1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee explained

See main article: 1896 United States presidential election.

Election Name:1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee
Country:Tennessee
Flag Year:1897
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1892 United States presidential election in Tennessee
Previous Year:1892
Next Election:1900 United States presidential election in Tennessee
Next Year:1900
Election Date:November 3, 1896
Image1:William Jennings Bryan 2 (cropped).jpg
Nominee1:William Jennings Bryan
Party1:Democratic Party (United States)
Alliance1:Populist
Home State1:Nebraska
Running Mate1:Arthur Sewall
Electoral Vote1:12
Popular Vote1:167,168
Percentage1:52.09%
Nominee2:William McKinley
Party2:Republican Party (United States)
Home State2:Ohio
Running Mate2:Garret Hobart
Electoral Vote2:0
Popular Vote2:148,683
Percentage2:46.33%
Map Size:350px
President
Before Election:Grover Cleveland
Before Party:Democratic Party (United States)
After Election:William McKinley
After Party:Republican Party (United States)

The 1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee took place on November 3, 1896. All contemporary 45 states were part of the 1896 United States presidential election. Tennessee voters chose 12 electors to the Electoral College, which selected the president and vice president.

For over a century after the Civil War, Tennessee’s white citizenry was divided according to partisan loyalties established in that war. Unionist regions covering almost all of East Tennessee, Kentucky Pennyroyal-allied Macon County, and the five West Tennessee Highland Rim counties of Carroll, Henderson, McNairy, Hardin and Wayne[1] voted Republican – generally by landslide margins – as they saw the Democratic Party as the “war party” who had forced them into a war they did not wish to fight.[2] Contrariwise, the rest of Middle and West Tennessee who had supported and driven the state’s secession was equally fiercely Democratic as it associated the Republicans with Reconstruction.[3] After the state’s white landowning class re-established its rule in the early 1870s, black and Unionist white combined to forge adequate support for the GOP to produce a competitive political system for two decades,[4] although during this era the Republicans could only capture statewide offices when the Democratic Party was divided on this issue of payment of state debt.[4]

White Democrats in West Tennessee were always aiming to eliminate black political influence, which they first attempted to do by election fraud in the middle 1880s and did so much more successfully at the end of that decade by instituting in counties with significant black populations a secret ballot that prevented illiterates voting,[5] and a poll tax throughout the state, which cut turnout by at least a third in the 1890s.[6] This poll tax was supposedly relaxed or paid by party officials in Unionist Republican areas,[6] where whites were much poorer than in secessionist areas.

The mid-1890s Populist movement did not affect Tennessee so much as other southern states, with the party never cracking 12 percent in any biennial gubernatorial election. Although the state’s poll tax had already reduced the Republican black and poor white electorate, Democratic managers were unsure about carrying Tennessee in late October, because it was felt that urban businessmen would desert the party in sufficient numbers for McKinley to come close to carrying the state.[7] Polls the day before the election suggested Tennessee would be exceedingly close,[8] but as it turned out Bryan would carry the state relatively easily by nearly six points, which was still a decline upon recent Democratic performances despite a quantitatively reduced Republican electorate.

Tennessee would be won by the Democratic and Populist nominees, former Representative of Nebraska William Jennings Bryan and his running mate Arthur Sewall of Maine. They defeated the Republican nominees, former Ohio Governor William McKinley and his running mate Garret Hobart of New Jersey. Bryan won the state by a margin of 5.76%.

Bryan would later win Tennessee against McKinley again four years later and would later win the state again in 1908 against William Howard Taft.

Results

1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee[9]
PartyCandidateVotesPercentageElectoral votes
DemocraticWilliam Jennings Bryan162,64350.68%12
PopulistWilliam Jennings Bryan4,5251.41%0
TotalWilliam Jennings Bryan67,16852.09%12
RepublicanWilliam McKinley148,68346.33%0
ProhibitionJoshua Levering3,0990.97%0
National DemocraticJohn M. Palmer1,9530.61%0
Totals320,903100.00%12
Voter turnout

