1836 United States presidential election explained

Election Name:1836 United States presidential election
Country:United States
Flag Year:1836
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Previous Election:1832 United States presidential election
Previous Year:1832
Next Election:1840 United States presidential election
Next Year:1840
Votes For Election:294 members of the Electoral College
Needed Votes:148 electoral
Turnout:56.5%[1] 0.5 pp
Nominee1:Martin Van Buren
Party1:Democratic Party (United States)
Home State1:New York
Running Mate1:Richard M. Johnson
Electoral Vote1:170
States Carried1:15
Popular Vote1:764,176
Percentage1:50.8%
Nominee2:William Henry Harrison
Party2:Whig Party (United States)
Alliance2:Anti-Masonic
Home State2:Ohio
Running Mate2:Francis Granger
Electoral Vote2:73
States Carried2:7
Popular Vote2:550,816
Percentage2:36.6%
Nominee3:Hugh L. White
Party3:Whig Party (United States)
Colour3:800080
Home State3:Tennessee
Running Mate3:John Tyler
Electoral Vote3:26
States Carried3:2
Popular Vote3:146,109
Percentage3:9.7%
Nominee4:Daniel Webster
Party4:Whig Party (United States)
Colour4:F88379
Home State4:Massachusetts
Running Mate4:Francis Granger
Electoral Vote4:14
States Carried4:1
Popular Vote4:41,201
Percentage4:2.7%
Nominee5:Willie P. Mangum
Party5:Whig Party (United States)
Alliance5:Nullifier Party
Colour5:006D61
Home State5:North Carolina
Running Mate5:John Tyler
Electoral Vote5:11
States Carried5:1
Popular Vote5:N/A
Percentage5:N/A
Map Size:350px
President
Before Election:Andrew Jackson
Before Party:Democratic Party (United States)
After Election:Martin Van Buren
After Party:Democratic Party (United States)
Module:
Child:yes
Election Name:1837 contingent U.S. vice presidential election
Type:presidential
Ongoing:no
Election Date:February 8, 1837
Needed Votes:27
Vote Type:Senate
Candidate1:Richard M. Johnson
Party1:Democratic Party (United States)
Popular Vote1:33
Percentage1:63.46%
Party2:Whig Party (United States)
Popular Vote2:16
Percentage2:30.77%
Map Size:350px

The 1836 United States presidential election was the 13th quadrennial presidential election, held from Thursday, November 3 to Wednesday, December 7, 1836. In the third consecutive election victory for the Democratic Party, incumbent Vice President Martin Van Buren defeated four candidates fielded by the nascent Whig Party.

The 1835 Democratic National Convention chose a ticket of Van Buren (President Andrew Jackson's handpicked successor) and U.S. Representative Richard Mentor Johnson of Kentucky. The Whig Party, which had only recently emerged and was primarily united by opposition to Jackson, was not yet sufficiently organized to agree on a single candidate. Hoping to compel a contingent election in the House of Representatives by denying the Democrats an electoral majority, the Whigs ran multiple candidates. Most Northern and border state Whigs supported the ticket led by former Senator William Henry Harrison of Ohio, while most Southern Whigs supported the ticket led by Senator Hugh Lawson White of Tennessee. Two other Whigs, Daniel Webster and Willie Person Mangum, carried Massachusetts and South Carolina respectively on single-state tickets.

Despite facing multiple candidates, Van Buren won a majority of the electoral vote, and he won a majority of the popular vote in both the North and the South. Nonetheless, the Whig strategy came very close to success, as Van Buren won the decisive state of Pennsylvania by just over two points. As Virginia's electors voted for Van Buren but refused to vote for Johnson, Johnson fell one vote short of an electoral majority, compelling a contingent election for vice president. In that contingent election, the United States Senate elected Johnson over Harrison's running mate, Francis Granger.

