Maryland increased from 6 to 8 representatives after the 1790 census. The previous mixed district/at-large system was replaced with a conventional district system.
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected | Result | Candidates | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Philip Key | Pro-Administration | 1790 | Incumbent lost re-election. New member elected. Pro-Administration hold. | nowrap | √ George Dent (Pro-Admin) 44.7% John Parnham (Pro-Admin) 29.8% Philip Key (Pro-Admin) 25.5% | |||
John F. Mercer | Anti-Administration | nowrap | 1791 (Special) | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | √ John F. Mercer (Anti-Admin) 57.0% John Thomas (Pro-Admin) 42.1% Richard A. Contee 0.9% | ||
None (District created) | New seat. New member elected. Pro-Administration gain. | nowrap | √ Uriah Forrest (Pro-Admin) 71.8% William Dorsey (Anti-Admin) 28.1% Others 0.1% | |||||
None (District created) | New seat. New member elected. Anti-Administration gain. | nowrap | √ Thomas Sprigg (Anti-Admin) 100% | |||||
None (District created) | New seat. New member elected. Anti-Administration gain. | nowrap | √ Samuel Smith (Anti-Admin) 61.1% Charles Ridgely (Anti-Admin) 38.9% | |||||
None (District created) | New seat. New member elected. Anti-Administration gain. | nowrap | √ Gabriel Christie (Anti-Admin) 63.6% William Matthews (Pro-Admin) 36.4% | |||||
Joshua Seney | Anti-Administration | 1789 | Incumbent retired. New member elected. Pro-Administration gain. Incumbent then resigned December 6, 1792 to become Chief Justice of Maryland's 3rd Judicial District. Winner was then also elected to finish the term, see above. | nowrap | √ William Hindman (Pro-Admin) 51.7% James Tilghman (Anti-Admin) 48.3%[1] | |||
William V. Murray | Pro-Administration | 1790 | Incumbent re-elected. | nowrap | √ William V. Murray (Pro-Admin) 93.8% Littleton Dennis (Pro-Admin) 5.4% Others 0.9% |