Results by county

1896 United States presidential election in Tennessee by county[10]
CountyWilliam Jennings Bryan
Democratic
William McKinley
Republican
Joshua Levering
Prohibition
John McAuley Palmer
National Democratic
MarginTotal votes cast
data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %data-sort-type="number" data-sort-type="number" %
Anderson74524.87%2,22474.23%50.17%220.73%-1,479-49.37%2,996
Bedford2,59653.34%2,15144.20%501.03%701.44%4459.14%4,867
Benton1,46565.20%76934.22%120.53%10.04%69630.97%2,247
Bledsoe47837.49%78561.57%00.00%120.94%-307-24.08%1,275
Blount97026.41%2,65272.20%481.31%30.08%-1,682-45.79%3,673
Bradley1,05737.32%1,72560.91%451.59%50.18%-668-23.59%2,832
Campbell57119.14%2,38980.06%130.44%110.37%-1,818-60.92%2,984
Cannon1,27661.82%77837.69%00.00%100.48%49824.13%2,064
Carroll2,29346.45%2,57752.20%611.24%60.12%-284-5.75%4,937
Carter44513.87%2,70084.14%351.09%290.90%-2,255-70.27%3,209
Cheatham1,23769.81%49627.99%90.51%301.69%74141.82%1,772
Chester1,07863.37%60735.68%140.82%20.12%47127.69%1,701
Claiborne1,15233.90%2,23065.63%80.24%80.24%-1,078-31.72%3,398
Clay83659.42%54838.95%221.56%10.07%28820.47%1,407
Cocke98027.47%2,58272.39%00.00%50.14%-1,602-44.91%3,567
Coffee1,89172.42%63924.47%521.99%291.11%1,25247.95%2,611
Crockett1,66558.12%1,16640.70%341.19%00.00%49917.42%2,865
Cumberland41834.12%80065.31%10.08%60.49%-382-31.18%1,225
Davidson7,51154.99%5,72041.88%1591.16%2691.97%1,79113.11%13,659
DeKalb1,62649.39%1,63349.61%280.85%50.15%-7-0.21%3,292
Decatur99752.78%89047.11%20.11%00.00%1075.66%1,889
Dickson1,97668.92%84129.33%361.26%140.49%1,13539.59%2,867
Dyer2,58973.63%86824.69%441.25%150.43%1,72148.95%3,516
Fayette2,37363.79%1,31635.38%90.24%220.59%1,05728.41%3,720
Fentress30127.17%79872.02%00.00%90.81%-497-44.86%1,108
Franklin2,58473.79%83423.81%501.43%340.97%1,75049.97%3,502
Gibson4,20365.87%1,95530.64%2163.39%70.11%2,24835.23%6,381
Giles3,99262.32%2,37237.03%210.33%210.33%1,62025.29%6,406
Grainger1,00234.91%1,86364.91%50.17%00.00%-861-30.00%2,870
Greene2,72642.83%3,57756.21%530.83%80.13%-851-13.37%6,364
Grundy99775.99%28621.80%171.30%120.91%71154.19%1,312
Hamblen1,03340.18%1,50658.58%271.05%50.19%-473-18.40%2,571
Hamilton3,72944.32%4,46853.10%1211.44%961.14%-739-8.78%8,414
Hancock45623.35%1,49076.29%70.36%00.00%-1,034-52.94%1,953
Hardeman2,23460.25%1,42738.48%10.03%461.24%80721.76%3,708
Hardin1,33237.99%2,16561.75%70.20%20.06%-833-23.76%3,506
Hawkins1,72337.65%2,82461.71%130.28%160.35%-1,101-24.06%4,576
Haywood2,39278.79%62420.55%20.07%180.59%1,76858.23%3,036
Henderson1,31639.11%2,00959.70%401.19%00.00%-693-20.59%3,365
Henry3,07767.17%1,47332.15%140.31%170.37%1,60435.01%4,581
Hickman1,55360.52%98838.50%130.51%120.47%56522.02%2,566
Houston89670.16%34326.86%231.80%151.17%55343.30%1,277
Humphreys1,60476.93%46522.30%100.48%60.29%1,13954.63%2,085
Jackson1,75269.88%75430.08%00.00%10.04%99839.81%2,507
James32733.37%64766.02%40.41%20.20%-320-32.65%980
Jefferson90225.32%2,63874.06%90.25%130.36%-1,736-48.74%3,562
Johnson22411.72%1,68388.02%50.26%00.00%-1,459-76.31%1,912
Knox4,02038.52%6,24359.83%1171.12%550.53%-2,223-21.30%10,435
Lake81185.01%12613.21%111.15%60.63%68571.80%954
Lauderdale2,24474.97%70923.69%70.23%331.10%1,53551.29%2,993
Lawrence1,37653.21%1,20346.52%00.00%70.27%1736.69%2,586
Lewis32961.73%20438.27%00.00%00.00%12523.45%533
Lincoln3,26973.94%99222.44%1202.71%400.90%2,27751.50%4,421
Loudon59428.91%1,44770.41%110.54%30.15%-853-41.51%2,055
Macon86939.63%1,32460.37%00.00%00.00%-455-20.75%2,193