Van Buren was the third incumbent vice president to win election as president, an event which would not happen again until 1988, when George H. W. Bush was elected president. He is also the most recent Democrat to be elected to succeed a two-term Democratic president.[2] Harrison finished second in both the popular and electoral vote, and his strong performance helped him win the Whig nomination in the 1840 presidential election. The election of 1836 was crucial in developing the Second Party System and a stable two-party system more generally. By the end of the election, nearly every independent faction had been absorbed by either the Democrats or the Whigs.[3]

Nominations

Democratic Party nomination

See main article: 1835 Democratic National Convention.

1836 Democratic Party ticket
for Presidentfor Vice President
8th
Vice President of the United States
(1833–1837)
U.S. Representative
from Kentucky
The 1835 Democratic National Convention was held in Baltimore, Maryland, from 20 to 22 May 1835. The early date of the convention was selected by President Andrew Jackson to prevent the formation of opposition to Martin Van Buren. Twenty-two states and two territories were represented at the convention with Alabama, Illinois, and South Carolina being unrepresented. The delegate amount per state varied from Maryland having 188 delegates to cast its ten votes while Tennessee's fifteen votes were cast by one delegate.[4]

The convention saw the first credentials dispute in American history with two rival delegations from Pennsylvania claiming the state's votes. The issue was solved by seating both delegations and having them share the state's votes. An attempt to remove the two-thirds requirement for the selection of a candidate was passed by a vote of 231 to 210, but was later restored through a voice vote.

Some Southerners opposed Johnson's nomination, due to his open relationship with an enslaved woman, whom he had regarded as his common-law wife. At the convention, Van Buren was nominated unanimously with all 265 delegates in favor, but the Virginia delegates supported Senator William Cabell Rives against Johnson. However, Rives got little support and Johnson was nominated with one more vote than the two-thirds requirement.[5]

Convention vote
Presidential voteVice presidential vote
align=left Martin Van Buren265align=left Richard M. Johnson178
align=left William C. Rives87

Whig Party nomination

The Whig Party emerged during the 1834 mid-term elections as the chief opposition to the Democratic Party. The party was formed from members of the National Republican Party, the Anti-Masonic Party, disaffected Jacksonians, and small remnants of the Federalist Party (people whose last political activity was with them a decade before). Some Southerners who were angered by Jackson's opposition to states' rights, including Sen. John C. Calhoun and the Nullifiers, also temporarily joined the Whig coalition.[5]

Unlike the Democrats, the Whigs did not hold a national convention. Instead, state legislatures and state conventions nominated candidates, being the reason why so many candidates from the Whig party ran in the general election. Southern Nullifiers placed Tennessee Senator Hugh Lawson White into contention for the presidency in 1834 soon after his break with Jackson. White was a moderate on the states' rights issue, which made him acceptable in the South, but not in the North. The state legislatures of Alabama and Tennessee officially nominated White. The South Carolina state legislature nominated Senator Willie Person Mangum of North Carolina. By early 1835, Massachusetts Senator Daniel Webster was building support among Northern Whigs. Both Webster and White used Senate debates to establish their positions on the issues of the day, as newspapers carried the text of their speeches nationwide. The Pennsylvania legislature nominated popular former general William Henry Harrison, who had led American forces at the Battle of Tippecanoe. The Whigs hoped that Harrison's reputation as a military hero could win voter support. Harrison soon displaced Webster as the preferred candidate of Northern Whigs. State legislatures, particularly in larger states, also nominated various vice presidential candidates.[5]

Despite multiple candidates, there was only one Whig ticket in each state. The Whigs ended up with two main tickets: William Henry Harrison for president and Francis Granger for vice president in the North and Kentucky, and Hugh Lawson White for president and John Tyler for vice president in the middle and lower South. In Massachusetts, the ticket was Daniel Webster for president and Granger for vice president. In South Carolina, the ticket was Mangum for president and Tyler for vice president. In Maryland, it was Harrison and Tyler. Of the four Whig presidential candidates, only Harrison was on the ballot in enough states for it to be mathematically possible for him to win a majority in the Electoral College, and even then, it would have required him to win Van Buren's home state of New York.[5]

Anti-Masonic Party nomination

After the negative views of Freemasonry among a large segment of the public began to wane in the mid-1830s, the Anti-Masonic Party began to disintegrate. Some of its members began moving to the Whig Party, which had a broader issue base than the Anti-Masons. The Whigs were also regarded as a better alternative to the Democrats.

