1904 Melbourne by-election explained

Election Name:1904 Melbourne by-election
Country:Australia
Type:Parliamentary
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1903 Australian federal election
Previous Year:1903
Election Date:30 March 1904
Next Election:1906 Australian federal election
Next Year:1906
Turnout:16,700 (62.62%)
Registered:26,669
Seats For Election:The Melbourne seat in the House of Representatives
Candidate1:William Maloney
Image1:William Maloney1.jpg
Party1:Australian Labor Party
Popular Vote1:8,667
Percentage1:52.61%
Swing1: 2.86
Candidate2:Malcolm McEacharn
Party2:Protectionist Party
Popular Vote2:7,808
Percentage2:47.39%
Swing2: 2.86
MP
Before Election:Malcolm McEacharn
Before Party:Protectionist Party
After Election:William Maloney
After Party:Labour

A by-election was held for the Australian House of Representatives seat of Melbourne in Victoria on 30 March 1904. This was triggered by the Chief Justice of the High Court (sitting as a Court of Disputed Elections) declaring invalid the election of Sir Malcolm McEacharn to the seat in the 1903 federal election.[1] The writ for the by-election was issued by the Speaker of the Australian House of Representatives on 15 March 1904.[2]

Background

The 1903 federal election took place on 16 December. Sir Malcolm McEacharn had held the seat for the Protectionist Party since the 1901 election, and was re-elected with a slim 77 vote majority. McEacharn's opponent in 1901 and 1903 was Dr William Maloney, a medical doctor, social worker and reform agitator who had run for the Labour Party.

Following the declaration of McEacharn's election, Maloney petitioned the Court of Disputed Elections, alleging that the applications for 303 ballot papers had been improperly attested by persons unqualified to do so, including police constables, sergeants and other unqualified persons. In addition, 66 postal ballots were examined, and were likewise ruled invalid as having been recorded on material other than ordinary ballot papers. In all, between 240 and 250 "bad votes" were cast for McEacharn, easily negating his 77-vote majority.[3]

The Chief Justice took the view that if the votes had been informal through any fault of the voters concerned, the votes would have been voided and Maloney elected. However, as the informality had arisen through the fault of Commonwealth electoral officers, he would have to rule the election invalid, thus triggering a by-election.

Aftermath

A 2.86 per cent swing towards Labour saw Dr Maloney elected, and the seat of Melbourne was held by the ALP until 2010. Following his defeat, McEacharn abandoned not only politics but Australia, leaving the country in 1905 and moving to Wigtownshire in Scotland, where he purchased the ancestral home of the Earl of Galloway.

See also

References

 

Notes and References

  1. Maloney v McEacharn No 1 . Chanter v Blackwood#Maloney v McEacharn . 1904 . HCA . 3 . (1904) 1 CLR 77. and Maloney v McEacharn No 2 (1904) 10 Argus LR (CN) 17
  2. News: Federal Affairs – The Melbourne Election . . 15 March 1904 . Trove.
  3. News: Disputed Elections – Judgment on Points of Law – Sir Malcolm McEacharn Unseated . . 11 March 1904 . Trove.