Madison3,70177.80%1,02421.53%170.36%150.32%2,67756.27%4,757
Marion1,32041.85%1,80157.10%50.16%280.89%-481-15.25%3,154
Marshall2,83575.50%84922.61%571.52%140.37%1,98652.89%3,755
Maury4,02160.47%2,53738.15%590.89%330.50%1,48422.32%6,650
McMinn1,38837.83%2,23560.92%340.93%120.33%-847-23.09%3,669
McNairy1,51650.89%1,46349.11%00.00%00.00%531.78%2,979
Meigs72152.70%64146.86%20.15%40.29%805.85%1,368
Monroe1,57848.29%1,63450.00%471.44%90.28%-56-1.71%3,268
Montgomery2,80446.04%2,93448.17%2524.14%1011.66%-130-2.13%6,091
Moore94289.71%787.43%282.67%20.19%86482.29%1,050
Morgan45227.80%1,14070.11%191.17%150.92%-688-42.31%1,626
Obion3,77574.59%1,14722.66%981.94%410.81%2,62851.93%5,061
Overton1,49566.24%76133.72%00.00%10.04%73432.52%2,257
Perry1,00063.57%57236.36%00.00%10.06%42827.21%1,573
Pickett39442.00%54458.00%00.00%00.00%-150-15.99%938
Polk74944.01%94755.64%30.18%30.18%-198-11.63%1,702
Putnam1,75061.08%1,09738.29%140.49%40.14%65322.79%2,865
Rhea1,12444.75%1,32452.71%461.83%180.72%-200-7.96%2,512
Roane82120.51%3,02675.59%1423.55%140.35%-2,205-55.08%4,003
Robertson2,94365.02%1,38630.62%1824.02%150.33%1,55734.40%4,526
Rutherford3,35259.46%2,20339.08%230.41%591.05%1,14920.38%5,637
Scott20910.96%1,69188.67%70.37%00.00%-1,482-77.71%1,907
Sequatchie38661.27%24138.25%30.48%00.00%14523.02%630
Sevier42811.20%3,37688.35%130.34%40.10%-2,948-77.15%3,821
Shelby5,83052.01%5,12245.70%420.37%2151.92%7086.32%11,209
Smith2,41468.89%1,06430.37%200.57%60.17%1,35038.53%3,504
Stewart1,64271.42%64828.19%90.39%00.00%99443.24%2,299
Sullivan2,51256.05%1,91442.70%531.18%30.07%59813.34%4,482
Sumner3,17171.34%1,21527.33%110.25%481.08%1,95644.00%4,445
Tipton2,11951.07%1,89445.65%130.31%1232.96%2255.42%4,149
Trousdale76970.81%31328.82%00.00%40.37%45641.99%1,086
Unicoi899.86%80489.04%70.78%30.33%-715-79.18%903
Union59924.30%1,86275.54%20.08%20.08%-1,263-51.24%2,465
Van Buren41973.12%14024.43%50.87%91.57%27948.69%573
Warren2,10169.96%84228.04%391.30%210.70%1,25941.92%3,003
Washington1,66136.67%2,80761.98%430.95%180.40%-1,146-25.30%4,529
Wayne74833.04%1,50566.48%100.44%10.04%-757-33.44%2,264
Weakley3,93465.14%2,00333.17%991.64%30.05%1,93131.98%6,039
White1,83974.12%61724.87%160.64%90.36%1,22249.25%2,481
Williamson3,09769.66%1,28128.81%511.15%170.38%1,81640.85%4,446
Wilson3,43668.17%1,56831.11%170.34%190.38%1,86837.06%5,040
Totals168,17652.23%148,77346.20%3,0990.96%1,9530.61%19,4036.03%322,001

See also

Notes and References

  1. Wright, John K.; ‘Voting Habits in the United States: A Note on Two Maps’; Geographical Review, vol. 22, no. 4 (October 1932), pp. 666-672
  2. [Valdimer Orlando Key|Key (Jr.), Valdimer Orlando]
  3. Lyons, William; Scheb (II), John M. and Stair Billy; Government and Politics in Tennessee, pp. 183-184
  4. Kousser, J. Morgan; The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restriction and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880-1910, p. 104
  5. Kousser; The Shaping of Southern Politics, p. 110
  6. Kousser, The Shaping of Southern Politics, p. 118
  7. ‘Doubtful about Tennessee: Democratic Managers Uncertain about Carrying the State’; Evening Star, October 28, 1896, p. 1
  8. ‘Pluralities for President: Major McKinley’s Secretary Compiles a Table’; The Wilkes-Barre Record, November 2, 1896, p. 2
  9. Dave Leip's U.S. Election Atlas; Presidential General Election Results – Tennessee
  10. Web site: Géoelections. Popular Vote at the Presidential Election for 1896. (.xlsx file for €30 including full minor party figures)