A state convention for the Anti-Masonic Party was held in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, from December 14 to 17, 1835, to choose presidential electors for the 1836 election. The convention unanimously nominated William Henry Harrison for president and Francis Granger for vice president. The Vermont state Anti-Masonic convention followed suit on February 24, 1836. Anti-Masonic leaders were unable to obtain assurance from Harrison that he was not a Mason, so they called a national convention. The second national Anti-Masonic nominating convention was held in Philadelphia on May 4, 1836. The meeting was divisive, but a majority of the delegates officially stated that the party was not sponsoring a national ticket for the presidential election of 1836 and proposed a meeting in 1837 to discuss the future of the party.

Nullifier Party nomination

The Nullifier Party had also begun to decline sharply since the previous election, after it became clear that the doctrine of nullification lacked sufficient support outside of the party's political base of South Carolina to ever make the Nullifiers more than a fringe party nationwide. Many party members began to drift towards the Democratic Party, but there was no question of the party endorsing Van Buren's bid for the presidency, as he and Calhoun were sworn enemies. Seeing little point in running their own ticket, Calhoun pushed the party into backing the White/Tyler ticket, as White had previously sided against Jackson during the Nullification Crisis.

General election

Campaign

In the aftermath of the Nat Turner's Rebellion and other events, slavery emerged as an increasingly prominent political issue. Calhoun attacked Van Buren, saying that he could not be trusted to protect Southern interests and accusing the sitting Vice President of affiliating with abolitionists.[5] Van Buren defeated Harrison by a margin of 51.4% to 48.6% in the North, and he defeated White by a similar margin of 50.7% to 49.3% in the South.

Disputes

A dispute similar to that of Indiana in 1817 and Missouri in 1821 arose during the counting of the electoral votes. Michigan only became a state on January 26, 1837, and had cast its electoral votes for president before that date. Anticipating a challenge to the results, Congress resolved on February 4, 1837, that during the counting four days later the final tally would be read twice, once with Michigan and once without Michigan. The counting proceeded in accordance with the resolution. The dispute had no bearing on the final result: either way, Van Buren was elected, and either way no candidate had a majority for vice-president.[6]

Results

The Whigs' strategy narrowly failed to prevent Van Buren's victory in the Electoral College, though he earned a somewhat lower share of the popular vote and fewer electoral votes than Andrew Jackson had in either of the previous two elections. The key state in this election was ultimately Pennsylvania, which Van Buren won from Harrison with a narrow majority of just 4,222 votes or 2.4%. Had Harrison won the state, Van Buren would have been left eight votes short of an Electoral College majority - despite receiving a majority (50.48%) in the popular vote - and the Whig goal to force the election into the House of Representatives (per the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution) would have succeeded. Thus, the 11.8% difference between the margin in the tipping point state of Pennsylvania and the margin in the national popular vote, is the largest gap in American history.

In a contingent election, the House would have been required to choose between Van Buren, Harrison, and White as the three candidates with the most electoral votes. Jacksonians controlled enough state delegations (14 out of 26) and enough Senate seats (31 out of 52) to win both the presidency and the vice presidency in a contingent election.

This was the last election in which the Democrats won Connecticut, Rhode Island, and North Carolina until 1852. This was also the only election where South Carolina voted for the Whigs, and the last time it voted against the Democrats until 1868. It was also the last time that a Democrat was elected to the U.S. presidency succeeding a Democrat who had served two terms as U.S. president.[7]

Source (Popular Vote): Source (Electoral Vote):

(a) The popular vote figures exclude South Carolina where the electors were chosen by the state legislature rather than by popular vote.
(b) Mangum received his electoral votes from South Carolina where the electors were chosen by the state legislatures rather than by popular vote.

Source:

Geography of results

Cartographic gallery

Results by state

Source: Data from Walter Dean Burnham, Presidential ballots, 1836-1892 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955) pp 247–57.

