1895 United States Senate election in Massachusetts explained

Election Name:1895 United States Senate election in Massachusetts
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1889 United States Senate election in Massachusetts
Previous Year:1889
Next Election:1901 United States Senate election in Massachusetts
Next Year:1901
Election Date:January 15, 1895
Votes For Election:Resolution of legislature needed to win
1Blank:Senate
2Blank:Percentage
3Blank:House
4Blank:Percentage
Image1:File:GFHoar.jpg
Nominee1:George Frisbie Hoar
Party1:Republican Party (US)
1Data1:34
2Data1:89.47%
3Data1:180
4Data1:82.19%
Nominee2:John E. Russell
Party2:Democratic Party (US)
1Data2:4
2Data2:10.53%
3Data2:39
4Data2:17.81%
Senator
Before Election:George Frisbie Hoar
Before Party:Republican Party (United States)
After Election:George Frisbie Hoar
After Party:Republican Party (United States)

The 1895 United States Senate election in Massachusetts was held in January 1895. Incumbent Republican Senator George Frisbie Hoar was re-elected to a fourth term in office.

At the time, Massachusetts elected United States senators by a resolution of the Massachusetts General Court.

Background

State legislature

See main article: 1895 Massachusetts legislature.

At the time, the Massachusetts legislature was controlled by the Republican Party, as it had been since that party's founding, typically in dominant fashion. The 1894 election in particular, which coincided with the landslide election of Governor Frederic Greenhalge, returned the strongest Republican majority in 21 years.

The Senate was composed of 36 Republicans and only 4 Democrats, and the House had 194 Republicans and 45 Democrats.

Candidates

Hoar faced no evident opposition from Republicans.

Election

Caucuses

In caucuses held on January 9, Republicans re-nominated Hoar unanimously. Democrats, as a matter of party honors, nominated former U.S. Representative John E. Russell of Leicester, also unanimously.[1]

Election

Both houses convened on January 15 and ratified Hoar's re-election along strict party lines, with many members not bothering to vote.[2]

Notes and References

  1. News: Senator Hoar Re-Nominated . The New York Times . 10 Jan 1895 . 7.
  2. News: HOAR HIS OWN SUCCESSOR . Boston Daily Globe . 16 Jan 1895. 3.