100 Proof (film) explained

100 Proof
Director:Jeremy Horton
Producer:Jay Faires
George Maranville
Starring:Pamela Stewart
Tara Bellando
J. S. Johnson
Minnie Bates Yancy
Jim Varney
Music:Michael Mossier
Cinematography:Harold Jarboe
Editing:George Maranville
Runtime:94 minutes
Country:United States
Language:English

100 Proof is a 1997 independently produced American thriller film written and directed by Jeremy Horton. Shot on location in Kentucky, it is based on the true story of a killing spree that took place in Lexington in 1986.[1] Two women, LaFonda Fay Foster and Tina Hickey Powell, murdered five people in the real-life incident.[2] [3] The film's supporting cast includes Jim Varney, who portrays the drunk, violent, incestuous father of one of the two women at the center of the story. Varney's role is radically different from the humorous Ernest P. Worrell character for which he was best known.[4]

Premise

Close friends Rae and Carla live an impoverished life in a quiet, depressed Southern town. They pay for their drug and alcohol habits through odd jobs, grifting, and occasional prostitution. Rae has a disturbing encounter with her abusive, alcoholic father at a local bar. The two friends then head out to the countryside to score some cocaine and a brutal cycle of violence ensues.

Cast

Reception

The film premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January 1997 and was released commercially that September. Variety reviewer Joe Leydon applauded the acting—particularly that of Stewart and Varney—and called the film a "diamond in the rough, or at least a shiny bit of jagged rhinestone."[4] Stephen Holden of The New York Times praised the film's "integrity" and authentic depiction of poverty and violence, but found it difficult to take: "The film's crudeness works in its favor ... [it] has the look, texture and loose-jointedness of a semi-improvised home movie. Nothing is really explained. You are just plunked into the middle of this infinitely sullen slice of life. It isn't long before the characters' boredom and accumulated hostility begin to seep into you. But beyond an appalled sense of pity, it is impossible to feel much for them. You just want to get out of there as quickly as possible."[5]

Ken Fox of TV Guide viewed it as both "grueling" and admirable: "The film attains the dirty, hyperrealism of a reality based cop show, but with a surprising touch of quiet compassion. ... In the end, the violence isn't cleansing, redemptive or empowering; it's just pitiful and very nasty."[6]

Notes

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Alspector, Lisa. 100 Proof. Chicago Reader. 26 October 1985. 2010-02-26.
  2. O'Shea, Kathleen A. (1999). Women and the Death Penalty in the United States, 1900–1998, pp. 183–87. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.
  3. Web site: Ortiz, Brandon. 'Drunk Defense' Works in Two Big Cases. Lexington Herald-Leader. 2008-07-18. 2010-02-26.
  4. Web site: Leydon, Joe. 100 Proof. Variety. 1997-03-02. 2010-02-26. 2008-12-24. https://web.archive.org/web/20081224080359/http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117432607.html?categoryid=31&cs=1&p=0. dead.
  5. Web site: Holden, Stephen. '100 Proof': Sullen Slice of Sullen Lives. The New York Times. 1997-09-24. 2010-02-26.
  6. Web site: Fox, Ken. 100 Proof: Review. TVGuide.com. 2010-02-26.