States/districts won by Van Buren/Johnson
States/districts won by a Whig candidate
Martin Van Buren
Democratic
William H. Harrison
Whig
Hugh L. White
Whig
Daniel Webster
Whig
Willie Person Mangum
Whig
MarginTotal
align=center Stateelectoral
votes
Votes castalign=center %electoral
votes
Votes castalign=center %electoral
votes
Votes castalign=center %electoral
votes
Votes castalign=center %electoral
votes
electoral
votes
%
style"text-align:left" Alabama720,63855.347no ballots16,65844.660no ballotsno ballots3,98010.6837,296AL
style"text-align:left" Arkansas32,38064.083no ballots1,33435.920no ballotsno ballots1,04628.163,714AR
style"text-align:left" Connecticut819,29450.65818,79949.350no ballotsno ballotsno ballots4951.3038,093CT
style"text-align:left" Delaware34,15446.7004,73653.243no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-582-6.548,895DE
style"text-align:left" Georgia1122,77848.200no ballots24,48151.8011no ballotsno ballots-1,703-3.6047,259GA
style"text-align:left" Illinois518,36954.69515,22045.310no ballotsno ballotsno ballots3,1499.3833,589IL
style"text-align:left" Indiana932,47844.03041,28155.979no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-8,803-11.9473,759IN
style"text-align:left" Kentucky1533,22947.41036,86152.5915no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-3,632-5.1870,090KY
style"text-align:left" Louisiana53,84251.745no ballots3,58348.260no ballotsno ballots2593.487,425LA
style"text-align:left" Maine1022,82558.921014,80338.210no ballotsno ballotsno ballots8,02220.7138,740ME
style"text-align:left" Maryland1022,26746.27025,85253.7310no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-3,585-7.4648,119MD
style"text-align:left" Massachusetts1433,48644.810no ballotsno ballots41,20155.1314no ballots-7,715-10.3274,687MA
style"text-align:left" Michigan37,12256.2235,54543.780no ballotsno ballotsno ballots1,57712.4412,667MI
style"text-align:left" Mississippi410,29751.284no ballots9,78248.720no ballotsno ballots5152.5620,079MS
style"text-align:left" Missouri410,99559.984no ballots7,33740.020no ballotsno ballots3,65819.9618,332MO
style"text-align:left" New Hampshire718,69775.0176,22824.990no ballotsno ballotsno ballots12,46950.0224,925NH
style"text-align:left" New Jersey825,59249.47026,13750.538no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-545-1.0651,729NJ
style"text-align:left" New York42166,79554.6342138,54845.370no ballotsno ballotsno ballots28,2479.26305,343NY
style"text-align:left" North Carolina1526,63153.1015no ballots23,52146.900no ballotsno ballots3,1106.2050,153NC
style"text-align:left" Ohio2196,23847.560104,95851.8721no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-8,720-4.31202,333OH
style"text-align:left" Pennsylvania3091,45751.183087,23548.820no ballotsno ballotsno ballots4,2222.36178,692PA
style"text-align:left" Rhode Island42,96452.2442,71047.760no ballotsno ballotsno ballots2544.485,674RI
style"text-align:left" South Carolina11no popular voteno popular voteno popular voteno popular vote11--0SC
style"text-align:left" Tennessee1526,17042.080no ballots36,02757.9215no ballotsno ballots-9,857-15.8462,197TN
style"text-align:left" Vermont714,03740.07020,99459.937no ballotsno ballotsno ballots-6,957-19.8635,031VT
style"text-align:left" Virginia2330,55656.6423no ballots23,38443.350no ballotsno ballots7,17213.2953,945VA
TOTALS:294763,29150.79170549,90736.5973146,1079.722641,2012.741411213,38414.201,502,811US
TO WIN:148

States that flipped from National Republican to Whig

States that flipped from National Republican to Democratic

States that flipped from Anti-Masonic to Whig

States that flipped from Democratic to Whig

States that flipped from Nullifer to Whig

Close states

States where the margin of victory was under 5%:

