.81%6366.06%80.08%1,91418.25%10,488
Total61,16556.23%42,63739.19%4,8904.50%920.08%18,52817.03%108,784

See also

Notes and References

  1. Peterson, Charles S.; Utah: A History; pp. 163-164
  2. Wahlquist, C. Austin; 'The 1912 Presidential Election in Utah' (A Thesis Presented to the Department of History, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah)
  3. Deskins, Donald Richard; Walton, Hanes and Puckett, Sherman C.; Presidential Elections, 1789-2008: County, State, and National Mapping of Election Data, p. 286
  4. Hornig, Edgar A.; 'Campaign Issues in the Presidential Election of 1908'; Indiana Magazine of History, vol. 54, no. 3 (September 1958), pp. 237-264
  5. Salvatore, Nick; Eugene V. Debs: Citizen and Socialist, p. 220
  6. 'Both Parties Claim Northwest States: Republicans Seem to Have Best Chance in Wyoming and Colorado'; The New York Times, August 26, 1908, p. 4
  7. Géoelections; Popular Vote at the Presidential Election for 1908 (.xlsx file for €30 including full minor party figures)