New Jersey 1.06% (545 votes)
Connecticut 1.3% (495 votes)
Pennsylvania 2.36% (4,222 votes) (tipping point state for a Van Buren victory)
Mississippi 2.56% (515 votes)
Louisiana 3.48% (259 votes)
Georgia 3.6% (1,703 votes)
Ohio 4.31% (8,720 votes)
Rhode Island 4.48% (254 votes)

States where the margin of victory was under 10%:

Kentucky 5.18% (3,632 votes)
North Carolina 6.2% (3,110 votes)
Delaware 6.54% (582 votes)
Maryland 7.46% (3,585 votes)
New York 9.26% (28,247 votes) (tipping point state for a Harrison victory)
Illinois 9.38% (3,149 votes)

Breakdown by ticket

CandidateTotalMartin Van Buren
Democratic
William H. Harrison
Whig
Hugh L. White
Whig
Daniel Webster
Whig
Willie P. Mangum
Whig
Electoral Votes for President29417073261411
For Vice President, Richard Mentor Johnson147147    
For Vice President, Francis Granger77 63 14 
For Vice President, John Tyler47 1026 11
For Vice President, William Smith2323    

1837 Contingent election for Vice-President

In an unusual turn of events, Virginia's 23 electors, who were all pledged to Van Buren and his running mate Richard Mentor Johnson, became faithless electors due to dissension related to Johnson's interracial relationship with a slave[8] and refused to vote for Johnson, instead casting their vice-presidential votes for former South Carolina senator William Smith.

This left Johnson one electoral vote short of an Electoral College majority. Since no vice presidential candidate received a majority of electoral votes, for the only time in American history, the Senate decided a vice presidential race in a contingent election.[9]

On February 8, 1837, Johnson was elected on the first ballot by a vote of 33 to 16; the vote proceeded largely along party lines, albeit with three Whigs voting for Johnson, one Democrat voting for Granger, and three abstentions (Hugh L. White declined to vote out of respect for his own running-mate, John Tyler, while the two Nullifier Party senators refused to back either candidate).[10]

1837 Contingent United States vice presidential election
February 8, 1837
PartyCandidateVotes%
DemocraticRichard M. Johnson33
WhigFrancis Granger16
Not voting3
Total membership52100
Votes necessary27>50

Electoral college selection

See also

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. Web site: National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789-Present. United States Election Project. CQ Press.
  2. Web site: Last Time Consecutive Democratic Presidents Were Elected . Tom. Murse. December 16, 2020. ThoughtCo.. You'd have to go back even further in history to find the most recent instance of a Democrat being elected to succeed a two-term president from the same party. The last time that happened was in 1836 when voters elected Martin Van Buren to follow Andrew Jackson. .
  3. Book: Cole, Donald B.. Donald B. Cole. Martin Van Buren and the American Political System. 279. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. 1984. 0-691-04715-4. March 23, 2017.
  4. Book: 1979 . National Party Conventions, 1831-1976 . Congressional Quarterly.
  5. Book: Deskins . Donald Richard . Walton . Hanes . Puckett . Sherman . Presidential Elections, 1789-2008: County, State, and National Mapping of Election Data . 2010 . University of Michigan Press . 106–107.
  6. Book: United States Congress . 24th Congress, 2nd Session, February 4 . Senate Journal . August 20, 2006 . 1837 . 203–204 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20150404001932/http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem%2Fhlaw%3A%40field%28DOCID+%40lit%28sj02647%29%29 . April 4, 2015 . mdy-all .
  7. Web site: Murse . Tom . Last Time Consecutive Democratic Presidents Were Elected . ThoughtCo. . 6 July 2021 . https://web.archive.org/web/20210603041426/https://www.thoughtco.com/two-consecutive-democratic-presidents-3368109 . 3 June 2021 . English . 16 December 2020.
  8. Burke, Window To The Past
  9. Book: Norton . Mary Beth . A People and a Nation: A History of the United States . 2015 . Wadsworth Publishing . 344 . 10th .
  10. Web site: The Senate Elects a Vice President. Office of the Secretary of the Senate. Washington, D.C.. August 11, 2019.